| Literature DB >> 36035920 |
Xiaoying Chao1, Zhiyuan Jiang2, Guoqiang Zhong1, Rongjie Huang2.
Abstract
Background: Salt-sensitive hypertension (SSH) is a common type of essential hypertension in China. In recent years, although an increasing number of researches have focused on SSH, few studies have been researched on patients with SSH. The objective of this study was to explore the genes and pathways linked with SSH using RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq). Materials and methods: We used RNA-seq to analyze the transcriptome of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of five SSH patients and five SRH patients. Next, we analyzed the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway, and Gene Set Enrichment (GSEA) enrichment analysis. Then, Cytoscape was used to construct the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and the hub genes. Finally, CMAP analysis found that several small molecular compounds could reverse the altered DEGs.Entities:
Keywords: RNA-sequencing; biomarker; differentially expressed genes; salt-resistant hypertension; salt-sensitive hypertension
Year: 2022 PMID: 36035920 PMCID: PMC9399395 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.963744
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Baseline characteristics of study participants in salt-sensitive hypertension (SSH) and salt-resistant hypertension (SRH).
| Baseline content | SSH ( | SRH ( |
| Age (years) | 56 ± 9 | 49 ± 10 |
| Gender (Male, %) | 34% | 60% |
| Gender (Female, %) | 66% | 40% |
| SBP (mmHg) | 150.31 ± 22.21 | 151.74 ± 19.35 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 89.55 ± 8.86 | 95.05 ± 14.96 |
| Heart rate | 82.1 ± 13.46 | 83.18 ± 12.9 |
| TBiL (μmol/L) | 14.24 ± 4.68 | 14.13 ± 5.55 |
| DBiL (μmol/L) | 3.75 ± 1.1 | 3.7 ± 1.21 |
| IBil (μmol/L) | 10.49 ± 3.82 | 10.43 ± 4.87 |
| AST (μ/L) | 27.46 ± 9.75 | 25.65 ± 8.3 |
| ALT (μ/L) | 29.07 ± 23.96 | 25.74 ± 16.52 |
| AST/ALT | 1.23 ± 0.58 | 1.28 ± 0.7 |
| ALP (μ/L) | 72.96 ± 18.33 | 68.21 ± 16.09 |
| MCH (pg) | 28.46 ± 4.16 | 29.24 ± 2.46 |
| MCHC (g/L) | 330.09 ± 11.99 | 334.66 ± 12.38 |
BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; LDL, low-density lipoprotein, TBil, total bilirubin; DBiL, direct bilirubin; IBil, indirect bilirubin; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration.
*P < 0.05 t-test.
NS-loading test in salt-sensitive hypertension (SSH) and salt-resistant hypertension (SRH).
| SSH ( | SRH ( | |
| SBP1 | 133.59 ± 16.83 | 147.07 ± 17.39 |
| DBP1 | 82.21 ± 12.18 | 93.42 ± 12.26 |
| SBP2 | 151.07 ± 19.58 | 140.02 ± 14.77 |
| DBP2 | 91.97 ± 11.3 | 85.63 ± 12.46 |
| PP1 | 51.28 ± 14.25 | 52.86 ± 16.27 |
| PP2 | 59.1 ± 15.47 | 54.4 ± 10.1 |
| MAP1 | 99.28 ± 12.24 | 111.49 ± 12.67 |
| MAP2 | 111.76 ± 12.64 | 103.72 ± 12.43 |
| MAP2- MAP1 | 12.37 ± 5.79 | −7.71 ± 9.5 |
Before NS-loading test of MAP = MAP1.
After NS-loading test of MAP = MAP2.
Before NS-loading test of SBP = SBP1.
After NS-loading test of SBP = SBP2.
Before NS-loading test of DBP = DBP1.
After NS-loading test of DBP = DBP2.
Before NS-loading test of PP = PP1.
After NS-loading test of PP = PP1.
FIGURE 1The discrepancy between salt-sensitive hypertension (SSH) and salt-resistant hypertension (SRH) in terms of gene expression profile. (A) Hierarchical cluster analysis of genes identified in SSH and SRH. (B) Distribution of the genes expressed in the two groups, red dots and green dots indicates genes significantly up-regulated or down-regulated in the SSH and SRH. (C) Number of Gene expressed in the two groups.
FIGURE 2Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between SSH and SRH in the biological processes (BPs), cellular components (CCs), and molecular functions (MFs). (A) GO-CC, (B) GO-MF, (C) GO-BP, and (D) KEGG pathway.
FIGURE 3Enrichment analyses via gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). (A) The top three enriched up-regulated GO gene sets. (B) The top three enriched down-regulated GO gene sets.
FIGURE 4Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using the GSEA Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathways database. (A) The top three enriched up-regulated KEGG pathway sets. (B) The top three enriched down-regulated KEGG pathway sets.
FIGURE 5The protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Circles and lines represent genes and the interaction of proteins between genes, respectively. The red represents the up-regulated genes. The blue represents the down-regulated genes.
FIGURE 6The highly expressed protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. (A) Score 6, (B) Score 5.6, (C) Score 4.6. The red represents the up-regulated genes. The blue represents the down-regulated genes.
Top ten genes in the 12 statistical methods.
| Number | Gene | The number of occurrences | Expression |
| 1 | IL6 | 10 | Up |
| 2 | CCL2 | 10 | Up |
| 3 | IL1A | 8 | Up |
| 4 | CXCL1 | 8 | Down |
| 5 | BUB1 | 8 | Up |
| 6 | CCL3L3 | 7 | Up |
| 7 | CDC20 | 7 | Down |
FIGURE 7The hub gene of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The red represents the up-regulated genes. The blue represents the down-regulated genes.
FIGURE 8The heatmap of hub genes. Color from green to red indicated low to high representation value.
The result of connectivity map (CMAP) database analysis.
| Rank | CMAP name | Mean |
| Enrichment |
| Specificity | Percent non-null |
| 1 | Metitepine | 0.577 | 4 | 0.827 | 0.00135 | 0.0051 | 75 |
| 2 | Iopromide | −0.301 | 4 | −0.804 | 0.00284 | 0.0074 | 50 |
| 3 | Pipemidic acid | 0.364 | 3 | 0.873 | 0.00373 | 0.0159 | 66 |
| 4 | Iloprost | −0.375 | 3 | −0.876 | 0.00385 | 0.0063 | 66 |
| 5 | Cephaeline | 0.509 | 5 | 0.716 | 0.00427 | 0.3151 | 80 |
| 6 | Securinine | 0.455 | 4 | 0.762 | 0.00605 | 0.0325 | 75 |
| 7 | Lycorine | 0.455 | 5 | 0.695 | 0.00655 | 0.1235 | 80 |
| 8 | Thiostrepton | 0.343 | 4 | 0.737 | 0.00939 | 0.098 | 50 |