Literature DB >> 36040629

Prevalence of free-living amoebae in swimming pools and recreational waters, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Beni Jequicene Mussengue Chaúque1,2, Denise Leal Dos Santos1, Davood Anvari3, Marilise Brittes Rott4,5.   

Abstract

Free-living amoebae (FLA) are cosmopolitan microorganisms known to be pathogenic to humans who often have a history of contact with contaminated water. Swimming pools and recreational waters are among the environments where the greatest human exposure to FLA occurs. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of FLA in swimming pools and recreational waters, through a systematic review and meta-analysis that included studies published between 1977 and 2022. A total of 106 studies were included and an overall prevalence of FLA in swimming pools and recreational waters of 44.34% (95% CI = 38.57-50.18) was found. Considering the studies published up to 2010 (1977-2010), between 2010 and 2015, and those published after 2010 (> 2010-2022), the prevalence was 53.09% (95% CI = 43.33-62.73) and 37.07% (95% CI = 28.87-45.66) and 45.40% (95% CI = 35.48-55.51), respectively. The highest prevalence was found in the American continent (63.99%), in Mexico (98.35%), and in indoor hot swimming pools (52.27%). The prevalence varied with the variation of FLA detection methods, morphology (57.21%), PCR (25.78%), and simultaneously morphology and PCR (43.16%). The global prevalence by genera was Vahlkampfia spp. (54.20%), Acanthamoeba spp. (33.47%), Naegleria spp. (30.95%), Hartmannella spp./Vermamoeba spp. (20.73%), Stenamoeba spp. (12.05%), and Vannella spp. (10.75%). There is considerable risk of FLA infection in swimming pools and recreational waters. Recreational water safety needs to be routinely monitored and, in case of risk, locations need to be identified with warning signs and users need to be educated. Swimming pools and artificial recreational water should be properly disinfected. Photolysis of NaOCl or NaCl in water by UV-C radiation is a promising alternative to disinfect swimming pools and artificial recreational waters.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Free-living amoebae; Recreational waters; Risk of infection; Swimming pool

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36040629      PMCID: PMC9424809          DOI: 10.1007/s00436-022-07631-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.383


Introduction

Free-living amoebae (FLA) are cosmopolitan and ubiquitous microorganisms widely distributed in the environment and can be opportunistic and/or pathogenic (Visvesvara et al. 2007; Bellini et al. 2022). They have been isolated from many natural and anthropogenic environmental matrices, including plants, soil, air conditioning dust, bottled mineral water, drinking water treatment and distribution system, and cooling towers (Landell et al. 2013; Maschio et al. 2015; Javanmard et al. 2017; Soares et al. 2017; Wopereis et al. 2020; Pazoki et al. 2020). They have also been isolated from contact lenses, swimming pools, and other recreational waters (Fabres et al. 2016; Bunsuwansakul et al. 2019; Santos et al. 2021; Fabros et al. 2021). Among its representatives with importance for human health, the genera Acanthamoeba, Naegleria, and Balamuthia stand out. Acanthamoeba spp. and its abundance in water bodies seem to be favored by higher temperatures (Kang et al 2020). These protozoa can cause illnesses in healthy people, such as Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) which primarily affects contact lens wearers, usually due to lens wear while swimming or improper lens cleaning (Dos Santos et al. 2018). In immunosuppressed individuals, it can cause granulomatous amebic encephalitis (GAE), which can be fatal (Visvesvara et al. 2007; Sarink et al. 2022). Acanthamoeba spp. have also been reported to cause skin infections (Murakawa et al. 1995; Paltiel et al. 2004). In addition, it was isolated from 26% (17/63) of critically ill patient urine samples (Santos et al. 2009); similarly, Acanthamoeba (T4) was isolated from 22% (11/50) of urine samples collected from patients with recurrent urinary tract infection (Saberi et al. 2021). Naegleria fowleri is known as a “brain-eating amoeba” and primarily affects healthy young people using recreational waters, causing primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM) (Fowler and Carter, 1965). PAM is a serious and usually fatal disease if adequate treatment is not initiated at the onset of symptoms (Król-Turmińska and Olender 2017). The rapid deterioration in the health status of patients affected by PAM, combined with the ease of being confused with bacterial meningoencephalitis (since the symptoms are similar), as well as erratic or late diagnosis, contributes to a high prevalence of deaths (> 97%) (Capewell et al. 2015; Johnson et al. 2016). Balamuthia mandrillaris and Sappinia pedatta also cause encephalitis (Gelman et al. 2001; Visvesvara et al. 2007; Cope et al. 2019); however, there are no reports of the isolation of S. diploidea/pedatta from swimming pools and recreational waters. The FLA essentially have three forms of life, namely, the trophozoite form (with or without flagellum) and the flagellated form which are the active forms of the protozoan, in which it may feed, reproduce, and express pathogenicity, and the form of cysts (which is the form of environmental resistance). Cysts have a double-layer wall made essentially of cellulose (Garajová et al. 2019) that protects the protozoan against unfavorable conditions (e.g., food shortages, dissection, extreme pH, and temperatures) or antimicrobial agents (e.g., NaCl, chlorine, drugs, UV, heat) (Aksozek et al. 2002; Thomas et al. 2008; Chaúque and Rott 2021a, b; Chaúque et al. 2021). FLA are considered the “Trojan Horse” of the microbial world, as phylogenetically diverse microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, and viruses survive and multiply within them; these microorganisms are called amoeba-resistant microorganisms (ARM) (Greub and Raoult 2004; Scheid 2014; Delafont et al. 2016; Hubert et al. 2021; Rayamajhee et al. 2021). A wide range of pathogens of public health importance have been described as being ARM, including Legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium leprae, Pseudomonas spp., Candida auris, and various viruses (Maschio et al. 2015; Staggemeier et al. 2016; Balczun and Scheid 2017; Turankar et al. 2019; Nisar et al. 2020; Hubert et al. 2021). The participation of FLA in the environmental persistence of severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has also been proposed (Chaúque et al. 2022; Dey et al 2022). All these aspects that characterize the profile of FLA constitute the main attributes that determine the great importance of these protozoa for human health and the environment. Although increasingly prevalent, diseases caused by FLA remain rare; however, the presence of these protozoa, especially in the aquatic environment, is well documented (Milanez et al. 2022; Stapleton 2021; Saburi et al. 2017; Caumo et al. 2009). The presence of FLA in swimming pools and other recreational waters is of concern, as they can be pathogenic or opportunistic and/or lead to the persistence of non-amoebic pathogens in the water, including waters treated with chlorine-based disinfectants (Siddiqui and Khan 2014; Kiss et al. 2014; Dey et al. 2021). It was determined that the prevalence of Naegleria spp. in different water sources around the world (considering data from 35 countries) was 26.42%, in recreational water it was 21.27% (10.80–34.11), and in swimming pools was 44.80% (16.19–75.45) (Saberi et al. 2020); however, the global prevalence of FLA in swimming pools and recreational waters remains to be determined. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of FLA in swimming pools and recreational waters worldwide.

