The transformation behavior of pyrite (FeS2) in the blast furnace process is critical to control the formation and emission of gaseous sulfides in the top gas of ironmaking but has seldom been explored. In present work, the pyrolysis of pyrite from 200 to 900 °C under a CO-H2 atmosphere was investigated by thermal-gravimetric and mass spectrometry. The thermodynamic theoretical calculations were carried out to further understand the transformation process. The results show that FeS2 is almost completely reduced to FeS under various CO-H2 atmospheres. H2S and carbonyl sulfide (COS) are the main gaseous sulfides formed through the pyrolysis reactions of FeS2 under a CO-H2 atmosphere. A higher H2 concentration can reduce the pyrolysis reaction temperature of FeS2, which is favorable for the conversion of sulfides to H2S, while a higher CO concentration promotes the conversion of sulfides to COS. Besides, the pyrolysis products of FeS2 by order from the former to latter under a strong reductive atmosphere (CO-H2) with increasing temperature are as follows: COS → S → H2S → S2 → CS2.
The transformation behavior of pyrite (FeS2) in the blast furnace process is critical to control the formation and emission of gaseous sulfides in the top gas of ironmaking but has seldom been explored. In present work, the pyrolysis of pyrite from 200 to 900 °C under a CO-H2 atmosphere was investigated by thermal-gravimetric and mass spectrometry. The thermodynamic theoretical calculations were carried out to further understand the transformation process. The results show that FeS2 is almost completely reduced to FeS under various CO-H2 atmospheres. H2S and carbonyl sulfide (COS) are the main gaseous sulfides formed through the pyrolysis reactions of FeS2 under a CO-H2 atmosphere. A higher H2 concentration can reduce the pyrolysis reaction temperature of FeS2, which is favorable for the conversion of sulfides to H2S, while a higher CO concentration promotes the conversion of sulfides to COS. Besides, the pyrolysis products of FeS2 by order from the former to latter under a strong reductive atmosphere (CO-H2) with increasing temperature are as follows: COS → S → H2S → S2 → CS2.
Gaseous sulfur emitted
from industrial production processes from
industries such as chemical, metallurgical, and power industries is
one of the culprits that endanger the natural environment and human
health.[1−3] Hence, environmental protection regulations for gaseous
sulfide emissions from industrial production processes are becoming
increasingly stringent all over the world. Blast furnace gas (BFG),
as a combustible by-product of the ironmaking process, is an important
secondary energy. Its main components are 20–28% CO, 17–25%
CO2, 50–55% N2, 1–5% H2,[4] 86–118 mg/Nm3 hydrogen
sulfide (H2S), and 20–60 mg/Nm3 carbonyl
sulfide (COS).[5,6] Sulfides in BFG cause the corrosion
of gas pipes and generator rotor blades.[7−9] Generally, it is better
to remove the sulfides from the BFG before combustion.Sulfur
in the blast furnace comes from the burdens such as coke
(over 70%), coal, and iron ore,[10,11] and its final destination
is mainly the blast furnace slag, hot metal, and BFG. Organic sulfur
(thiophenes, sulfoxides, and sulfones) and inorganic sulfur (pyrite
and sulfate sulfur) are two common forms of sulfur in the coke.[12] Most of the sulfides in the burdens eventually
enter into the slag and the hot metal, and the remaining small amount
enters the BFG.[11] Although less sulfides
enter the gas phase, the desulfurization process of the gas is more
complex and thus has received extensive attention. Especially in the
lumpy zone (200–900 °C) of blast furnace, the pyrite in
the coke and iron ore is pyrolyzed in a reducing atmosphere to generate
H2S and COS, which is one of the main sources of sulfides
in BFG.[13] Hence, the key to BFG desulfurization
is the removal of H2S and COS. It was reported that the
removal difficulty of COS is significantly higher than that of H2S, and COS usually needs to be converted into H2S before the removal.[7,9,14] Therefore,
exploring the decomposition mechanism of pyrite in a reducing atmosphere
and controlling more pyrite in coke and iron ores to be converted
into H2S in the lumpy zone can help to achieve high-efficiency
desulfurization of BFG.The pyrolysis of pyrite under different
atmospheric conditions
has been extensively studied.[15−19] Lv et al.[20] proposed that the decomposition
of FeS2 in a CO2 atmosphere can be divided into
three stages: 3FeS2 → 2FeS2 + Fe1–S → FeS2 + Fe1–S + Fe1–S → Fe1–S + 2Fe1–S. Moreover, CO2 promotes
the decomposition of FeS2, and the product S further reacts
with CO2 to form COS. Huang et al.[16] found that FeS2 began to decompose at 560 °C in
a CO2 atmosphere, and the type of solid products changes
with the temperature. Particularly, pyrrhotite (FeS, 1 ≤ x ≤ 2) is the only solid
product when the temperature is lower than 700 °C, while the
solid products change to magnetite (Fe3O4) and
FeS for a temperature higher than 700 °C. Levy et al.[17] studied the reaction of pyrite with water vapor;
pyrite reacted with water vapor to produce sulfur dioxide and H2S at 440 °C, and the generated sulfur dioxide and H2S further reacted to produce sulfur vapor and water. Hong
et al.[21] investigated the decomposition
of pyrite in He, N2, CO2–CO–SO2, O2–CO, and H2S–H2 gas mixtures from 400 to 590 °C. They concluded that
pyrite decomposes to pyrrhotite and sulfur vapor in all atmospheres,
and the decomposition can be divided into two processes: the formation
of pyrrhotite and liquid sulfur and the gasification of liquid sulfur.
