Literature DB >> 36040059

Genome Assembly of the Polyclad Flatworm Prostheceraeus crozieri.

Daniel J Leite1,2, Laura Piovani2, Maximilian J Telford2.   

Abstract

Polyclad flatworms are widely thought to be one of the least derived of the flatworm classes and, as such, are well placed to investigate evolutionary and developmental features such as spiral cleavage and larval diversification lost in other platyhelminths. Prostheceraeus crozieri, (formerly Maritigrella crozieri), is an emerging model polyclad flatworm that already has some useful transcriptome data but, to date, no sequenced genome. We have used high molecular weight DNA extraction and long-read PacBio sequencing to assemble the highly repetitive (67.9%) P. crozieri genome (2.07 Gb). We have annotated 43,325 genes, with 89.7% BUSCO completeness. Perhaps reflecting its large genome, introns were considerably larger than other free-living flatworms, but evidence of abundant transposable elements suggests genome expansion has been principally via transposable elements activity. This genome resource will be of great use for future developmental and phylogenomic research.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Prostheceraeus crozierizzm321990 ; homeobox; polyclad; tiger flatworm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36040059      PMCID: PMC9469890          DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evac133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Biol Evol        ISSN: 1759-6653            Impact factor:   4.065


Flatworms are a major phylum of protostome animals showing enormous diversity, from free-living “turbellarians” to parasites including tapeworms, liver flukes, and schistosomes. Flatworm body plans and embryology have diverged considerably from the state seen in other protostomes, with many classes showing a unique form of early cleavage called “blastomeren anarchie”. Only a few platyhelminth classes, including polyclads, have retained a canonical spiralian type of development and polyclads are the only flatworm class with both spiral cleavage and ciliated larvae comparable to an annelid or mollusk trochophore larva. While whole-genome sequences are available from several other classes of flatworm, we have sequenced the first genome of a polyclad. Our annotated genome will provide an essential resource for the further study of this developing laboratory model and will help us understand the evolution of flatworm genomes, embryology and body plans and allow us to make fruitful comparisons across the animal kingdom.

Introduction

Platyhelminthes (flatworms) are a phylum of protostomes related to annelids, mollusks, and other Lophotrochozoa; they are a very diverse phylum represented by both free-living (turbellarian) and parasitic species (Martin-Duran et al. 2012; Egger et al. 2015). They have received particular attention due in part to their parasitism but also to the remarkable regenerative abilities of many species. Members of most flatworm classes are unusual amongst Lophotrochozoa in that they display divergent embryogenic processes (notably blastomeren anarchie) that have captured the interests of evolutionary and developmental biologists (Martin-Duran et al. 2012; Egger et al. 2015). The canonical spiral cleavage, typical of many lophotrochozoan phyla, is only seen in the early diverging flatworm classes—Catenulida, Macrostomida, Lecithoepitheliata, and Polycladida. Ciliated larvae, comparable to those of annelids and mollusks, are even more restricted, being found only in the polyclads. The polyclad class is thus pivotal to understanding the starting point for the evolution of the divergent developmental modes in other platyhelminth classes and more generally for linking platyhelminth development to the wider context of the Lophotrochozoa (Egger et al. 2015). Prostheceraeus crozieri (previously Maritigrella crozieri) is a species of polyclad flatworm found in the mangroves of Bermuda and the Florida Keys. The adults live on (and eat) colonies of the sea squirt species Ecteinascidia turbinata (Lapraz et al. 2013). Prostheceraeus crozieri is becoming a useful laboratory model polyclad and transcriptomes of different developmental stages exist; the species has been used to examine early spiral cleavage and larval development using micro-injection labeling techniques, 3D light sheet microscopy (Girstmair and Telford 2019), and gene expression in its Müller's larva using anti-body and in situ hybridization techniques (Rawlinson et al. 2019). While previous work has resulted in an assembled de novo transcriptome (Lapraz et al. 2013), a genome is needed to enable comparisons with existing genomes of other free-living flatworms such as the laboratory models Schmidtea mediterranea (Grohme et al. 2018), Macrostomum lignano (Wasik et al. 2015; Wudarski et al. 2017), and Dugesia japonica (An et al. 2018) as well as those of the many parasitic species. Flatworm genomes are notoriously repetitive and challenging to assemble, but long-read sequencing has been used to improve assembly contiguity (Wudarski et al. 2017; Grohme et al. 2018). We have used high molecular weight DNA extracted from a single individual and sequenced with PacBio technology to assemble a draft genome. The genome assembly and annotation will be a key resource for future studies involving this polyclad flatworm.

