| Literature DB >> 36039275 |
S N Manoharan1, K M V Madan Kumar2, N Vadivelan2.
Abstract
One of the mosquito-borne pandemic viral infections is Dengue which is mostly transmitted to humans by the Aedes agypti or female Aedes albopictis mosquitoes. The dengue disease expansion is mainly due to the different factors such as climate change, socioeconomic factors, viral evolution, globalization, etc. The unavailability of certain antiviral therapy and specific vaccine increases the risk of the dengue disease spreading even further. This arises the need for a novel technique that overcomes the complexities associated with dengue disease prediction such as low reporting level, misclassification, and incompatible disease monitoring framework. This paper mainly overcomes the above-mentioned problems by integrating the Internet of Things (IoT), fog-cloud, and deep learning techniques for efficient dengue monitoring. A compatible disease monitoring framework is formed via the IoT devices and the reports are effectively created and transferred to the healthcare facilities via the fog-cloud model. The misdiagnosis error is overcome in this paper using the novel Hybrid Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with Tanh Long and Short Term Memory (TLSTM) based Adaptive Teaching Learning Based Optimization (ATLBO) algorithm. The ATLBO optimized CNN-TLSTM architecture mainly analyzes the dengue-related parameters such as Soft Bleeding, Muscle Pain, Joint Pain, Skin rash, Fever, Water Site, Carbon Dioxide, Water Site Humidity, Water Site Temperature, etc. for an efficient clinical decision making and timely disease diagnosis. The experimental results are conducted using a real-time dataset and its performance is validated using various performance metrics. When compared in terms of different statistical parameters such as accuracy, f-measure, mean square error, and reliability, the proposed method offers superior results in the case of dengue disease detection than other existing methods. The ATLBO optimized hybrid CNN-TLSTM shows an accuracy of 96.9%, a precision of 95.7%, recall of 96.8%, and F-measure of 96.2% which is relatively high when compared to the existing techniques. The proposed model is capable of identifying the patients in a certain geographical region and preventing the disease emergency via immediate disease diagnosis and alerting the healthcare officials to offer the stipulated services.Entities:
Keywords: And adaptive teaching learning optimization algorithm; Deep learning; Dengue disease prediction; Healthcare monitoring; Internet of things
Year: 2022 PMID: 36039275 PMCID: PMC9402409 DOI: 10.1007/s11063-022-10971-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Process Lett ISSN: 1370-4621 Impact factor: 2.565
Fig. 1General architecture of CNN-LSTM
Fig. 2Architecture of TLSTM
Fig. 3Structure of hybrid CNN-TLSTM with ATLBO algorithm
Fig. 4Block diagram of the proposed model
Hardware and software used for implementation
| Experimental platform | Environmental constraints |
|---|---|
| Software environments | TensorFlow: 1.14.0 |
| Keras: 2.1.0 | |
| Python: 3.7.6 | |
| Hardware environments | Operating system: Window 10.0 bit |
| Graphics card: NVIDIA MAX 450 | |
| Hard Disk Capacity: 512 G | |
| Memory: 16 GB | |
| Processor: 8 compute cores 4.2 GHz, i5-1135G7 Rade on R4 |
Optimal parameter settings
| Methods | Parameters | Ranges |
|---|---|---|
| CNN-TLSTM | Activation function of convolutional layer | Sigmoid |
| Kernel size | 2 | |
| Filters in the convolutional layers | 60 | |
| Number of hidden units in the TLSTM layer | 60 | |
| Number of nodes in input and output layer | 16 and 2 | |
| Activation function of TLSTM layers | Tan | |
| Loss function | MAE | |
| Batch size | 60 | |
| Number of epochs | 50 | |
| ATLBO algorithm | Number of learners | 10 |
| Number of duplicate elimination | 10 | |
| Random interval | [0, 1] | |
| Number of iterations | Maximum | |
| Variation of inertia weight | 0.85–0.95 | |
| Convergence ratio | 95% |
