Literature DB >> 36044998

Enterococcus faecalis V583 cell membrane protein expression to alkaline stress.

Peter Cathro1, Peter McCarthy2, Peter Hoffmann3, Stephen Kidd2, Peter Zilm1.   

Abstract

Enterococcus faecalis is able to adapt to alkaline conditions and is commonly recovered from teeth in which endodontic treatment has failed. The role that E. faecalis membrane proteins play in survival strategies to extreme alkaline conditions is unclear. We grew E. faecalis V583 in a chemostat at pH 8 and 11 at one-tenth the organism's relative maximum growth rate. Following membrane shaving, isotope-coding protein labels were added at the peptide level to samples and then combined. The relative proportion of membrane proteins were identified using LC-ESI mass spectrometry and MaxQuant analysis. Ratios of membrane proteins were log2 transformed, with proteins deviating by more than 1 SD of the mean considered to be up- or down-regulated. A total of six proteins were up-regulated in pH 11 including: EF0669 (polysaccharide biosynthesis family); EF1927 (glycerol uptake facilitator), and EF0114 (glycosyl hydrolase). A total of five proteins were down-regulated including: EF0108 (C4-dicarboxylate transporter); EF1838 (PTS system IIC component); EF0456 (PTS system IID component); and EF0022 (PTS mannose-specific IID component). In extreme alkaline conditions, the membrane proteins of E. faecalis seem to be involved in a shift of carbohydrate metabolism from the PTS system to glycerol, which supports the formation of a protective capsule protecting the cell.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Enterococcus faecaliszzm321990 ; ICPL; alkaline pH; biofilm; continuous culture; membrane shaving

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36044998      PMCID: PMC9491840          DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnac082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett        ISSN: 0378-1097            Impact factor:   2.820


Introduction

Enterococcus faecalis is commonly recovered from food, the oral cavity, and clinical specimens (Anderson et al. 2016). Endodontic treatment (root canal therapy) of a tooth with a necrotic pulp usually involves the chemo-mechanical debridement of the canal(s) with irrigants such as sodium hypochlorite and often interappointment medicaments such as calcium hydroxide (∼ pH 12.5–12.8) placed in the main root canal to help in the elimination of surviving bacteria (Siqueira and Lopes 1999). Calcium hydroxide kills bacteria by direct contact through pH effects and is known to dramatically reduce the bacterial load in root canals with survival of E. faecalis reported to fall to 0.001% at pH 11 and 0.00001% at pH 12 (Appelbe and Sedgley 2007). However, E. faecalis is one of the most commonly recovered bacteria from persistent root canal infections, suggesting that it has the capacity to survive the chemomechanical procedures (Yap et al. 2014) and subsequent nutrient limited environment (Sundqvist et al. 1998). Specific survival mechanisms maybe used by E. faecalis to survive alkaline stress, which include: the activation of ion-transport systems to balance intracellular and external pH levels (Evans et al. 2002); intrinsic resistance; neutralization of medicaments by bacterial cells; and an alteration in gene expression to the changes in the environmental conditions (Siqueira and Lopes 1999). More recently, it has been reported that alkaline stress initiates a reduction in carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism and increased nucleotide synthesis (Ran et al. 2015). A similar reduction in carbohydrate and energy metabolism has been reported in a response to fluoride exposure (Li et al. 2020). The response of bacteria to specific environments are often mediated by membrane proteins, which are especially difficult to study due to the innate hydrophobicity of the transmembrane domain (Wolff et al. 2008). However, a number of fractionation protocols have been used to enrich for integral membrane proteins, with membrane shaving showing the greatest promise (Cathro et al. 2016). The aim of this study was to determine the role of cell membrane proteins as an adaptive response by E. faecalis to extreme alkaline conditions. We have compared the membrane proteome expression in E. faecalis grown in nutrient limited conditions at one-tenth the maximum growth rate (μrel; Zilm and Rogers 2007) to mimic the nutrient limited environment of a root canal; using continuous culture at the physiologically and clinically relevant switch in pH from 8 to 11; with membrane shaving, and postdigest ICPL labeling.