Results and Discussion

The Large Genome of P. crozieri

High molecular weight DNA was extracted from a single, hermaphrodite P. crozieri adult and sequenced using PacBio and Illumina technologies, generating 11,921,195 PacBio reads with an N50 of ∼30 kb and 558,509,539 Illumina 150 bp paired-end reads, which FastQC identified high-quality reads throughout. The initial assembly used Flye (Kolmogorov et al. 2019) to assemble PacBio reads to 2.26 Gb, with 26,131 scaffolds and an N50 of 261,667 bp. Polishing and purging of possible haplotype-associated duplicate scaffolds generally removed smaller scaffolds (fig. 1), reducing the final genome size to 2.07 Gb, with 17,074 scaffolds (16,926 scaffolds >1,000 bp) and increased the N50 to 292,050. The assembled genome has a GC content of 37.64% (table 1).
Fig. 1.

Genome stats, gene annotation characteristics, gene ortholog, and Pfam comparisons to other free-living flatworms. (A) Scaffold size frequency of initial (red) and final assembly (blue) and the scaffold sizes removed (green) during duplicate scaffold removal. (B) Kmer frequency coverage reveals two peaks, suggesting diploidy. (C) Repeat sizes in the soft-masked genome show many short and long repeats (>10 kb = red dash line). (D) Exon and (E) intron sizes and GC% distribution reveal large intron sizes but comparable GC% to other free-living flatworms. Exons/introns were sorted by GC %, split into bins of 1,000 genes, and the average length of each bin was measured. (F) Orthofinder detected 23,378 orthogroups of which 4,590 (19.6%) were shared between all four flatworm species. (G) Of the total 5,428 Pfams, 3,233 (59.6%) were shared between all four species. (H) The most abundant Pfam domains ordered by the total of all four species. Mlig in blue shows different distribution relating to possible high gene duplication. (I) The top 20 families in (B) reveal that Prostheceraeus crozieri has a high occurrence of retroviral/transposable element functioning Pfams. Pcro, P. crozieri (blue); Smed, Schmidtea mediterranea (purple); Djap, Dugesia japonica (blue); and Mlig, Macrostomum lignano (green).

