| Literature DB >> 36034968 |
Fan Luo1, Jingrui Qi1, Li Zhao1, Yu Wang2, Mei Yang1.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effect of individual nursing combined with dietary management on blood glucose levels and quality of life in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome with diabetes. Method: This study included 68 elderly patients who underwent acute coronary syndrome at Department of Emergency in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2020. And they were assigned to a control group (n = 34) treated with individual nursing and a research group (n = 34) treated with individual nursing and dietary management according to the random number table. A comparison of the changes in blood glucose levels, anxiety and depression, quality of life, and nursing satisfaction was made between groups before and after nursing. Result: Before nursing, the differences in blood glucose levels, SAS scores, and SDS scores between groups were not considered statistically significant (P > 0.05). After nursing, the blood glucose levels, SAS, and SDS levels of patients in both groups significantly decreased, and the research group presented a higher decrease when compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The short form health survey (SF-36) showed that the research group had higher scores in physical function (PF), general health (GH), vitality (VT), mental health (MH), social function (SF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), and role-emotional (RE) compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The satisfaction survey presented that the research group had a significantly higher total score than the control group [(91.40 ± 5.23) vs. (86.61 ± 7.14), P < 0.05].Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36034968 PMCID: PMC9402311 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8770996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Comparison of general data [n (%), ()].
| Group |
| Gender | Age | Type | Hypertension | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Acute myocardial infarction | Unstable angina | ||||
| Control group | 34 | 21 | 13 | 68.21 ± 9.47 | 18 | 16 | 29 |
| Research group | 34 | 23 | 11 | 69.58 ± 9.54 | 20 | 14 | 30 |
|
| 0.258 | 0.594 | 0.239 | 0.128 | |||
|
| 0.400 | 0.554 | 0.404 | 0.500 | |||
Comparison of glycosylated hemoglobin between groups before and after nursing ().
| Group |
| Before nursing | After nursing |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 34 | 10.08 ± 1.46 | 6.65 ± 1.35 | 10.058 | <0.001 |
| Research group | 34 | 9.93 ± 1.57 | 6.01 ± 0.96 | 12.421 | <0.001 |
|
| 0.408 | 2.253 | |||
|
| 0.684 | 0.028 |
Comparison of SAS and SDS scores before and after nursing ().
| Group |
| SAS | SDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before nursing | Before nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | ||
| Control group | 34 | 65.39 ± 7.27 | 49.22 ± 5.51 | 29.14 ± 3.45 | 19.12 ± 2.47 |
| Research group | 34 | 66.67 ± 7.45 | 38.47 ± 4.32 | 28.98 ± 3.13 | 14.28 ± 1.79 |
|
| 0.717 | 8.953 | 0.200 | 9.252 | |
|
| 0.476 | <0.001 | 0.842 | <0.001 | |
Note. Comparison with before nursing, (P < 0.05).
Comparison of SF-36 scores after follow-up ().
| Item | Control group | Research group |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF | 86.14 ± 5.98 | 95.78 ± 4.51 | 7.505 | <0.001 |
| GH | 42.21 ± 7.99 | 81.03 ± 1.95 | 27.520 | <0.001 |
| TV | 55.78 ± 6.91 | 93.26 ± 3.37 | 28.430 | <0.001 |
| MH | 66.82 ± 7.56 | 88.67 ± 3.56 | 15.250 | <0.001 |
| SF | 87.69 ± 8.57 | 104.41 ± 9.77 | 7.502 | <0.001 |
| RP | 85.48 ± 17.92 | 94.16 ± 8.78 | 2.536 | 0.014 |
| BP | 60.72 ± 6.53 | 71.87 ± 10.13 | 5.394 | <0.001 |
| RE | 51.42 ± 5.34 | 89.45 ± 6.74 | 25.790 | <0.001 |
Figure 1Comparison of quality of life scores between the two groups.
Comparison of nursing satisfaction ().
| Type | Control group ( | Research group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nursing attitude | 17.75 ± 1.34 | 18.01 ± 1.12 | 0.868 | 0.388 |
| Health education | 17.46 ± 1.01 | 17.89 ± 1.24 | 1.568 | 0.122 |
| Humanistic care | 18.13 ± 1.04 | 18.36 ± 0.87 | 0.989 | 0.326 |
| Nursing efficacy | 16.84 ± 2.23 | 18.98 ± 0.51 | 5.455 | <0.001 |
| Discharge guidance | 16.43 ± 2.51 | 18.16 ± 1.32 | 3.557 | <0.001 |
| Total score | 86.61 ± 7.14 | 91.40 ± 5.23 | 3.156 | 0.002 |