| Literature DB >> 36034696 |
Andrea K Locke1,2,3, Farzana R Zaki4, Sean T Fitzgerald1,2, Kavya Sudhir4,5, Guillermo L Monroy4, Honggu Choi4, Jungeun Won4,5, Anita Mahadevan-Jansen1,2,6,7,8, Stephen A Boppart4,5,9,10.
Abstract
In the management of otitis media (OM), identification of causative bacterial pathogens and knowledge of their biofilm formation can provide more targeted treatment approaches. Current clinical diagnostic methods rely on the visualization of the tympanic membrane and lack real-time assessment of the causative pathogen(s) and the nature of any biofilm that may reside behind the membrane and within the middle ear cavity. In recent years, optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been demonstrated as an improved in vivo diagnostic tool for visualization and morphological characterization of OM biofilms and middle ear effusions; but lacks specificity about the causative bacterial species. This study proposes the combination of OCT and Raman spectroscopy (RS) to examine differences in the refractive index, optical attenuation, and biochemical composition of Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; four of the leading otopathogens in OM. This combination provides a dual optical approach for identifying and differentiating OM-causing bacterial species under three different in vitro growth environments (i.e., agar-grown colonies, planktonic cells from liquid cultures, and biofilms). This study showed that RS was able to identify key biochemical variations to differentiate all four OM-causing bacteria. Additionally, biochemical spectral changes (RS) and differences in the mean attenuation coefficient (OCT) were able to distinguish the growth environment for each bacterial species.Entities:
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; bacteria; bacterial infection; biofilms; biophotonics; optical coherence tomography; optical spectroscopy; otitis media
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36034696 PMCID: PMC9400059 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.869761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 6.073
Figure 1Average Raman spectra of (A) H. influenzae, (B) S. pneumoniae, (C) M. catarrhalis, and (D) P. aeruginosa comparing key Raman spectral differences relating to bacterial growth under three different environments (grey: colony on agar, red: planktonic form, and blue: biofilms on CaF2 substrates). The red bands highlight the wavenumbers with SMLR weighted features contributing ≥60% in differentiating each species’ growth forms.
A summary of the sensitivity and specificity for SMLR differentiation of three different growth environments for individual bacterial species using RS.
|
| Colony | Planktonic | Biofilm |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Sensitivity (%) | 100 | 95.2 | 100 |
|
| |||
| Sensitivity (%) | 100 | 100 | 96.7 |
|
| |||
| Sensitivity (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 |
|
| |||
| Sensitivity (%) | 100 | 100 | 96.7 |
Figure 2Averaged Raman spectra (left) highlighting key Raman features identified by SMLR to differentiate OM-causing bacterial biofilms. The table (right) provides a summary of the tentative biochemical assignments for the Raman peaks with 80% and above weighted feature contribution to the differentiation. The red bands highlight the wavenumbers with SMLR weighted features contributing to *60-79% and **≥80% in differentiating amongst the species’ biofilms.
A summary of the sensitivity and specificity using SMLR to differentiate the four bacterial species for a given environment using RS.
| Environment |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colony | ||||
| Sensitivity (%) | 100 | 98.0 | 93.8 | 97.9 |
| Planktonic | ||||
| Sensitivity (%) | 100 | 92.9 | 98.2 | 100 |
| Biofilms | ||||
| Sensitivity (%) | 94.4 | 93.8 | 92.3 | 100 |
Figure 3Averaged Raman spectra (left) highlighting key Raman features identified by SMLR to differentiate OM-causing bacteria planktonic form. The table (right) provides a summary of the tentative biochemical assignments of the Raman peaks. The red bands highlight the wavenumbers with SMLR weighted features contributing to *60-79% and **≥80% in differentiating amongst the species’ planktonic cells (+spectral changes observed visually but not identified by the SMLR model).
Figure 4Averaged Raman spectra (left) highlighting key Raman features identified by SMLR to differentiate OM-causing bacterial colonies grown on BHI agar. The table (right) provides a summary of the tentative biochemical assignments of a few of the key Raman peaks. The red bands highlight the wavenumbers with SMLR weighted features contributing to *60-79% and **≥80% in differentiating amongst the species’ colonies.