Table 1

Genome Assembly, Repeat Content, Annotation and BUSCO Metrics

Assembly size (bp)2,065,465,794
Scaffolds17,074
N50 (bp)292,050
Largest scaffold (bp)2,612,272
N count (bp)12,175
GC (%)37.64
Protein-coding genes43,325
BUSCO (%)C:89.7 (S:87.1, D:2.6), F:5.2, M:5.1
Total repeats (%)67.9
Genome stats, gene annotation characteristics, gene ortholog, and Pfam comparisons to other free-living flatworms. (A) Scaffold size frequency of initial (red) and final assembly (blue) and the scaffold sizes removed (green) during duplicate scaffold removal. (B) Kmer frequency coverage reveals two peaks, suggesting diploidy. (C) Repeat sizes in the soft-masked genome show many short and long repeats (>10 kb = red dash line). (D) Exon and (E) intron sizes and GC% distribution reveal large intron sizes but comparable GC% to other free-living flatworms. Exons/introns were sorted by GC %, split into bins of 1,000 genes, and the average length of each bin was measured. (F) Orthofinder detected 23,378 orthogroups of which 4,590 (19.6%) were shared between all four flatworm species. (G) Of the total 5,428 Pfams, 3,233 (59.6%) were shared between all four species. (H) The most abundant Pfam domains ordered by the total of all four species. Mlig in blue shows different distribution relating to possible high gene duplication. (I) The top 20 families in (B) reveal that Prostheceraeus crozieri has a high occurrence of retroviral/transposable element functioning Pfams. Pcro, P. crozieri (blue); Smed, Schmidtea mediterranea (purple); Djap, Dugesia japonica (blue); and Mlig, Macrostomum lignano (green). Genome Assembly, Repeat Content, Annotation and BUSCO Metrics This assembled genome is larger than any other free-living flatworm genome known (S. mediterranea—782.1 Mb, D. japonica—1.46 Gb, and M. lignano—764 Mb) (Wudarski et al. 2017; An et al. 2018; Grohme et al. 2018). The assembled genome size corresponds closely to a flow cytometry-based estimates of 2.5 Gb, indicating a ∼83% complete assembly (Lapraz et al. 2013). Kmer-based genome size estimates gave a smaller size of only 1.56–1.68 Gb genome size (supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online), suggesting that Flye performed well despite issues with repeats presumably disrupting kmer-based size estimation. Kmer frequencies suggested diploidy, with two peaks occurring (fig. 1) and predicted heterozygosity levels between 0.810% and 0.936% (supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online). The level of duplicate BUSCO genes in the initial assembly was 5.5% and, after polishing and haplotype purging, this was reduced to 2.7% (supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material online). In both assembly versions, the percentage of missing BUSCO genes was similar, at ∼13.5% (supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material online), indicating that haplotype-specific scaffold removal did not reduce genome completeness.

Highly Repetitive Genome

A total of 67.9% of the P. crozieri genome was identified as repeat, and this portion was masked. This level of repeats was high, but was anticipated given other highly repetitive flatworm genomes (e.g. S. mediterranea and D. japonica genomes have 61.7% and 80% repeat content, respectively) (Wasik et al. 2015; Wudarski et al. 2017; An et al. 2018; Grohme et al. 2018) and the predicted size of this genome. The percentage of repeat content was greater than S. mediterranea (61.7%), but less than the estimated 80% in D. japonica. While retroelements (10.19%) and DNA transposons (23.89%) like PiggyBac and hobo-activator, and SINE (Penelope) and LTR (Pao and Copia), and 1.62% of other repeats (e.g. small RNA, satellites, rolling circles, simple repeats), were identified in the genome, the largest fraction of repeats was unclassified (32.3%). There were many large repeat regions >10 kb, but small repeats were also abundant (fig. 1). Sequencing and assembly of other free-living flatworms has proved difficult due to the highly repetitive genomes and long repeats, and we also encountered assembly difficulties here, despite using PacBio long reads, likely due to high repeat content and long repeats.

Many Gene Annotations Have Large Introns

Braker2 (Bruna et al. 2021) was used to predict gene models and predicted a total of 43,325 genes, with 46,235 isoforms, which had an average length of 2,048 bp. The 23,852 of the 43,325 genes had transcriptional support >1 transcript per million in the RNAseq data. InterProScan (Jones et al. 2014) identified 21,493 of the predicted genes with homology to Pfam domains and, of these, 12,199 were also supported by the existing transcriptome data. This suggests that Braker2 was able to recover gene predictions that had Pfam homology but which lacked RNAseq evidence. The BUSCO completeness of the annotated gene set (C:89.7% [S:87.1%, D:2.6%], F:5.2%, M:5.1%) was more complete than the genome assembly alone (supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material online). We compared the length and GC content of exons and introns with other free-living flatworms (Zhu et al. 2009). P. crozieri exons had a mean length of 467 bp, which was similar to what is seen in S. mediterranea (198 bp), D. japonica (297 bp), and M. lignano (574 bp) (fig. 1). However, P. crozieri introns were substantially longer than what is seen in the three other flatworms, with P. crozieri having an average intron length of 5,263 bp compared with S. mediterranea (1,064 bp), D. japonica (2,972 bp), and M. lignano (975 bp) (fig. 1). P. crozieri average exon GC content was 44.5% (higher than the genome GC of 37.64%), which was greater than S. mediterranea and D. japonica, but less than M. lignano (fig. 1). The GC of introns (37.4%) was very similar to the background P. crozieri genomic GC content (fig. 1).