Methods

Article search strategy

The present study, which aimed to determine the prevalence of FLA in swimming pools and recreational waters, was planned and carried out based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines (Page et al. 2021) (Fig. 1). The search for scientific articles was performed in different databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, ProQuest, and CAPES periódicos, between July 4 and 9, 2022. In these databases, articles were retrieved using a combination of the following search terms combined with appropriate Boolean operators: “Free-living amoeba,” “swimming pool,” “recreational water,” “prevalence,” “epidemiology,” and “hot springs.” The references of the selected articles were examined in search of some interesting literature. The search for articles in the database was performed by B.J.M.C, and the accuracy of the searches was verified by D.L.S.
Fig. 1

Details of the article retrieval and selection steps based on PRISMA 2020

Details of the article retrieval and selection steps based on PRISMA 2020

Selection and exclusion criteria

The screening focused essentially on the title and then on the abstract of the articles. All retrieved articles written in English (reporting primary data), with accessible full text, dealing with the presence of FLA in swimming pools and human recreation waters were selected. Studies based on natural surface waters that do not clearly state that the samples were collected in places where human recreational activities certainly take place were not selected. Studies whose data were insufficient, unclear, or duplicated were excluded. Case studies that do not report the prevalence of FLA in swimming pools and human recreation waters were also excluded.

Data analysis procedure

Data were independently extracted and verified by two authors (B.J.M.C and D.L.S); data verification was performed three times. Data extracted from all articles that met the inclusion criteria were included in the calculation of the global prevalence of FLA in swimming pools and recreational waters. To calculate the prevalence of each FLA genera, only data extracted from articles that included molecular methods for the identification of FLA were used. Data analysis was performed by two authors (D.A and B.J.M.C) using Stata software (version 14; Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) and GraphPad prism 8.02. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to estimate the combined and weighted prevalence of FLA in swimming pools and recreational waters, using a 95% confidence interval, and the results are visualized using a forest plot. Cochran’s Q test (chi-square) and the Higgins I2 statistic were used to calculate the heterogeneity index among the selected studies. I2 values < 25%, 25%–50%, and > 50% meant low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively. The Egger’s test was used to assess the significance of publication bias among the selected studies; P < 0.001 was considered significant.

Results

From the total of 2034 documents returned by the databases accessed, using the search strategy and inclusion criteria described above, 106 articles were selected (Table 1). These studies are distributed in a total of 30 countries, namely Iran (33), Taiwan (12), Egypt (8), Malaysia (6), Brazil (4), Italy (4), Turkey (4), USA (4), Mexico (3), Saudi Arabia (3), China (2), France (2), Philippines (2), Spain (2), and Thailand (2). One study was included from each of the following countries: Belgium, Bulgaria, Cape Verde, Chile, Finland, Germany, Hungary, India, Jamaica, Japan, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Sweden, and Switzerland. Among the studies, 74.52% (79/106) used or included molecular methods to identify FLA, while 25.47% (27/106) used only morphological methods.
Table 1

Description of included studies reporting the prevalence of live amoebae in swimming pools and recreational waters

