Literature DB >> 36042086

Gender Differences in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease Among Young Veterans.

Sanket S Dhruva1,2, James Dziura3,4, Harini Bathulapalli3,5, Lindsey Rosman6, Allison E Gaffey3,7, Melinda B Davis8,9,10, Cynthia A Brandt3,4, Sally G Haskell3,4,11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing burden of cardiovascular disease, including coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure (HF), among women Veterans. Clinical practice guidelines recommend multiple pharmacotherapies that can reduce risk of mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if there are disparities in the use of guideline-directed medical therapy by gender among Veterans with incident CAD and HF.
DESIGN: Retrospective. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans (934,504; 87.8% men and 129,469; 12.2% women) returning from Operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn. MAIN MEASURES: Differences by gender in the prescription of Class 1, Level of Evidence A guideline-directed medical therapy among patients who developed incident CAD and HF at 30 days, 90 days, and 12 months after diagnosis. For CAD, medications included statins and antiplatelet therapy. For HF, medications included beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. KEY
RESULTS: Overall, women developed CAD and HF at a younger average age than men (mean 45.8 vs. 47.7 years, p<0.001; and 43.7 vs. 45.4 years, p<0.02, respectively). In the 12 months following a diagnosis of incident CAD, the odds of a woman receiving a prescription for at least one CAD drug was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-1.08) compared to men. In the 12 months following a diagnosis of incident HF, the odds of a woman receiving at least one HF medication was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.37-0.79) compared to men.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite guideline recommendations, young women Veterans have approximately half the odds of being prescribed guideline-directed medical therapy within 1-year after a diagnosis of HF. These results highlight the need to develop targeted strategies to minimize gender disparities in CVD care to prevent adverse outcomes in this young and growing population.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular disease; coronary artery disease; gender differences; heart failure; medical therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36042086      PMCID: PMC9481764          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07595-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


  45 in total

1.  Risk of heart failure with human immunodeficiency virus in the absence of prior diagnosis of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Adeel A Butt; Chung-Chou Chang; Lewis Kuller; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; David Leaf; David Rimland; Cynthia L Gibert; Krisann K Oursler; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas; Joseph Lim; Lewis E Kazis; Stephen Gottlieb; Amy C Justice; Matthew S Freiberg
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-25

2.  Does Patient-Physician Gender Concordance Influence Patient Perceptions or Outcomes?

Authors:  Emily S Lau; Sharonne N Hayes; Annabelle Santos Volgman; Kathryn Lindley; Carl J Pepine; Malissa J Wood
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Mental Health and Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Ashish Chaddha; Elizabeth A Robinson; Eva Kline-Rogers; Tina Alexandris-Souphis; Melvyn Rubenfire
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 4.  Preventing and Experiencing Ischemic Heart Disease as a Woman: State of the Science: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jean C McSweeney; Anne G Rosenfeld; Willie M Abel; Lynne T Braun; Lora E Burke; Stacie L Daugherty; Gerald F Fletcher; Martha Gulati; Laxmi S Mehta; Christina Pettey; Jane F Reckelhoff
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Discriminating clinical features of heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in the community.

Authors:  Jennifer E Ho; Philimon Gona; Michael J Pencina; Jack V Tu; Peter C Austin; Ramachandran S Vasan; William B Kannel; Ralph B D'Agostino; Douglas S Lee; Daniel Levy
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Women Veterans' Experiences with Perceived Gender Bias in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Specialty Care.

Authors:  Kristin Mattocks; Jose Casares; Amber Brown; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Karen M Goldstein; Mary Driscoll; Sally Haskell; Lori Bastian; Cynthia Brandt
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2019-11-14

7.  Patient-physician gender concordance and increased mortality among female heart attack patients.

Authors:  Brad N Greenwood; Seth Carnahan; Laura Huang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Social Determinants of Risk and Outcomes for Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Edward P Havranek; Mahasin S Mujahid; Donald A Barr; Irene V Blair; Meryl S Cohen; Salvador Cruz-Flores; George Davey-Smith; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Michael S Lauer; Debra W Lockwood; Milagros Rosal; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Smoker's Paradox in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Tanush Gupta; Dhaval Kolte; Sahil Khera; Prakash Harikrishnan; Marjan Mujib; Wilbert S Aronow; Diwakar Jain; Ali Ahmed; Howard A Cooper; William H Frishman; Deepak L Bhatt; Gregg C Fonarow; Julio A Panza
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  Treatment of coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Authors:  C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine; Hiroki Shimokawa; Colin Berry
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.