Health attributes description
| Criterion | Attributes | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Health | Soft bleeding (MB) | Is the registered individual feel soft bleeding in the gums, nose, or easy bruising? (Y/N) |
| Muscle pain (MP) | Does the registered individual suffer from muscle pain? (Y/N) | |
| Joint pain (JP) | Does the registered individual suffer from joint pain? (Y/N) | |
| Skin rash (SR) | Does the registered individual have rashes on the body after the fever? (Y/N) | |
| Severe abdominal pain (AP) | Is the registered individual suffering from severe abdominal pain? (Y/N) | |
| Vomiting (V) | Does the registered individual feel like vomiting? (Y/N) | |
| Nausea (NA) | Does the registered individual feel restlessness or discomfort? (Y/N) | |
| Pain behind eyes (PE) | Is the registered individual suffering from pain behind the eyes? (Y/N) | |
| Severe headache (SH) | Is the registered individual suffering from severe headaches? (Y/N) | |
| Fever (F) | Is the registered individual suffering from fever? (Y/N) | |
| Environmental | Water site carbon Dioxide | Value of carbon dioxide around a standing water site |
| Water site humidity | Humidity around a standing water site | |
| Water site Temperature | Temperature around standing water site | |
| Breeding sites count | Total number of breeding sites in a particular area | |
| Mosquito breeding Site | The geographical location of the mosquito breeding site | |
| Mosquito dense site | The geographical location of mosquito dense site | |
| Mosquito density | The density of mosquitoes in a location | |
| Personal | relatives | Name and contact number of Registered individual’s relatives |
| Mobile number | Registered individual’s mobile number | |
| Residential’s address and location | Registered individual’s residential address and geographical location | |
| Workplace’s address and location | Registered individual’s workplace address and geographical location | |
| Sex | Registered individual’s gender | |
| Age | Registered individual’s age (in years) | |
| Name | Registered individual’s name | |
| uId | Registered individual’s unique identification number |
Probabilities generated for different dataset symptoms
| Symptoms | Probability value | Symptoms | Probability value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soft bleeding (MB) | 0.7 | Pain behind eyes (PE) | 0.5 |
| Fever (F) | 0.8 | Water site carbon dioxide | 0.6 |
| Nausea (NA) | 0.5 | Vomiting (V) | 0.5 |
| Muscle pain (MP) | 0.7 | Water site humidity | 0.59 |
| Joint pain (JP) | 0.69 | Water site temperature | 0.36 |
| Skin rash (SR) | 0.5 | Breeding sites count | 0.25 |
| Severe abdominal pain (AP) | 0.5 | mosquito breeding site | 0.56 |
| Vomiting (V) | 0.6 | Mosquito dense site | 0.12 |
| Severe headache (SH) | 0.7 | Mosquito density | 0.60 |
Fig. 5Performance of accuracy based on the number of epochs
Fig. 6Performance of loss based on the number of epochs
Evaluation of training and testing time
| Number of health records | Training time (s) | Testing time (s) |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | 1.23 | 0.003 |
| 400 | 1.02 | 0.05 |
| 600 | 0.09 | 0.12 |
| 800 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| 1000 | 0.034 | 0.024 |
Fig. 7State-of-art results based on the health records, a Training time, and b Testing time
Fig. 8State-of-art accuracy based on varying number of health records
Fig. 9State-of-art comparison of mean absolute percentage error
Fig. 10State-of-art comparison of mean square error
Fig. 11State-of-art result of classification performance
Fig. 12Performance analysis of reliability
Performance analysis
| Techniques | Latency (seconds) | Time complexity (seconds) | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cascading ensssembe of CNN [ | 0.071 | 24 | 93 |
| Multimodel classification [ | 0.054 | 22 | 91 |
| DRL [ | 0.079 | 25 | 92 |
| 1DCNN [ | 0.086 | 16 | 94 |
| DNN [ | 0.093 | 28 | 93 |
| Proposed ATLBO optimized hybrid CNN-TLSTM | 0.075 | 10 | 96.9 |