| Literature DB >> 36035415 |
Patrice Marques1,2, Lucia Fernandez-Presa2,3, Aitor Carretero2,4, Maria-Carmen Gómez-Cabrera2,4, José Viña2,4, Jaime Signes-Costa2,3, Maria-Jesus Sanz1,2,5.
Abstract
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has placed enormous pressure on intensive care units (ICUs) and on healthcare systems in general. A deeper understanding of the pathophysiology of the most severe forms of COVID-19 would help guide the development of more effective interventions. Herein, we characterized the inflammatory state of patients with COVID-19 of varying degrees of severity to identify admission biomarkers for predicting COVID-19 worsening. Design: Admission blood samples were obtained from 78 patients with COVID-19. Radiographic assessment of lung edema (RALE) scoring was calculated by imaging. Platelet and leukocyte counts were measured by flow cytometry, and plasma levels of C-reactive protein were assessed by immunoturbidimetry, and interleukin (IL)-8/CXCL8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon (IFN)-γ, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2) levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; biomarkers; inflammation; rale score
Year: 2022 PMID: 36035415 PMCID: PMC9402930 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.871714
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Demographic and clinical features of participants.
| Group 0 (mild) | Group 1 (moderate) | Group 2 (severe) | ||
| Number per group ( | 27 | 44 | 7 | – |
| Age (years) | 54.26 ± 2.91 | 56.57 ± 2.11 | 62.14 ± 5.25 | 0.5691 (0 vs. 1) |
| Gender (male %) | 51.85 % | 79.55 % | 85.71 % | – |
| Day of blood extraction after hospital admission | 1.96 ± 0.35 | 2.89 ± 0.49 | 2.71 ± 1.11 | 0.4521 (0 vs. 1) |
| Number of days with symptoms at blood extraction | 6.74 ± 0.77 | 6.93 ± 0.46 | 5.43 ± 0.78 | 0.8172 (0 vs. 1) |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
FIGURE 1The radiographic assessment of lung edema (RALE) score correlates with several admission hemogram and inflammatory parameters in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Correlations between admission hemogram parameters [number of circulating platelets/L, (A) leukocytes/L, (B) neutrophils/L, (C) lymphocytes/L, (D) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, (E)] or plasma levels of inflammatory mediators [IL-8/CXCL8, (F) monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2), (G) IL-10, (H), and C-reactive protein, (I)] and the RALE score (calculated by radiographic imaging) were established using the Pearson/Spearman correlation analysis procedures. Values are expressed as individual data points (n = 78 patients). Data were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
FIGURE 2The RALE score correlates with the oxygen supply administrated, validating oxygen supply as an indicator of COVID-19 severity. Distribution of the RALE score according to admission oxygen supply groups: group 0 (mild COVID-19, without oxygen supply, n = 27), group 1 (moderate COVID-19, nasal cannula/FiltaMask™, n = 44) and group 2 (severe COVID-19, conventional oxygen therapy/non-invasive mechanical ventilation, n = 7). Representative radiographic images with the respective RALE scoring are shown. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 or **p < 0.01 relative to group 0, and +p < 0.05 relative to group 1.
FIGURE 3Coronavirus disease 2019 worsening during hospitalization is correlates negatively with admission lymphocyte counts but positively with admission neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, IL-8/CXCL8, MCP-1/CCL2, IL-10, and C-reactive protein plasma levels. Correlations between admission hemogram parameters [number of circulating lymphocytes/L, (A) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, (B)] or plasma levels of inflammatory mediators [IL-8/CXCL8, (C) MCP-1/CCL2, (D) IL-10, (E), and C-reactive protein, (F)] and disease progression (Δoxygen supply) were calculated using Pearson/Spearman correlation analysis procedures. Disease progression was calculated for each participant by: maximum oxygen therapy during the hospital stay–oxygen therapy at hospital-admission blood extraction (Δoxygen supply). Group A = no changes in oxygen supply; group B = moderate variation in oxygen supply; group C = marked variation in oxygen supply. Values are expressed as individual data points (n = 78 patients). Data were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.