| Literature DB >> 36035945 |
Burak T Cilhoroz1, Jacob P DeBlois1, Wesley K Lefferts2, Allison P Keller1, Patricia Pagan Lassalle3, Michelle L Meyer4,5, Lee Stoner3,4, Kevin S Heffernan1.
Abstract
Background: The interactions between large artery function and neurovascular coupling (NVC) are emerging as important contributors to cognitive health. Women are disproportionally affected by Alzheimer's disease and related dementia later in life. Understanding large artery correlates of NVC in young women may help with preservation of cognitive health with advancing age. Purpose: To explore the association between large artery function, NVC and cognitive performance in young women.Entities:
Keywords: blood pressure; cerebral pulsatility; cognitive function; neurovascular coupling; vascular stiffness
Year: 2022 PMID: 36035945 PMCID: PMC9411931 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.914439
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1(Top) Theoretical model linking large artery structure (i.e., carotid intima-media thickness) and function (i.e., aortic stiffness, carotid stiffness, carotid compliance, carotid reactivity) to cerebral reactivity (MCA, middle cerebral artery; Vmean, mean blood velocity; Vmax, maximum blood velocity; PI, pulsatility index) and cognitive function. (Bottom) Operational definitions of specific physiological and cognitive constructs explored in this study that relate to our theoretical model. Darker font signifies variables that emerged as correlates across paths.
Descriptive characteristics of study participants (n = 61, Mean ± SD).
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 21 ± 4 |
|
| |
| Black/African American | 17 (28) |
| White | 35 (57) |
| Asian | 2 (3) |
| American Indian | 2 (3) |
| Other | 5 (8) |
|
| |
| Hispanic | 19 (31) |
| Non-Hispanic | 42 (69) |
|
| |
| High school | 5 (8) |
| Some college | 45 (74) |
| College | 4 (7) |
| Graduate school | 7 (11) |
|
| |
| Height (m) | 1.64 ± 0.07 |
| Weight (kg) | 66.4 ± 10.4 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.5 ± 3.6 |
| Body fat (%) | 29.7 ± 5.7 |
| MoCA (score out of 30) | 28 ± 1 |
| MVPA (min/week) | 365.6 ± 138.8 |
| Oral contraceptive use (n, %) | 18 (29) |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 169 ± 34 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 62 ± 17 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 93 ± 32 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 67 ± 33 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 87 ± 6 |
| Carotid IMT (mm) | 0.39 ± 0.06 |
MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein; IMT, intima-media thickness.
Changes in hemodynamics and vascular function during cognitive challenge (n = 61, Mean ± SD).
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart rate (bpm) | 60 ± 8 | 63 ± 12 | 65 ± 9 |
| 0.40 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 111 ± 9 | 115 ± 13 | 117 ± 11 |
| 0.24 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 72 ± 7 | 75 ± 7 | 77 ± 8 |
| 0.35 |
| Mean blood pressure (mmHg) | 85 ± 7 | 88 ± 8 | 90 ± 9 |
| 0.36 |
| Carotid diastolic diameter (mm) | 5.12 ± 0.42 | 5.24 ± 0.55 | 5.35 ± 0.38 |
| 0.14 |
| Carotid compliance (mm2/kPa) | 1.51 ± 0.29 | 1.50 ± 0.35 | 1.48 ± 0.39 | 0.772 | 0.01 |
| Carotid beta-stiffness (aU) | 3.3 ± 0.9 | 3.2 ± 1.0 | 3.3 ± 1.1 | 0.781 | 0.01 |
| Carotid-femoral PWV (m/s) | 5.4 ± 0.6 | 5.5 ± 0.8 | 5.6 ± 0.8 |
| 0.12 |
| MCA max blood velocity (cm/s) | 116 ± 16 | 120 ± 18 | 122 ± 17 |
| 0.27 |
| MCA mean blood velocity (cm/s) | 80 ± 12 | 85 ± 13 | 87 ± 14 |
| 0.41 |
| MCA pulsatility index (aU) | 0.75 ± 0.08 | 0.72 ± 0.08 | 0.70 ± 0.09 |
| 0.22 |
Significantly different from Congruent (p < 0.05).
Significantly different from Incongruent (p < 0.05).
PWV, pulse wave velocity; MCA, middle cerebral artery.
Effect sizes were calculated for differences across time points as partial η.
Figure 2(A) Individual and mean ± standard deviation values for Middle Cerebral Artery Mean Blood Velocity (MCA Vmean, cm/s), (B) Middle Cerebral Artery Pulsatility Index (aU), and (C) Carotid Diameter (mm) across Baseline, Congruent Stroop, and Incongruent Stroop. aSignificantly different from Congruent (p < 0.05); bSignificantly different from Incongruent (p < 0.05).
Association between cerebral reactivity and select domains of cognitive function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
|
| ||||||
| MBP reactivity | −0.02 | −0.07 | −0.53 | 0.60 | −0.11 | 0.06 |
| Vmean reactivity | −0.12 | −0.33 | −2.59 |
| −0.19 | −0.02 |
|
| ||||||
| MBP reactivity | −0.03 | −0.07 | −0.58 | 0.57 | −0.11 | 0.06 |
| Vmean reactivity | 0.10 | 0.28 | 2.27 |
| 0.01 | 0.19 |
|
| ||||||
| MBP reactivity | −0.01 | −0.02 | −0.13 | 0.89 | −0.08 | 0.07 |
| Vmax reactivity | 0.05 | 0.26 | 2.06 |
| 0.01 | 0.10 |
|
| ||||||
| MBP reactivity | 0.10 | 0.28 | 2.28 |
| 0.01 | 0.08 |
| PI reactivity | −9.0 | −0.29 | −2.29 |
| −14.9 | −1.0 |
MBP, mean blood pressure. Bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Path analyses exploring cross-sectional paths through which carotid artery function affects cerebral reactivity, in turn affecting domains of cognitive function. Values represent standardized regression weights.