Literature DB >> 36046555

Sarcocystis bovifelis in Raw Hamburgers Marketed in Hamadan City, Western Iran.

Fariba Jafari1, Seyed Mousa Motavallihaghi1, Mehran Bakhtiari1, Amir Hossein Maghsood1, Faeze Foroughi-Parvar1.   

Abstract

Background: We aimed to evaluate Sarcocystis contamination in conventional and industrial raw beef burger samples from butcheries and retail stores in Hamadan, western Iran.
Methods: Overall, 80 samples including 30 conventional and 50 industrial hamburgers were randomly obtained from different butcheries and supermarkets. All specimens were studied by digestion method following microscopic examination. Samples' genomic ribosomal DNA were amplified and nucleotide sequences were analyzed by BLAST for comparison with the sequences in the gene bank of the NCBI.
Results: Sarcocystis bradyzoites were detected in 46 of 80 (57.6%) samples. Positive specimens were included as 46 (57.6%) and 30 (37.5%) by digestion and molecular method, respectively. Differences between two studied (digestion and molecular) methods was statistically significant (P=0.00). Twenty-six (86.5 %) of 30 conventional beef burgers and 20 (40%) of 50 industrial burgers were positive for Sarcocystis sp. by digestion method. There was a significant difference between Sarcocystis infested conventional and industrial beef burgers (P=0.01).
Conclusion: The parasitic contamination of beef burgers implied a high level of infection in cattle. Felids as the definitive hosts for S. bovifelis urged on the improvement of the hygienic conditions of keeping and feeding livestock in order to reduce the infection. Molecular techniques confirm species in meat products with high sensitivity and distinguish it from human species.
Copyright © 2022 Jafari et al. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beef burger; Food microbiology; Sarcocystis; Sarcocystosis

Year:  2022        PMID: 36046555      PMCID: PMC9375717          DOI: 10.18502/ijpa.v17i1.9014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Parasitol        ISSN: 1735-7020            Impact factor:   1.217


Introduction

Sarcocystis is an intracellular apicomplexan protozoan parasite with a worldwide distribution. Carnivorous as well as human are considered as definitive and herbivorous including cattle, sheep, goat, poultry and pig as intermediate hosts (1). Ingestion of cyst-containing tissues via raw or poorly cooked meat or meat products by the definitive hosts leads to sexual reproduction of the Sarcocystis in the digestive tract, followed by the discharge of sporocysts in the feces (2, 3). The parasitic protozoan causes symptoms such as anorexia, mild fever, vomiting, diarrhea and respiratory problems in human (4). Most of the Sarcocystis species are host-specific. S. hominis, S. heydorni and S. suihominis are found to use humans as definitive hosts. Sarcocystosis infection illustrated high incidence among bovine carcasses, whose prevalence can nearly reach 100% in various parts of the world (5–7). Cattle (Bos tarus) act as intermediate hosts for S. cruzi, S. hirsuta and S. bovifelis (8). Sarcocystis-infected meat causes economic losses due to the unpleasant appearance of meat, which annually enforces huge damages on the livestock industry (9). Human infection can be related to eating raw or under-cooked meat containing encysted parasites (10). Processed meat products such as hamburgers, are one of the most popular meat products in different countries of the world, for example, about 5 billion burgers are consumed in the United States per year (11). Although there is no accurate information about the per capita meat products in Iran, it is worth noting that the annual consumption of hamburgers in this country is remarkable. Unlike the conventional burgers which are made just by meat, industrial beef burgers are not mainly made from beef, their mostly ingredients are a mixture of minced meat, onions, garlic, flour, soybeans and other food additives (12). In recent years, high sensitive molecular methods have identified parasites even in small and insignificant parasitic loads (13). Digestive methods are the most used techniques in detection of Sarcocystis bradyzoites in meat or its products while molecular diagnostic methods used in few studies to detect Sarcocystis species (14). Investigations on Sarcocystis in meat products reported a frequency of 56% and 80% of hamburgers in Iran (15, 16). Therefore, due to the increasing demand for fast foods, especially burgers, and the high frequency of sarcocystosis in slaughtered cattle, it can be regarded as a potential foodborne problem. Therefore, we aimed to identify the Sarcocystis bradyzoites in beef burgers obtained from butcheries and supermarkets in the city of Hamadan, western Iran.

