Jordan Wlodarczyk1, Debora Kim1, Catherine Finney2, Abhinav Gupta1, Rebecca Cannom3, Marjun Duldulao4. 1. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, Suite 415, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. 2. Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente West Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, Suite 415, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. Marjun.Duldulao@med.usc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Endoscopic tattooing in rectal cancer is infrequently utilized for fear of tattoo ink obscuring anatomical planes, increasing the difficulty of surgical excision. Colon cancer tattooing has demonstrated increased lymph node yields and increased accuracy in establishing adequate margins. Rectal cancer tattooing may be especially helpful after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, where complete clinical responses could limit lesion identification and lymph node yields are typically less robust. We seek to review and identify the effects of tattooing in rectal cancer. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS. Studies on endoscopic tattooing with cohorts consisting of at least ≥ 25% of rectal cancer patients were selected. Studies focusing solely on rectal cancer were also reviewed separately. RESULTS: Of 416 studies identified, 10 studies encompassing 2460 patients were evaluated. Seven studies evaluated lymph node yields; five reported beneficial effects of endoscopic tattooing, while two reported no significant difference. Among four studies reporting lesion localization, successful localization rates were between 63 and 100%. Rates of intraoperative endoscopy performed to reevaluate lesion location ranged from 5.7 to 20%. The distal margin was evaluated in two studies, which reported more accurate placement of the distal resection margin after tattooing. When complications of tattooing were documented (7 studies with 889 patients), only five direct complications of endoscopic tattooing were observed (0.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the data is heterogenous, it suggests that endoscopic tattooing in rectal cancer may improve lymph node yields and assist in determining accurate distal margins without high rates of complication. Further research must be completed before practice management guidelines can change. TRIAL REGISTRATION: No. CRD42021271784.
PURPOSE: Endoscopic tattooing in rectal cancer is infrequently utilized for fear of tattoo ink obscuring anatomical planes, increasing the difficulty of surgical excision. Colon cancer tattooing has demonstrated increased lymph node yields and increased accuracy in establishing adequate margins. Rectal cancer tattooing may be especially helpful after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, where complete clinical responses could limit lesion identification and lymph node yields are typically less robust. We seek to review and identify the effects of tattooing in rectal cancer. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS. Studies on endoscopic tattooing with cohorts consisting of at least ≥ 25% of rectal cancer patients were selected. Studies focusing solely on rectal cancer were also reviewed separately. RESULTS: Of 416 studies identified, 10 studies encompassing 2460 patients were evaluated. Seven studies evaluated lymph node yields; five reported beneficial effects of endoscopic tattooing, while two reported no significant difference. Among four studies reporting lesion localization, successful localization rates were between 63 and 100%. Rates of intraoperative endoscopy performed to reevaluate lesion location ranged from 5.7 to 20%. The distal margin was evaluated in two studies, which reported more accurate placement of the distal resection margin after tattooing. When complications of tattooing were documented (7 studies with 889 patients), only five direct complications of endoscopic tattooing were observed (0.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the data is heterogenous, it suggests that endoscopic tattooing in rectal cancer may improve lymph node yields and assist in determining accurate distal margins without high rates of complication. Further research must be completed before practice management guidelines can change. TRIAL REGISTRATION: No. CRD42021271784.
Authors: K I Fu; T Fujii; S Kato; Y Sano; I Koba; K Mera; H Saito; T Yoshino; M Sugito; S Yoshida Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Daniel L Feingold; Tommaso Addona; Kenneth A Forde; Tracey D Arnell; Joseph J Carter; Emina H Huang; Richard L Whelan Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Sanne A L Bartels; Edwin S van der Zaag; Evelien Dekker; Christianne J Buskens; Willem A Bemelman Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 9.427