| Literature DB >> 36034699 |
LiBo Zhao1, Huanhuan Wang2, Yinghui Gao3, Benchuan Hao1, Xueyan Li4, Ruoqing Wen5, Kaibing Chen6, Li Fan1, Lin Liu7.
Abstract
Objectives: To analyze the characteristics of oral microbiota in plateau and plain youth and the possible function of the microbiome. Materials and methods: A total of 120 healthy young males (80 on the plateau, 40 on the plain) completed this cross-sectional study. Oral microflora samples were collected from all participants. The bacterial 16S rDNA was amplified using PCR and sequenced using Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing. The data were analyzed to determine the microbial distribution and community structure of the oral microflora from the two groups. Metastats was used to test differences in relative species abundance between the groups. The correlation between the abundance of specific bacteria and blood indicators was also analyzed.Entities:
Keywords: altitude; biodiversity; high-throughput sequencing; metabolic function; oral microbiota; relative abundance; triglyceride
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36034699 PMCID: PMC9400057 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.952579
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 6.073
Comparison of general characteristics and Alpha diversity between the two groups.
| plateau group | plain group | t or χ2 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age,year | 19.6 ± 1.5 | 19.9 ± 1.0 | -1.33 | 0.185 |
| Ethnic Han,n(%) | 73(91.3) | 39(97.5) | 0.820 | 0.365 |
| Completion of high school,n(%) | 69(86.3) | 35(87.5) | 0.036 | 0.849 |
| Brush teeth twice a day,n(%) | 69(86.3) | 34(85.0) | 0.276 | 0.871 |
| nseqs | 63657.8 ± 11781.0 | 57057.4 ± 11720.9 | 2.89 | 0.004 |
| sobs | 568.2 ± 138.4 | 619.1 ± 149.7 | -1.85 | 0.067 |
| Chao index | 799.3 ± 178.4 | 828.4 ± 173.2 | -0.85 | 0.397 |
| Ace index | 885.6 ± 197.7 | 890.9 ± 167.7 | -0.15 | 0.884 |
| coverage | 99.7 ± 0.1 | 99.6 ± 0.1 | 1.79 | 0.075 |
| Shannon index | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 2.7 ± 0.9 | -5.06 | <0.001 |
| Npshannon index | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 2.8 ± 0.9 | -5.05 | <0.001 |
| Simpson index | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.2 ± 0.2 | 5.31 | <0.001 |
nseqs, the number of sequences clustered to OTUs; sobs, the number of observed species.
Figure 1Histogram of flora distribution (taking phyla for example) The points on the horizontal coordinate represented individual objects of study. Different colors indicated different phyla, and the length of each colored band suggested the amount of specific phylum in an individual.
Figure 2UniFrac ranking diagram based on principal coordinate analysis [2A (Left): three-dimensional, 2B (Right): two-dimensional. group 1: plateau group; group 2: plain group) The similarity and dissimilarity of bacterial community structures between the two groups were evaluated by PCoA that based on Bray-Curtis distances at the OTU level at 97% identity. The distribution of the two groups overlapped partially. PC1 explained 8.8% of the variation observed, and PC2 explained 5.8% of the variation.
Comparative table of the abundance of each phylum between two groups (top 10 phyla).
| taxonomy | mean total | plateau group | plain group |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firmicutes,% | 58.57 | 75.01 ± 1.40 | 48.15 ± 3.66 | <0.001 |
| Proteobacteria,% | 14.86 | 11.84 ± 0.84 | 22.35 ± 1.82 | <0.001 |
| Bacteroidetes,% | 12.01 | 6.77 ± 0.77 | 20.45 ± 2.57 | <0.001 |
| Actinobacteria,% | 4.32 | 4.17 ± 0.55 | 5.27 ± 0.68 | 0.184 |
| Fusobacteria,% | 1.21 | 0.84 ± 0.19 | 1.59 ± 0.72 | 0.399 |
| Synergistetes,% | 0.52 | 0.41 ± 0.07 | 0.71 ± 0.23 | 0.206 |
| Candidate division TM7,% | 0.41 | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.59 ± 0.11 | 0.044 |
| Acidobacteria,% | 0.17 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.013 |
| Eukaryota_unclassified,% | 0.10 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.005 |
| Tenericutes,% | 0.09 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.043 |
P < 0.05, the differences between groups were statistically significant.
Figure 3The volcano map showed the difference at genera level {Red dot: met log2[mean(A)/mean(B)] > 1 and p < 0.05 and q < 0.05 (advanced standard). green dot: only met log2[mean(A)/mean(B)] > 1 and p < 0.05 (primary standard). Gray dot: Taxonomy that did not meet any of the above criteria.}.
Figure 4Scale map of the top 10 genera in abundance (all samples) The map displayed the proportion of several kinds of genera with richer contents directly.
Figure 5Comparison of the abundance of each genera between two groups (top 10 genera) The symbol above the columnar band indicated that the difference between groups was statistically significant. ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01. No statistical differences were found between groups without symbols.
Figure 6Bar diagram of the distribution of pathways and functions (the left two-thirds of the abscissa: plateau group, the right third: plain group.) Each position on the horizontal axis represented separate object. Different colors indicated different pathways or functions, and the length of each color stripe indicated the proportion of a particular pathway (function) in somebody.
Correlation between bacteria abundance and blood indices in different groups.
| subgroup | taxonomy | blood indices | r |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plateau group | Streptococcus | TG | 0.247 | 0.027 |
| Plain group | Prevotella | Hb | -0.558 | <0.001 |
| Rothia | the number of RBC | -0.388 | 0.013 | |
| Veillonella | Hb | -0.347 | 0.028 | |
| Haemophilus | AST | 0.365 | 0.021 | |
| MCV | 0.314 | 0.049 | ||
| Gemella | EOSR | -0.325 | 0.041 | |
| Fusobacterium | NEUR | 0.419 | 0.007 |
TG, triglyceride; Hb, haemoglobin; RBC, red blood cell; AST, aspartate transaminase; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; EOSR, eosinophil ratio; NEUR, neutrophil ratio. P < 0.05: the correlation between the two variables was statistically significant.