| Literature DB >> 36035695 |
Heng Zhang1,2, Mengqing Guo1,2, Qiaona Wu1,2, Mengqiu Zhao1,2, Ruiping Li1,2, Xiaomei Deng1,2, Ruchun Xi1,2.
Abstract
Castanopsis hystrix is one of the main timber trees grown in China. However, severe shortage of natural seeds and the difficulty of explant regeneration has limited seedling supply. As such, there is a need for research on asexual multiplication of C. hystrix. This study established a rapid propagation technology system for C. hystrix genotypes, including explant treatment, proliferation, and rooting. HZ (a modified MS medium) supplemented with 4.4 μM BA and 0.5 μM IBA was found to be the optimal medium for shoot sprouting. The maximum proliferation coefficient and the number of effective shoots was obtained on HZ medium supplemented with 2.6 μM BA and 1.0 μM IBA, were 3.00 and 5.63, respectively. A rooting rate of 83.33% was achieved using half-strength HZ medium supplemented with 3.2 μM NAA. Adding vitamin C (80 mg⋅l-1) for 7 days in a dark environment reduced the browning rate, while increasing the proliferation rate. Additionally, through cytological observation, we established how and where adventitious roots occur. The survival rate of transplanted plantlets was > 90%. This is the first report of an in vitro regeneration technique that uses stem segments of mature C. hystrix as explants.Entities:
Keywords: Castanopsis hystrix; adventitious roots; browning; disinfection; in vitro regeneration; mature tree
Year: 2022 PMID: 36035695 PMCID: PMC9412185 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.914652
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
FIGURE 2Micropropagation of mature Castanopsis hystrix trees using axillary node explants. (A) Mother plant; (B) the miniature grafting nursery; (C) shoot sprouting; (D,E) shoot proliferation; (F) rooting; (G) plantlet acclimatization for 30 days; (H) plantlet acclimatization for 90 days.
Effects of different disinfection treatments on the survival of explants.
| No. | Disinfection treatments | Contamination | Browning rate | Survival rate | ||||
| NaOCl | Ethanol | Benzalkonium | Mercuric chloride | Tween 80 | ||||
| 1 | 5–7 | – | – | – | – | 40.00 ± 1.92a | 12.22 ± 1.11b | 35.56 ± 4.00c |
| 2 | – | – | – | 1–4 | – | 31.11 ± 2.22b | 13.33 ± 1.92b | 42.22 ± 2.22c |
| 3 | – | 30 | – | 1–4 | – | 28.89 ± 1.11b | 25.56 ± 2.22a | 52.22 ± 4.00b |
| 4 | – | – | 2–4 | 1–4 | – | 21.11 ± 2.94cd | 14.44 ± 2.22b | 62.22 ± 2.94b |
| 5 | – | – | 2–4 | 1–4 | 2–3 | 17.78 ± 2.94d | 11.11 ± 1.11b | 74.44 ± 2.94a |
| 6 | – | 30 | 2–4 | 1–4 | – | 25.56 ± 2.22bc | 27.78 ± 2.22a | 55.56 ± 2.94b |
The disinfection time of benzalkonium bromide and mercuric chloride depended on the degree of lignification of the explants. After disinfection with disinfectant agent, all explants were rinsed four times with sterile distilled water. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences, as per Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05, n = 3 indicates three replicates).
Effects of different basal media on initial shoot sprouting.
| No. | Basal medium | Time of shoot initiation | Shoot induction | Shoot length | Growth state of shoots |
| 1 | MS | 21–24 | 8.89 ± 1.11d | 0.21 ± 0.03cd | Hyperhydricity, thin shoots |
| 2 | 1/2MS | 18–21 | 11.11 ± 1.11d | 0.17 ± 0.01d | Small and short shoots |
| 3 | 1/4MS | 14–16 | 42.22 ± 1.11b | 0.74 ± 0.01b | Yellow-green and thin |
| 4 | HZ | 12–14 | 71.11 ± 2.94a | 0.95 ± 0.01a | Robust shoots, fast growth |
| 5 | B5 | 14–16 | 25.56 ± 2.94c | 0.23 ± 0.01c | Hyperhydricity |
The macronutrient component of the HZ medium was composed of NH4NO3, 520 mg⋅l–1; KNO3, 950 mg⋅l–1; KH2PO4, 495 mg⋅l–1; MgSO4⋅7H2O, 370 mg⋅l–1, and CaCl2⋅2H2O, 440 mg⋅l–1, with other mineral nutrients having the same composition as in MS. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference, as per Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05, n = 3 indicates three replicates).
Effects of different concentrations and compositions of BA, NAA, and IBA on shoot induction, and range analysis.
