Literature DB >> 36045308

Usage and Adherence of Seven Advanced Therapies with Differing Mechanisms of Action for Inflammatory Arthritis in Canada.

Francois Nantel1, Juejing Ling2, Meagan Rachich1, Odalis Asin-Milan1, Brad Millson2, Shane Golden2, Huijuan Yang2, Purva Barot2, Allen J Lehman3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective, observational study aimed to analyze and assess adherence, persistence, dosing, and use of concomitant medications of seven self-administered target drugs (abatacept, golimumab, secukinumab, tocilizumab, ustekinumab, apremilast, and tofacitinib) that are currently available in Canada for the treatment of inflammatory arthritis (IA).
METHODS: We used IQVIA's longitudinal claims databases, which include private drug plans and public plans. Patients with IA identified using a proprietary indication algorithm who initiated treatment with any of the target drugs between January 2015 and February 2019 were selected and followed for 12 months.
RESULTS: Golimumab and apremilast had the highest proportion of patients (~ 75%) who were bio-naïve and secukinumab had the fewest bio-naïve patients (~ 43%). The oral therapies, apremilast and tofacitinib, had the lowest percentage of adherent patients (73% and 71%) followed by abatacept (83%), while the remaining drugs had adherence around 90%. Secukinumab and tofacitinib had the highest 12-month persistence rate (63% and 61%), while abatacept and apremilast had the lowest persistence rate (52% and 47%). Oral corticosteroid (OCS) use was not significantly associated with adherence. Tocilizumab, secukinumab, and ustekinumab had the highest proportion of patients (> 20%) with dose escalation at 3-4 months from index. OCS and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARD) use decreased in post-index period across all target drugs.
CONCLUSION: This study identified substantial differences in patient baseline characteristics. Patients on injectable biologics were more likely to be adherent compared with those on oral drugs, possibly owing to longer dosing intervals. Other outcomes at 12 months appeared similar as evidenced by tapering of concomitant medications, although differences in persistence and dose escalation were noted.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Administrative data; Inflammatory arthritis; Persistence

Year:  2022        PMID: 36045308     DOI: 10.1007/s40744-022-00485-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Ther        ISSN: 2198-6576


  30 in total

1.  Biologic Therapy Utilization in Patients With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: An Observational Summary of Biologic Therapy Use in a Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Wayne P Gulliver; Shane Randell; Susanne Gulliver; Valerie Gregory; Sean Nagle; Olivier Chambenoit
Journal:  J Cutan Med Surg       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.092

Review 2.  Fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Patricia Katz
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Adherence and Persistence with Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Vivian P Bykerk; Maher Aassi; Michael Schiff
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 4.  Economics of non-adherence to biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Mary A De Vera; Jonathan Mailman; Jessica S Galo
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Comparative persistence of the TNF antagonists in rheumatoid arthritis--a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Anat Fisher; Ken Bassett; James M Wright; M Alan Brookhart; Hugh Freeman; Colin R Dormuth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Impact of adherence to biological agents on health care resource utilization for patients over the age of 65 years with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Urja Lathia; Emmanuel M Ewara; Francois Nantel
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Adherence and dosing interval of subcutaneous antitumour necrosis factor biologics among patients with inflammatory arthritis: analysis from a Canadian administrative database.

Authors:  Peter Bhoi; Louis Bessette; Mary J Bell; Cathy Tkaczyk; Francois Nantel; Karina Maslova
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The impact of different rheumatic diseases on health-related quality of life: a comparison with a selected sample of healthy individuals using SF-36 questionnaire, EQ-5D and SF-6D utility values.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Marco Di Carlo; Marina Carotti; Sonia Farah; Alessandro Ciapetti; Marwin Gutierrez
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2019-01-15

9.  Persistence rates of abatacept and TNF inhibitors used as first or second biologic DMARDs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: 9 years of experience from the Rhumadata® clinical database and registry.

Authors:  Denis Choquette; Louis Bessette; Evo Alemao; Boulos Haraoui; Roelien Postema; Jean-Pierre Raynauld; Louis Coupal
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Prognostic factors for abatacept retention in patients who received at least one prior biologic agent: an interim analysis from the observational, prospective ACTION study.

Authors:  Hubert G Nüßlein; Rieke Alten; Mauro Galeazzi; Hanns-Martin Lorenz; Michael T Nurmohamed; William G Bensen; Gerd R Burmester; Hans-Hartmut Peter; Karel Pavelka; Melanie Chartier; Coralie Poncet; Christiane Rauch; Manuela Le Bars
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.