ReferencesCountrySample source (total)Analyzed samplesPositive samplesMethodsIdentity
Brown And Cursons (1977)NorwaySwimming area5034MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp., Naegleria fowleri, and Naegleria gruberi
Lyons and Kapur (1977)USASwimming pool3027MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp. and/or Hartmannella spp.
Pernin and Riany (1978)FranceSwimming pool (9)4439MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp., Hartmannella spp., and Naegleria spp.
De Jonckheere (1979)BelgiumSwimming pool1613MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp. and Naegleria spp.
Janitschke et al. (1980)GermanySwimming pool1410MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp.
Scaglia et al. 1983ItalyThermal pool and mud basin spa307Morphology, fluorescent-antibody techniqueN. australiensis
Gogate and Deodhar (1985)IndiaPublic swimming pool121MorphologyN. fowleri
Scaglia et al. 1987ItalyThermal bath and mud basin (34)5134Morphology, pathogenicity testNaegleria spp., Acanthamoeba spp., Vahlkampfia spp., and Hartmannella spp.
Hamadto et al. 1993EgyptSwimming pool (16)1612Morphology, pathogenicity testNaegleria spp. and Acanthamoeba spp.
Penas-Ares et al. 1994SpainThermal spa water (12)128MorphologyVahlkampfia longicauda, Vahlkampfia salina, Vahlkampia baltica, Vahlkampfia sp., A. polyphaga, Acanthamoeba lenticulata, Naegleria sp., Lingulamoeba sp., Paramoeba aesturina, and Flabellula sp.
Vesaluoma et al. (1995)FinlandPublic swimming pool and whirlpool (21)3414MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp., Vexillifera spp., Flabellula spp., Hartmannella spp., and Rugipes spp.
Munoz et al. 2003ChileSwimming pool85Morphology, PCRH. vermiformes, Vanella spp., Naegleria spp., and Acanthamoeba spp.
Sheehan et al. 2003USAHot spring (22)2212Morphology, PCRN. australiensis, N. dobsoni, N. americana, N.pagei, N. polaris, and N. fultoni
Izumiyama et al. 2003JapanWhirlpool bath and hot spring spa (251)549197Morphology, PCRN. fowleri, N. lovaniensis, and N. australiensis
Górnik and Kuźna-Grygiel (2004)PolandPublic swimming pools (13)7242MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp.
Tsvetkova et al. 2004BulgariaSwimming pool (6)3115Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp. and Hartmannella spp.
Lekkla et al. (2005)ThailandHot spring (13)6826MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp. and Naegleria spp.
Sukthana et al. 2005ThailandHot spring5715MorphologyNaegleria spp. and Acanthamoeba spp.
Rezaeian et al 2008IranSwimming pool22MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp.
Caumo et al. (2009)BrazilSwimming pool6513Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp.
Gianinazzi et al. (2009)SwitzerlandIndoor hot swimming pool11Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba lenticulata
Hsu et al. (2009a, b)TaiwanRecreational hot spring559PCRAcanthamoeba griffini and Acanthamoeba jacobsi
Hsu et al. (2009a)TaiwanMud recreation area water3420Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp., Hartmannella spp., and Naegleria spp.
Gianinazzi et al. (2010)SwedenHot springs (4)319Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba healyi, Stenoamoeba sp., Hartmannella vermiformis, and Echinamoeba exundans
Huang and Hsu (2010a, b)TaiwanHot spring and waste water in recreation area5211PCRAcanthamoeba T1, Acanthamoeba T2, Acanthamoeba T3, Acanthamoeba T4, Acanthamoeba T5, Acanthamoeba T6, and Acanthamoeba T15
Huang and Hsu (2010a)TaiwanHot spring and hot spring facilities10615Morphology, PCRNaegleria lovaniensis, Naegleria australiensis, Naegleria clarki, Naegleria americana, and Naegleria pagei
Init et al. (2010)MalaysiaPublic swimming pool (14)1414MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp. and Naegleria spp.
Lares-Villa et al. 2010MexicoNatural recreational water (2)2424PCRThermophilic amoebae, thermophilic Naegleria spp., and N. fowleri
Badirzadeh et al. (2011)IranRecreational hot spring2812Morphology, PCRVahlkampfiid and Acanthamoeba castellanii T4
Huang and Hsu (2011)TaiwanRecreational water10719PCRNaegleria spp.
Ithoi et al. (2011)MalaysiaRecreational pool, lake, and stream3333Morphology, PCRNaegleria spp.
Nazar et al. 2011IranWater in recreation area5016Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp. T4 and Acanthamoeba spp. T5
Alves et al. (2012)BrazilPublic swimming pool (7)77Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp.
Kao et al. (2012a, b, c)TaiwanRecreation and drinking water source (2)21113PCRNaegleria philippinensis, N. clarki, Naegleria gálica, N. americana, N. australiensis, Naegleria dobsoni, N. gruberi, and Naegleria schusteri
Kao et al. (2012a)TaiwanRecreational hot spring (4)609Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba T15, Acanthamoeba T4, Acanthamoeba T2, and Acanthamoeba spp.
Kao et al. (2012b)TaiwanHot spring6026Morphology, PCRN. australiensis, N. lovaniensis, Naegleria mexicana, and N. gruberi
Nazar et al. (2012)IranRecreational water (22)508Morphology, PCRHartmannella vermiformis and Vannella persistens
Niyyati et al. (2012)IranRiver recreation area (10)5515Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp. (T4 and T15) and Naegleria spp. (N. pagei, N. clarki, and Naegleria fultoni)
Rahdar et al. 2012IranSwimming pool (4)42Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba T4
Solgi et al. (2012a, b)IranHot spring308Morphology, PCRHartmannella vermiformis and Naegleria (N. carteri and Naegleria spp.)
Solgi et al. (2012a)IranTherapeutic hot spring6012Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba T4 and T3
Kao et al. 2013a, bChinaThermal spring water484PCRNaegleria spp.
Kao et al. 2013aChinaThermal spring485PCRAcanthamoeba spp.
Moussa et al. (2013)FranceRecreational geothermal waters (6)7335Morphology, PCRN. fowleri and N. lovaniensis
Tung et al. (2013)TaiwanHot spring (1)2513Morphology, PCRNaegleria spp. (N. fowleri) and Acanthamoeba spp.
Al-Herrawy et al. (2014)EgyptSwimming pool (10)12059Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp.
Ji et al. (2014)TaiwanHot spring6129Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp.
Ji et al. (2014)TaiwanHot spring6117Morphology, PCRNaegleria spp.
Ji et al. (2014)TaiwanHot spring6111Morphology, PCRVermamoeba vermiformis
Kiss et al. (2014)HungarySwimming pool (20)16468Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp.
Onichandran et al. 2014PhilippinesRecreational river (4)2312Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp. and Naegleria spp.
Sifuentes et al. (2014)USARecreational water (33)10318PCRThermophilic amoebae and N. fowleri