Previous studies have basically confirmed that although pyrite can
be decomposed in any atmosphere, the decomposition mechanism under
different atmospheres varies significantly, and temperature is another
important factor affecting the decomposition of pyrite. However, previous
studies mainly focused on the pyrolysis of pyrite in inert and oxidizing
atmospheres, and the studies on reducing atmospheres, especially H2–CO mixed atmospheres, are still scarce.In the
present study, thermodynamic calculations and experiments
were carried out to study the pyrolysis process of FeS2 under the atmosphere of CO and H2. The effects of temperature
and H2 ratio on the pyrolysis products including solid
and gaseous products were analyzed to explore the transformation mechanism
of sulfides in the blast furnace.
Methods
Materials
Analytically pure pyrite
with the size of 63–75 μm was used in the experiments.
The purity of the pyrite was higher than 95 wt %, and the parameters
of pyrite sample are shown in Table . X-ray diffraction (XRD) [model D/max2500/PC (Cu Kα)]
analysis was performed to verify phase compositions of the sample.
The detection was performed at an angular range of 20–90°
with a scan rate of 4°/min, and the results are shown in Figure . In comparison of
the standard phase, the pyrite samples used are with high purity.
Besides, the impurities in the sample are mainly small amounts of
silica and traces of calcium sulfide (shown in Figure ). Due to the high stability of impurities
under the current experimental conditions, the effect of impurities
on the experimental results can be negligible.
Table 1
Parameters of Pyrite Samples
composition
standard value (wt %)
actual value (wt %)
FeS2
≥95.0
96.5
Fe
≥43.0
44.2
S
≥52.0
52.3
Si
≤2.0
1.5
other
2
Figure 1
Comparison of the XRD
pattern of the sample with the standard PDF
card.
Figure 4
XRD patterns
for the solid products formed at different gas compositions.
Comparison of the XRD
pattern of the sample with the standard PDF
card.
Experimental Procedures
The pyrolysis
of pyrite was carried out in a thermo-gravimetric analyzer (Setaram
Evo TG-DTA 1750) consisting of a vertical furnace, a gas manometer
system for controlling the atmosphere in the reactor, and an electronic
balance connected to a computer that records the mass loss. The schematic
diagram of the thermo-gravimetric analyzer is similar to that of the
previous study.[12,22−25] The reacted gas in the thermo-gravimetric
analyzer was blown into a quadrupole mass spectrometer (TILON LC-D200,
AMETEK LLC, USA) to detect its components according to the molecular
weight. The electron ionization voltage, the temperature of the transfer
line, and the m/z range of the mass
spectrometer are 10–70 eV, 270 °C, and 1–200, respectively.
Six different volume ratios (CO/H2 = 100:0, 90:10, 75:25,
50:50, 25:75, and 10:90) of CO and H2 mixtures were blown
into the thermo-gravimetric analyzer as the reaction atmosphere. The
protective gas was Ar (99.999%), and the gas flow rate was set at
20 mL/min to ensure that the gas could be carried away in time and
avoid the impact of the secondary reaction on the instantaneous weight
loss of the samples. For each test, the pyrite with an initial mass
of 375 mg was placed into an alumina crucible (Φ 12 × 10
mm). The reaction vessel was evacuated to vacuum with a pump, and
Ar (99.999%) was introduced into the reactor at a flow rate of 20
mL/min until the operating pressure reached 1 atm. The samples were
heated from room temperature to 900 °C with 5 °C min–1 heating rate, and the mass loss was recorded until
the end of the reduction. The final solid product after pyrolysis
was detected by XRD to explore the change of sulfur in the solid samples
after pyrolysis and the effect of reaction conditions on the precipitation
of sulfur from pyrite.