Materials and methods

Growth conditions

Enterococcus faecalis ATCC V583 strain was purchased from Cryosite (NSW, Australia) and maintained on Columbia blood agar (Oxoid, Victoria, Australia) at 37°C. Culture purity was periodically checked by culturing onto Bile Aesculin agar (Oxoid). Enterococcus faecalis was grown by continuous culture using a model C30 BioFlo chemostat (New Brunswick Scientific, Edison, NJ, USA) with a culture volume of 365 ml. The maximum growth rate (μmax) was determined by growing the organism under batch conditions in the chemostat at pH 8 or 11. For growth at pH 8, the medium flow rate was set at 25.19 ml h−1 (0.1 μrel) giving a dilution rate of 0.069 h−1 and an estimated generation time of 10 h, which is typical of natural ecosystems (Hamilton et al. 1979). Growth pH was maintained at 8.0 by the automatic addition of 2 M KOH or 2 M HCl using a Fermac 260 pH controller (ElectroLab Tewkesbury, UK). After equilibration (10 generations) cell culture samples were harvested daily over a 4-week period and pooled. The pH in the chemostat was then incrementally increased to 11 over 48 h, the maximum growth rate determined and the medium flow rate set at 0.1 μrel (3.3 ml h−1, D = 0.009 h−1) giving an estimated generation time of 77 h. After equilibration of 10 generations (770 h) cell culture samples were harvested daily over a 4-week period and pooled. Bacteria grown at each pH were harvested by centrifugation (6000 × g), at 4°C for 20 min. A volume of 1 ml of each sample was used for SEM analysis. Standard SEM sample processing was undertaken. After the samples had undergone critical point of drying, they were coated with carbon and gold and analyzed under a SEM (Philips XL 30, field emission SEM; Eindhoven, The Netherlands). Cells were washed twice with saline (0.9% w/v) at 4°C and cells were finally resuspended in 12 ml of ice cold saline. Cells were lysed by two passes (60,000 kPa) through a SLM Aminco French Press (Thermo Fisher, MA, USA). Endogenous proteinase activity was controlled by the addition of 100 μl of bacterial protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, St. Louis MO, USA). Nucleic acids were then degraded by the addition of Deoxyribonuclease I (2000 units), Ribonuclease A (1000 units), and MgCl2 (50 mM) and incubated on ice for 60 min. To separate unbroken cells, the suspension was centrifuged twice (8000 × g at 4°C for 5 min). Membrane shaving—the protocol described by Cathro et al. (2016) was utilized for pH 8 and 11 samples and MALDI spectroscopy was used to establish that the relative concentration of peptides in samples was similar.

Peptide ICPL labeling

Both pH 8 and 11 samples were lyophilized and the peptides resuspended in 30 μl TEAB (40 mM, pH 8.5). The samples were then vortexed for 30 s and then sonicated for 5 min. A volume of 2 μl of ICPL_0 label (Serva quadruplex kit) was added to the pH 8 sample and 2 μl of ICPL_6 label (Serva quadruplex kit) was added to the pH 11 sample and both were overlayed with Argon. The samples were vortexed for 30 s and then sonicated for 1 min before incubation for 60 min at room temperature. A further 1 μl of ICPL label was added to each sample (0 and 6, respectively) and incubated for a further 60 min at room temperature. A volume of 2 μl of STOP solution was added to each sample and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. Equal volumes of sample pH 8 and sample pH 11 (with ICPL-labels) were loaded into a Protein LoBind tube, mixed gently, and then desalted and concentrated using C18 spin column (Pierec, Rockford, IL, USA). Peptides were eluted using ACN: TFA: H20 (70: 0.5: 29.5, v/v) and freeze-dried. The lyophilized peptides were resuspended using ACN: TFA: H20 (2: 0.1: 97.9, v/v). The volumes of the resulting peptide extracts were reduced by vacuum centrifugation to approximately 2 μl then resuspended with 0.1% TFA in 2% ACN to a total volume of ∼10 μl. Liquid chromatography—electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry—the protocol described by Cathro et al. (2016) was utilized.

Protein analysis

Data from the MASCOT search was searched through MAXQUANT (version 1.3.0.5). The ICPL_6-labeled proteins from pH 11 conditions were designated as “H” (heavy)–labeled, whilst ICPL_0-labeled proteins from pH 8 conditions were designated “L” (light).The search allowed for protein quantification on a single H/L count (i.e. just one peptide ratio) and was restricted to ENTFA V583. The proteins were searched using UniProtKB (http://www.uniprot.org) to determine the predicted localization. The total number of membrane-associated proteins and intracellular proteins were determined. The NCBI protein database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) was used to obtain the FASTA format for each membrane-associated protein, which was then used to search with ExPASy ProtParam (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/) for the GRAVY scores (a measure of protein hydrophobicity). The presence of signal peptides and the location of their cleavage sites were performed using SignalP-5.0 (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?SignalP-5.0). The MAXQUANT H/L ratios of membrane-associated proteins were log2 transformed, and the proteins that deviated by more than 1 SD of the mean were considered to be up- or down-regulated.

