| Literature DB >> 36042676 |
Song Zhang1, Qin Tan2, Hanjun He1.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Optimal nutritional therapy for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has been debated; however, little is known about key points of pancreatin enteric-coated capsule administration, a critical component of the PD treatment regimen. Patients often report elevations in tablet platoon and steatorrhea, and steatorrhea may adversely affect nutritional therapy for PD. Herein, we report a case of individualized pharmaceutical care for a patient after PD with trypsin replacement nutritional therapy. PATIENT CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSIS: After PD with trypsin replacement nutritional therapy, the patient developed acute steatorrhea. INTERVENTION: Individualized pharmaceutical care was provided by clinical pharmacists to address intolerance to pancreatin enteric-coated capsules following PD. OUTCOMES: The clinical pharmacist's integration into the patient's treatment plan enhanced pharmacotherapy optimization, especially through pharmacokinetic monitoring and interventions related to nutritional therapy. LESSON: Pharmaceutical care by clinical pharmacists aids in ensuring the safety and efficacy of drugs and nutritional treatment. Clinical pharmacists should be members of the nutrition support team.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36042676 PMCID: PMC9410642 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Nutritional treatment program.
| Treatment stage | Time | The clinical situation | Nutritional regimen | Total calories and protein |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 treatment | D6–D9 | After 3–4 d in the ICU, the patient’s condition was improved on day 6 and he was transferred to the general ward for intensive care. At this time, the patient was conscious, without fever, chills, or other discomfort. Physical examination revealed the following: heart rate, 102 beats/min; blood pressure, 125/58 mm Hg; 1 chest catheter could be seen on the right chest wall; and the drainage tube was unblocked. In the continuous negative pressure drainage of the abdominal incision, the drainage was unobstructed, 4 drainage tubes and 1 fistula tube were seen in abdominal cavity, abdominal drainage tubes were unobstructed, abdominal muscle was tense, fecal material flowed out of abdominal wall incision, and bowel sounds were not heard. The right hip and lower limb were swollen. The right lower limb was fixed with a special brace. His muscle strength was approximately grade 2 and NRS2002 score was 5. He received PN. | Fat emulsion, amino acids (17), glucose (11) injection (1440 mL) | Total calories, 1000 kcal; protein, 34 g; non-protein calories, 900 kcal |
| D9–D14 | On day 9, the patient’s heart rate was increased (approximately 120 beats/min), abdomen was flat, no gastrointestinal type or peristaltic wave was observed, the abdominal incision continued to attract negative pressure, the skin in the upper part of the incision was confluent, intestinal fluid outflow could be seen in the middle and lower parts of the incision, his whole abdomen was slightly tender, without obvious rebound pain or tension, and his liver function results were as follows: total protein, 56 g/L; albumin, 32.5 g/L. On day 12, the patient indicated that his abdominal pain was significantly better and cough and sputum were relieved. There was no abdominal distention, vomiting, or other discomfort. He had mental distress, poor sleep, and unformed stool. The abdominal incision still had fecal-like material outflow and his whole abdomen was slightly tender, without obvious rebound pain and tension. His right lower limb continued to be fixed with nail shoes. The muscle strength of the right lower limb was grade 3, and the blood flow of the extremity was reasonable. Re-nutrition assessment with NRS2002 resulted in a score of 5, the patient’s condition was stable, and PN treatment was continued. | Fat emulsion, amino acids (17), glucose (11) injection (1920 mL) | Total calories, 1400 kcal; protein, 45 g | |
| D14–D27 | On day 14, the patient had slight pain around the abdominal incision. There was no abdominal distention, vomiting, or other discomfort. His spirit and sleep were good, urine was normal, and stool was unformed. His liver function results were as follows: total protein, 70.2 g/L; albumin, 36.3 g/L. He was still in the state of malnutrition and the gastrointestinal tract was not recovered. PN treatment was continued, and PN protein was increased to 87.5 g. | Fat emulsion, amino acids (17), glucose (11) injection (1920 mL) + compound amino acids (18AA-II, 8.5% 500 mL), 42.5 g | Total calories, 1570 kcal; protein, 87.5 g | |
