Literature DB >> 36043307

Epidemiology of stillbirths based on different gestational thresholds at a tertiary hospital.

Kok Hian Tan1, Fei Dai2, Mor Jack Ng2, Pih Lin Tan3, Seow Heong Yeo1, Bernard Chern2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The stillbirth rate (SBR) is an important public health indicator. We studied the distribution of maternal and fetal characteristics and time trends of the SBR at KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH), Singapore, from 2004 to 2016 based on various definitions of stillbirth.
METHODS: Data was obtained from the Data Warehouse and Stillbirth Reporting System of KKH from 2004 to 2016. SBRs were calculated based on three definitions (fetal deaths at ≥ 20 weeks, 24 weeks or 28 weeks of gestation per 1,000 total births) and were described with maternal and fetal characteristics, and by year.
RESULTS: From 2004 to 2016, the SBR declined by 44.7%, 25.5% and 18.9% based on Definitions I, II and III, respectively. The SBR at KKH in 2016 was 5.2 (Definition I), 4.1 (Definition II) and 3.0 (Definition III) per 1,000 total births. The SBR was significantly higher in women aged ≥ 35 years, nulliparas and female fetuses. The number of live births at 24-27+6 weeks of gestation was more than four times higher than that of stillbirths (822 vs. 176). There were 104 (12.7%) neonatal deaths during this gestation period, giving a high survival rate of 87.3%.
CONCLUSION: The SBR in KKH is relatively lower than that in other developed countries. There is a need to consider revising our hospital and national definitions of the stillbirth lower boundary from 28 weeks to 24 weeks of gestation. This would allow us to make better comparisons with other developed countries, in line with improvements in healthcare. Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  definition; epidemiology; gestation; stillbirth

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 36043307      PMCID: PMC9329547          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2020173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   3.331


  32 in total

Review 1.  Stillbirth: a review.

Authors:  R L Goldenberg; R Kirby; J F Culhane
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2004-08

2.  Risk factors for antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth: a population-based study.

Authors:  Darios Getahun; Cande V Ananth; Wendy L Kinzler
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Perinatal mortality and its relationship to the reporting of low-birthweight infants.

Authors:  S T Phelan; R Goldenberg; G Alexander; S P Cliver
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count?

Authors:  Joy E Lawn; Hannah Blencowe; Robert Pattinson; Simon Cousens; Rajesh Kumar; Ibinabo Ibiebele; Jason Gardosi; Louise T Day; Cynthia Stanton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Neonatal outcome of extremely preterm Asian infants ⩽28 weeks over a decade in the new millennium.

Authors:  P Agarwal; B Sriram; V S Rajadurai
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Confidential enquiry of stillbirths in current obstetric practice.

Authors:  W L Tham; K H Tan; C S Tee; G S Yeo
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  Determinants of the optimal time in gestation to initiate antenatal fetal testing: a decision-analytic approach.

Authors:  D J Rouse; J Owen; R L Goldenberg; S P Cliver
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Reducing intrapartum stillbirths and intrapartum-related neonatal deaths.

Authors:  Robert L Goldenberg; Elizabeth M McClure
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.561

9.  Advanced Maternal Age and Stillbirth Risk in Nulliparous and Parous Women.

Authors:  Ulla Waldenström; Sven Cnattingius; Mikael Norman; Erica Schytt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Global, regional, national, and selected subnational levels of stillbirths, neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.