| Literature DB >> 36043138 |
Susumu Mori1, Kengo Onda2, Shohei Fujita3, Toshiaki Suzuki4, Mikimasa Ikeda4, Khin Zay Yar Myint5, Jun Hikage4, Osamu Abe3, Hidekazu Tomimoto6, Kenichi Oishi1, Junichi Taguchi7.
Abstract
Although health screening plays a key role in the management of chronic diseases associated with lifestyle choices, brain health is not generally monitored, remaining a black box prior to the manifestation of clinical symptoms. Japan is unique in this regard, as brain MRI scans have been widely performed for more than two decades as part of Brain Dock, a comprehensive health screening programme. A vast number of stored images (well over a million) of longitudinal scans and extensive health data are available, offering a valuable resource for investigating the prevalence of various types of brain-related health conditions occurring throughout adulthood. In this paper, we report on the findings of our preliminary quantitative analysis of T1-weighted MRIs of the brain obtained from 13 980 subjects from three participating sites during the period 2015-19. We applied automated segmentation analysis and observed age-dependent volume loss of various brain structures. We subsequently investigated the effects of scan protocols and the feasibility of calibration for pooling the data. Last, the degree of brain atrophy was correlated with four known risk factors of dementia; blood glucose level, hypertension, obesity, and alcohol consumption. In this initial analysis, we identified brain ventricular volume as an effective marker of age-dependent brain atrophy, being highly sensitive to ageing and evidencing strong robustness against protocol variability. We established the normal range of ventricular volumes at each age, which is an essential first step for establishing criteria used to interpret data obtained for individual participants. We identified a subgroup of individuals at midlife with ventricles that substantially exceeded the average size. The correlation studies revealed that all four risk factors were associated with greater ventricular volumes at midlife, some of which reached highly significant sizes. This study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting a large-scale quantitative analysis of existing Brain Dock data in Japan. It will importantly guide future efforts to investigate the prevalence of large ventricles at midlife and the potential reduction of this prevalence, and hence of dementia risk, through lifestyle changes.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; atrophy; brain; dementia; modifiable
Year: 2022 PMID: 36043138 PMCID: PMC9416065 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac211
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Commun ISSN: 2632-1297
Sample size and demographic information on the participants for each protocol
| Sample size | Women/men | Ages (average ± std) | Scanner type | Matrix size/voxel size (mm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site 1: Protocol 1 | 2781 | 976 (1197)/1245 (1584)[ | 53.7 ± 11.2 (F), 53.2 ± 10.8 (M) | Skyra/3T | 320 × 320 × 120–128/0.78 × 0.78 × 1.2 |
| Protocol 2 | 1497 | 473 (598)/742 (899) | 54.5 ± 10.9 (F), 54.2 ± 10.2 (M) | Skyra/3T | 320 × 320 × 72–80/0.78 × 0.78 × 2.0 |
| Site 2: Protocol 1 | 2847 | 882 (1041)/1495 (1806) | 54.2 ± 11.5 (F), 54.0 ± 10.6 (M) | Biograph mMR/3T | 640 × 640 × 120/0.39 × 0.39 × 1.2 |
| Protocol 2 | 3543 | 1007 (1268)/1036 (2275) | 54.8 ± 11.0 (F), 54.4 ± 10.5 (M) | Biograph mMR/3T | 640 × 640 × 72/0.39 × 0.39 × 2.0 |
| Site 3: Protocol 1 | 11 739 | 3324 (4.609)/4669 (7130) | 50.7 ± 11.5 (F), 50.0 ± 10.4 (M) | Spectra/3T | 320 × 320 × 64/0.69 × 0.69 × 2.5 |
Numbers in parentheses denote the number of scans, which exceeded the number of subjects because multiple scans were performed.
Brain structures evidencing strong correlations with age among the subjects
| Correlation ( | Change (30–60 years) | Size at 30 years | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Telencephalon | 0.297 (0.293/0.300)[ | −1.76% (−1.72/−1.80) | 39.6% (39.7/39.4) |
| Cortex | 0.320 (0.323/0.317) | −4.35% (−4.34/−4.35) | 20.9% (20.8/21.1) |
| Frontal lobe | 0.298 (0.292/0.304) | −7.80% (−7.60/−8.00) | 6.98% (6.89/7.06) |
| Parietal lobe | 0.090 (0.107/0.073) | −4.74% (−4.94/−4.54) | 3.72% (3.67/3.77) |
| Temporal lobe | 0.115 (0.117/0.114) | −2.10% (−1.89/−2.30) | 5.30% (5.28/5.32) |
| Occipital lobe | 0.005 (0.006/0.003) | −1.99% (−2.33/−1.64) | 2.68% (2.75/2.60) |
| Limbic Cortex | 0.002 (0.002/0.002) | −0.10% (−1.13/0.88) | 1.74% (1.65/1.82) |
| Ventricles | 0.321 (0.318/0.324) | +59.8% (63.0/56.7) | 0.63% (0.66/0.61) |
| Anterior ventricles | 0.308 (0.307/0.309) | +68.6% (70.9/66.3) | 0.44% (0.46/0.41) |
| Posterior ventricles | 0.298 (0.293/0.302) | +54.7% (56.8/52.6) | 0.13% (0.14/0.12) |
| Inferior ventricles | 0.203 (0.220/0.185) | +14.6% (18.8/10.3) | 0.07% (0.06/0.08) |
| Sylvian fissure | 0.371 (0.368/0.374) | +20.3% (19.5/21.2) | 0.35% (0.37/0.33) |
| Periventicular WM-LI area[ | 0.410 (0.419/0.401) | +48.5% (62.2/34.8) | 0.03% (0.02/0.04) |
WM-LI denotes white matter low-intensity area.
