Literature DB >> 36040167

Tangent normalization for somatic copy-number inference in cancer genome analysis.

Galen F Gao1, Coyin Oh1,2,3, Gordon Saksena1, Davy Deng1,3,4, Lindsay C Westlake1, Barbara A Hill1, Michael Reich1,5, Steven E Schumacher1,3, Ashton C Berger1,3, Scott L Carter1,2,3, Andrew D Cherniack1, Matthew Meyerson1,3,6, Barbara Tabak1,3, Rameen Beroukhim1,3,7, Gad Getz1,8,9.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs) play an important role in cancer development. Systematic noise in sequencing and array data present a significant challenge to the inference of SCNAs for cancer genome analyses. As part of The Cancer Genome Atlas, the Broad Institute Genome Characterization Center developed the Tangent normalization method to generate copy-number profiles using data from single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays and whole-exome sequencing (WES) technologies for over 10 000 pairs of tumors and matched normal samples. Here, we describe the Tangent method, which uses a unique linear combination of normal samples as a reference for each tumor sample, to subtract systematic errors that vary across samples. We also describe a modification of Tangent, called Pseudo-Tangent, which enables denoising through comparisons between tumor profiles when few normal samples are available.
RESULTS: Tangent normalization substantially increases signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) compared to conventional normalization methods in both SNP array and WES analyses. Tangent and Pseudo-Tangent normalizations improve the SNR by reducing noise with minimal effect on signal and exceed the contribution of other steps in the analysis such as choice of segmentation algorithm. Tangent and Pseudo-Tangent are broadly applicable and enable more accurate inference of SCNAs from DNA sequencing and array data.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Tangent is available at https://github.com/broadinstitute/tangent and as a Docker image (https://hub.docker.com/r/broadinstitute/tangent). Tangent is also the normalization method for the copy-number pipeline in Genome Analysis Toolkit 4 (GATK4). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36040167      PMCID: PMC9563697          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.931


  39 in total

1.  Exome sequencing-based copy-number variation and loss of heterozygosity detection: ExomeCNV.

Authors:  Jarupon Fah Sathirapongsasuti; Hane Lee; Basil A J Horst; Georg Brunner; Alistair J Cochran; Scott Binder; John Quackenbush; Stanley F Nelson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Computational tools for copy number variation (CNV) detection using next-generation sequencing data: features and perspectives.

Authors:  Min Zhao; Qingguo Wang; Quan Wang; Peilin Jia; Zhongming Zhao
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Using probabilistic estimation of expression residuals (PEER) to obtain increased power and interpretability of gene expression analyses.

Authors:  Oliver Stegle; Leopold Parts; Matias Piipari; John Winn; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Sequenza: allele-specific copy number and mutation profiles from tumor sequencing data.

Authors:  F Favero; T Joshi; A M Marquard; N J Birkbak; M Krzystanek; Q Li; Z Szallasi; A C Eklund
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  CNVkit: Genome-Wide Copy Number Detection and Visualization from Targeted DNA Sequencing.

Authors:  Eric Talevich; A Hunter Shain; Thomas Botton; Boris C Bastian
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Integrated genomic and molecular characterization of cervical cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Reliability of algorithmic somatic copy number alteration detection from targeted capture data.

Authors:  Nora Rieber; Regina Bohnert; Ulrike Ziehm; Gunther Jansen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  SvABA: genome-wide detection of structural variants and indels by local assembly.

Authors:  Jeremiah A Wala; Pratiti Bandopadhayay; Noah F Greenwald; Ryan O'Rourke; Ted Sharpe; Chip Stewart; Steve Schumacher; Yilong Li; Joachim Weischenfeldt; Xiaotong Yao; Chad Nusbaum; Peter Campbell; Gad Getz; Matthew Meyerson; Cheng-Zhong Zhang; Marcin Imielinski; Rameen Beroukhim
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 9.438

9.  Somatic rearrangements across cancer reveal classes of samples with distinct patterns of DNA breakage and rearrangement-induced hypermutability.

Authors:  Yotam Drier; Michael S Lawrence; Scott L Carter; Chip Stewart; Stacey B Gabriel; Eric S Lander; Matthew Meyerson; Rameen Beroukhim; Gad Getz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Copynumber: Efficient algorithms for single- and multi-track copy number segmentation.

Authors:  Gro Nilsen; Knut Liestøl; Peter Van Loo; Hans Kristian Moen Vollan; Marianne B Eide; Oscar M Rueda; Suet-Feung Chin; Roslin Russell; Lars O Baumbusch; Carlos Caldas; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Ole Christian Lingjaerde
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.