Literature DB >> 36037831

Effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on Canadian ophthalmologists: A survey.

Zina Fathalla1, Emaan Chaudry2, Minoo Aminnejad3, Forough Farrokhyar3, Danah Albreiki2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36037831      PMCID: PMC9289042          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0008-4182            Impact factor:   2.592


× No keyword cloud information.
Many health care fields, including ophthalmology, were not equipped to manage the logistical, emotional, and mental stresses of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. Ophthalmologists were required to rapidly adapt to virtual health care delivery, a less efficient way of practice for such a procedure-based specialty. Moreover, a decrease in patient encounters caused financial setbacks for many ophthalmologists. The true impact of the pandemic at both professional and personal levels on Canadian ophthalmologists is unknown. Consequently, this study investigates the experiences of Canadian ophthalmologists during the pandemic. Understanding these challenges will provide guidance for physicians when traditional services are limited. A web-based survey was emailed to all members of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society on November 3 and 17, 2020. Survey questions targeted the months March through July 2020 to capture a specific period when ophthalmologists were first adjusting to new COVID-19 health guidelines and restrictions. Responses were collected until December 31, 2020. This study was approved by the Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board. A total of 164 responses were collected (14.5% response rate). Demographic and professional characteristics of respondents are displayed in Table 1 . Of note, we also performed a subgroup analysis and found no significant differences between subspecialists (Appendix A, available online). Our study results revealed that many ophthalmologists (83.5%) experienced a reduction in workload that negatively impacted patient health outcomes. This unfortunate reality of delayed care highlights the need for well-established telehealth and infection protocols to allow continued health care delivery. Ophthalmologists’ decreased workload also was reflected in changes in income across all subspecialties, with 77.4% reporting a 50%–100% decrease, whereas only 7.3% saw no decrease. These financial cuts were an additional stressor to practitioners during these unprecedented times.
Table 1

