| Literature DB >> 36040785 |
Schenita D Randolph1, Ragan Johnson1, Allison Johnson1, Lana Keusch1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multilevel interventions are necessary to address the complex social contributors to health that limit pre-exposure prophylaxis use among Black women, including medical distrust, pre-exposure prophylaxis stigma, and access to equitable health care. Strategies to improve knowledge, awareness, and uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis among Black women will be more successful if information-sharing and implementation take place within trusted environments. Providing women with information through trusted cultural and social channels can effectively support informed decision-making about pre-exposure prophylaxis for themselves and members of their social networks who are eligible for pre-exposure prophylaxis.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; HIV prevention; PrEP uptake; application; community engagement; mixed-method; pilot test; pre-exposure prophylaxis; prophylaxis; web-based; web-based application; women
Year: 2022 PMID: 36040785 PMCID: PMC9472057 DOI: 10.2196/34556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Res Protoc ISSN: 1929-0748
Figure 1Socioecological model for the Using PrEP: Doing it for Ourselves (UPDOs) Protective Styles intervention. PrEP: pre-exposure prophylaxis.
Figure 2Study design schematic. PrEP: pre-exposure prophylaxis.
Summary of concepts and instruments used to collect the data.
| Measure | Description | Expected outcome | Evaluation schedule |
| Systems Usability Scale [ | A 10-item measure of digital intervention usability that allows evaluation of a wide variety of products and services, including hardware, software, mobile devices, websites and applications. Items are scored on a 5-item Likert scale, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. | Assessment only | Postintervention |
| Acceptability and feasibility [ | Video series/episodes | Assessment only | Postintervention |
| PrEPa knowledge/awareness [ | Two items: “Before this study, had you ever heard of PrEP?” (yes/no) and “On a range of 0 = no knowledge to 10 = expert knowledge, what is your knowledge of PrEP?” | Improved knowledge and awareness of PrEP | Baseline and postintervention |
| PrEP risk [ | Five risk questions adapted from the CDC source documents: question 1 and questions 2-5 (yes/no response). | Assessment only | Baseline, postintervention |
| PrEP stigma [ | Eight items; responses include “strongly disagree,” “disagree,” “agree,” and “strongly agree.” This measure assesses user stereotypes about PrEP and disapproval by others to take PrEP. | Improve stigma related to PrEP | Baseline, postintervention |
| PrEP trust [ | Twelve items; responses are on a 10-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree.” This measure perceptions about trust in the provider and health care interactions. | Improve trust related to PrEP | Baseline, postintervention |
| PrEP intentions [ | Six items, including “How likely are you to use PrEP in the future?” Responses range from 0, “very unlikely,” to 5, “very likely.” This measure is based on the transtheoretical model of change. | Improve intentions of women to take PrEP | Baseline, postintervention, 3-6 months postintervention |
aPrEP: pre-exposure prophylaxis.