Literature DB >> 36034406

What Do People Expect of Cognitive Enhancement?

Sheida Rabipour1, Ronald Andringa2, Walter R Boot2, Patrick S R Davidson1,3,4.   

Abstract

Enhancing cognitive function through mentally challenging exercises ("brain training") or non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is an enticing yet controversial prospect. Although use of these methods is increasing rapidly, their effectiveness remains questionable. Notably, cognitive enhancement studies have typically failed to consider participants' expectations. However, high expectations could easily make brain-training approaches appear more effective than they actually are. We addressed this major gap in the literature by assessing the perceived effectiveness of brain training and NIBS in a series of surveys. Our results suggest that people are optimistic about the possibilities of cognitive enhancement, particularly through brain training. Moreover, reading a brief message implying high or low effectiveness of such methods can raise or lower expectations, respectively, suggesting that perceptions of brain training are malleable - at least in the short term. Measuring expectations in brain training and NIBS is important to determining whether these cognitive enhancement methods truly are effective.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain training; Cognitive enhancement; Demand characteristics; Expectation; Intervention design; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Placebo effect

Year:  2017        PMID: 36034406      PMCID: PMC9410192          DOI: 10.1007/s41465-017-0050-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc        ISSN: 2509-3304


  18 in total

Review 1.  Modelling non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Carlo Miniussi; Justin A Harris; Manuela Ruzzoli
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Ethics and social risks in brain stimulation.

Authors:  Vincent Q Walsh
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  The Pervasive Problem With Placebos in Psychology: Why Active Control Groups Are Not Sufficient to Rule Out Placebo Effects.

Authors:  Walter R Boot; Daniel J Simons; Cary Stothart; Cassie Stutts
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-07

4.  Early adopters of the magical thinking cap: a study on do-it-yourself (DIY) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) user community.

Authors:  Anita Jwa
Journal:  J Law Biosci       Date:  2015-06-02

Review 5.  Rethinking Explicit Expectations: Connecting Placebos, Social Cognition, and Contextual Perception.

Authors:  Katharina A Schwarz; Roland Pfister; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Medical risks: Regulate devices for brain stimulation.

Authors:  Olivia Carter; Jason Forte
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Do you believe in brain training? A questionnaire about expectations of computerised cognitive training.

Authors:  Sheida Rabipour; Patrick S R Davidson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Evidence for Narrow Transfer after Short-Term Cognitive Training in Older Adults.

Authors:  Dustin J Souders; Walter R Boot; Kenneth Blocker; Thomas Vitale; Nelson A Roque; Neil Charness
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Barriers, Benefits, and Beliefs of Brain Training Smartphone Apps: An Internet Survey of Younger US Consumers.

Authors:  John Torous; Patrick Staples; Elizabeth Fenstermacher; Jason Dean; Matcheri Keshavan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Seven Pervasive Statistical Flaws in Cognitive Training Interventions.

Authors:  David Moreau; Ian J Kirk; Karen E Waldie
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.