Materials and Methods

Sampling

This cross-sectional study was conducted during February 2020 to February 2021 in Hamadan, west of Iran. A total of 80 hamburgers were purchased from different butcher shops and grocery stores in simple random sampling. The samples (n: 30) which were traditionally made by the butcheries consisted of 100% beef while the meat content of the other ones (n:50) was 60 to 90% according to the industrial trademark.

Ethical approval

The research was performed in terms of the principles and ethical considerations of working with laboratory animals as confirmed by the ethics committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (Ethics committee code: IR.UMSHA.REC.1397.304).

Microscopic examination and peptic digestion

All specimens were firstly analyzed via digestion method. Briefly, 20 grams of each hamburger was grinded thoroughly and then treated by a 50 ml digestion solution including 1.3 g of pepsin, 2.5 g of NaCl and 3.5 mL of concentrated HCl in 500 mL of sterile distilled water. The mixture was incubated at 40 °C for 2 h and then centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was discarded and the precipitate washed three times and examined under microscopy for Sarcocystis bradyzoites (17).

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

Genomic DNA of the parasite was extracted using the tissue extraction kit (DNG-plus, SINACOLON, Iran) according to the manufacturer‘s instruction. The extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C until PCR examination. The ratio of absorbance was assessed at 260–280 nm for evaluation of the purity of DNA. PCR was performed to detect Sarcocystis DNA fragments. Fragments of 900 bp from 18s ribosomal DNA genes were amplified using forward (SarF: GGATAACCTGGTAATTCTATG) and reverse (SarR: GGCAAATGCTTTCGCAGTAG) primer (18). The amplification began with an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min followed by 30s annealing at 57 °C and extension at 72 °C for 3 min. Sarcocystis-positive samples isolated from cattle striated muscle were used as positive controls while blank reagents (dd H2O) were manipulated as negative controls. PCR products were resolved through 1.5% agarose gel and imaged in a blue light transilluminator. Amplicons were purified and analyzed by the Bioner Company of South Korea. The nucleotide sequence homology of randomly selected four samples was compared with the sequences in the gene bank of the NCBI database by BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V.16 (Chicago, IL, USA). Variables were analyzed by Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The statistical level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Sarcocystis bradyzoites were detected in 46 of 80 (57.6%) samples. Among a total of 80 hamburgers, including two different groups, 46 (57.6%) and 30 (37.5%) were identified positive by digestion and molecular method, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1:

Prevalence of Sarcocystis in two types of beef burgers. Using microscopic and molecular methods

Sample Microscopic method (%) Molecular method (%) Total
Positive (%)Negative (%)Positive (%)Negative (%)
Conventional made beef burgers26 (86.6)4 (13.3)19 (63.3)11 (36.6)30
Industrial made beef burgers20 (40)30 (60)11 (22)39 (78)50
Total (%)46 (57.5)34 (42.5)30 (37.5)50 (62.5)80
Prevalence of Sarcocystis in two types of beef burgers. Using microscopic and molecular methods The PCR products were identified by size using a 100 bp ladder. The expected PCR product had a length of 900 bp (Fig. 1). The homology of randomly selected four purified amplicons were determined in Blast software and the S. bovifelis was identified with homology > 95%.
Fig. 1:

PCR amplification of eucoccidial DNA fragments in samples.