Comparisons of Pfam Domain Content With Other Flatworms

Orthofinder (Emms and Kelly 2019) analysis identified 23,378 orthogroups of which 4,590 orthogroups were shared between P. crozieri, S. mediterranea, D. japonica, and M. lignano (fig. 1). Many orthogroups were shared between the closely related S. mediterranea and D. japonica (4,198) or found only in M. lignano (6,372) (fig. 1). Across all four species, a total of 5,428 Pfams were detected, with 3,233 being shared in all four species (fig. 1). We also asked how many genes were associated with each Pfam domain in the other available free-living flatworm genomes. The number of genes per Pfam domain was similar in P. crozieri, S. mediterranea, and D. japonica, but the macrostomid M. lignano had more instances of genes linked to each Pfam, supporting previous evidence of high levels of duplication in M. lignano (fig. 1) (Wasik et al. 2015; Wudarski et al. 2017). It is possible that the large number of specific orthology groups in M. lignano is associated with the divergence of these duplicated genes (Holland et al. 2017; Natsidis et al. 2021). Many of the most frequently occurring Pfam domains in P. crozieri (rvt_1 [pf00078], rve [pf00665], piggybac [pf13843], and integrase [pf17921]), were also more abundant than the other flatworms (fig. 1) and are associated with retroviral or transposable element genes. Taken together with the high proportion of repetitive elements, this could suggest that P. crozieri has a large number of active transposable elements. It is unclear whether the large intron sizes (when compared with other flatworms) are functionally related to the higher transposable element activity.

Homeobox Gene Repertoire

We annotated 89 homeobox containing genes in P. crozieri (29 ANTP, 19 PRD, 11 LIM, 7 TALE, 6 SINE, 4 POU, 3 CUT, 3 ZF, 1 CERS, 1 HNF, 2 PROS, and 3 unassigned) (supplementary fig. S1 and table S3, Supplementary Material online), which covers the 11 major classes (Holland et al. 2007), which is similar to other free-living flatworms (Olson 2008; Abril et al. 2010; Currie et al. 2016). We found five Hox genes Hox1, Hox6–8 and three Hox9–13/Post2. ParaHox genes (Cdx, Gsx, and Xlox/Pdx) have been lost (or not identified) in S. mediterranea (Currie et al. 2016); we identified Cdx and Gsx but not Xlox/Pdx in P. crozieri (supplementary table S3, Supplementary Material online). The Hox genes were not found in a single cluster, although two Hox9–13 genes were linked on a single scaffold, Cdx and Hhex were present on another scaffold and tandem duplicates of Otx on a third (supplementary table S3, Supplementary Material online). Low discovery of syntenic homeobox genes may be a result of a large, repeat-rich genome that is fragmented. The P. crozieri genome is considerably larger than other flatworms sequenced to date. However, given the complete repertoire of homeobox classes and high BUSCO completeness, the lack of extensive duplications of either homeobox or BUSCO genes suggests that there have been no large-scale or pervasive gene duplications in the lineage leading to P. crozieri.

Genes Associated with Pluripotency and Regeneration

Like other flatworms, P. crozieri possesses high regenerative capabilities (Lapraz et al. 2013). Flatworms have lost most mammalian stem cell and pluripotency genes (Oct4/Pou5f1, Nanog, Klf4, c-Myc, and Sox2) however. Of these mammalian factors, only Sox2 homologs remain in S. mediterranea and M. lignano (Wasik et al. 2015; Grohme et al. 2018). Similarly, in P. crozieri, Sox2 was present in one copy, and none of the other factors were identified, despite its regenerative capabilities. Therefore P. crozieri like other flatworms, lacks the pluripotency genes commonly found in mammals, though further improvements in P. crozieri genome and annotation completeness may help to validate this observation.

