Literature DB >> 36043032

Framework for lumen-based nonrigid tomographic coregistration of intravascular images.

Abhishek Karmakar1, Max L Olender2, David Marlevi2, Evan Shlofmitz3, Richard A Shlofmitz3, Elazer R Edelman2, Farhad R Nezami4.   

Abstract

Purpose: Modern medical imaging enables clinicians to effectively diagnose, monitor, and treat diseases. However, clinical decision-making often relies on combined evaluation of either longitudinal or disparate image sets, necessitating coregistration of multiple acquisitions. Promising coregistration techniques have been proposed; however, available methods predominantly rely on time-consuming manual alignments or nontrivial feature extraction with limited clinical applicability. Addressing these issues, we present a fully automated, robust, nonrigid registration method, allowing for coregistering of multimodal tomographic vascular image datasets using luminal annotation as the sole alignment feature. Approach: Registration is carried out by the use of the registration metrics defined exclusively for lumens shapes. The framework is primarily broken down into two sequential parts: longitudinal and rotational registration. Both techniques are inherently nonrigid in nature to compensate for motion and acquisition artifacts in tomographic images.
Results: Performance was evaluated across multimodal intravascular datasets, as well as in longitudinal cases assessing pre-/postinterventional coronary images. Low registration error in both datasets highlights method utility, with longitudinal registration errors-evaluated throughout the paired tomographic sequences-of 0.29 ± 0.14    mm ( < 2 longitudinal image frames) and 0.18 ± 0.16    mm ( < 1 frame) for multimodal and interventional datasets, respectively. Angular registration for the interventional dataset rendered errors of 7.7 ° ± 6.7 ° , and 29.1 ° ± 23.2 ° for the multimodal set. Conclusions: Satisfactory results across datasets, along with additional attributes such as the ability to avoid longitudinal over-fitting and correct nonlinear catheter rotation during nonrigid rotational registration, highlight the potential wide-ranging applicability of our presented coregistration method.
© 2022 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular imaging; coregistration; intravascular imaging; multimodal imaging; nonrigid registration

Year:  2022        PMID: 36043032      PMCID: PMC9402451          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.9.4.044006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  25 in total

1.  A Mechanical Approach for Smooth Surface Fitting to Delineate Vessel Walls in Optical Coherence Tomography Images.

Authors:  Max L Olender; Lambros S Athanasiou; Jose M de la Torre Hernandez; Eyal Ben-Assa; Farhad Rikhtegar Nezami; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Co-registration of optical coherence tomography and X-ray angiography in percutaneous coronary intervention. the Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Revascularization (DOCTOR) fusion study.

Authors:  Lasse Hebsgaard; Troels Munck Nielsen; Shengxian Tu; Lars Romer Krusell; Michael Maeng; Karsten Tange Veien; Bent Raungaard; Christian Juhl Terkelsen; Anne Kaltoft; Johan H C Reiber; Jens Flensted Lassen; Evald Høj Christiansen; Niels Ramsing Holm
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  A new method for real-time co-registration of 3D coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Stéphane Carlier; Rich Didday; Tristan Slots; Peter Kayaert; Jeroen Sonck; Mike El-Mourad; Nicolas Preumont; Dany Schoors; Guy Van Camp
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2014-03-19

Review 4.  Concise Review of Optical Coherence Tomography in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Min-I Su; Chun-Yen Chen; Hung-I Yeh; Kuang-Te Wang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.672

5.  Automatic deformable PET/MRI registration for preclinical studies based on B-splines and non-linear intensity transformation.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bricq; Hiliwi Leake Kidane; Jorge Zavala-Bojorquez; Alexandra Oudot; Jean-Marc Vrigneaud; François Brunotte; Paul Michael Walker; Alexandre Cochet; Alain Lalande
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Precision percutaneous coronary intervention: Is optical coherence tomography co-registration the future?

Authors:  Evan Shlofmitz; Allen Jeremias
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Framework to co-register longitudinal virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound data in the circumferential direction.

Authors:  Lucas H Timmins; Jonathan D Suever; Parham Eshtehardi; Michael C McDaniel; John N Oshinski; Habib Samady; Don P Giddens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Mitsuaki Matsumura; Gary S Mintz; Tetsumin Lee; Wenbin Zhang; Yang Cao; Akiko Fujino; Yongqing Lin; Eisuke Usui; Yoshihisa Kanaji; Tadashi Murai; Taishi Yonetsu; Tsunekazu Kakuta; Akiko Maehara
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-08

9.  Simultaneous Registration of Location and Orientation in Intravascular Ultrasound Pullbacks Pairs Via 3D Graph-Based Optimization.

Authors:  Ling Zhang; Andreas Wahle; Zhi Chen; Li Zhang; Richard W Downe; Tomas Kovarnik; Milan Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Position Paper Computational Cardiology.

Authors:  Lambros Athanasiou; Farhad Rikhtegar Nezami; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 5.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.