Lane 1: 100bp marker, 2: Positive control (positive samples isolated from cattle striated muscle), 3: Negative control (dd H2O), 4: industrial burger sample, 5: traditional burger sample, 6: industrial burger sample, 7: traditional burger sample, 8: industrial burger sample

PCR amplification of eucoccidial DNA fragments in samples. Lane 1: 100bp marker, 2: Positive control (positive samples isolated from cattle striated muscle), 3: Negative control (dd H2O), 4: industrial burger sample, 5: traditional burger sample, 6: industrial burger sample, 7: traditional burger sample, 8: industrial burger sample

Discussion

The results confirm that the overall 56.25% of conventional beef burgers and 38.75% industrial beef burgers were infected by Sarcocystis. Microscopic digestion method indicated 57.5% of Sarcocystis bradyzoites while molecular technique showed parasites‘ DNA in 30% of burger specimens. There was a significant difference between Sarcocystis infested conventional and industrial beef burgers (P=0.01). Macroscopic investigation of Sarcocystis was not possible due to the process of hamburger preparation as a meat product; nevertheless, studies reported the Sarcocystis contamination of beef between zero to 0.4% in beef and meat products (14, 18, 19). Macrocysts may be ignored in visual inspection so, other accurate methods such as microscopic or molecular techniques are much more reliable in confirmation of infestation (19). On the other hand, according to the previous reports (5, 6), nearly 100% of beef was contaminated by Sarcocystis spp. so, it is highly expected to recognize the bradyzoites in the meat products including hamburgers. Several studies have evaluated the Sarcocystis frequency in the meat products in Iran which have provided disputable points. For example, in accordance with the present job, the total infection of meat products with Sarcocystis was 80% and the highest contamination was determined for the hamburger samples (15). Besides, 87.5% of hamburgers, 83.3% of sausages and 66% of cocktail sausages in Hamadan were infected by Sarcocystis sp. by digestion method (15). Digestion method was the only used method in Dehkordi et al. project, so, more positive results were obtained compared to the present study. Nematollahia et al, also reported the prevalence of Sarcocystis 56.25%, using digestion method in hamburgers prepared in traditional and industrial procedures in Tabriz. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, in this regard the molecular method was not employed on detection of parasites (20). In this study, the difference between the two types of beef burgers was statistically significant and the frequency of this parasite was higher in conventional beef burgers (87%) in comparison to industrial ones (56.6%). This difference may be due to the fact that the traditional burgers were made with a mixture of 100% fresh meat without any additives, while industrial burgers contain other vegetal ingredients beside meat. Furthermore, industrial meat products proceed a cooking process for producing safer output. Haj Mohammadi et al. indicated the Sarcocystis infection rate 77.9 %, in the study of 190 industrial and traditional hamburgers in Yazd. Accordingly, PCR-RFLP technique detected the small traces of Sarcocystis DNA, so the rate of positive results compared to studies using peptide digestion or impression smears was higher (21). Faghiri et al described the parasite contamination of traditional hamburgers 87.9%, which is significantly higher than industrial hamburgers 67.8% (18). In contrast to the current study, others found no statistical difference between the infection rate of the industrial and traditional hamburgers (20, 22). It may have contributed to the method because in two studies peptic digestion was the only used method. Sarcocystis infection of meat and meat products were not associated with geographical area nevertheless, the applied method was the crucial element for investigation of Sarcocystis (21). According to the sequencing results, S. bovifelis was identified in the hamburger samples. Cattle (Bos taurus) are as intermediate host for six Sarcocystis spp. which felids, canids and humans are respectively definitive hosts for S. cruzi, S. hirsuta and S. hominis and the three latter ones S. bovihominis and S. bovini with felids and S.heydorni with primates as definitive hosts (8, 23). Sarcocystosis is very important in cattle because it can cause irreparable economic damage to the meat and meat products industry (7, 24). Sarcocystis species are distinguished based on the characteristics of the cyst wall by electron microscopy as well as molecular methods (25, 26). The histological examination of cattle tissue can easily differentiate thick-walled S. hominis (27, 28). In the case of processed meat products, including hamburgers, the histological detection of thick-walled cysts is not possible. S. hirsuta (S. bovifelis) could not be confirmed even by electron microscopy nor by RAPD-PCR (29). Due to the high prevalence of Sarcocystis in cattle, DNA-based procedures play a crucial role in identification of species and their contribution in meat industry. On the other hand, species identification can determine the sources of livestock infection by leading to the final host (30). Hooshyar et al showed a 29% contamination among 200 studied hamburgers in Kashan, by PCR-RFLP technique. They confirmed that 74% of the samples were infected by S. cruzi, which canids act as definitive host, 20% by both S. cruzi and S. hirsuta (felids as final hosts) and 3.5% revealed both infection of S. cruzi and S. homminis (human as final hosts) (14). In Italy, S. cruzi and S. bovifelis were the most isolated species of cattle in the slaughterhouses (23). S. hominis, unlike previous studies (14, 21), was isolated from only 1.7% of the samples. Prior studies had not considered the prevalence of S. bovifelis and this may indicate that the higher prevalence of S. hominis has been due to the inability of techniques to separate the two species (23). In the present study, although molecular methods were determined as a powerful tool for confirmation of meat infection due to the high sensitivity rather than the digestive ones, they may not be merited for food safety detection because of showing the dead particles of infectious agents. On the other hand DNA extraction was challenging, due to disruption of the parasite structure in processed food.

