| Literature DB >> 36035143 |
Zhou Ding1,2, Changjun Jiang1,2.
Abstract
Tea plant (Camellia sinensis) is an important economic beverage crop. Drought stress seriously affects the growth and development of tea plant and the accumulation of metabolites, as well as the production, processing, yield and quality of tea. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the reaction mechanism of tea plant under drought conditions and find efficient control methods. Based on transcriptome sequencing technology, this study studied the difference of metabolic level between sexual and asexual tea plants under drought stress. In this study, there were multiple levels of up-regulation and down-regulation of differential genes related to cell composition, molecular function and biological processes. Transcriptomic data show that the metabolism of tea plants with different propagation modes of QC and ZZ is different under drought conditions. In the expression difference statistics, it can be seen that the differential genes of QC are significantly more than ZZ; GO enrichment analysis also found that although differential genes in biological process are mainly enriched in the three pathways of metabolic, single organism process and cellular process, cellular component is mainly enriched in cell, cell part, membrane, and molecular function, and binding, catalytic activity, and transporter activity; the enrichment order of differential genes in these pathways is different in QC and ZZ. This difference is caused by the way of reproduction. The further study of these differential genes will lay a foundation for the cultivation methods and biotechnology breeding to improve the quality of tea.Entities:
Keywords: Camellia sinensis (L.)O.Ktze; asexual reproduction; drought stress; sexually progeny; transcriptome
Year: 2022 PMID: 36035143 PMCID: PMC9399340 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.907026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
FIGURE 1Picture of seedings and cuttings tea plant.
qRT-PCR primers.
| Primer name | Sequence 5′-3′ |
|---|---|
| CsGAPDH-F | TTGGCATCGTTGAGGGTCT |
| CsGAPDH-R | CAGTGGGAACACGGAAAGC |
| CsActin-F | GCCATCTTTGATTGGAATGG |
| CsActin-R | GGTGCCACAACCTTGATCTT |
| QC TEA006283-F | TGACTAACCCGCCAACAACT |
| QC TEA006283-R | ACCAACCCGCCAAGAAGAT |
| QC TEA018992-F | CATACAAATGCCAGCTCCCA |
| QC TEA018992-R | TGAGAGGGCCACTAGGTCGT |
| QC TEA010590-F | TGCCAATTTCTCTGCTCCTG |
| QC TEA010590-R | TCAAGTTCCACACCGACGTT |
| QC TEA016075-F | CGGATCGTTGCCTAGTTCAC |
| QC TEA016075-R | CGCATTCGACCTCTTCTGAC |
| QC TEA004537-F | CAAACCCACAAGCGCAAGTA |
| QC TEA004537-R | TCACTGCCCAAGAATCGTTC |
| QC TEA005361-F | ACCGCATCACCACTACCACA |
| QC TEA005361-R | CACTCTGCCGATCCGAAAT |
| QC TEA008983-F | GGGTTTGACCTCGCAACTTC |
| QC TEA008983-R | GCATGACACGCAATAGGGAT |
| QC TEA026818-F | CCCATACGGTGAATACTGGC |
| QC TEA026818-R | CCCTGTGATCGACGAAATGT |
| QC TEA009673-F | TGTTCTTCCACCGGGTTCC |
| QC TEA009673-R | AACACCGGCCCATATCTCTG |
| QC TEA016430-F | AGAATCCGGGCTGCATGTAT |
| QC TEA016430-R | AGTCCCAAGCCAGAGTCGAT |
| ZZ TEA015199-F | CGCATGGACAATGAGGTGAT |
| ZZ TEA015199-R | TTGCGGCACAATACAGCTCT |
| ZZ TEA010880-F | CGCCACAGTTGGAAATTCTG |
| ZZ TEA010880-R | AAGCCAAGATTGGAACTCCC |
| ZZ TEA026349-F | TAGCCACTGAATGCGGGATA |
| ZZ TEA026349-R | CAATCGCTGCTCTGGAGTGT |
| ZZ TEA006156-F | GGGGCCATCAATGTTCCTTA |
| ZZ TEA006156-R | CAAGCTGGCATCCGACAATA |
| ZZ TEA015880-F | ACGAGATAGGGGTTCTTGCC |
| ZZ TEA015880-R | GAATCCCTTTCCTTTCCAGC |
| ZZ TEA008472-F | TTGGCAAGTTCGACACGTCT |
| ZZ TEA008472-R | AAGCCAACCCTAGCAAGCCT |
| ZZ TEA004071-F | CCTTGGCTTTGGCATCAGTA |
| ZZ TEA004071-R | AACATGACCTTGGGCGACAT |
| ZZ TEA001821-F | CACATTCTCGTCCCCATGAA |
| ZZ TEA001821-R | TGCTCGAAGAGGTTGTGGGT |
| ZZ TEA004537-F | CAAACCCACAAGCGCAAGTA |
| ZZ TEA004537-R | TCACTGCCCAAGAATCGTTC |
| ZZ TEA016076-F | GCGCGGTTTTCTCATTCCTA |
| ZZ TEA016076-R | AACCTCTCGGGCATGAATTG |
Effect of drought stress on physiological indicators in seedlings and cuttings of tea plant.
