| Literature DB >> 36045376 |
Xiao-Jun Yu1, Shan-Xi Wang1, Xin-Zhen Guo2, Qi-Kun Liu1, Ying-Guang Wang1, Yun-Kun Qu1, Hao Kang3, Yuan Bao4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The paper holds the research purpose of confirming the long-term results of trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocations (TSPFD) under the treatment of open reduction and internal fixation.Entities:
Keywords: Dislocation; Open reduction; Perilunate; TSPFD; Trans-scaphoid
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36045376 PMCID: PMC9429764 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05748-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.562
Fig. 1A 54-year-old man with right TSPFD. A Preoperative anteroposterior X-ray. B Preoperative lateral X-ray. C Postoperative anteroposterior X-ray. D Postoperative lateral X-ray
Krimmer Score
| Grip trength(% of contrlateral) | Percentage(%) | |||
| 0–25 | 0 | |||
| > 25–50 | 10 | |||
| > 50–75 | 20 | |||
| > 75–100 | 30 | |||
| Range of motion | extension/flextion | ulnar/radial abduction | pronation/supination | |
| < 30 | < 10 | < 80 | 0 | |
| 31°-69° | 10°-35° | 81°-110° | 10 | |
| 61°-100° | 36°-50° | 111°-140° | 15 | |
| > 100 | > 50° | > 140° | 20 | |
| Pain | Degree | |||
| Severe | 0 | |||
| With/without stress | 10 | |||
| Only with stress | 15 | |||
| pain free | 20 | |||
| Restrictions | Degree | |||
| Severe | 0 | |||
| Fair | 10 | |||
| Only with certain activities | 20 | |||
| Normal, no restrictions | 30 |
Mayo wrist score
| Pain | VAS score | Degree of pain | Points |
| 0 | No pain | 25 | |
| 1–4 | Mild, occasional | 20 | |
| 5–7 | Moderate, tolerable | 15 | |
| 8–10 | Severe to intolerable | 0 | |
| Functional status | Details | Points | |
| Return to regular empoyment | 25 | ||
| Restricted employment | 20 | ||
| Able to work, unemployed | 15 | ||
| Unable to work, pain | 0 | ||
| Range of motion | Total motion | Percentage of normal(%) | Points |
| ≧20° | 90–100 | 25 | |
| 100°-119° | 80–89 | 20 | |
| 90°-99° | 70–79 | 15 | |
| 60°-89° | 50–69 | 10 | |
| 30°-59° | 25–49 | 5 | |
| 0° = -29° | 0–24 | 0 | |
| Grip strength | Percentage of normal(%) | Points | |
| 90–100 | 25 | ||
| 75–89 | 15 | ||
| 50–74 | 10 | ||
| 25–49 | 5 | ||
| 0–24 | 0 | ||
| 91–100––-Excellent | 80–90––-Good | 65–79––-fair | < 65––-Poor |
Base data of the patients with TSPFD
| Patient | Gender | Age | Side | Causes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Male | 20 | Left | Falling from height |
| 2 | Male | 54 | Right | Tumble |
| 3 | Male | 49 | Right | Tumble |
| 4 | Male | 30 | Left | Tumble |
| 5 | Female | 55 | Left | Tumble |
| 6 | Male | 18 | Left | Tumble |
| 7 | Male | 58 | Right | Falling from height |
| 8 | Male | 35 | Right | Tumble |
| 9 | Male | 21 | Left | Sport injury |
| 10 | Male | 30 | Right | Tumble |
| 11 | Female | 21 | Left | Sport injury |
| 12 | Male | 18 | Right | Sport injury |
| 13 | Male | 29 | Left | Tumble |
| 14 | Male | 31 | Left | Tumble |
| 15 | Male | 37 | Left | Tumble |
| 16 | Male | 25 | Right | Tumble |
| 17 | Male | 15 | Left | Sport injury |
| 18 | Male | 30 | Left | Tumble |
| 19 | Male | 20 | Right | Tumble |
| 20 | Female | 43 | Right | Falling from height |
| 21 | Male | 22 | Left | Sport injury |