Conclusion

More than half (57 %) of beef burgers were infected by Sarcocystis. S. bovifelis was identified as the main isolated species. Although the predominant species of the parasite in this study was S. bovifelis, isolation and species identification are suggested to confirm the real contamination with the zoonotic S. hominis. Livestock should be maintained at hygienic condition, away from felids, in order to avoid S. bovifelis infection.
  22 in total

1.  Molecular identification targeting cox1 and 18S genes confirms the high prevalence of Sarcocystis spp. in cattle in the Netherlands.

Authors:  B J A Hoeve-Bakker; J W B van der Giessen; F F J Franssen
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.981

2.  First isolation of Sarcocystis hominis from cattle in Japan.

Authors:  M Saito; Y Shibata; M Kubo; I Sakakibara; A Yamada; H Itagaki
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.267

3.  Prevalence of Sarcocystis spp. in Argentinean cattle.

Authors:  G Moré; P Abrahamovich; S Jurado; D Bacigalupe; J C Marin; M Rambeaud; L Venturini; M C Venturini
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.738

Review 4.  Sarcocystis spp. in human infections.

Authors:  Ronald Fayer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Molecular identification of Sarcocystis species in raw hamburgers using PCR-RFLP method in Kashan, central Iran.

Authors:  H Hooshyar; Z Abbaszadeh; R Sharafati-Chaleshtori; M Arbabi
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2017-05-11

6.  Characterization of Sarcocystis species in domestic animals using a PCR-RFLP analysis of variation in the 18S rRNA gene: a cost-effective and simple technique for routine species identification.

Authors:  Zhao-Qing Yang; Qing-Qing Li; Yang-Xian Zuo; Xin-Wen Chen; Yong-Jiu Chen; Long Nie; Chang-Gue Wei; Jia-Shun Zen; S W Attwood; Xue-Zheng Zhang; Ya-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.011

7.  Molecular-based identification of Sarcocystis hominis in Belgian minced beef.

Authors:  L Vangeel; K Houf; K Chiers; J Vercruysse; K D'Herde; R Ducatelle
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.077

8.  Histopathological Survey on Sarcocystis Species Infection in Slaughtered Cattle of Zabol-Iran

Authors:  Ehsan Faghiri; Aida Davari; Reza Nabavi
Journal:  Turkiye Parazitol Derg       Date:  2019-12-23

Review 9.  Sarcocystosis in South American camelids: The state of play revisited.

Authors:  Muhammad A Saeed; Mohammed H Rashid; Jane Vaughan; Abdul Jabbar
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Molecular differentiation of cattle Sarcocystis spp. by multiplex PCR targeting 18S and COI genes following identification of Sarcocystis hominis in human stool samples.

Authors:  S Rubiola; T Civera; E Ferroglio; S Zanet; T Zaccaria; S Brossa; R Cipriani; F Chiesa
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2020-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.