Conclusion

We have assembled and annotated the first polyclad flatworm genome of P. crozieri attaining a 2.07 Gb assembly with 43,325 genes. The high repeat content of 67.9% was not unexpected based on other flatworm genomes. Despite the problems that these high repeat contents can cause in genome assembly, the high BUSCO scores we observed and the large homeobox repertoire suggest the assembly and annotation are of reasonable completeness and of a quality that will be useful for future studies. Our work helps elevate P. crozieri as an increasingly important model that will contribute to our understanding of flatworm and animal evolution.

Materials and Methods

Animal collection, DNA extraction, and sequencing

P. crozieri adults were collected between Largo and Marathon Keys in the Florida Keys, USA (September/October 2019), transported in sea water to UCL, UK, and transitioned to artificial sea water (ASW) and maintained in ASW for 4 weeks. DNA from one live adult was extracted following a standard soft tissue protocol from BioNano Prep Animal tissue DNA Isolation. Extracted DNA was stored at 4°C for 3 days before DNA concentration was estimated using NanoDrop and TapeStation technology. Approximately 10 μg of DNA was used for library preparation and sequencing with two SMRT SQII PacBio cells and shearing, library preparation, and 150 bp paired-end Illumina sequencing done at the University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Kmer Genome Size Estimation

Genome size was estimated with kmer abundance in short-read data with Jellyfish v2.3 (Marcais and Kingsford 2011) using kmer lengths of 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, and 31 bp, with option count -C. Histo generated files using Jellyfish histo were used with GenomeScope (read_length = 150, kmer_max = 10,000) to estimate the genome size and heterozygosity (Vurture et al. 2017) and visualized with R v3.5.3.

Genome Assembly

We use the repeat concatenated de Bruijn graph assembler Flye v2.7 (Kolmogorov et al. 2019) and the PacBio reads for an initial assembly with the genome size parameter set to 2.5 Gb (-g 2.5 g), 75× coverage for repeat graph construction (--asm-coverage 75) and a minimum overlap of 8,000 bp (-m 8000) to avoid an overly fragmented assembly. This was followed by one round of polishing with long reads using Flye (Kolmogorov et al. 2019). Further polishing with NextPolish v1.1.0 (Hu et al. 2020) using short reads trimmed with Trimmomatic v0.39 (LEADING:3 TRAILING:3 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15 MINLEN:36) (Bolger et al. 2014) and long reads to polish using the -task = best strategy. The parameters for minimap2 v2.17-r941 (Li 2018) for max depth of short reads was set to 35× coverage and for long reads -x map-pb, with a minimum read length of 5 kb, maximum read length 300 kb, and max depth at 60×. Purge_dups v1.2.3 (Guan et al. 2020) further collapsed haplotype scaffolds (including parameter -e). We searched for BUSCO genes at each step of assembly and the final gene predictions. Busco v3.0.2 (Simao et al. 2015) was used with metazoan_odb9 with default evalue and “-long” for optimization of the Augustus parameters in genome searches.

Repeat Modeling and Masking

De novo repeats were identified with RepeatModeler v2.0.1 (Flynn et al. 2020), with RepeatScout v1.0.6 (Price et al. 2005), TandemRepatsFinder v4.06 (Benson 1999) and RECON v1.08 (Bao and Eddy 2002), Genometools v1.6 ltrharvest (Ellinghaus et al. 2008; Gremme et al. 2013), LTR_retriever v2.8 (Ou and Jiang 2018), with the RMBlast v2.10.0 search engine and the -LTRstruct identification options. This de novo repeat library and the Dfam3.2 (Hubley et al. 2016) library were used with RepeatMasker v4.0.7 to produce a soft-masked genome assembly of P. crozieri.

