Literature DB >> 36040744

Trends in Out-of-Pocket Cost of Glucagon, 2010-2020.

Margaret Zupa1, Robert Feldman2, Jing Luo3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36040744      PMCID: PMC9428735          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Severe hypoglycemia results in 242 000 emergency department visits annually.[1] More than 20% of patients with type 2 diabetes and all patients with type 1 diabetes in the United States are at risk of severe hypoglycemia due to insulin or sulfonylurea use.[2] Glucagon is a life-saving medication for emergency treatment of severe hypoglycemia that can be administered outside of health care settings, where most episodes occur. The American Diabetes Association guidelines recommend that patients at risk of moderate to severe hypoglycemia have access to glucagon.[3] This is especially important for young children, who are at increased risk owing to their inability to communicate symptoms.[4] However, an analysis of nationally representative claims data found that 3.5% of adults with type 1 diabetes and 8% of adults with type 2 diabetes who had prior severe hypoglycemia filled a glucagon prescription in 2014.[5] Studies of insulin and other diabetes medications found that high out-of-pocket costs (OOPCs) were associated with low rates of use.[6] In this study, we sought to assess trends in the OOPCs of unmixed and novel glucagon formulations.

Methods

The University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board determined that this cross-sectional study was exempt from review and informed consent because it used deidentified claims data and was not human participants research. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline. We assessed trends in wholesale acquisition cost (WAC), an estimate of the manufacturer’s list price, for glucagon formulations over time using the AnalySource drug pricing database. Next, we examined trends in OOPCs paid by patients using the Optum deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart, which includes administrative claims from large commercial and Medicare Advantage (MA) health plans. Analyzed claims included any formulation of glucagon from January 1, 2010, through September 30, 2020. Given that there were only 24 prescription fills of novel premixed liquid glucagon injection, it was excluded from analysis (eFigure in the Supplement). Analysis was performed using R statistical software version 4.1.2 (R Project for Statistical Computing) from November to December 2021.

Results

The WAC of unmixed glucagon increased 192% from 2010 to 2020 (Figure). The median OOPC of unmixed glucagon was less than $37.00 for commercially insured beneficiaries and was $0 for MA beneficiaries throughout the study period (Table). Costs increased for MA beneficiaries in the 75th percentile of OOPC, from $25.00 to $40.00 from 2010 to 2020. The 2020 median OOPC of novel intranasal glucagon, which was introduced in 2019, was $15.00 for commercially insured beneficiaries and $10.00 for MA beneficiaries.
Figure.

Wholesale Acquisition Cost (WAC) of Glucagon

Premixed liquid glucagon prefilled syringe, autoinjector, and intranasal glucagon are represented as a single point given that the WAC for all 3 formulations was $280.80. WAC is per single-use kit.

Table.

Volume of Prescription Fills and OOPCs for Unmixed and Intranasal Glucagon

YearPrescription fills, No.OOPC, median (IQR), $a
Commercial insurancebMedicare Advantage
Unmixed glucagon
201015 69127.04 (14.88-37.45)0 (0-25.00)
201116 94629.29 (17.57-41.00)0 (0-21.59)
201217 96134.14 (22.76-39.83)0 (0-25.61)
201319 53133.61 (22.40-39.21)0 (0-24.65)
201418 94333.09 (16.54-38.60)0 (0-24.81)
201519 92533.11 (5.52-41.39)0 (0-33.11)
201622 63232.67 (0-43.55)0 (0-32.67)
201724 30331.87 (3.25-42.49)0 (0-37.18)
201825 47936.43 (0-41.63)0 (0-36.43)
201924 90635.87 (0-44.84)0 (0-25.62)
2020c14 74830 (15.00-45.00)0 (0-40.00)
Intranasal glucagon
201944910.89 (0-32.03)7.71 (0-15.54)
2020c606115.00 (7.50-35.00)10.00 (0.98-23.50)

Abbreviation: OOPC, out-of-pocket cost.

Defined as the sum of copays and deductibles; costs were adjusted for inflation based on January 2020 dollars and scaled per single-use kit.

Insurance type was based on the primary payer at the time of the glucagon prescription fill.

Through September 30, 2020.

Wholesale Acquisition Cost (WAC) of Glucagon

Premixed liquid glucagon prefilled syringe, autoinjector, and intranasal glucagon are represented as a single point given that the WAC for all 3 formulations was $280.80. WAC is per single-use kit. Abbreviation: OOPC, out-of-pocket cost. Defined as the sum of copays and deductibles; costs were adjusted for inflation based on January 2020 dollars and scaled per single-use kit. Insurance type was based on the primary payer at the time of the glucagon prescription fill. Through September 30, 2020.

Discussion

This cross-sectional study found that WAC rose steadily, while the median OOPC for unmixed glucagon was stable for commercially insured patients and $0 for most MA beneficiaries from 2010 to 2020. The difference in OOPCs between commercial and MA beneficiaries may be associated with incentives for MA plans to lower total costs, such as those potentially resulting from hypoglycemia-related emergency department visits. Alternatively, MA beneficiaries may wait to fill glucagon prescriptions until they reach catastrophic coverage, potentially suggesting that these patients lack access to life-saving medications earlier in the year. However, the median OOPC of unmixed glucagon increased for MA beneficiaries with the highest OOPCs (4th quartile). There are multiple possible reasons that may underly this trend, including MA plans passing on higher WAC to beneficiaries or beneficiaries choosing plans with more cost sharing over time. Our study has several limitations. Results may not generalize to patients who are insured through traditional Medicare or Medicaid or are uninsured. In addition, we were unable to assess instances in which high OOPCs prevented patients from filling the prescription (primary nonadherence) or the association of manufacturer patient-assistance programs and coupons with OOPCs for commercial beneficiaries. Cost-sharing should not serve as a major barrier to accessing glucagon for MA and commercially insured patients. Further work should assess other barriers to guideline-concordant glucagon uptake among patients at risk of severe hypoglycemia. Such barriers may include awareness among patients and primary care, emergency, and diabetes clinicians of the availability of this potentially life-saving treatment. In addition, future studies may examine the association of novel glucagon formulations, which had similar OOPCs to those of unmixed glucagon and may be easier to administer, with uptake in the coming years.
  5 in total

1.  ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Assessment and management of hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with diabetes.

Authors:  Mary B Abraham; Timothy W Jones; Diana Naranjo; Beate Karges; Abiola Oduwole; Martin Tauschmann; David M Maahs
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.866

2.  Effect of Out-of-Pocket Cost on Medication Initiation, Adherence, and Persistence among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE).

Authors:  Andrew J Karter; Melissa M Parker; Matthew D Solomon; Courtney R Lyles; Alyce S Adams; Howard H Moffet; Mary E Reed
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Trends of insulin use among US adults with type 2 diabetes: the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1995-2007.

Authors:  Chaoyang Li; Earl S Ford; Guixiang Zhao; James Tsai; Lina S Balluz; Wayne H Giles
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.852

4.  6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.

Authors:  Boris Draznin; Vanita R Aroda; George Bakris; Gretchen Benson; Florence M Brown; RaShaye Freeman; Jennifer Green; Elbert Huang; Diana Isaacs; Scott Kahan; Jose Leon; Sarah K Lyons; Anne L Peters; Priya Prahalad; Jane E B Reusch; Deborah Young-Hyman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Glucagon use by U.S. adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Peter A Kahn; Shuling Liu; Rozalina McCoy; Robert A Gabbay; Kasia Lipska
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.852

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.