| Literature DB >> 36035826 |
Malek Badr1,2, Shaha Al-Otaibi3, Nazik Alturki3, Tanvir Abir4.
Abstract
The electrocardiogram, also known as an electrocardiogram (ECG), is considered to be one of the most significant sources of data regarding the structure and function of the heart. In order to obtain an electrocardiogram, the contractions and relaxations of the heart are first captured in the proper recording medium. Due to the fact that irregularities in the functioning of the heart are reflected in the ECG indications, it is possible to use these indications to diagnose cardiac issues. Arrhythmia is the medical term for the abnormalities that might occur in the regular functioning of the heart (rhythm disorder). Environmental and genetic variables can both play a role in the development of arrhythmias. Arrhythmias are reflected on the ECG sign, which depicts the same region regardless of where in the heart they occur; thus, they may be seen in ECG signals. This is how arrhythmias can be detected. Due to the time limits of this study, the ECG signals of individuals who were healthy, as well as those who suffered from arrhythmias were divided into 10-minute segments. The arithmetic mean approach is one of the fundamental statistical factors. It is used to construct the feature vectors of each received wave and interval, and these vectors offer information regarding arrhythmias in accordance with the agreed-upon temporal restrictions. In order to identify the heart arrhythmias, the obtained feature vectors are fed into a classifier that is based on a multilayer perceptron neural network. In conclusion, ROC analysis and contrast matrix are utilised in order to evaluate the overall correct classification result produced by the ECG-based classifier. Because of this, it has been demonstrated that the method that was recommended has high classification accuracy when attempting to diagnose arrhythmia based on ECG indications. This research makes use of a variety of diagnostic terminologies, including ECG signal, multilayer perceptron neural network, signal processing, disease diagnosis, and arrhythmia diagnosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36035826 PMCID: PMC9410968 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1094830
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1(a) Biological nerve cell structure and (b) artificial neuron structure.
Figure 2Multilayer perceptron neural network (MPNN) class model.
Example input values used in MPNN.
| −0.32439 | −0.31479 | 0.047868 | −0.23542 | −0.40862 | −0.27346 | 0.027801 | 1 | 0 |
| −0.31515 | −0.30804 | 0.073892 | −0.23052 | −0.38382 | −0.26372 | 0.423111 | 1 | 0 |
| −0.31038 | −0.30561 | 0.068777 | −0.22866 | −0.38145 | −0.26014 | 0.421215 | 1 | 0 |
| −0.30523 | −0.33142 | 0.012525 | −0.17322 | −0.39915 | −0.10686 | 0.030321 | 1 | 0 |
| −0.29537 | −0.32213 | 0.00847 | −0.19931 | −0.39377 | −0.18664 | 0.446077 | 1 | 0 |
| −0.29879 | −0.31608 | −0.0471 | −0.20281 | −0.38134 | −0.18024 | 0.451827 | 1 | 0 |
| −0.22591 | −0.23854 | 0.200567 | −0.21593 | −0.48883 | −0.25299 | 0.033917 | 1 | 0 |
| −0.24436 | −0.25376 | 0.137639 | −0.22789 | −0.46865 | −0.24487 | 0.363481 | 1 | 0 |
| −0.22831 | −0.24922 | 0.07375 | −0.22680 | −0.46672 | −0.22632 | 0.317504 | 1 | 0 |
| −0.26414 | −0.21274 | 0.107591 | −0.07347 | −0.36917 | 0.07149 | 0.131064 | 1 | 0 |
| −0.14564 | −0.13468 | 0.333994 | −0.03551 | −0.22433 | −0.11605 | 0.054218 | 0 | 1 |
| −0.13861 | −0.12987 | 0.378555 | −0.02868 | −0.20941 | −0.08673 | 0.392148 | 0 | 1 |
| −0.13971 | −0.13435 | 0.383486 | −0.04665 | −0.18899 | −0.13101 | 0.354666 | 0 | 1 |
| −0.1408 | −0.13496 | 0.380989 | −0.04530 | −0.18077 | −0.13068 | 0.359025 | 0 | 1 |
| −0.14555 | −0.13962 | 0.395855 | −0.04032 | −0.1741 | −0.13047 | 0.368294 | 0 | 1 |
| −0.17153 | −0.1633 | 0.418286 | −0.03743 | −0.14792 | −0.14097 | 0.375346 | 0 | 1 |
| −0.16082 | −0.15058 | 0.368256 | −0.02273 | −0.16884 | −0.09294 | 0.325423 | 0 | 1 |
| −0.1637 | −0.15382 | 0.382274 | −0.02667 | −0.15914 | −0.10595 | 0.363618 | 0 | 1 |
| −0.16178 | −0.15104 | 0.37407 | −0.0304 | −0.16452 | −0.10913 | 0.357767 | 0 | 1 |
| −0.16122 | −0.15004 | 0.395915 | −0.03601 | −0.15363 | −0.13164 | 0.399601 | 0 | 1 |
Figure 3Average values obtained from normal and arrhythmic signs ((a) Port values; (b) PRort values; (c) QRSort; (d) STort; (e) Tort values; (f) QTort, and RRort values obtained from healthy and arrhythmia signals).
Criteria used in the evaluation of diagnostic and screening tests.
| Test result | Arrhythmia patient | Healthy samples | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Positive) | (Negative) | ||
| Test (+) |
|
|
|
| Test (−) |
|
|
|
| Total |
|
|
|
| TP : True positive; FP : False positive; FN : False negative; TN : True negative. | |||
Figure 4Confusion matrix for arrhythmia diagnosis.
Figure 5ROC analysis curve of classification.