| Literature DB >> 36034501 |
Xiaochong Fan1, Huan Ren1, Chunxiao Bu2, Zhongyuan Lu1, Yarui Wei2, Fuxing Xu1, Lijun Fu1, Letian Ma1, Cunlong Kong1, Tao Wang1, Yong Zhang2, Qingying Liu1, Wenqi Huang3, Huilian Bu1, Jingjing Yuan4.
Abstract
Introduction: The efficacy of short-term spinal cord stimulation (stSCS) as a treatment for neuropathic pain in patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) has already been validated. However, the potential alterations in brain functionality that are induced by such treatment have yet to be completely elucidated.Entities:
Keywords: emotion; functional magnetic resonance imaging; mechanisms of action; pain; postherpetic neuralgia; spinal cord stimulation
Year: 2022 PMID: 36034501 PMCID: PMC9405669 DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.938280
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Mol Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5099 Impact factor: 6.261
Figure 1Study protocol. Patients with PHN were enrolled prior to the implantation of the SCS and were followed up after the removal of the stSCS. Each patient underwent a neuroimaging protocol prior to SCS and 14 days after SCS. SCS, spinal cord stimulation; stSCS, short-time spinal cord stimulation; V, visit.
Individual patient's characteristics for all patients (N = 10).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||||
| 1 | M | 39 | Right | 6 | 14 |
| 2 | M | 77 | Left | 1 | 14 |
| 3 | F | 79 | Left | 3 | 14 |
| 4 | F | 62 | Left | 6 | 14 |
| 5 | M | 60 | Right | 7 | 14 |
| 6 | F | 70 | Right | 2 | 14 |
| 7 | F | 68 | Left | 4 | 14 |
| 8 | F | 87 | Right | 1.5 | 14 |
| 9 | M | 70 | Left | 1 | 14 |
| 10 | M | 83 | Left | 1 | 14 |
F, female; M, male; SCS, spinal cord stimulation.
Figure 2Boxplots for the clinical outcomes for all patients at baseline (in green) and after stSCS (in orange). The beginning four boxplots represent the four subscale scores of the SF-MPQ-2 (continuous pain, intermittent pain, predominantly neuropathic pain, and affective descriptors). The last two boxplots represent the two subscale scores for the HADS (HADS-A and HADS-D). NRS, numeric rating scale; PSQI, Pittsburgh sleep quality index; SCS, spinal cord stimulation. *p < 0.05.
Clusters of different ReHo values between baseline and after stSCS.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |||
| Baseline < after stSCS | |||||
| Temporal_Mid_L | −54 | −63 | 9 | 8.184 | 61 |
| Frontal_Sup_R | 18 | 63 | 6 | 7.2821 | 39 |
| Precuneus | −3 | −60 | 39 | 8.7368 | 49 |
| SupraMarginal-L | −48 | −45 | 33 | 9.8058 | 81 |
| Parietal_Inf_L | −36 | −60 | 48 | 7.6008 | 46 |
| Parietal_Sup_R | 24 | −51 | 60 | 6.6291 | 81 |
| Baseline > after stSCS | |||||
| Rolandic_Oper_R | 39 | −30 | 18 | −6.5298 | 45 |
| Occipital_Mid_R | 27 | −72 | 30 | −6.5043 | 60 |
ReHo, regional homogeneity.
Figure 3Significant differences in ReHo between baseline and after stSCS in axial and sagittal slices. The warm colors indicate a higher ReHo value whereas the cooler colors indicate a lower ReHo value at baseline and after stSCS (p < 0.05). Brain images are displayed in radiology convention (the left of the figure represents the right side of the patient's brain and vice versa).
Clusters of different DC values between baseline and after stSCS.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |||
| Baseline < after stSCS | |||||
| Temporal_Mid_L | −54 | −63 | 12 | 13.5598 | 22 |
| Rolandic_Oper_R | 54 | 3 | 12 | 6.5985 | 20 |
| Supramarginal_L | −42 | −45 | 30 | 9.6256 | 62 |
| Supramarginal_R | 69 | −72 | 24 | 5.8351 | 24 |
| Precentral_R | 57 | 3 | 27 | 6.238 | 17 |
| Precuneus_L | 0 | −63 | 27 | 7.2906 | 42 |
| Parietal_Inf_L | −60 | −42 | 39 | 7.2755 | 21 |
DC, degree centrality.
Figure 4Significant differences in DC between baseline and after stSCS in axial and sagittal slices. The warm colors indicate higher DC values at baseline and after stSCS (p < 0.05). Brain images are presented in radiology convention (the left of the figure represents the right side of the patient's brain and vice versa).