| Literature DB >> 36046327 |
Austin R Gomindes1,2,3, Resya Bhakthavalsalan4, Utkarsh Sharma5, Shannon L Johnston6, Ashiq Naushad7.
Abstract
Introduction Identifying pregnancy-related complications and high-risk pregnancies early on and effectively managing care for these pregnant women through a holistic approach guided by the main objectives of antenatal care (ANC) and efficient, good-quality health care through ANC services can reduce the risk of pregnancy-related complications, being favourable for both mother and child. This study was intended to identify the percentage of pregnant women in high-risk groups attending ANC clinics. Objective This study's aim was to understand the prevalence of high-risk pregnancies in women attending ANC camps in Kinaye and Vantamuri villages in Belagavi, India. Methods A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out in a primary healthcare (PHC) setting that included all pregnant women attending antenatal camps and residing in the same areas. With a total study sample size of 200, consisting of pregnant women attending ANC camps in Kinaye and Vantamuri PHC, the data were collected using a pre-tested, pre-designed questionnaire after obtaining written informed consent from the participating pregnant women. Results The data were analysed using a chi-square test to uncover the relationship between socio-demographics, obstetric history, medical variables, and high-risk pregnancy. The results demonstrated that 48.5% of women attending ANC clinics were in the high-risk pregnancy group. Conclusion Pregnancy outcomes are greatly affected by a woman's socio-demographic, obstetric, and medical variables. The WHO recommends a minimum of four ANC visits to safely identify and mitigate the risks and complications of high-risk pregnancy to ensure positive outcomes for both mothers and children.Entities:
Keywords: : antenatal care; antenatal care visits; antenatal screening; high-risk pregnancy; pregnancy risk factors
Year: 2022 PMID: 36046327 PMCID: PMC9417325 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1Pre-designed and pre-tested questionnaire
Age-wise distribution of women
| Age (years) | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| <18 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 18–21 | 31 | 31 | 20 | 20 |
| 22–25 | 40 | 40 | 49 | 49 |
| 26–30 | 23 | 23 | 27 | 27 |
| 31–35 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| >35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Religion-wise distribution of pregnant women
| Religion | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Hindu | 87 | 87 | 85 | 85 |
| Muslim | 13 | 13 | 15 | 15 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Socio-economic distribution of pregnant women
| Socio-economic status (modified BG Prasad) | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 39 | 39 | 35 | 35 |
| 3 | 39 | 39 | 40 | 40 |
| 4 | 14 | 14 | 17 | 17 |
| 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
Family type distribution of pregnant women
| Type of family | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Nuclear | 28 | 28 | 91 | 91 |
| Joint | 72 | 72 | 9 | 9 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Consanguinity distribution of pregnant women
| Consanguineous | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Consanguineous | 17 | 17 | 22 | 22 |
| Non-consanguineous | 83 | 83 | 78 | 78 |
Height distribution of pregnant women
| Height (cm) | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| <141 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| 141–150 | 23 | 23 | 56 | 56 |
| >150 | 74 | 74 | 39 | 39 |
Weight distribution of pregnant women
| Weight (kg) | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| <41 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 9 |
| 41–45 | 6 | 6 | 23 | 23 |
| >45 | 88 | 88 | 68 | 68 |
Trimester distribution of pregnant women
| Trimester | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| First | 12 | 12 | 8 | 8 |
| Second | 47 | 47 | 53 | 53 |
| Third | 41 | 41 | 39 | 39 |
Distribution based on the number of antenatal care visits of pregnant women
| ANC visits | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Adequate | 86 | 86 | 53 | 53 |
| Inadequate | 14 | 14 | 47 | 47 |
Distribution based on ante-natal USG scan of pregnant women done
| USG scan | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Yes | 95 | 95 | 88 | 88 |
| No | 5 | 5 | 12 | 12 |
Distribution based on the number of pregnant women who had taken folic acid supplements
| Folic acid | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Yes | 98 | 98 | 95 | 95 |
| No | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
Distribution based on the number of pregnant women who had taken iron supplements
| Iron | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Yes | 96 | 96 | 91 | 91 |
| No | 4 | 4 | 9 | 9 |
Distribution based on the number of pregnant women who had taken calcium supplements
| Calcium | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Yes | 96 | 96 | 88 | 88 |
| No | 4 | 4 | 12 | 12 |
Distribution based on the number of pregnant women who had taken TT injections
| TT injection | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Yes | 98 | 98 | 90 | 90 |
| No | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 |
Distribution based on the number of pregnant women who had had previous pregnancy compilations
| Previous pregnancy complication | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Yes | 9 | 9 | 26 | 26 |
| No | 64 | 64 | 39 | 39 |
| Not applicable | 27 | 27 | 35 | 35 |
Distribution based on the grade of anaemia in pregnant women
| Grade of anaemia (WHO) | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Normal (>11 g/dl) | 58 | 58 | 43 | 43 |
| Mild (10.1–11 g/dl) | 22 | 22 | 33 | 33 |
| Moderate (7.1–10 g/dl) | 20 | 20 | 24 | 24 |
| Severe (<7 g/dl) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Distribution based on the number of pregnant women who were at high risk due to medical complications
| Medical complication | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Yes | 8 | 8 | 11 | 11 |
| No | 92 | 92 | 89 | 89 |
Distribution based on the number of pregnant women who were at high risk due to obstetric complications
| Obstetrical complication | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Yes | 25 | 25 | 63 | 63 |
| No | 75 | 75 | 37 | 37 |
Type of high-risk distribution of pregnant women
| High-risk pregnancy | Vantamuri | Kinaye | ||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Yes | 30 | 30 | 67 | 67 |
| No | 70 | 70 | 33 | 33 |