| No. | PGRs (μ M) | Shoot induction rate (%) (Mean ± SE; | Shoot length (cm) (Mean ± SE; | Growth state of shoots | ||
| BA | NAA | IBA | ||||
| 1 | 2.2 | 0 | 0 | 36.67 ± 1.93e | 0.35 ± 0.01f | Thin shoots, short internode |
| 2 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 43.33 ± 1.93d | 0.28 ± 0.01g | Short shoots, large leaves |
| 3 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 36.67 ± 1.93e | 0.13 ± 0.00i | Small and short shoots |
| 4 | 4.4 | 0 | 0.5 | 82.22 ± 1.11a | 0.78 ± 0.00c | Robust shoots, fast growth |
| 5 | 4.4 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 66.67 ± 1.93b | 1.04 ± 0.02b | Robust shoots, small leaves |
| 6 | 4.4 | 2.7 | 0 | 45.56 ± 1.11d | 0.62 ± 0d | Thin shoots, callus |
| 7 | 8.8 | 0 | 2.5 | 65.56 ± 1.11b | 0.65 ± 0d | Robust shoots, small leaves, callus |
| 8 | 8.8 | 0.5 | 0 | 57.78 ± 1.11c | 1.12 ± 0.01a | Hyperhydricity |
| 9 | 8.8 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 55.56 ± 1.11c | 0.53 ± 0.01e | Hyperhydricity, plenty of callus |
|
| ||||||
| K | 38.89 | K | 61.48 | K | 46.67 | |
| K | 64.82 | K | 55.93 | K | 60.37 | |
| K | 59.63 | K | 45.93 | K | 56.30 | |
| R | 20.74 | R | 15.55 | R | 13.70 | |
Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences, as per Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05, n = 3 indicates three replicates).
Effects of different concentrations and compositions of BA, IBA, and NAA on shoot proliferation, and range analysis.
| No. | PGRs (μ M) | Proliferation coefficient (Mean ± SE; | Number of effective shoots per explants (≥ 0.5 cm) (Mean ± SE; | Growth state of plantlets | ||
| BA | IBA | NAA | ||||
| 1 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | 2.28 ± 0.01e | 4.48 ± 0.09d | Little shoots, Unfolding leaves |
| 2 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.25 ± 0.01e | 4.43 ± 0.22d | Little shoots, Unfolding leaves |
| 3 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 2.29 ± 0.04e | 4.59 ± 0.14d | Folding Leaves, short shoots |
| 4 | 2.6 | 0 | 0.5 | 2.75 ± 0.01c | 5.32 ± 0.09bc | Unfolding leaves |
| 5 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 2.71 ± 0.03c | 5.21 ± 0.04c | Folding Leaves |
| 6 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0 | 3.00 ± 0.04b | 5.63 ± 0.02b | Robust shoots, Unfolding leaves |
| 7 | 4.4 | 0 | 1.1 | 2.95 ± 0.01b | 5.60 ± 0.08b | Folding leaves |
| 8 | 4.4 | 0.5 | 0 | 3.34 ± 0.02a | 6.19 ± 0.18a | Short and small shoots |
| 9 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.56 ± 0.04d | 4.87 ± 0.08d | Folding leaves |
|
| ||||||
| K | 2.28 | K | 2.66 | K | 2.87 | |
| K | 2.82 | K | 2.77 | K | 2.52 | |
| K | 2.95 | K | 2.62 | K | 2.65 | |
| R | 0.67 | R | 0.15 | R | 0.35 | |
Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences, as per Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05, n = 3 indicates three replicates).
FIGURE 1Effects of different types and concentrations of anti-browning agents on shoot proliferation and browning. Group a (left) was cultured directly under light. Group b (right) was transferred to light culture after a 7-day darkness treatment. (A) Proliferation coefficient; (B) browning rate. Different uppercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference, as per Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05, n = 3 indicates three replicates).
Effects of different types and concentrations of auxin on rooting.
| No. | Auxins | Concentration (μ M) | Rooting rate (%) (Mean ± SE; | Average number of roots (Mean ± SE; | Growth state of plantlets |
| 1 | NAA | 0.0 | 20.00 ± 0.02f | 1.43 ± 0.07e | Thin roots, callus less |
| 2 | 1.1 | 50.00 ± 0.02cd | 1.85 ± 0.04b | Stubby roots, callus less | |
| 3 | 2.2 | 52.22 ± 0.01c | 1.83 ± 0.04bc | Stubby roots, callus less | |
| 4 | 3.2 | 83.33 ± 0.02a | 2.19 ± 0.04a | Strong and long roots, callus less | |
| 5 | 4.3 | 78.89 ± 0.02a | 2.09 ± 0.00a | Strong and long roots, callus more | |
| 6 | 5.4 | 70.00 ± 0.02b | 1.90 ± 0.00b | Thin and short roots, callus more | |
| 7 | 8.1 | 73.33 ± 0.02b | 1.94 ± 0.01b | Strong and long roots, callus more | |
| 8 | IBA | 1.0 | 54.44 ± 0.01c | 1.73 ± 0.02cd | Thin and short roots, callus less |
| 9 | 2.0 | 36.67 ± 0.02e | 1.88 ± 0.06b | Thin and long roots, callus less | |
| 10 | 2.9 | 24.44 ± 0.01g | 1.73 ± 0.01cd | Thin and long roots, callus less | |
| 11 | 3.9 | 45.56 ± 0.01d | 1.66 ± 0.02d | Thin and long roots, callus less | |
| 12 | 4.9 | 36.67 ± 0.02e | 1.66 ± 0.04d | Thin and short roots, callus more | |
| 13 | 7.4 | 34.44 ± 0.01e | 1.68 ± 0.04d | Stubby roots, callus more |
Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences, as per Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05, n = 3 indicates three replicates).
FIGURE 3Histology observation on differentiating roots formation of Castanopsis hystrix plantlets. Ri, pith; Rp, root primordium; Ar, adventitious root; Ca, callus. (a) Rooted on day 4; (b) the cambium cells were active on day 5; (c) callus appeared; (d) root primordium appeared on day 7; (e,f) root primordium differentiated; (g) adventitious root broken through the cortex on day 11; (h) adventitious root broken through callus on days 12–13; (i) the adventitious root vascular connected to the stem vascular.