| Literature DB >> 36038232 |
Jiajie Liang1, Peijun Teng2, Liangshan Hu3, Guanbo He4, Qifang Song2, Ying Zhang2, Bin Peng2, Gan Li2, Wei Xiao5, Donglin Cao6, Yong Tang7.
Abstract
Early rapid screening diagnostic assay is essential for the identification, prevention, and evaluation of many contagious or refractory diseases. The optical density transducer created by platinum nanoparticles (PtNPs) (OD-CRISPR) is reported in the present research as a cheap and easy-to-execute CRISPR/Cas12a-based diagnostic platform. The OD-CRISPR uses PtNPs, with ultra-high peroxidase-mimicking activity, to increase the detection sensitivity, thereby enabling the reduction of detection time and cost. The OD-CRISPR can be utilized to identify nucleic acid or protein biomarkers within an incubation time of 30-40min in clinical specimens. In the case of taking severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) N gene as an instance, when compared to a quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), the OD-CRISPR test attains a sensitivity of 79.17% and a specificity of 100%. In terms of detecting prostate-specific antigen (PSA), aptamer-based OD-CRISPR assay achieves the least discoverable concentration of 0.01 ng mL-1. In general, the OD-CRISPR can detect nucleic acid and protein biomarkers, and is a potential strategy for early rapid screening diagnostic tools.Entities:
Keywords: Biosensor; CRISPR/Cas12a; Noble metal nanocatalysts; Nucleic acid detection; Protein detection; SARS-CoV-2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36038232 PMCID: PMC9365833 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2022.340203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Chim Acta ISSN: 0003-2670 Impact factor: 6.911
Fig. 1Establishment of OD-CRISPR for nucleic acid detection. a) Representation of the OD-CRISPR assay. b) Optimization of the SH-ssDNA-biotin and PtNPs concentrations. c) Target DNA 1 was used for the purpose of confirming the PtNP-based OD-CRISPR assay. The concentration of DNase Ⅰ is 100 U. All the error bars are obtained from three experiments that were carried out independently.
Fig. 2OD-CRISPR assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection. a) SARS-CoV-2 N gene-positive and -negative plasmid titration as identified based on the OD-CRISPR test. The fitting model: [Inhibitor] vs. response - Variable slope (four parameters). Equation: Y = 0.2045 + (−0.01404–0.2045)/(1 + (0.04697/X)-0.8673), R2 = 0.9688. b) OD-CRISPR test was investigated with the use of IVT RNA products from SARS-CoV-2. The fitting model: [Inhibitor] vs. response - Variable slope (four parameters). Equation: Y = 0.2149 + (−0.001078–0.2149)/(1 + (0.01819/X)-1.207), R2 = 0.9919. The LoD definition was achieved by a significant variation of ΔOD450 at the lowest concentration. c) The crRNA specificity. Cas12a crRNA is programmed to specifically target SARS-CoV-2. The N gene crRNA used in the assay was specific for SARS-CoV-2 and failed to detect SARS-CoV and bat SARS-like coronavirus. d) Initial validation regarding the storage life of OD-CRISPR assay. The storage of OD-CRISPR assay components was performed for up to 7 days in 4 °C (green bars) and 37 °C (blue bars), and the IVT RNA products (1 pM) were utilized in assessing the change in signal during the specified storage period. All the error bars are derived from three independently performed experiments. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 3OD-CRISPR for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab samples. a) Schematic of the workflow for SARS-CoV-2 OD-CRISPR. Extraction of Standard RNA can be utilized as the first stage in CRISPR-based assays, and measurement can be achieved by a microplate reader. b) OD-CRISPR utilized in SARS-CoV-2 detection in 32 clinically diagnosed COVID-19 positive samples and 80 negative samples. The threshold (pink line) of signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), for the ΔOD readouts, was fixed as follows; with the noise as the signal intensity of a negative sample containing water measure equivalent to a positive result was set at 2. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Concordance between the RT-qPCR and OD-CRISPR outcomes in the SARS-CoV-2 N gene detection.
| Samples diagnosed by RT-qPCR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Total | ||
| OD-CRISPR | Positive | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Negative | 5 | 88 | 93 | |
| Total | 24 | 88 | 112 | |
Specificity, sensitivity, and predictive agreement characterizations[a] of the OD-CRISPR for SARS-CoV-2 N gene detection.
| Sensitivity [95% CI] | Specificity [95% CI] | PPA [95% CI] | NPA [95% CI] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OD-CRISPR | 79.17% | 100% | 100% | 94.62% |
| (61.65–96.68) | (94.79–100) | (79.08–100) | (87.32–98.00) |
Values were computed from 112 samples for clinical validation and subjected to a comparison with those of RT-qPCR.
CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 4Aptamer-based OD-CRISPR assay for PSA detection. a) Representation of the aptamer-based OD-CRISPR. b) Titration of the PSA as detected by aptamer-based OD-CRISPR assay. c) Correlation analysis between the aptamer-based OD-CRISPR assay and CLIA using the serums of 23 patients with prostate cancer. All the error bars are obtained from three experiments that were carried out independently.