Behniafar et al. (2015)IranRecreational water and hot spring407Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp.
Evyapan et al. (2015)TurkeySwimming pool and hot spring5021Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp., Acanthamoeba griffini T3, Acanthamoeba castellanii T4, and A. jacobsi T15
Niyyati et al. (2015a, b)IranRecreational water (lakes, pools, and streams)609Morphology, PCRN. australiensis and N. pagei
Niyyati et al. (2015a)IranRecreational water5015Morphology, PCRA. castellanii T4
Todd et al. (2015)JamaicaRecreational water8342Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba T4, Acanthamoeba T5, Acanthamoeba T10, and Acanthamoeba T11
Al-Herrawy et al. (2016)EgyptSwimming pool (1)4830Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp., Naegleria spp., and Hartmannella
Armand et al. (2016)IranSwimming pool1712Morphology, PCRVermamoeba spp. and Acanthamoeba spp.
Azlan et al. 2016MalaysiaRecreational lake77MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp.
Fabres et al. (2016)BrazilHot tubs and thermal pool7220Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba T3, Acanthamoeba T4, Acanthamoeba T5, and Acanthamoeba T15
Latifi et al. (2016)IranHot spring662Morphology, PCRBalamuthia mandrillaris
Niyyati et al. (2016a, b)IranGeothermal water source4020PCRAcanthamoeba T4 and T2
Niyyati et al. (2016a)IranRecreational water2525MorphologyVahlkampfidae spp., Acanthamoeba spp., Thecamoeba spp., and Miniamoebae spp.
Al-Herrawy et al. (2017)EgyptSwimming pool (2)14437Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp. and Naegleria spp.
Di Filippo et al. (2017)ItalyGeothermal spring3626Morphology, PCRN. australiensis, Naegleria itálica, N. lovaniensis, and Naegleria spp.
Javanmard et al. (2017)IranSwimming pool and hot spring336Morphology, PCRN. pagei and N. gruberi
Latifi et al. (2017)IranRecreation hot spring2212Morphology, PCRNaegleria spp. (N. australiensis, N. americana, N. dobsoni, N. pagei, N. polaris, and N. fultoni)
Mafi et al. (2017)IranSwimming pool and park pond (40)7518MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp., Hartmannella spp., and Vahlkampfiids
Reyes-Batlle et al. (2017)SpainRecreational water (10)101Morphology, PCRNaegleria spp.
Toula and Elahl 2017Saudi ArabiaSwimming pool (6)166MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp. and Naegleria spp.
Dodangeh et al. (2018)IranRecreational hot spring2411Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba castellanii T4
Ghaderifar et al. 2018IranParks pond water (13)9031Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba T4
Hikal et al (2018)EgyptSwimming pool (5)10024Morphology, PCRNaegleria fowleri
Hikal et al. (2018)EgyptSwimming pool (5)10079Morphology, PCRNaegleria spp.
Lares-Jiménez et al. (2018)MexicoHot spring (1)88Morphology, PCRN. lovaniensis, A. jacobsi, Stenamoeba sp., and Vermamoeba vermiformis
Latiff et al. (2018)MalaysiaRecreational hot spring (5)5238MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp. and Naegleria spp.
Poor et al. (2018)IranSwimming pool and hot tubs (10)408Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba T3 and Acanthamoeba T4
Vijayakumar (2018)Saudi ArabiaPools and recreation waters277MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp.
Xue et al. 2018USAlake recreation areas (10)16056PCRN. fowleri
Gabriel et al. 2019MalaysiaRecreational place5740Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp. and Naegleria spp.
Haddad et al. (2019)IranHot springs5415Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba castellanii T4, Vermamoeba vermiformis, N. australiensis, N. pageii, and N. gruberi
Hussain et al. (2019)MalaysiaRecreational hot spring (5)5038Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba T4, T15, T3, T5, T11, and T17
Maghsoodloorad et al. 2019IranRecreational park water308Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp. T4 and Acanthamoeba spp. T15
Salehi et al. 2019IranPark pool and swimming pool1412Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba T2, T4, T5, and T11
Attariani et al. (2020)IranSwimming pool423Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp.
Ballares et al. 2020PhilippinesRecreational water (6)166Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba T4, Acanthamoeba T5, and Acanthamoeba T9
Bonilla-Lemus et al. 2020MexicoRecreational water (9)99Morphology, PCRN. australiensis, N. gruberi, N. fowleri, N. clarki, and N. pagei
Değerli et al. (2020)TurkeyThermal swimming pool434148Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp. and Naegleria spp.
El-Badry et al. 2020EgyptSwimming pool (7)280Morphology, PCR
Esboei et al. (2020)IranSwimming pools3012Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba T4
Latifi et al. (2020)IranHot spring and beach8154Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba (T3, T4 e T5), V. vermiformis, and Naegleria spp.
Paknejad et al. (2020)IranSwimming pool and bathtub16631Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba T3, Acanthamoeba T4, Acanthamoeba T11, Acanthamoeba sp., Protacanthamoeba bohemica, and N. lovaniensis
Sarmadian et al. (2020)IranSwimming pool (6)61MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp.
Sarmadian et al. (2020)IranSwimming pool (6)5761MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp.
Zeybek and Türkmen 2020TurkeySwimming pool257Morphology, FISH
Aykur and Dagci (2021)TurkeySwimming pool263PCRAcanthamoeba T2, T4, and T5
Bakri et al. 2021Saudi ArabiaSwimming pool104Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp. and Naegleria spp.
Berrilli et al. (2021)ItalyHot spring (2)3633Morphology, PCRV. vermiformisi, N. australiensisi, Acanthamoeba T4, and Acanthamoeba T15
Eftekhari-Kenzerki et al. (2021)IranIndoor public swimming pool (20)8032Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba spp.
Reyes-Batlle et al. (2021)PortugalSwimming pool facilities (20)200PCR
Nageeb et al. (2022)EgyptSwimming pool (2)80Morphology, PCR
Rocha et al. 2022BrazilSwimming pool (9)3615MorphologyAcanthamoeba spp. and Naegleria spp.
Salehi et al. 2022IranSwimming pool and park pool2017Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba (T2, T3, T4, T11, and T15)
Sousa-Ramos et al. 2022Cape VerdeRecreational fountain and swimming pool42Morphology, PCRAcanthamoeba sp. T4 and Vannella sp.
Description of included studies reporting the prevalence of live amoebae in swimming pools and recreational waters The included studies were published between 1977 and 2022, and the distribution of studies by year and the average percentage value of positive samples per year are shown in Fig. 2. FLA were detected in at least 1 sample of 97.17% (103/106) of selected studies (Table 1).
Fig. 2