Descriptive statistics for all survey questions

Demographic questionsn (%)Missing (%)
What is your age?
 <30 years6 (3.7)
 30–39 years29 (17.7)
 40–49 years24 (14.6)
 50–59 years43 (26.2)
 ≥60 years58 (35.4)
What is your gender?
 Female62 (37.8)
 Male95 (57.9)
In what province(s) or territory do you work?65 (39.6)
 Ontario
 British Columbia30 (18.3)
 Quebec20 (12.2)
 Alberta17 (10.4)
 Nova Scotia12 (7.3)
 Manitoba6 (3.7)
 New Brunswick5 (3)
 Prince Edward Island3 (1.8)
 Saskatchewan2 (1.2)
 Yukon2 (1.2)
 Newfoundland and Labrador1 (0.6)
 Northwest Territory1 (0.6)
Where do you practice?
 Urban–suburban135 (82.3)
 Rural–town23 (14)
 Prefer not to say6 (3.7)
Which level of practice are you currently in?
 Attending physician150 (91.5)
 Residency10 (6.1)
 Fellowship4 (2.4)
What type of clinical setting do you practice/work in?
 Private practice108 (65.9)
 Academic hospital45 (27.4)
 Hospital clinic6 (3.7)
 Community health centre2 (1.2)
 Other3 (1.8)
Which subspecialty are you practicing or currently training in?
 General93 (56.7)
 Anterior segment28 (17.1)
 Cornea18 (11)
 Glaucoma37 (22.6)
 Medical retina21 (12.8)
 Vitreoretinal surgery11 (6.7)
 Neuro-ophthalmology15 (9.1)
 Ocular oncology1 (0.6)
 Oculoplastic surgery21 (12.8)
 Pediatric ophthalmology10 (6.1)
 Refractive surgery9 (5.5)
 Strabismus7 (4.3)
 Uveitis15 (9.1)
Professional impacts of COVID-19 questions
Which of the following options best reflects your current situation with COVID-19?8 (4.9)
 Asymptomatic and no COVID-19 testing done102 (62.2)
 Asymptomatic and tested negative for COVID-1937 (22.6)
 Asymptomatic but was in contact with patient with COVID-19; did not get tested.5 (3)
 Asymptomatic but was in contact with patient with COVID-19; tested negative for COVID-19.7 (4.3)
 Asymptomatic but was in contact with patient with COVID-19; tested positive for COVID-19.0 (0)
 Nonspecific cold or gastrointestinal symptoms but did not get tested.1 (0.6)
 Symptomatic and tested positive for COVID-19, almost or completely recovered.2 (1.2)
 Symptomatic and tested positive for COVID-19 and still experiencing moderate to severe health problems from the virus.2 (1.2)
How did you practice ophthalmology during the March–July 2020 period of the COVID-19 pandemic?
 Not currently practicing/unemployed6 (3.7)
 Practicing from home (e.g., telemedicine, video conferencing patients)38 (23.2)
 Working in clinic setting part time (e.g., emergency cases only)115 (70.1)
 Working in clinic setting full time48 (29.3)
How did your workload change during the March–July period of the COVID-19 restrictions?8 (4.9)
 Decreased137 (83.5)
 Increased11 (6.7)
 Stayed the same8 (4.9)
What percentage of your monthly income dropped during March–July 2020 owing to COVID-19 restrictions?8 (4.9)
 012 (7.3)
 2017 (10.4)
 5051 (31.1)
 7568 (38.4)
 10013 (7.9)
What percentage of your work was telemedicine versus face-to-face clinical practice during March–July 2020?8 (4.9)
 Telemedicine 0% of the time58 (35.4)
 Telemedicine 25% of the time53 (32.3)
 Telemedicine 50% of the time17 (10.4)
 Telemedicine 70% of the time25 (15.2)
 Telemedicine 100% of the time3 (1.8)
If you practiced ophthalmology using telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, how has your experience been while using telemedicine?8 (6.4)
 Excellent6 (4.8)
 Good23 (18.5)
 Natural47 (37.9)
 Poor30 (24.2)
 Very poor10 (8.2)
 N/A40
Do you envision yourself continuing to practice telemedicine beyond the COVID-19 pandemic?8 (5.6)
 Yes48 (33.4)
 No61 (42.4)
 I do not know27 (18.6)
 N/A20
In your experience, how did the COVID-19 pandemic impact the Canadian ophthalmology community?8 (4.9)
 Brought it closer than before54 (32.9)
 Distanced the community apart43 (26.2)
 Stayed the same59 (36)
Personal impacts of COVID-19 questions
Including yourself, how many individuals lived in your residence from March to July 2020?13 (7.9)
 02 (1.2)
 118 (11)
 243 (26.2)
 326 (15.9)
 438 (23.2)
 4–51 (0.6)
 512 (7.3)
 68 (4.9)
 73 (1.8)
From March to July 2020, who was living in your residence?
 Children89 (54.3)
 Spouse129 (78.7)
 Parent5 (3)
 Sibling4 (2.4)
 In-law3 (1.8)
 Roommate4 (2.4)
 Lived alone13 (7.9)
 Prefer not to disclose5 (3)
During the COVID-19 restrictions from March to July 2020, how much free time did you feel you had compared with before the pandemic?10 (6.1)
 More114 (69.5)
 Less24 (14.6)
 Same16 (9.8)
How would you rate your stress levels during March–July 2020 compared with before the pandemic?10 (6.1)
 Much higher46 (28)
 Higher62 (37.8)
 No change23 (14)
 Lower18 (11)
 Much lower5 (3)
How would you rate your overall mental health from March to July 2020?10 (6.1)
 Excellent18 (11)
 Very good62 (37.8)
 Fair58 (35.4)
 Poor15 (9.1)
 Very poor1 (0.6)
How has COVID-19 affected your personal relationships?10 (6.1)
 Mostly positively affected my relationships50 (30.5)
 Mostly negatively affected my relationships25 (15.2)
 No change79 (48.2)
Did you engage in physical activity from March to July 2020?10 (6.1)
 Always41 (25)
 Very often55 (33.5)
 Sometimes34 (20.7)
 Rarely20 (12.2)
 Never4 (2.4)
The pandemic changed me in the following sense:
 Made me more patient34 (20.7)
 Made me more creative41 (25)
 Made me more depressed/stressed66 (40.2)
 Made me see life in a whole new way66 (40.2)
 Made me appreciative and grateful93 (56.7)
Descriptive statistics for all survey questions Owing to the pandemic, many ophthalmologists (59.7%) shifted to practicing telemedicine at least a quarter of the time, but only 4.8% reported their experience using telemedicine as “excellent,” and 18.5% reported it as “good.” With varied experiences, it is unclear whether ophthalmologists will continue to use telemedicine after the pandemic. Participants were split, with 33.4% reporting that they would, 42.4% reporting that they would not, and 18.6% unsure. Regardless of ophthalmologist preference, it is likely that this technology will play a role in some practices and will require well-developed infrastructure to do so. There was a wide range of personal and psychological impacts of COVID-19 on Canadian ophthalmologists. Although 69.5% of ophthalmologists reported having more free time during the period March–July 2020, 28% and 37.8% reported having “much higher” or “higher” stress levels, respectively. One comment highlighted a few of the pertinent stressors at the time: “Multiple sources of stress . . . COVID protocols, office issues, poor remuneration, no holiday time, telephone care of patients, etc.” (See Appendix B, available online, for additional comments that represent the mixed feelings ophthalmologists had toward the pandemic.) Given that practitioner well-being directly affects patient care, this is a worrisome finding. It is therefore important for strong employee wellness programs to prevent and mitigate burnout, including but not limited to promoting a healthy work environment, discussion groups, and mindfulness training. Our study had a relatively low response rate, likely because participation was voluntary. Moreover, survey studies, especially those distributed digitally, are prone to sampling biases. Nevertheless, it has been argued that the representativeness of the population may be more important than the response rate. Our study participants are representative of Canadian ophthalmologists, that is, mainly from Ontario (39.6%) and working in private practice (66%) and urban–suburban areas (82%). This is the first study that looks at the impacts of COVID-19 on Canadian ophthalmologists both professionally and personally. It identifies challenges and areas of improvement and serves as a meaningful learning opportunity for all physicians. Online-only material: This article includes online-only material. Appendix A and Appendix B can be found on the CJO web site at http://pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/cjo/cjo.html. They are linked to this article in the online contents of the xxx 2022 issue.

Uncited Reference

Disclosures

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
  4 in total

1.  Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19.

Authors:  Judd E Hollander; Brendan G Carr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Covid-19 - Implications for the Health Care System.

Authors:  David Blumenthal; Elizabeth J Fowler; Melinda Abrams; Sara R Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Use of saliva to monitor meningococcal vaccine responses: proposing a threshold in saliva as surrogate of protection.

Authors:  Mariëtte B van Ravenhorst; Fiona R M van der Klis; Debbie M van Rooijen; Elisabeth A M Sanders; Guy A M Berbers
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Impact on mental health and perceptions of psychological care among medical and nursing staff in Wuhan during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease outbreak: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Lijun Kang; Simeng Ma; Min Chen; Jun Yang; Ying Wang; Ruiting Li; Lihua Yao; Hanping Bai; Zhongxiang Cai; Bing Xiang Yang; Shaohua Hu; Kerang Zhang; Gaohua Wang; Ci Ma; Zhongchun Liu
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 7.217

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.