| Literature DB >> 36045430 |
Mohammadali Tofighi1, Ali Asgary2, Ghassem Tofighi2, Mahdi M Najafabadi2, Julien Arino3, Amine Amiche4, Ashrafur Rahman5, Zachary McCarthy2, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi2, Edward Thommes2,4,6, Laurent Coudeville4, Martin David Grunnill2, Lydia Bourouiba7, Jianhong Wu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most mass gathering events have been suspended due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, with vaccination rollout, whether and how to organize some of these mass gathering events arises as part of the pandemic recovery discussions, and this calls for decision support tools. The Hajj, one of the world's largest religious gatherings, was substantively scaled down in 2020 and 2021 and it is still unclear how it will take place in 2022 and subsequent years. Simulating disease transmission dynamics during the Hajj season under different conditions can provide some insights for better decision-making. Most disease risk assessment models require data on the number and nature of possible close contacts between individuals.Entities:
Keywords: Agent-Based Simulation; AnyLogic; COVID-19; Disease Transmission; Hajj; Mass gathering; Social Contacts
Year: 2022 PMID: 36045430 PMCID: PMC9433139 DOI: 10.1186/s40794-022-00177-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines ISSN: 2055-0936
Fig 1Masjid-Al-Haram a and b 3D Model, c Pilgrim’s path in the ritual that is begun from one of the gates and ended at the same or another gate. Arrows show one of the paths in the order of cyan, green, yellow, purple, blue and red (Refer to Video 1 and Video 2)
Fig 2Mata’af area a Geometry b Monte Carlo simulation, random distribution of 20,000 pilgrims
Number of contacts during the Tawaf and Sa’ay rituals (Monte Carlo Simulation)
| Total number of pilgrims | 100 | 1,000 | 2,500 | 5,000 | 7,000 | 10,000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tawaf | Total number of contacts | 6.7 | 658 | 4,007 | 15,656 | 29,846 | 59,224 |
| Pilgrims with at least one contact | 12 | 703 | 2,346 | 4,973 | 6,993 | 9,998 | |
| Average individual contacts±0.95CI | 0.12±0.03 | 1.30±0.03 | 3.21±0.03 | 6.20±0.06 | 8.51±0.04 | 11.85±0.03 | |
| Maximum individual contacts±0.95CI | 1.50±0.31 | 7.1±0.58 | 12.4±0.63 | 20.3±1.04 | 23.8±0.67 | 30.7±0.88 | |
| Sa’ay | Total number of contacts | 6.4 | 713 | 4,452 | 17,876 | 35,442 | 72,358 |
| Pilgrims with at least one contact | 12.5 | 764 | 2,347 | 4,996 | 6,999 | 9,999 | |
| Average individual contacts±0.95CI | 0.16±0.04 | 1.43±0.03 | 3.58±0.03 | 7.19±0.03 | 10.06±0.01 | 14.4±0.02 | |
| Maximum individual contacts±0.95CI | 1.60±0.40 | 6.3±0.40 | 11.1±0.58 | 16.9±0.43 | 22.1±0.90 | 27.8±0.87 |
Number of contacts during the Tawaf and Sa’ay rituals (Agent-based Simulation)
| Ritual | Population | Average Density | All Contacts | Unique Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tawaf | 990 | 0.09 | 97.0 | 96.2 |
| 1980 | 0.18 | 230.0 | 227.3 | |
| 2980 | 0.27 | 417.9 | 381.6 | |
| 3940 | 0.36 | 582.1 | 516.5 | |
| 4920 | 0.45 | 755.5 | 607.2 | |
| 6830 | 0.62 | 920.9 | 734.6 | |
| Sa’ay | 998 | 0.07 | 94.2 | 94.0 |
| 1995 | 0.14 | 140.0 | 138.4 | |
| 2992 | 0.21 | 214.4 | 164.9 | |
| 3989 | 0.28 | 303.4 | 197.1 | |
| 4980 | 0.35 | 434.7 | 258.2 | |
| 6960 | 0.48 | 643.6 | 390.5 | |
| 9920 | 0.69 | 1,259.1 | 556.4 |
Fig 3Agent-based simulation results a Number of contacts in the Mat’af and Masa’a areas b The relation between the population in the Tawaf and time spent there
Fig 4Distribution of the average number of total contacts and the average time a pilgrim spends in the Masjid-Al-Haram
Fig 5Pilgrims’ distribution in Tawaf and a The general setting b Social distancing perpendicular to the circulation (2,000 pilgrims in distance on circles with the distance of 2.0 m) c Density map of 2,500 pilgrims (Legend shows the number of pilgrims per square meter of area)
Fig 6Social distancing in the Mata’af and the number of contacts