Distribution of selected studies, and mean percentage of positive samples for FLA per year

Distribution of selected studies, and mean percentage of positive samples for FLA per year Publication bias was checked by Egger’s regression test, showing that it may have a substantial impact on total prevalence estimate (Egger bias: 6.8, P < 0.001) (Fig. 3). This suggests that the reported global prevalence may have been impacted by publication bias.
Fig. 3

Result of Egger’s bias assessment for the prevalence of free-living amoebae in swimming pools and recreational waters

Result of Egger’s bias assessment for the prevalence of free-living amoebae in swimming pools and recreational waters Based on the random-effects model meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of FLA in water sources was 44.34% (95% CI = 38.57–50.18). The included studies demonstrated a strong heterogeneity (Q = 2198.0, df = 102, I2 = 95.4%, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Forest plot of the worldwide prevalence of free-living amoebae in swimming pools and recreational waters

Forest plot of the worldwide prevalence of free-living amoebae in swimming pools and recreational waters The global prevalence of FLA in swimming pools and recreational waters considering studies published up to 2010 (1977–2010) was considerably higher 53.09% (95% CI = 43.33–62.73) than in studies published between 2010 and 2015, 37.07% (95% CI = 28.87–45.66), and those published after 2015 (> 2015–2022) 45.40% (95% CI = 35.48–55.51) (Table 2).
Table 2