| Materials | Item | Drought stress levels | SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 5d | 10d | 15d | 20d | 25d | |||
| Seedlings | soluble sugar (mg/g) | 1.21e | 1.18e | 3.35c | 5.78a | 4.25b | 2.95d | 0.23 |
| soluble protein (mg/g) | 12.21d | 13.18d | 15.35c | 17.78b | 19.34a | 17.95b | 0.41 | |
| proline (μg/g) | 17.08e | 18.35e | 21.25d | 28.59c | 35.05b | 38.37a | 1.21 | |
| MDA (μmol/g) | 6.36e | 6.46e | 7.35d | 8.87c | 10.63a | 10.17b | 0.25 | |
| Cuttings | soluble sugar (mg/g) | 1.35d | 1.25d | 2.28c | 3.95a | 3.11b | 2.23c | 0.14 |
| soluble protein (mg/g) | 12.61d | 13.65d | 15.28c | 17.05b | 18.68a | 16.83b | 0.36 | |
| proline (μg/g) | 17.53d | 18.65d | 21.36c | 26.45ab | 28.96a | 27.65a | 0.67 | |
| MDA (μmol/g) | 6.26e | 6.42e | 7.26d | 9.82c | 11.96b | 13.37a | 0.41 | |
SEM: standard error of mean.
Means within the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
a, b, c,d indicate that after Duncan test, p < 0.05, the difference is significant
Statistics of gene expression results.
| All Reference Genes | Known Gene Num | New Gene Num |
|---|---|---|
| 33932 | 30680 (90.42%) | 7120 |
FIGURE 2Sample Cluster Diagram. QC, Cutting tea plant. ZZ, Seeding tea plant. CK: Cutting samples treated with drought for 0 days, T: Cutting samples treated with drought for 20 days.
FIGURE 3Histogram of differential gene statistics between groups. QC, Cutting tea plant. ZZ, Seeding tea plant. CK: Cutting samples treated with drought for 0 days, T: Cutting samples treated with drought for 20 days.
FIGURE 4GO function annotation of the differentially expressed genes in QC tea plantation. QC, Cutting tea plant. CK: Cutting samples treated with drought for 0 days, T: Cutting samples treated with drought for 20 days.
FIGURE 5GO function annotation of the differentially expressed genes in ZZ tea plantation. ZZ, Seeding tea plant. CK: Cutting samples treated with drought for 0 days, T: Cutting samples treated with drought for 20 days.
FIGURE 6KEGG pathway of cutting tea plants under drought on day 0 and day 20. QC, Cutting tea plant. CK: Cutting samples treated with drought for 0 days, T: Cutting samples treated with drought for 20 days.
FIGURE 7KEGG pathway of seeding tea plants under drought on day 0 and day 20. QC, Cutting tea plant. CK: Cutting samples treated with drought for 0 days, T: Cutting samples treated with drought for 20 days.
FIGURE 8QC-CK&QC-T Comparison of unregulated genes expression pattern between RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR results. The gene expression values were normalized to the Actin gene. The purple column represents the results of drought treatment for 0 days, and the orange red column represents the results of drought treatment for 20 days. CK: Cutting samples treated with drought for 0 days, T: Cutting samples treated with drought for 20 days. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 9QC-CK&QC-T Comparison of down genes expression pattern between RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR results. The gene expression values were normalized to the Actin gene. The purple column represents the results of drought treatment for 0 days, and the orange red column represents the results of drought treatment for 20 days. CK: Cutting samples treated with drought for 0 days, T: Cutting samples treated with drought for 20 days. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 10ZZ-CK&ZZ-T Comparison of unregulated genes expression pattern between RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR results. The gene expression values were normalized to the Actin gene. The purple column represents the results of drought treatment for 0 days, and the orange red column represents the results of drought treatment for 20 days. CK: Seeding samples treated with drought for 0 days, T: Seeding samples treated with drought for 20 days. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 11ZZ-CK&ZZ-T Comparison of down genes expression pattern between RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR results. The gene expression values were normalized to the Actin gene. The purple column represents the results of drought treatment for 0 days, and the orange red column represents the results of drought treatment for 20 days. CK: Seeding samples treated with drought for 0 days, T: Seeding samples treated with drought for 20 days. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 12Correlation analysis between RNA-seq and qPCR. Pearson coefficient is used for correlation analysis, and r represents the correlation coefficient.