Results and discussion

Continuous culture

Continuous culture in a chemostat can be used to study the properties of microorganisms at the slow growth rates that these organisms often achieve in their natural ecosystems (Hamilton et al. 1979). Maximum growth rate at pH 8 was consistent with a mean generation time (MGT) of 1.0 and 7.7 h at pH 11. This reduction is consistent with pH being one of the most important variables to the growth kinetics of Enterococcus species (Fisher and Phillips 2009). All chemostat cultures were grown at a growth rate of 0.1 of the maximum growth rate (μrel) to mimic a more nutrient-deprived environment (Zilm and Rogers 2007). The dilution rate of the chemostat was 0.069 h−1 (MGT = 10 h) for pH 8 and 0.009 h−1 (MGT = 77 h) for pH 11. Sampling of the chemostat occurred after 10 generations in which the bacteria would have reached steady state and adapted to the growth conditions. SEM analysis (Fig. 1) after 10 generations at pH 11 showed the appearance of an extracellular matrix compared to growth at pH 8. This observation also coincided with the chemostat chamber becaming coated with a biofilm at pH 11. Collectively these observations are consistent with the formation of floating biofilms (flocs) which are not attached to an interface, but which share the characteristics of biofilms (Zilm and Rogers 2007, Flemming and Wingender 2010). The change in phenotype is consistent with SEM observations made by Distel et al. (2002) of E. faecalis exposed to a calcium hydroxide medicaments for 77 days. The production of EPS and its importance in response to alkaline stress has recently been reported by Wu et al. (2019). The authors investigated the role of the WalK/WalR two-component system on the susceptibility of E. faecalis to calcium hydroxide in infected root canals. Enterococcus faecalis (V583) and the E. faecalis ASwalR mutant were incubated on root canal blocks for 3 weeks followed by medication with calcium hydroxide for 1 week. The E. faecalis parental strain exhibited the highest EPS/bacterial cell ratio, whereas the ASwalR strain exhibited the lowest with a decreased alkaline stress tolerance.
Figure 1.

SEM image of E. faecalis at steady state at pH 8 (A), and pH 11 (B). Cells at pH 8 and 11 were grown at a MGT = 0.1 μrel.

SEM image of E. faecalis at steady state at pH 8 (A), and pH 11 (B). Cells at pH 8 and 11 were grown at a MGT = 0.1 μrel.

Protein localization and ICPL labeling

A total of 136 proteins were identified from the membrane shaving preparations (Table S1, Supporting Information). From in silico analysis, there are 781 predicted membrane-embedded proteins of E. faecalis V583 (Zhou et al. 2008) and approximately 10% were resolved in the present study. This is consistent with the study of Maddalo et al. (2011) who also identified ∼ 10% of the membrane-embedded proteome. The majority of proteins identified had a positive GRAVY score (the sum of hydropathy values of all amino acids divided by the protein length), and is consistent with the hydrophobic nature of transmembrane protein portions and the efficacy of the membrane shaving protocol. (Fig. 2). It is also consistent with the findings of Ran et al. (2013) who demonstrated that cell surface hydrophobicity increased with increasing pH and time.
Figure 2.

Frequency of GRAVY indices of membrane associated proteins.

Frequency of GRAVY indices of membrane associated proteins. Approximately, 90% (123 proteins) were labeled with both ICPL_6 (H) and ICPL_0 (L) indicating a high efficency of labeling (Table S1, Supporting Information). In conventional ICPL protocols, lysine-containing peptides are labeled with a light or heavy form of the ICPL reagent (Leroy et al. 2010) and quantification is determined by comparing the relative abundance of differentially labeled peptides by mass spectrometry (Paradela et al. 2010). However, as only lysine-containing peptides can be quantified, labeling at the protein level has the disadvantage in that only 60%–70% of proteins may be accurately quantified (Fleron et al. 2010, Leroy et al. 2010). Leroy et al. (2010) described a modified “Post-digest ICPL” protocol to label samples after tryptic digestion, which allowed tagging of the N-terminal primary amine of all peptides in the sample, therefore, making it possible to quantify all identified proteins. To our knowledge, a postdigest ICPL approach has not been used to investigate protein expression in E. faecalis. Only peptides that had either a heavy or light label attached were included and only proteins with a heavy label (pH 11) that were also matched to proteins with a light label (pH 8) were investigated further. The ratio of the ion intensities represents the relative abundance of the protein in the original samples. The predicted localization of the 136 proteins identified were categorized using UniProtKB (www.Uniprot.org; Table 1).
Table 1.