Subgroup analysis of FLA in water sources

Subgroup variablePrevalence (95% CI)I2 (%)Heterogeneity (Q)P-valueInteraction test (X2)P-value
Year
  < 201053.09 (43.33–62.73)89.5%210.4P < 0.001449.4P < 0.001
  2010–201537.07 (28.87–45.66)93.6%519.5P < 0.001
  > 201545.40 (35.48–55.51)96.7%1366.2P < 0.001
Continent
  Africa51.27 (35.08–67.33)93.5%107.8P < 0.001156.7P < 0.001
  America63.99 (45.03–80.92) 94.5%201.7P < 0.001
  Asia37.38 (30.12–44.93) 95.7%1403.3P < 0.001
  Europe51.99 (42.52–61.40)89.5%190.6P < 0.001
Country
  Brazil43.70 (21.99–66.76)88.7%26.5P < 0.00126.0P < 0.001
  China10.15 (4.99–16.87)-0.1P = 0.737
  Egypt51.65 (31.74–71.30)95.3%107.0P < 0.001
  France69.62 (27.07–97.94)-22.5P < 0.001
  Iran35.11 (24.74–46.26)95.9%787.8P < 0.001
  Italy64.76 (37.01–87.95)92.1%38.2P < 0.001
  Malaysia87.38 (73.20–96.72)85%33.3P < 0.001
  Mexico98.35 (92.56–99.96)0%0.1P = 0.913
  Philippines46.29 (31.43–61.48)-0.7P = 0.377
  Saudi Arabia32.85 (21.28–45.60)0%1.0P = 0.602
  Spain37.68 (1.06–88.08)-7.7P = 0.005
  Taiwan26.33 (17.36–36.42)90.6%116.4P < 0.001
  Thailand32.68 (21.82–44.57)-1.9P = 0.160
  Turkey30.60 (20.92–41.23)65.6%8.7P = 0.033
  USA48.70 (22.32–75.47)95.3%63.7P < 0.001
Origin
  Hot springs39.12 (30.48–48.13)93%369.0P < 0.00151.6P = 0.224
  Indoor hot swimming pools52.27 (14.55–88.50)-1.8P = 0.169
  Public swimming pools49.47 (36.87–62.10)97%1201.5P < 0.001
  Recreational waters44.44 (33.19–55.99)95%538.7P < 0.001
  Thermal swimming pools46.05 (2674–65.99)88.8%26.7P < 0.001
Diagnostic method
  Morphology57.21 (37.99–7535)97.8%1083.3P < 0.001373.5P < 0.001
  PCR25.78 (14.18–39.44)94.6%183.6P < 0.001
  Morphology and PCR43.16 (37.73–48.67)91.6%757.6P < 0.001
Subgroup analysis of FLA in water sources Considering the continents covered by the selected studies, the highest prevalence 63.99% (95% CI = 45.03–80.92) was reported in America and the lowest 37.38% (95% CI = 30.12–44.93) in Asia. Among the countries from which more than one study was included, Mexico had the highest prevalence of FLA in swimming pools and recreational waters 98.35% (95% CI = 92.56–99.96), and the lowest prevalence 10.15% (95% CI = 4.99–16.87) was recorded in China (Table 2). Considering the different sampling sources, the highest prevalence of FLA 52.27% (95% CI = 14.55–88.50) was obtained in indoor hot swimming pools, and the lowest prevalence 39.12% (95% CI = 30.48–48.13) was obtained in hot springs (Table 2). The analysis of data from studies that used only morphological methods to identify FLA showed the highest prevalence 57.21% (95% CI = 37.99–7535), the lowest prevalence 25.78% (95% CI = 14.18–39.44) was obtained from studies based only on molecular methods (PCR), and an intermediate prevalence value 43.16% (95% CI = 37.73–48.67) was obtained by analyzing studies that simultaneously used morphological and molecular methods (Table 2). The subgroup analysis revealed that there were statistically significant differences between the overall prevalence of FLA in water sources and year (X2 = 449.4, P < 0.001), continent (X2 = 156.7, P < 0.001), country (X2 = 26.0, P < 0.001), and diagnostic method (X2 = 373.5, P < 0.001) (Table 2). The highest values of the global prevalence of different genera of FLA in swimming pools and recreational waters were from Vahlkampfia spp. (54.20%), Acanthamoeba spp. (33.47%), and Naegleria spp. (30.95%). For other genera, Hartmannella spp./Vermamoeba spp., Stenamoeba spp., and Vannella spp., the global prevalence values were 20,73%, 12.05%, and 10.75%, respectively (Table 3). The results of Egger’s regression test, as well as the forest plot of the worldwide prevalence of each of these FLA genera in swimming pools and recreational waters, can be seen in Fig. S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6 of the supplementary material, respectively.
Table 3

Global prevalence, publication bias, and heterogeneity of FLA in water sources

GenusPrevalence, % (95% CI)Cochran QdfI2 (%)P-valueEgger biasP-value
Acanthamoeba spp.33.47 (28.06–39.11)429.15587.2% < 0.0013.40.0002
Hartmannella spp./Vermamoeba spp.20.73 (7.73–38.39)30.55583.8%0.00085.90.1363
Naegleria spp.30.95 (22.85–39.69)676.03894.4% < 0.0014.60.0054
Stenamoeba spp.12.05 (0.08–39.61)3.21-0.0732--
Vahlkampfia spp.54.20 (27.49–79.67)12.6284.2%0.0018--
Vannella spp.10.75 (0.01–37.14)2.21-0.133--

CI, confidence interval; df, degree of freedom

Global prevalence, publication bias, and heterogeneity of FLA in water sources CI, confidence interval; df, degree of freedom

