| Literature DB >> 36034378 |
Ze-Chun Huang1, Dan Yan1, Li-Fang Huang1, Hao-Yan Yang2, Bin He3, An-Li Zhang1, Shuai-Hua Li1,4.
Abstract
Objective: To introduce a new surgical method for the repair of a large inner canthus combined with tissue loss at the inner canthal angle of the eye by using a bird-beak-type z-shaped asymmetrical flap and to summarize its clinical effect. Method: A total of 56 patients with a large inner canthus were randomly selected, and a bird-beak-type z-shaped asymmetrical flap was used on the nasal side of the lower eyelid to repair and reconstruct the inner canthal folds. The inner canthal point was located according to physiological aesthetics. The short and long arms of the z-shaped asymmetrical flap were separated, replaced, fixed, and shaped to reconstruct the skin folds of the inner canthus and restore its aesthetic morphology.Entities:
Keywords: new surgical method; overlarge inner canthus; reconstruction; tissue loss; z-shaped asymmetric flap
Year: 2022 PMID: 36034378 PMCID: PMC9411987 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.786370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Surg ISSN: 2296-875X
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the unequal z-shaped flap.
Figure 2Diagram of the z-shaped asymmetric flap design.
Figure 3Short-arm scar fascia flap turned 180 degrees upward as the lining of the inner canthus.
Figure 4Suture point B on the long-arm flap with point A on the short-arm flap in a suitable position.
Figure 5Case 1 (A) Before surgery, (B) Immediately after surgery and (C) 2 years after surgery.
Figure 6Case 2 (A) Before surgery and (B) Six months after surgery.
Quantitative score of scar before and after surgery (n = 56 cases).
| Before surgery (x ± s) | After surgery (x ± s) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSAS score | 48.50 ± 3.60 | 17.15 ± 1.65 | 0.025 |
| OSAS score | 33.64 ± 2.28 | 12.66 ± 1.23 | 0.032 |
| VAS score of patients | 7.55 ± 0.58 | 2.85 ± 0.19 | 0.027 |
| VAS score of observer | 6.34 ± 0.36 | 2.62 ± 0.22 | 0.012 |
The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05);.
Note: POSAS stands for Patient and Observer Scar Assessment and is based on the patient scar assessment score (PSAS) and observer scar assessment score (OSAS) designed in accordance with Vancouver scar scale (accurate to 0.01).
PASA contains 6 parameters: color, softness, thickness, unevenness, itching, and pain.
OSAS contains 5 parameters: vascularization, pigmentation, softness, thickness, and unevenness.
All parameters are 10 points, 1 point means normal skin, and 10 points mean severe scars.
The VAS score is subjective and approximate value, with a score of 1–10 according to the degree of satisfaction (0 points mean the most satisfactory and 10 points the least satisfactory).
Comparison of preoperative and postoperative carunculae lacrimalis exposure score (n = 56 cases).
| Before surgery ( | After surgery ( | |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 41 |
| 2 | 11 | 15 |
| 3 | 45 | 0 |
| Average score | 2.80 ± 0.32 | 1.27 ± 0.18 |
The difference is statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Note: Lacrimal caruncle exposure score (LCES): 0 point (lacrimal caruncle is completely covered by the epicanthus); 1 point (lacrimal caruncle exposure is less than 1/2); 2 points (lacrimal caruncle exposure is greater than 1 /2); 3 points (full exposure of lacrimal caruncle).
Extension of inner canthus distance.
| Extension of inner canthal distance(mm) |
|
|---|---|
| <1 mm | 5 |
| 1–2 mm | 12 |
| 2–3 mm | 16 |
| >3 mm | 3 |
| Average extension | 1.86 mm |
Comparison of internal canthal distance before and after surgery (n = 56 cases).
| Before surgery ( | After surgery ( | |
|---|---|---|
| 30–35 mm | 23 | 11 |
| 35–40 mm | 21 | 28 |
| 40–45 mm | 11 | 17 |
| Average distance | 31.2 ± 2.85 mm | 33.7 ± 3.27 mm |
The difference is statistically significant (P < 0.05).