BACKGROUND: We aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) as diagnostic biomarkers for postoperative infection/sepsis following major abdominal surgery. Postoperative infection is an important cause for morbidity and mortality in major surgery. Early diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment improves outcomes, and high-performing biomarkers could guide clinical decision making. METHODS: A systematic database search was conducted for studies reporting diagnostic performance of biomarkers (including PCT and IL-6) for infection/sepsis following major abdominal surgery. Studies were assessed for reporting of diagnostic accuracy, relevance and quality. Data were extracted for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Ten studies with 1,611 participants reported the diagnostic accuracy of PCT, with pooled sensitivity, specificity and summary receiver operator curve of 72% (95% CI 66-78), 62% (95% CI 59-64) and 0.766, respectively. Four studies with 175 participants reported the diagnostic accuracy of IL-6, with pooled sensitivity, specificity and summary receiver operator curve of 84% (95% CI 72-92), 76% (95% CI 68-84) and 0.878, respectively There was variability in the timing of sampling and cut-off values and significant heterogeneity and inconsistency between studies (I2 diagnostic odds ratio (DOR)= 43.2% for PCT, I2 DOR=0% for IL-6). CONCLUSIONS: PCT performs only moderately well as a diagnostic test for postoperative infection/sepsis in major abdominal surgery, demonstrating limited sensitivity and specificity. Heterogeneity between studies is a limitation of the meta-analysis. There is an ongoing need for a rapid, accurate biomarker for postoperative infection or sepsis.
BACKGROUND: We aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) as diagnostic biomarkers for postoperative infection/sepsis following major abdominal surgery. Postoperative infection is an important cause for morbidity and mortality in major surgery. Early diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment improves outcomes, and high-performing biomarkers could guide clinical decision making. METHODS: A systematic database search was conducted for studies reporting diagnostic performance of biomarkers (including PCT and IL-6) for infection/sepsis following major abdominal surgery. Studies were assessed for reporting of diagnostic accuracy, relevance and quality. Data were extracted for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Ten studies with 1,611 participants reported the diagnostic accuracy of PCT, with pooled sensitivity, specificity and summary receiver operator curve of 72% (95% CI 66-78), 62% (95% CI 59-64) and 0.766, respectively. Four studies with 175 participants reported the diagnostic accuracy of IL-6, with pooled sensitivity, specificity and summary receiver operator curve of 84% (95% CI 72-92), 76% (95% CI 68-84) and 0.878, respectively There was variability in the timing of sampling and cut-off values and significant heterogeneity and inconsistency between studies (I2 diagnostic odds ratio (DOR)= 43.2% for PCT, I2 DOR=0% for IL-6). CONCLUSIONS: PCT performs only moderately well as a diagnostic test for postoperative infection/sepsis in major abdominal surgery, demonstrating limited sensitivity and specificity. Heterogeneity between studies is a limitation of the meta-analysis. There is an ongoing need for a rapid, accurate biomarker for postoperative infection or sepsis.
Entities:
Keywords:
Biomarker(s); Infection; Interleukin-6; Procalcitonin; Sepsis; Surgery
Authors: Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: D Mokart; M Merlin; A Sannini; J P Brun; J R Delpero; G Houvenaeghel; V Moutardier; J L Blache Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2005-04-22 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Olivier Facy; Brice Paquette; David Orry; Christine Binquet; David Masson; Aurélie Bouvier; Isabelle Fournel; Pierre E Charles; Patrick Rat; Pablo Ortega-Deballon Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Ricard Ferrer; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Gary Phillips; Tiffany M Osborn; Sean Townsend; R Phillip Dellinger; Antonio Artigas; Christa Schorr; Mitchell M Levy Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Penny Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jos Kleijnen Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2003-11-10 Impact factor: 4.615