| Literature DB >> 36043147 |
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effects of cyclophosphamide combined with vinorelbine in advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and anteroposterior changes in MRI.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36043147 PMCID: PMC9377958 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3104879
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Comparison of baseline data between the two groups.
| Items | Study group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.073 | 0.788 | ||
| Male | 37 (82.22%) | 36 (80.00%) | ||
| Female | 8 (17.78%) | 9 (20.00%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Age ( | 60.69 ± 10.50 | 63.47 ± 10.05 | 1.283 | 0.203 |
|
| ||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.61 ± 0.57 | 20.61 ± 0.61 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
|
| ||||
| Clinical stages | 0.049 | 0.824 | ||
| Limited stage | 29 (64.44%) | 30 (66.67%) | ||
| Extensive stage | 16 (35.56%) | 15 (33.33%) | ||
|
| ||||
| ECOG scores | 0.104 | 0.748 | ||
| 0–1 point | 40 (88.89%) | 39 (86.67%) | ||
| 2 points | 5 (11.11%) | 6 (13.33%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Educational level | 0.048 | 0.827 | ||
| Senior high school and above | 28 (62.22%) | 29 (64.44%) | ||
| Junior high school and below | 17 (37.78%) | 16 (35.56%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Occupation | ||||
| Civil servant | 11 (24.44%) | 10 (22.22%) | 0.062 | 0.803 |
| Teacher | 10 (22.22%) | 12 (26.67%) | 0.241 | 0.624 |
| Financial staff | 11 (24.44%) | 13 (28.89%) | 0.227 | 0.634 |
| Individual | 7 (15.56%) | 5 (11.11%) | 0.385 | 0.535 |
| Others | 6 (13.33%) | 5 (11.11%) | 0.104 | 0.748 |
|
| ||||
| Religious belief | 0.048 | 0.827 | ||
| Yes | 17 (37.79%) | 16 (35.56%) | ||
| No | 28 (62.22%) | 29 (64.44%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Cases of family income | 0.124 | 0.725 | ||
| ≥3000 yuan/(months·person) | 40 (88.89%) | 41 (91.11%) | ||
| <3000 yuan/(months·person) | 5 (11.11%) | 4 (8.89%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Smoking | 0.051 | 0.822 | ||
| Yes | 30 (66.67%) | 31 (68.89%) | ||
| No | 15 (33.33%) | 14 (31.11%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Drinking | 0.073 | 0.788 | ||
| Yes | 36 (80.00%) | 37 (82.22%) | ||
| No | 9 (20.00%) | 8 (17.78%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Place of residence | 0.053 | 0.818 | ||
| City | 31 (68.89%) | 32 (71.11%) | ||
| Town | 14 (31.11%) | 13 (28.89%) | ||
Comparison of indexes in image data between the two groups .
| Groups | n | Ktrans | Ve | Kep | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| Study group | 45 | 976.54 ± 156.44 | 514.16 ± 79.19 | 765.94 ± 97.90 | 583.22 ± 62.84 | 2048.32 ± 439.66 | 906.65 ± 107.84 |
| Control group | 45 | 973.27 ± 147.13 | 744.17 ± 25.08 | 741.95 ± 50.77 | 629.61 ± 17.35 | 2145.10 ± 413.48 | 1394.14 ± 56.13 |
| t | 0.102 | 18.575 | 1.459 | 4.774 | 1.076 | 26.899 | |
|
| 0.919 | <0.001 | 0.148 | <0.001 | 0.285 | <0.001 | |
Comparison of DCR between the two groups after treatment [n (%)].
| Groups |
| CR | PR | SD | PD | DCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study group | 45 | 0 (0.00%) | 27 (60.00%) | 10 (22.22%) | 8 (17.78%) | 37 (82.22%) |
| Control group | 45 | 0 (0.00%) | 11 (24.44%) | 9 (20.00%) | 25 (55.56%) | 20 (44.44%) |
|
| 13.828 | |||||
|
| <0.001 |
Figure 1Comparison of QLQ-C30 scores between the two groups after treatment . Notes. The abscissa indicates the study group and control group, and the ordinate indicates the QLQ-C30 score (points). The QLQ-C30 scores of the study group and control group after treatment were (31.51 ± 3.38) points and (64.76 ± 2.00) points, respectively. represents a significant difference in QLQ-C30 scores between the two groups after treatment (t = 56.793, P < 0.001).
Comparison of serum indices between the two groups after treatment .
| Groups |
| NSE (ng/ml) | CA125(U/ml) | CEA (ng/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study group | 45 | 13.66 ± 0.88 | 46.41 ± 0.99 | 3.43 ± 0.30 |
| Control group | 45 | 16.97 ± 0.92 | 52.43 ± 0.85 | 5.93 ± 0.60 |
|
| 17.441 | 30.949 | 25.000 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |