Literature DB >> 36040647

Knowledge, attitudes, detection, and reporting practices of elder abuse among orthopedists.

Yaniv Yonai1, Rawan Masarwa1, Merav Ben Natan2, Yaniv Steinfeld1, Yaron Berkovich1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to explore orthopedists' level of knowledge regarding laws and directives related to the detection and reporting of elder abuse, their attitudes towards the detection and reporting of elder abuse, detection and reporting practices, and the associations between these variables.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 145 orthopedists employed in various Israeli hospitals-senior orthopedists, orthopedic residents, and orthopedic interns-completed a questionnaire.
RESULTS: The orthopedists had a medium level of knowledge and held positive attitudes on the detection and reporting of elder abuse, but the actual number of cases they detected and reported was low. Senior orthopedists had the highest level of knowledge and also the most positive attitudes, followed by orthopedic residents, and then orthopedic interns. Common reasons for unwillingness to report cases of elder abuse differed between levels of training. A minority of the orthopedists had received training on the detection and management of elder abuse. Higher knowledge and more positive attitudes were found associated with a higher number of detected and reported cases of elder abuse.
CONCLUSIONS: The importance of training orthopedists on the detection and management of elder abuse cannot be overemphasized. It seems that orthopedists should receive such training early in their career. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Geriatric Medicine Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes; Detection; Elder abuse; Knowledge; Orthopedists; Reporting

Year:  2022        PMID: 36040647     DOI: 10.1007/s41999-022-00685-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med        ISSN: 1878-7649            Impact factor:   3.269


  15 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions designed to prevent or stop elder maltreatment.

Authors:  Liat Ayalon; Sagit Lev; Ohad Green; Uziel Nevo
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 2.  Screening tools for identification of elder abuse: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chiara Gallione; Alberto Dal Molin; Fabio V B Cristina; Hilary Ferns; Mark Mattioli; Barbara Suardi
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 3.  Elder Abuse: Systematic Review and Implications for Practice.

Authors:  Xin Qi Dong
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 4.  Elder abuse prevalence in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yongjie Yon; Christopher R Mikton; Zachary D Gassoumis; Kathleen H Wilber
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 26.763

Review 5.  Elder Abuse: Global Situation, Risk Factors, and Prevention Strategies.

Authors:  Karl Pillemer; David Burnes; Catherine Riffin; Mark S Lachs
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2016-04

6.  Raising the index of suspicion for elder abuse: cognitive impairment, falls, and injury patterns in the emergency department.

Authors:  Carolyn E Ziminski; Linda R Phillips; Diana Lynn Woods
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.361

Review 7.  Orthopedic Manifestations of Abuse.

Authors:  John D Milner; Davis A Hartnett; Steven F DeFroda; Amy Z Blackburn; Aristides I Cruz; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 8.  Elder abuse: a systematic review of risk factors in community-dwelling elders.

Authors:  Mark Johannesen; Dina LoGiudice
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 9.  Elder abuse.

Authors:  Mark S Lachs; Karl Pillemer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Oct 2-8       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.