| 22 | Male | 34 | Left | Tumble |
Clinical outcomes of 22 cases
| Patient | Hospital day | Union time | Follow-up | SLA | RLA | LTD | Krimmer score | VAS score | At last follow-up | Complications | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | (days) | (weeks) | (months) | (°) | (°) | (mm) | Preop | Final | Preop | Final | MWS | FEA | RUDA | Grip strength | |
| 1 | 11 | 10 | 159 | 48 | 2 | 2.1 | 50 | 100 | 6 | 2 | E | 122 | 36 | 25 | none |
| 2 | 7 | 12 | 145 | 49 | 2 | 2.2 | 45 | 100 | 6 | 2 | G | 117 | 36 | 20 | none |
| 3 | 10 | 14 | 133 | 50 | 2 | 2.2 | 35 | 95 | 7 | 3 | G | 119 | 38 | 20 | none |
| 4 | 13 | 15 | 134 | 48 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 40 | 100 | 5 | 2 | E | 112 | 37 | 20 | none |
| 5 | 10 | 13 | 140 | 49 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 40 | 100 | 5 | 2 | E | 115 | 35 | 25 | none |
| 6 | 14 | 14 | 124 | 49 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 40 | 100 | 5 | 2 | G | 119 | 35 | 20 | none |
| 7 | 11 | 15 | 124 | 50 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 45 | 100 | 5 | 2 | E | 121 | 34 | 25 | none |
| 8 | 6 | 14 | 128 | 51 | 1.8 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 6 | 2 | E | 120 | 35 | 20 | none |
| 9 | 18 | 15 | 94 | 51 | 1.8 | 2 | 35 | 100 | 7 | 3 | G | 121 | 37 | 20 | none |
| 10 | 10 | 14 | 95 | 51 | 2 | 2.1 | 45 | 100 | 6 | 1 | E | 119 | 37 | 20 | none |
| 11 | 6 | 13 | 95 | 49 | 2 | 1.9 | 45 | 100 | 6 | 1 | E | 120 | 37 | 20 | none |
| 12 | 7 | 12 | 85 | 49 | 2 | 1.9 | 45 | 95 | 6 | 3 | G | 123 | 35 | 20 | none |
| 13 | 11 | 12 | 86 | 49 | 2 | 1.9 | 55 | 100 | 5 | 0 | E | 123 | 35 | 20 | none |
| 14 | 10 | 13 | 87 | 49 | 2 | 1.8 | 55 | 100 | 5 | 0 | E | 123 | 34 | 25 | none |
| 15 | 8 | 14 | 77 | 50 | 2 | 2.2 | 35 | 100 | 7 | 1 | G | 120 | 35 | 20 | none |
| 16 | 9 | 14 | 77 | 50 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 50 | 100 | 6 | 1 | G | 118 | 35 | 20 | none |
| 17 | 9 | 15 | 77 | 50 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 35 | 100 | 7 | 0 | E | 124 | 38 | 20 | none |
| 18 | 13 | 11 | 54 | 50 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 40 | 100 | 6 | 0 | G | 120 | 38 | 20 | none |
| 19 | 5 | 14 | 52 | 51 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 55 | 100 | 5 | 1 | E | 121 | 36 | 25 | none |
| 20 | 15 | 13 | 49 | 51 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 45 | 100 | 5 | 2 | G | 121 | 35 | 20 | none |
| 21 | 6 | 12 | 91 | 51 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 55 | 100 | 5 | 0 | E | 122 | 35 | 20 | none |
| 22 | 12 | 12 | 58 | 49 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 55 | 100 | 6 | 1 | G | 122 | 36 | 20 | none |
Abbreviations: SLA scapholunate angle, RLA radiolunate angle, LTD lunotriquetral distance, VAS visual analog scale, MWS modified Mayo wrist score, FEA active flexion extention arc, RUDA radial deviation and ulnar deviation arc
Comparison of clinical outcomes between preoperation and final follow-up
| Pre-opertation | Final follow-up | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Krimmer score | 45.00 (40.00—51.25) | 100.00 (100.00—100.00) | < 0.001 |
| VAS score | 6.00 (5.00—6.00) | 1.50 (0.75—2.00) | < 0.001 |
Abbreviations: VAS visual analog scale