Predicted localization and number of identified membrane proteins using membrane shaving and searched with UniProtKB (www.uniprot.org).

Predicted localizationUniProtKBNumber of identified proteins
Multipass membrane54
Integral component of membrane21
Cell surface/cell wall/cell membrane8
Cytoplasm20
No structure information/no localization32
Predicted localization and number of identified membrane proteins using membrane shaving and searched with UniProtKB (www.uniprot.org).

Down-regulated PTS system

Relative abundance of these proteins were calculated to compare expression between growth at pH 11 and pH 8. Comparing the abundance ratios between the two growth conditions, six proteins had a log2 H/L ratio (pH11/pH8) greater than 1 SD of the mean: phage tail protein EF2096 (3 SD); membrane protein EF1541 (1 SD); polysaccharide biosynthesis family protein EF0669 (2 SD); glycosyl hydrolase, family 20 EF0114 (4 SD); uncharacterized protein EF2938 (1 SD); and glycerol uptake facilitator protein EF1927 (1 SD), whilst five proteins had a log2 ratio 1 SD less of the mean: PTS system IIC component EF1838 (1D); PTS system IID component EF0456 (2 SD); predicted nucleoside ABC transporter EF0177 (1 SD); C4-dicarboxylate transporter EF0108 (1 SD); and PTS system mannose-specific IID component EF0022 (1 SD; Table 2). The predicted nucleoside ABC transporter EF0177 contained a lipoprotein signal peptide (probability: 0.9984) with a cleavage site between positions 22 and 23 (LAA-CG).
Table 2.

Location, physiological classification, and GRAVY scores of proteins with a log2 H/L ratio (pH11/pH8) greater or lesser than 1 SD of the mean.

Protein namePhysiological classificationUniProt.orgGRAVY score
EF2096 phage tail proteinVirulenceIntegral component of membrane−0.06
EF1541 membrane proteinUnknownRiboflavin transporter multipass membrane protein0.886
EF0669 polysaccharide biosynthesis family proteinCellular membrane/wall and cell divisionMultipass membrane protein0.596
EF0114 glycosyl hydrolase, family 20Cellular membrane/wall and cell divisionIntegral component of membrane−0.44
EF2938 uncharacterized proteinUnknownIntegral component of membrane1.297
EF1927 glycerol uptake facilitator proteinTransport and bindingMultipass membrane protein0.855
EF1838 PTS system IIC componentTransport and bindingMultipass membrane protein0.8
EF0456 PTS system IID componentTransport and bindingMultipass membrane protein0.497
EF0177 predicted nucleoside ABC transporterTransport and bindingPlasma membrane−0.373
EF0108 C4-dicarboxylate transporterTransport and bindingMultipass membrane protein0.812
EF0022 PTS system mannose-specific IID componentTransport and bindingMultipass membrane protein0.335
Location, physiological classification, and GRAVY scores of proteins with a log2 H/L ratio (pH11/pH8) greater or lesser than 1 SD of the mean. The most striking observations in this study are that: (1) two proteins associated with nutrient acquisition, glycosyl hydrolase and glycerol uptake facilitator were up-regulated at pH 11, whilst (2) the proteins associated with the PTS system and associated glucose metabolism were down-regulated. Dale et al. (2015) found that glycosyltranferase genes play a role in E. faecalis maintenance of cell envelope integrity, and polysaccharide composition and is consistent with our first observation. However, it seems to be in contrast to the findings of Ran et al. (2015) that in response to alkaline stress, the GlpF operon encoding glycerol uptake facilitator protein, glxK encoding glycerate kinase and dhaKL encoding dihydroxyacetone kinase were significantly down-regulated, suggesting that glycerol metabolism was reduced. This difference maybe explained by the time alkaline stress was imposed on the bacteria. Ran et al. (2015) grew E. faecalis in alkaline stress (pH 10) for 24 h, whereas our study in grew bacteria over a 4-week period and samples were pooled after 10 generations. This difference may also reflect the different phenotypic changes observed, Ran et al. (2015) reported poor biofilms on glass surfaces composed of isolated microcolonies with sparse cells. This is in contrast to the evidence of an extracellular matrix and the formation of organized communities in our study which is consistent with the formation of a mature biofilm Our second observation of a down-regulated PTS system was initially unexpected. The carbohydrate specificity of the PTS system resides in enzyme IIs (EIIs), which consist of an integral membrane domain (Deutscher et al. 2006). In this study, the PTS mannose-specific IID protein (EF0022), PTS system IIC component (EF1838), and PTS system IID component (EF0456) were all down-regulated at pH 11 by more than 1 SD of the mean, clearly indicating a shift away from PTS uptake. The imposed growth rate was equally set for both pH 8 and 11 conditions, and therefore, nutrient availability would be similar. A similar finding of the EII enzyme family in PTS being inhibited or down-regulated in E. facealis has been reported by Ran et al. (2015) in response to an alkaline challenge and by Li et al. (2019) to a fluoride challenge. Glycerol forms one of the repeating units of the extracellular polysaccharide of E. faecalis (Hancock and Gilmore 2002) with additional potential sources of glycerol coming from the recycling of lysed cells within the biofilm matrix (Flemming and Wingender 2010). Glycerol can be an important energy source for pathogenic bacteria and enters cells by energy-independent facilitated diffusion. It has recently been reported that compared to glucose, glycerol did not increase either the planktonic growth rate of biofilm development, but significantly increased the metatobolic activity of biofilms, especially at a pH of 11 compared with a pH of 8 (Salem et al. 2022). With the up-regulation of the glycosyl hydrolase protein (EF0114) at pH 11, it is likely that sugar residues would be released from the extracellular polysaccharide and made available for cellular metabolism. Whilst the down regulation in PTS could be a result of a general stress response similar to that seen for bacteriocin resistance (Opsata et al. 2010), it may reflect an adaption to a specific ecological niche resulting in the choice of an alternative carbohydrate (Bruckner and Titgemeyer 2002).