| Stage 2 treatment | D27–D40 | On day 27, the patient complained of numbness in the right lower limb, occasional pain in the abdomen that was tolerable. There was no abdominal distention, vomiting, palpitations, chest tightness, or other discomfort. His mental state, sleep, and urine were as usual, and he had unformed stool. His abdomen had an incision approximately 17 cm in length, with a large amount of fresh granulation tissue. There was still a small amount of fecal material flow in the mass samples. The incision under the xiphoid process was largely restored. There was slight skin redness around the abdominal incision, without obvious rebound tenderness. Tension, liver, and spleen function were unchanged. The right lower limb was fixed in nail shoes. His muscle strength was grade II, without obvious abnormities. His endotrophic tolerance assessment score was 1 and acute gastrointestinal injury was grade II. He continued progressive ONS enteral therapy. | Fat emulsion, amino acids (17), glucose (11) injection (1440 mL) + enteral nutritional powder (SP) 50 mL/d, with added amount to 750 mL | PN total calories, 1000 kcal; protein, 34 g; EN (SP), 1 kcal/mL; protein, 0.04 g/mL |
| Stage 3 treatment | D40–D42 | On day 40, the patient complained of pain in the right lower limb. There was no abdominal discomfort after eating, cough, sputum, or obvious abdominal distention. He had regular urination and unformed stool. On day 42, the patient had diarrhea, with obvious fecal odor. The whole drug capsule could be seen in the feces; thus, fatty diarrhea was considered. In confirmation of the diagnosis, the patient did not have fever, chills, dizziness, headache, unconsciousness disorders, skin petechiae, petechiae, bleeding tendency, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, vomiting, or other symptoms. | Continued ONS sequential therapy, trypsin replacement therapy, gradually transitioning to whole protein type EN powder | Heat target: 20–25 kcal/kg; protein, 1.5 g/kg |
| D42–D45 | On day 42, his NRS2002 score was 5. The patient still required continued nutritional therapy. The patient complained of pain in the right lower limb. There was no abdominal discomfort after eating, cough, sputum, or obvious abdominal distention. He showed regular urination, fatty diarrhea, and a little fecal material outflow in the drainage. On day 45, the patient had no fever, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, vomiting, or other symptoms. His urine was normal and stool was unformed, with 3–5 bowel movements per day. He showed improved nutritional status (total protein, 70.2g/L; albumin, 36.3 g/L), no significant change in body weight, sand table condition. He continued to receive other treatment. | Bland diet, supplementary EN powder, trypsin enteric-soluble capsules (individualized treatment plan) | Heat target: 20–25 kcal/kg; protein, 1.5 g/kg |
EN = enteral nutrition, ICU = intensive care unit, NRS2002 = Nutrition Risk Screening, ONS = oral nutritional supplement, PN = parenteral nutrition.
Clinical pharmaceutical care.
| Time | Suggestions and guardianship content | Recommendation reasons | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| D6 | Start nutritional therapy and strictly monitored the patient’s changes in vital signs and laboratory indicators | The hemodynamics of the patient was stable after the trauma, a nutritional risk existed, and patient required nutritional therapy. | Physicians took advice |
| D9 | Increase nutritional healing target amount | After trauma, the patient was in a stable period and his nutritional demand was increasing. The current nutritional plan did not meet the target requirement. | Physicians took advice |
| D14 | After nutritional assessment, administer 8.5% 500 mL of compound amino acids (18AA-II) once daily as partial parenteral nutrition | The patient was in the recovery stage of trauma, with negative protein balance for a long time. He required a 1.5-g/kg protein supplement. | Physicians took advice |
| D27 | Tentatively initiate ONS, with short peptide enteral nutrition preparations | The patient’s gastrointestinal function had gradually recovered. In order to speed up the patient’s recovery, his intestinal mucosa need to be protected and bacterial community transfer needed to be prevented.[ | Physicians took advice |
| D40 | Continue ONS sequential therapy, trypsin preparation replacement therapy, and gradually transition to a treatment regimen of whole protein enteral nutrition powder, with trypsin preparations | After ONS, the gastrointestinal function of the patient had gradually recovered. Considering the economy and living ability of the patient, the ONS formula was changed and complementary food was gradually added. | Physicians took advice |
| D42 | Administer trypsin enteric-soluble capsules (individualized treatment plan) | For patients with radiography and fatty diarrhea, individualized medication is important. | Physicians took advice |
ONS = oral nutritional supplement.