| Literature DB >> 36036255 |
Sheng Chen1, Guo Liu2, Xin Liu1, Yun Wang1, Fen He3, Danyao Nie1, Xinhua Liu1, Xuyang Liu4,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Retinal degeneration (RD) is a group of serious blinding eye diseases characterized by photoreceptor cell apoptosis and progressive degeneration of retinal neurons. However, the underlying mechanism of its pathogenesis remains unclear.Entities:
Keywords: RNA-seq; Retinal degeneration; chemokine; inflammation; rat model; routine hematology analysis; sodium iodate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36036255 PMCID: PMC9434683 DOI: 10.1177/03000605221119376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.573
Figure 1.Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of rat retina tissues. (a) Control rats; the control group was administered a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution for 10 days and showed intact histological structure of the retina and (b) Sodium iodate (NaIO3)-treated rats; the NaIO3 treatment group was administered 50 mg/kg NaIO3 for 10 days and showed disruption of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) layer, degeneration of the layer of rods and cones, and extension into the inner layer of retina. The outer nuclear layer was thinner in the NaIO3-treated group than in the control group. The scale bars denote 200 μm. N = 9 per group.
Figure 2.Enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between NaIO3-treated rat retinas (T) and the control group©. (a) Principal component analysis of the DEGs. (b) Volcano plot for the DEGs. (c) Heat map of the DEGs, (d) Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of the DEG© and (e) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of the DEGs.
Figure 3.Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis. (a–b) Top two modules identified by MCODE in Cytos©e and (c) Top 20 hub genes and their corresponding degrees identified by CytoHubba in Cytoscape. All interaction networks were constructed with proteins encoded by differentially expressed genes in the present study.
Figure 4.Validation of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR). (a) Expression of ten selected genes measured by RNA-seq; n = 3 per group. (b) Validation of DEG expression levels by qRT-PCR; n = 6 per group and (c) Correlation between RNA-seq and qRT-PCR data. Data are represented as means ± standard deviation, where P values were obtained through the Student’s t-tests. *, **, and *** indicate significant differences at P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively.
Analysis of white blood cell-related parameters in the retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and age-related cataract (ARC) patients.
| RP (n = 59 eyes) | ARC (n = 59 eyes) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (males/females)† | 29/30 | 33/26 | 0.5804 |
| Age (years)† | 46 ± 35 | 50 ± 31 | 0.8521 |
| White blood cells (%)§ | 6.51 ± 1.38 | 6.19 ± 1.39 | 0.2108 |
| Neutrophils (%)§ | 61.47 ± 6.88 | 58.71 ± 7.76 | 0.0427* |
| Lymphocytes (%)§ | 30.03 ± 6.56 | 32.87 ± 7.08 | 0.0256* |
| Monocytes (%)§ | 5.52 ± 1.33 | 5.75 ± 1.49 | 0.3831 |
| Basophils (%)† | 0.50 ± 0.40 | 0.40 ± 0.30 | 0.1419 |
| Eosinophils (%)† | 2.60 ± 1.00 | 1.70 ± 1.10 | 0.1061 |
| Neutrophils (109/L)† | 3.90 ± 3.30 | 3.70 ± 2.90 | 0.0975 |
| Lymphocytes (109/L)† | 1.80 ± 1.50 | 2.00 ± 1.60 | 0.3695 |
| Monocytes (109/L)† | 0.35 ± 0.30 | 0.34 ± 0.26 | 0.7459 |
| Basophils (109/L)† | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.024* |
| Eosinophils (109/L)† | 0.17 ± 0.06 | 0.09 ± 0.05 | 0.0604 |
| Ratio of neutrophil/lymphocyte† | 2.05 ± 1.60 | 1.79 ± 1.37 | 0.0346* |
§P-value calculated using Student’s t-test, and the data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. †P-value calculated using Mann–Whitney U test, and the data are expressed as median ± quarter spacing. *P < 0.05.