Gene Prediction and Annotation

For gene annotation, we used RNAseq evidence with the Braker v2.1.2 (Bruna et al. 2021) pipeline with Augustus v3.2.3 (Stanke et al. 2006), and GeneMark-ET v4.46 (Bruna et al. 2020). First, paired-end (SRR1801815) and single-end (SRR1801812) RNAseq data from P. crozieri were trimmed with Trimmomatic v0.39 (LEADING:3 TRAILING:3 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15 MINLEN:36) (Bolger et al. 2014). The soft-masked genome was indexed with Star v2.7.3a (Dobin et al. 2013) and reads were mapped using the multi-sample 2-pass method to improve the accuracy of splice junction information. BAM files were sorted by coordinates with Samtools v1.9 (Li et al. 2009) as RNAseq evidence for Braker v2.1.2 (Bruna et al. 2021) to predict gene models including their UTRs (-UTRs = on), using 10 rounds of optimization (-r 10) and CRF modeling (-crf). Interproscan v 5.47-82.0 (Jones et al. 2014) was used to annotate protein predictions with all available databases. These Interproscan results, along with Interproscan searches for S. mediterranea, M. lignano, and D. japonica, were used to assess Pfams in free-living flatworm and presence of pluripontency genes (Nanog, Klf4, c-Myc, and Sox2) in P. crozieri.

Homeobox Gene Annotation

The homeodomain PF00046 Pfam RP55 alignment was used with hmmsearch v3.3.1 (Eddy 2011) to query the P. crozieri protein annotations and domain hits were extracted using eslsfetch v0.47. Hits (length > 50 amino acids) were aligned with all Caenorhabditis elegans, Branchiostoma floridae, and Tribolium castaneum homeodomains from HomeoDB (Zhong et al. 2008; Zhong and Holland 2011) (http://homeodb.zoo.ox.ac.uk/) using MAFFT v7.475 with 1,000 iterations (Katoh and Standley 2013). Iqtree v2.0.3 (Minh et al. 2020) built maximum likelihood trees, using 1,000 ultrafast bootstraps with automatic model prediction (LG + G4). The consensus tree was visualized in Figtree. Click here for additional data file.
  44 in total

1.  De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Neil C Jones; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences.

Authors:  G Benson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  GenomeScope: fast reference-free genome profiling from short reads.

Authors:  Gregory W Vurture; Fritz J Sedlazeck; Maria Nattestad; Charles J Underwood; Han Fang; James Gurtowski; Michael C Schatz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification.

Authors:  Philip Jones; David Binns; Hsin-Yu Chang; Matthew Fraser; Weizhong Li; Craig McAnulla; Hamish McWilliam; John Maslen; Alex Mitchell; Gift Nuka; Sebastien Pesseat; Antony F Quinn; Amaia Sangrador-Vegas; Maxim Scheremetjew; Siew-Yit Yong; Rodrigo Lopez; Sarah Hunter
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  LTRharvest, an efficient and flexible software for de novo detection of LTR retrotransposons.

Authors:  David Ellinghaus; Stefan Kurtz; Ute Willhoeft
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Classification and nomenclature of all human homeobox genes.

Authors:  Peter W H Holland; H Anne F Booth; Elspeth A Bruford
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.

Authors:  Anthony M Bolger; Marc Lohse; Bjoern Usadel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  HOX gene complement and expression in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea.

Authors:  Ko W Currie; David D R Brown; Shujun Zhu; ChangJiang Xu; Veronique Voisin; Gary D Bader; Bret J Pearson
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.250

9.  The Dfam database of repetitive DNA families.

Authors:  Robert Hubley; Robert D Finn; Jody Clements; Sean R Eddy; Thomas A Jones; Weidong Bao; Arian F A Smit; Travis J Wheeler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Efficient transgenesis and annotated genome sequence of the regenerative flatworm model Macrostomum lignano.

Authors:  Jakub Wudarski; Daniil Simanov; Kirill Ustyantsev; Katrien de Mulder; Margriet Grelling; Magda Grudniewska; Frank Beltman; Lisa Glazenburg; Turan Demircan; Julia Wunderer; Weihong Qi; Dita B Vizoso; Philipp M Weissert; Daniel Olivieri; Stijn Mouton; Victor Guryev; Aziz Aboobaker; Lukas Schärer; Peter Ladurner; Eugene Berezikov
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.