Figure 5Representative 2D OCT images from H. Influenzae (a1) single-colony, (a2) planktonic (in pellet), and (a3) biofilm; S. pneumoniae (b1) single-colony, (b2) planktonic (in pellet), and (b3) biofilm; M. catarrhalis (c1) single-colony, (c2) planktonic (in pellet), and (c3) biofilm and P. aeruginosa in (d1) single-colony, (d2) planktonic (in pellet), and (d3) biofilm. The lower right insets show photos of the bacteria in each form. (: Representative 3D OCT images from P. aeruginosa are shown in (a) a single-colony, (b) planktonic (in pellet) and (c) biofilm and 3D videos of the three forms).
Figure 6Comparison of (A) mean refractive indices and (B) mean attenuation coefficients from different bacterial colonies grown on brain heart (BH) agar plates, planktonic form, and biofilm forms. Here, each bar graph represents the mean and the standard deviation from 32 independent measurements.
Overall mean (n = 32 for each independent measurement) and statistical comparison of RI and AC for the different bacterial species in all three growth forms using the one-way ANOVA test.
| Mean ± SD at 1325 nm OCT |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environment | Refractive index | Attenuation coefficient (mm-1) | Refractive index | Attenuation coefficient |
| Colony | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
|
| 1.45 ± 0.02 | 4.25 ± 0.68 | ||
|
| 1.43 ± 0.03 | 3.58 ± 0.41 | ||
|
| 1.45 ± 0.02 | 3.28 ± 0.25 | ||
|
| 1.44 ± 0.02 | 2.91 ± 0.36 | ||
| Planktonic | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
|
| 1.35 ± 0.01 | 3.82 ± 0.39 | ||
|
| 1.34 ± 0.02 | 3.12 ± 0.51 | ||
|
| 1.35 ± 0.02 | 2.95 ± 0.26 | ||
|
| 1.33 ± 0.02 | 2.64 ± 0.28 | ||
| Biofilm | 0.56 | <0.001 | ||
|
| 1.34 ± 0.03 | 1.23 ± 0.17 | ||
|
| 1.33 ± 0.01 | 1.29 ± 0.08 | ||
|
| 1.33 ± 0.02 | 1.36 ± 0.17 | ||
|
| 1.33 ± 0.01 | 1.53 ± 0.16 | ||
Data is statistically significant if p < 0.05 and is not significant if p ≥ 0.05.
Inter-group comparison of p-values among bacterial species in colony, planktonic, and biofilm forms by one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s HSD test.
| Intergroup comparisons |
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otitis media-causing bacterial species | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| RI | AC | RI | AC | RI | AC | RI | AC | |
| Colony vs Planktonic | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Colony vs Biofilm | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Planktonic vs Biofilm | 0.089 | <0.001 | 0.621 | <0.001 | 0.052 | <0.001 | 0.867 | <0.001 |
Data is statistically significant if p < 0.05 and is not significant if p ≥ 0.05.
Intra-group comparison of p-values among colonies, planktonic form, and biofilms by one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s HSD test.
| Intergroup comparisons |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between colonies | Between planktonic form | Between biofilms | ||||
| RI | AC | RI | AC | RI | AC | |
|
| 0.029 | <0.001 | 0.226 | <0.001 | 0.996 | 0.291 |
|
| 0.722 | <0.001 | 0.967 | <0.001 | 0.992 | 0.003 |
|
| 0.999 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.553 | <0.001 |
|
| <0.001 | 0.045 | 0.512 | 0.224 | 0.999 | 0.331 |
|
| 0.040 | <0.001 | 0.032 | 0.112 | 0.695 | <0.001 |
|
| 0.648 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.987 | 0.732 | <0.001 |
Data is statistically significant if p < 0.05 and is not significant if p ≥ 0.05.
Figure 7Flow diagram of the refractive index calculation algorithm.
Figure 8Flow diagram of the attenuation coefficient calculation algorithm.