Alice Martin1, Grégory Lailler1, Yannick Béjot1, Amélie Gabet1, Clémence Grave1, Nolwenn Regnault1, Edouard Chatignoux1, Elodie Moutengou1, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux1, Sandrine Kretz1, Claire Mounier-Vehier1, Vassilis Tsatsaris1, Genevieve Plu-Bureau1, Jacques Blacher1, Valérie Olié2. 1. From the French Public Health Agency (A.M., G.L., A.G., C.G., N.R., E.C., E.M., V.O.), Saint-Maurice; Dijon Stroke Registry (Y.B.), University Hospital and Medical School of Dijon, University of Burgundy; Inserm U1153 (C.D.-T., G.P.-B.), Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Research Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS); Paris-Descartes University (C.D.-T., V.T., G.P.-B., J.B.); Diagnosis and Therapeutic Center (S.K., J.B.), Hotel Dieu, AP-HP, University Paris Descartes; Vascular Medecine and Hypertension Center (C.M.-V.), EA 2694, Santé Publique, University Lille; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (V.T.), APHP, Port-Royal Maternity, University Hospital Center Cochin Broca Hôtel Dieu, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Ouest; and Division of Gynaecology (G.P.-B.), APHP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France. 2. From the French Public Health Agency (A.M., G.L., A.G., C.G., N.R., E.C., E.M., V.O.), Saint-Maurice; Dijon Stroke Registry (Y.B.), University Hospital and Medical School of Dijon, University of Burgundy; Inserm U1153 (C.D.-T., G.P.-B.), Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Research Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS); Paris-Descartes University (C.D.-T., V.T., G.P.-B., J.B.); Diagnosis and Therapeutic Center (S.K., J.B.), Hotel Dieu, AP-HP, University Paris Descartes; Vascular Medecine and Hypertension Center (C.M.-V.), EA 2694, Santé Publique, University Lille; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (V.T.), APHP, Port-Royal Maternity, University Hospital Center Cochin Broca Hôtel Dieu, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Ouest; and Division of Gynaecology (G.P.-B.), APHP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France. valerie.olie@santepubliquefrance.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the potentially devastating effects of pregnancy-related stroke, few studies have examined its incidence by type of stroke. We aimed to study the nationwide incidence rates and recent temporal trends for all types of pregnancy-related stroke and to compare these incidences with stroke incidence in nonpregnant women. METHODS: We conducted a study of 6,297,698 women aged 15-49 years who gave birth in France between 2010 and 2018 with no history of stroke before pregnancy by collecting data from the French National Health Insurance Information System database. Poisson regression was used to estimate the incidence by types of strokes for the different pregnancy periods and the incidence rate ratio of stroke in pregnant vs nonpregnant French women. RESULTS: Among the 6,297,698 women, 1,261 (24.0 per 100,000 person-years) experienced a first ever stroke during, antepartum peripartum, or the first 6 weeks of postpartum. Of the pregnancy-related strokes, 42.9% were ischemic (IS), 41.9% were hemorrhagic (with similar proportion of intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage), and 17.4% were cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Compared with nonpregnant women, incidence rates of stroke were similar during pregnancy for IS (adjusted incidence risk ratio [IRR] 0.9 [0.8-1.1]), slightly higher for all hemorrhagic strokes (IRR 1.4 [1.2-1.8]), and considerably increased for CVT (IRR 8.1 [6.5-10.1]). Pregnancy-related stroke incidence rose between 2010 and 2018 for IS and HS but was stable for CVT. DISCUSSION: The risk of pregnancy-related CVT was more than 8-fold higher than that observed in nonpregnant women. The incidence of pregnancy-related IS and HS is increasing over time, and efforts should be made for prevention considering treatable cardiovascular risk factors and hypertensive disorders in pregnant women.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the potentially devastating effects of pregnancy-related stroke, few studies have examined its incidence by type of stroke. We aimed to study the nationwide incidence rates and recent temporal trends for all types of pregnancy-related stroke and to compare these incidences with stroke incidence in nonpregnant women. METHODS: We conducted a study of 6,297,698 women aged 15-49 years who gave birth in France between 2010 and 2018 with no history of stroke before pregnancy by collecting data from the French National Health Insurance Information System database. Poisson regression was used to estimate the incidence by types of strokes for the different pregnancy periods and the incidence rate ratio of stroke in pregnant vs nonpregnant French women. RESULTS: Among the 6,297,698 women, 1,261 (24.0 per 100,000 person-years) experienced a first ever stroke during, antepartum peripartum, or the first 6 weeks of postpartum. Of the pregnancy-related strokes, 42.9% were ischemic (IS), 41.9% were hemorrhagic (with similar proportion of intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage), and 17.4% were cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Compared with nonpregnant women, incidence rates of stroke were similar during pregnancy for IS (adjusted incidence risk ratio [IRR] 0.9 [0.8-1.1]), slightly higher for all hemorrhagic strokes (IRR 1.4 [1.2-1.8]), and considerably increased for CVT (IRR 8.1 [6.5-10.1]). Pregnancy-related stroke incidence rose between 2010 and 2018 for IS and HS but was stable for CVT. DISCUSSION: The risk of pregnancy-related CVT was more than 8-fold higher than that observed in nonpregnant women. The incidence of pregnancy-related IS and HS is increasing over time, and efforts should be made for prevention considering treatable cardiovascular risk factors and hypertensive disorders in pregnant women.
Authors: Suzanne M Silvis; Erik Lindgren; Sini Hiltunen; Sharon Devasagayam; Luuk J Scheres; Katarina Jood; Susanna M Zuurbier; Timothy J Kleinig; Frank L Silver; Daniel M Mandell; Saskia Middeldorp; Jukka Putaala; Suzanne C Cannegieter; Turgut Tatlisumak; Jonathan M Coutinho Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Lisa R Leffert; Caitlin R Clancy; Brian T Bateman; Allison S Bryant; Elena V Kuklina Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Maria C Magnus; Nils-Halvdan Morken; Knut-Arne Wensaas; Allen J Wilcox; Siri E Håberg Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 11.613
Authors: Lu Ban; Nikola Sprigg; Alyshah Abdul Sultan; Catherine Nelson-Piercy; Philip M Bath; Jonas F Ludvigsson; Olof Stephansson; Laila J Tata Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 5.501