The numbers in the parentheses are from left and right hemispheres.
Figure 1Histograms of ventricular volumes for each decade using a linear scale. The x-axis shows the normalized ventricular volume (% relative to all structures combined) and the y-axis shows the frequency.
Figure 2Distributions of ventricular volumes within a logarithmic scale and fitting to the normal-distribution model. (A)–(D) The actual histograms and results of fitting to normal distributions for the thirties, forties, fifties, and sixties age groups, respectively. Data from male subjects are shown for demonstration purposes. (E) The fitted normal-distribution curves over four decades.
Figure 3Scatter plots for age–volume relationships before and after calibration with three different scan resolutions. (A and B) Ventricular volumes from raw data in a logarithmic scale as a function of age for male (A) and female (B). (C and D) Ventricular volumes obtained after calibration using data with 1.2 mm slice thickness as a reference. The fitted curves are 3rd-order polynomial lines with 95% confidence intervals. After the calibration, the difference among the three protocols was non-significant (P = 0.923), based on the F-values of three-way ANOVA.
Figure 4Estimation of . Estimation of z-scores (or equivalent percentiles) of ventricular size based on the normal-distribution model (solid lines) and gradient boosting regression (dotted lines) for the pooled data.
Results of linear regression analyses of ventricular volumes and four risk factors
|
|
|
| Slope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood glucose level | 40 | Female | 2719 | 0 | 0.973 (0.852) | −9.00E−05 |
| Male | 4614 | 0.001 | 0.130 ( | 3.00E−04 | ||
| 50 | Female | 2518 | 0 | 0.987 (0.0681) | 3.00E−04 | |
| Male | 4282 | 0.005 |
| 1.00E−03 | ||
| 60 | Female | 1518 | 0.001 |
| 7.00E−04 | |
| Male | 2128 | 0.005 |
| 9.00E−04 | ||
| Abdominal fat | 40 | Female | 1896 | 0 | 0.874 (0.817) | 5.80E−03 |
| Male | 3743 | 0.002 |
| 2.19E−02 | ||
| 50 | Female | 2010 | 0 | 0.927 (0.171) | 8.40E−02 | |
| Male | 3543 | 0.001 |
| 1.93E−02 | ||
| 60 | Female | 1313 | 0 | 0.694 (0.654) | 7.70E−03 | |
| Male | 1935 | 0 | 0.573 (0.528) | 3.90E−03 | ||
| Blood pressure | 40 | Female | 2722 | 0.001 | 0.228 ( | 7.00E−04 |
| Male | 4615 | 0.007 |
| 1.70E−03 | ||
| 50 | Female | 2521 | 0.016 |
| 2.50E−03 | |
| Male | 4279 | 0.011 |
| 2.20E−03 | ||
| 60 | Female | 1523 | 0.001 | 0.0645 (0.0648) | 8.00E−04 | |
| Male | 2125 | 0.003 |
| 1.30E−03 | ||
| Frequency of alcohol consumption | 40 | Female | 2659 | 0.006 |
| 8.20E−03 |
| Male | 4570 | 0.04 |
| 6.20E−03 | ||
| 50 | Female | 2438 | 0.004 |
| 6.70E−03 | |
| Male | 4224 | 0.013 |
| 1.24E−02 | ||
| 60 | Female | 1465 | 0.001 | 0.215 (0.330) | 4.00E−03 | |
| Male | 2105 | 0.003 |
| 6.30E−03 |
Values inside the parentheses are based on brain size normalization using residuals method. For visual clues, values below 0.05 are underlined and below 0.0125 (Bonferroni corrections with four independent measurements) are shown by bold fonts.
Figure 5Relationship between four potential risk factors and ventricular volumes. For each analysis, the populations were binned according to the extent of risk factors, and their averaged ventricular volumes were presented. The error bars are standard errors and the numbers inside the bars are sample sizes.
Figure 6Representative scatter plots with linear regression results. Results are from male subjects in their 50s. (A) Blood glucose levels. (B) Abdominal fat areas. (C) Blood pressure levels. (D) Drinking frequencies. The lines were based on robust linear regressions and the ranges (shaded areas) indicate 99% confidence intervals. The multivariate linear regression was used for the fitting with P-values of 2.87E−4 (A), 0.0234 (B), 7.88E−5 (C), and 4.66E−12 (D).