Conclusions

Comparisons of the membrane protein profiles between E. faecalis grown at a host/clinically relevant growth rate at pH 11 compared to pH 8 resulted in a limited number of regulated proteins. Collectively, the membrane proteins seem to be involved in the formation of a protective capsule/EPS that protects the cell from the destructive OH− ions. The production of the EPS is facilitated by: an increase in polysaccharide biosynthesis; a shift to glycerol metabolism as the favored carbohydrate source with an associated down-regulation of the PTS system: nutrient acquisition via the actions of glycosyl hydrolase and glycerol uptake facilitator. The roles of membrane proteins in this coordinated response to increased pH may help explain the adaptation of cells to an extreme alkaline pH and therefore survival of the medicaments used in endodontic therapy. Click here for additional data file.
  28 in total

Review 1.  The biofilm matrix.

Authors:  Hans-Curt Flemming; Jost Wingender
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Novel post-digest isotope coded protein labeling method for phospho- and glycoproteome analysis.

Authors:  M Fleron; Y Greffe; D Musmeci; A C Massart; V Hennequiere; G Mazzucchelli; D Waltregny; M C De Pauw-Gillet; V Castronovo; E De Pauw; A Turtoi
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 3.  The ecology, epidemiology and virulence of Enterococcus.

Authors:  Katie Fisher; Carol Phillips
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 2.777

4.  Evaluation of isotope-coded protein labeling (ICPL) in the quantitative analysis of complex proteomes.

Authors:  Alberto Paradela; Miguel Marcilla; Rosana Navajas; Laura Ferreira; Antonio Ramos-Fernandez; Marisol Fernández; Javier Fernando Mariscotti; Francisco García-del Portillo; Juan Pablo Albar
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 6.057

5.  A reference map of the membrane proteome of Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Gianluca Maddalo; Peter Chovanec; Filippa Stenberg-Bruzell; Hailyn V Nielsen; Michael I Jensen-Seaman; Leopold L Ilag; Kimberly A Kline; Daniel O Daley
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  The capsular polysaccharide of Enterococcus faecalis and its relationship to other polysaccharides in the cell wall.

Authors:  Lynn E Hancock; Michael S Gilmore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Alkaline Tolerance and Biofilm Formation of Root Canal Isolates of Enterococcus faecalis: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Amira Samir Salem; Geoffrey R Tompkins; Peter R Cathro
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  Biofilm formation in medicated root canals.

Authors:  John W Distel; John F Hatton; M Jane Gillespie
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  The effect of sodium hypochlorite on Enterococcus faecalis when grown on dentine as a single- and multi-species biofilm.

Authors:  Benlee Yap; Peter S Zilm; Nancy Briggs; Anthony H Rogers; Peter C Cathro
Journal:  Aust Endod J       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 1.659

10.  LocateP: genome-scale subcellular-location predictor for bacterial proteins.

Authors:  Miaomiao Zhou; Jos Boekhorst; Christof Francke; Roland J Siezen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.