| Literature DB >> 36034631 |
Xiaojin Zheng1, Shengkun Qin1, Yanxia Zhang1.
Abstract
As the world's population grows, resulting in the aggravating trend of aging population, it brings with it an increase in the demand for blood. Nowadays, in most cities, the blood distribution network is based on a single distribution centre pattern, with the blood centre acting as distribution centre for one-to-one distribution. However, despite its convenience, this pattern has a high frequency of delivery, increased risk of blood shortage, and generates high carbon emissions. This paper aims to understand the real-life problems of the current blood distribution network and to design a more rational blood distribution network by taking the characteristics of the blood supply chain into account. Two blood distribution network patterns are considered, the current single distribution centre pattern and the proposed multiple distribution centre pattern. In order to minimise environmental impacts, we introduce open vehicle routing problem for blood delivery routes planning, using mixed integer programming for modelling, to compare the carbon emissions between the two blood distribution network patterns. Numerical experimental results demonstrate that applying the proposed BDN can reduce carbon emissions by an average of 25.84% and up to 29.59%, and the delivery time in emergency situations is significantly reduced by an average of 33.15%. Such studies are essential for both reducing carbon emissions and safeguarding patients' lives.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36034631 PMCID: PMC9410803 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7117151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1Blood supply chain network.
Figure 2Current blood distribution network.
Figure 3Proposed blood distribution network.
Notations used in the model.
| Sets: | |
|
| Set of hospitals, |
|
| Set of hospitals that can be selected as LBB, |
|
| Set of vehicles, |
|
| |
| Parameters: | |
|
| a large number; |
|
| City blood center; |
|
| Maximum number of LBBs; |
|
| Mean daily demand of hospitals |
|
| Delivery cycle of LBBs; |
|
| Distance between |
|
| Carbon emissions per unit distance per unit weight carried generated by blood delivery vehicles; |
|
| Maximum vehicle capacity; |
|
| |
| Decision variables: | |
|
| Binary variable. If hospital |
|
| Binary variable. If hospital |
|
| Binary variable. If hospital |
|
| Binary variable. If hospital |
|
| Binary variable. If hospital |
|
| Binary variable. If vehicle |
|
| Distance of the route of vehicle |
|
| Integer variable. Number of vehicles from o to |
Comparison of carbon emissions between current and proposed BDN.
|
|
|
|
| Obj | Reduced (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 10 | 5 | 500 | 5733.97 | 23.64 |
| 60 | 10 | 5 | 1000 | 5287.03 | 29.59 |
| 60 | 10 | 2 | 500 | 5989.48 | 20.23 |
| 60 | 10 | 2 | 1000 | 5386.81 | 28.26 |
| 60 | 5 | 2 | 1000 | 5443.80 | 27.50 |
| Average | 25.84 | ||||
Figure 4Configuration and allocation of current BDN.
Figure 5Configuration and allocation of proposed BDN.
Comparison of emergency response time between current and proposed BDN.
|
|
|
|
| Response time | Reduced (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 10 | 5 | 500 | 34.38 | 22.79 |
| 60 | 10 | 5 | 1000 | 27.26 | 38.78 |
| 60 | 10 | 2 | 1000 | 28.34 | 36.36 |
| 60 | 5 | 2 | 1000 | 31.01 | 30.36 |
| 60 | 5 | 5 | 1000 | 27.84 | 37.48 |
| Average | 29.77 | 33.15 | |||