Discussion

FLA are cosmopolitan microorganisms ubiquitous in all matrices of natural and anthropogenic environments, including water resources. The presence of FLA in pools and recreational waters is worrying, since some of these microorganisms are human pathogens/opportunists, as well as being widely implicated in persistence and/or pseudo-resistance of pathogenic bacteria, viruses, and fungi in water, including in water treated with disinfectants (Thomas et al. 2004; Staggemeier et al. 2016; Mavridou et al. 2018; Gomes et al. 2020; Hubert et al. 2021). The studies included in present review are distributed by five continents; however, they have a heterogeneous spatial distribution within the territories of the continents; this can suggest differences in the level of FLA importance for health in the contexts of different countries, as well as differences in the frequency of cases diseases associated with the FLA. The frequency of cases of FLA-related diseases can be influenced by the difference in the predominance of risk factors and the sensitivity of the health surveillance strategy of each country, as well as the heterogeneous distribution of trained professionals carrying out research in this area. In addition, the ease of confusing symptoms of diseases associated with the FLA with those caused by other microorganisms, combined with some cases of rapid deterioration of the patient’s health and death (Jahangéer et al. 2020) can contribute to the rarity of reports or even the lack of association of diseases with FLA, especially in contexts where post-mortem study policies are not robust. Our findings show that the global prevalence of FLA in swimming pools and recreational waters is 44.34%; however, a higher (53.09%) and intermediate (45.40%) prevalence value was obtained when considering the data from studies published up to 2010 and studies published after 2015, respectively. A lower prevalence value (37.07%) was obtained when analyzing data from studies published between 2010 and 2015 (Table 2). A similar result was reported in a study that aimed to determine the prevalence of Naegleria spp. in water resources (Saberi et al. 2020). This reduction in the prevalence reported in most recent studies was attributed to the most accurate diagnosis and reduction of false positive results (Jahangeeer et al. 2020; Saberi et al. 2020), as contrary to studies published up to 2010, the vast majority of studies published after 2010 used molecular methods for FLA identification. Curiously, our results show that the overall prevalence of FLA considering studies that used both morphological and molecular methods is close to the mean of the prevalence values obtained from data from studies that used only one of the methods (Table 2). This may suggest that the simultaneous use of these two methods reduces the extreme values obtained separately by each of the methods, and that these methods can be complementary, especially in studies that aim to assess the presence or absence of viable FLA in water samples. The authors agree that the morphological method (generally based on culture) is more laborious and less precise than molecular methods in the identification of FLA (Saberi et al. 2020; Hikal et al. 2018). The subgroup analysis considering the distribution of the studies by the continents showed that FLA are more prevalent in the swimming pools and recreational water from America (63.99%), followed by Europe (51.99%) and Africa (51.27%). In relation to countries, the highest value of the prevalence of FLA was obtained in Mexico (98.35%), followed by Malaysia (87.38%), France (69.62%), and Italy (64.76%), and the lowest values were obtained in China (10.15%), Taiwan (26.33%), Turkey (30.60), and Thailand (32.68%). As for the sample source, the indoor hot swimming pools presented a higher value (52.27%) of FLA prevalence, followed by public swimming pools (49.47%) and thermal swimming pools (46.05%). The genera Vahlkampfia spp., Acanthamoeba spp., and Naegleria spp. were more prevalent, presenting the following prevalence values, 54.20%, 33.47%, and 30.95%, respectively (Table 3). The lowest prevalence value was for Vannella spp. (10.75%). These results are in accordance with other authors whose studies reported high prevalence of FLA (Acanthamoeba spp. 48.5%, Naegleria spp. 46.0%, Vermamoeba spp. 4.7%, and Balamuthia spp. 0.7%) in hot springs (Fabros et al. 2021). Saberi et al. (2020) reported the following prevalence values for Naegleria spp. 44.80%, 32.88%, and 21.27%, in swimming pools, hot springs, and recreational waters, respectively. The subgroup analysis showed that prevalence values are statistically different (P < 0.001) for all variables studied (Table 2). These findings are in accordance with other studies that reported a variable distribution in abundance and diversity of FLA species around the world (Jahangéer et al. 2020; Saberi et al. 2020; Fabros et al. 2021). The global prevalence of FLA reported in the present study (44.34%) is worrying, since direct contact between humans and these waters is often established. In addition, several studies have reported the isolation of several potentially pathogenic FLA (Caumo et al. 2009; Alves et al. 2012; Behniafar et al. 2015;) and others with proven pathogenicity in ex vivo and in vivo trials (Brown and Cursons 1977; Janitschke et al. 1980; Rivera et al. 1983, 1993; Gianinazzi et al. 2009). Most of these FLA are identified as N. fowleri, Acanthamoeba spp., and Balamuthia mandrillaris. Most isolates of Acanthamoeba spp. reported as pathogens are distributed among the T5, T11, T15, T3, and T4 genotypes, and among them, the T4 genotype is more prevalent in hot springs (Mahmoudi et al. 2015; Fabros et al. 2021) and is associated with most cases of Acanthamoeba keratitis (Diehl et al. 2021; Bellini et al. 2022). The presence and abundance of FLA in swimming pool water clearly indicate that in addition to these microorganisms being resistant to chlorine in the dosage used in the treatment of drinking water (Thomas et al. 2004; Majid et al. 2017; Gomes et al. 2020), they are also resistant to chlorine and other disinfectants in the dosage used for swimming pools and artificial recreational waters (Rivera et al. 1983; Kiss et al. 2014; Zeybek et al. 2017). Acanthamoeba castellanii trophozoites and cysts have been reported to be resistant to exposure for more than 2 h to NaOCl and NaCl at concentrations up to 8 mg/L and 40 g/L, respectively. On the other hand, exposure to the combined effect of NaOCl or NaCl with ultraviolet C (UV-C) radiation resulted in rapid inactivation of trophozoites even when lower concentrations of NaOCl and NaCl were used (Chaúque and Rott 2021a, b). Cyst inactivation was achieved by twice as long exposure (300 min) to the combined effect of NaOCl or NaCl and UV-C, with redosing of NaOCl. Despite having demonstrated that both methods are effective, and that they have a strong potential to be used in the effective disinfection of swimming pool water, it was found that the use of NaCl is more cost-effective, as it is cheaper and has a residual effect; redosing is not necessary and is simple to apply (Chaúque and Rott 2021a, b). On the other hand, the use of solar UV radiation (UV-A and B) in place of UV-C (which depends on electricity) can further reduce the cost of the disinfection process. The effectiveness of using solar UV to photolyse NaOCl to inactivate chlorine-resistant microorganisms has been previously documented (Zhou et al. 2014). Readers interested in solar water disinfection technology applicable to recreational water treatment are directed to the appropriate literature (Chaúque and Rott 2021a; Chaúque et al. 2022). The main aspects that constituted limitations for the present study are the following: the lack of studies carried out in most countries of the world; the heterogeneous distribution of the number of studies among the included countries; difference in FLA identification methods among many studies and discrepancy in the number of samples considered positive by the morphological and molecular method in the same study. The loss of isolates from positive samples in some studies, due to fungal contamination of non-nutrient agar plates prior to molecular identification of the amoebae, was also a limitation.

Conclusion

It is concluded that the prevalence of FLA in swimming pools and recreational waters is high and, therefore, of concern, since there is a risk of contracting infection by pathogenic amoebae or other pathogens (such as fungi, bacteria, and viruses) that may be harbored and dispersed by FLA in water (Mavridou et al. 2018). Thus, it is necessary to implement disinfection techniques that are effective in eliminating microorganisms, including FLA, in swimming pools and artificial recreational waters. The use of the combined effect of NaCl and UV-C has great potential to be used to eliminate or minimize the risk of infection by FLA in swimming pools and other artificial recreational waters. The potential risk of infection by FLA in natural recreational waters needs to be routinely quantified by health surveillance. Warning signs need to be placed where there is minimal risk of infection by FLA, and people using these water bodies need to be educated about the potential risk and possible safety measures. These measures include not diving in recreational waters wearing contact lenses, preventing water from entering the airways and eyes, and avoiding jumping into the water. Health care workers (especially those working near recreational water use sites with risk of infection by FLA) need to be trained to be on the lookout for symptoms suggestive of infection by FLA, especially in summer. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (PDF 756 KB)
  99 in total

1.  Titiwangsa Lake a source of urban parasitic contamination.

Authors:  A Majid Azlan; M N Rasid; R L Richard; T Mahboob; C Sritongchuen; N Jaturas; T C Tan; N Sawangjaroen; Y A L Lim; V Nissapatorn
Journal:  Trop Biomed       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 0.623

2.  Molecular detection of Acanthamoeba spp. in Seven Crater Lakes of Laguna, Philippines.

Authors:  Lea D Ballares; Frederick R Masangkay; Joseph Dionisio; Oliver Villaflores; Maria Ruth Pineda-Cortel; Giovanni D Milanez
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.744

3.  Resistance of Acanthamoeba castellanii cysts to physical, chemical, and radiological conditions.

Authors:  A Aksozek; K McClellan; K Howard; J Y Niederkorn; H Alizadeh
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.276

4.  Isolation and identification of pathogenic free-living amoeba from surface and tap water of Shiraz City using morphological and molecular methods.

Authors:  B Armand; M H Motazedian; Q Asgari
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Isolation of free-living amoebae from sarein hot springs in ardebil province, iran.

Authors:  A Badirzadeh; M Niyyati; Z Babaei; H Amini; H Badirzadeh; M Rezaeian
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.012

6.  Molecular Characterization of Pathogenic Acanthamoeba Isolated from Drinking and Recreational water in East Azerbaijan, Northwest Iran.

Authors:  Hamed Behniafar; Maryam Niyyati; Zohreh Lasjerdi
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2015-06-29

7.  Acanthamoeba species in Swimming Pools of Cairo, Egypt.

Authors:  Ahmad Al-Herrawy; Mahmoud Bahgat; Abd-Elhafez Mohammed; Ameen Ashour; Wafaa Hikal
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.012

8.  Evaluation of molecular characterization and phylogeny for quantification of Acanthamoeba and Naegleria fowleri in various water sources, Turkey.

Authors:  Mehmet Aykur; Hande Dagci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Surveillance and Molecular Identification of Acanthamoeba and Naegleria Species in Two Swimming Pools in Alexandria University, Egypt.

Authors:  Ahmad Z Al-Herrawy; Mahmoud I Khalil; Soheir S El-Sherif; Fatima A E Omar; Wael M Lotfy
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.012

10.  Investigating the frequency of free-living amoeba in water resources with emphasis on Acanthamoeba in Bandar Abbas city, Hormozgan province, Iran in 2019-2020.

Authors:  Homa Attariani; Habibollah Turki; Saeed Shoja; Abdoreza Salahi-Moghaddam; Amin Ghanbarnejad; Jebreil Shamseddin
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.