Thermodynamic Calculation
In order
to better understand the decomposition process of the pyrite, the
final equilibrium state of pyrite in two mixed atmospheres (CO/H2 = 25:75, 75:25) was calculated by FactSage software with
the equilib module and the FactPS + FToxid databases. The ideal gas,
pure liquids, and pure solids were selected as the reactants, and
the temperature range was 0–1500 °C. Finally, thermodynamic
calculation results can further explain the Experimental Results.
Results and Discussion
Pyrolytic Behavior of FeS2
To facilitate the analysis of the pyrolysis process of pyrite, its
decomposition in a pure CO atmosphere is discussed as the base case. Figure shows the thermo-gravimetry
(TG) and derivative thermo-gravimetry (DTG) curves of pyrite in a
pure CO atmosphere. It can be found that about 27% of the pyrite sample
is decomposed into volatiles according to the mass loss curve. In
addition, the mass loss rates (%/s) of FeS2 are chosen
to compare the reaction rates for different heating rates and plotted
in Figure . Four parameters
are used to describe the whole decomposition process, the starting
temperature of the pyrolysis reaction (T0), the final temperature of the pyrolysis reaction (Tf), the maximum mass loss rate (Rm), and the temperature corresponding to the maximum mass loss
rate (Tmax). Sahu et al.[26] defined the ignition temperature and the burn-up temperature
as the temperature at which the mass loss rate of the combustion reaction
first reaches 1%/min in the early and final stages, respectively.
Similarly, the starting temperature and the final temperature of the
pyrolysis reaction were obtained in the same way with a reference
mass loss rate of 0.1%/min for FeS2 in this work.
Figure 2
TG and DTG
curves of pyrite pyrolysis in CO and Ar atmospheres.
TG and DTG
curves of pyrite pyrolysis in CO and Ar atmospheres.As shown in Figure , at the stage of 50–300 °C, the evaporation
of water
and the pyrolysis of a small amount of pyrite mainly occur. Most of
the pyrolysis of pyrite occurs at 350–900 °C, so the discussions
of this work focus on this stage. In addition, the pyrolysis of FeS2 under an inert atmosphere (Ar) was carried out for comparison
with CO. It can be found that the decomposition temperature of FeS2 in CO is lower and the reaction is more thorough. This is
because the S produced by the decomposition continues to react with
CO so that the decomposition reaction moves in the direction of producing
gas, thereby accelerating the process of decomposition.It should
be noted that TG and DTG curves show a reciprocating
variation in the range of 150–300 °C. This is because
the heating mode of the thermo-gravimetric analyzer is controlled
by the proportional integral derivative (PID) system. In the PID mode,
the process of increasing temperature with time is not linear but
oscillating. During the heating process, the actual temperature may
be higher or lower than the set temperature and gradually approaches
the set temperature. Due to the hysteresis of heating control, the
temperature fluctuation is more obvious in the range of 150–300
°C. Nevertheless, since the decomposition temperature of FeS2 detected in the experiments is higher than 350 °C, the
temperature fluctuation at this stage has no effect on the experimental
conclusion and accuracy.Figure a shows
the mass loss of FeS2 in different mixed gases. It can
be found that the mass loss of samples in each atmosphere exceeds
27%. In fact, the mass loss ratio of the reaction for which FeS2 is fully converted to FeS is about 26.67%. More than 26.67%
of the mass loss is caused by other compound reactions and water vaporization.
Besides, the final mass loss of the sample decreases with the increase
of H2 ratio. This is because the increase of H2 concentration improves the reducibility of the mixed gas. There
may be a trace of solid product FeS that is further reduced to Fe,
which leads to the carburization reaction to occur more easily, and
thus, the final mass loss of the sample is reduced. Previous work
pointed out that the carburization reaction occurs at around 650 °C.[27] As shown in Figure a, the carburization clearly occurs around
600 °C (the TG curve with a higher CO concentration clearly has
a raised peak at 600 °C). According to Hayashi,[28] traces of sulfur in gas mixtures significantly reduce the
carburization rate as the sulfur content increases.
Figure 3
TG (a) and DTG (b) curves
of the FeS2 pyrolysis process
under different gas compositions.
TG (a) and DTG (b) curves
of the FeS2 pyrolysis process
under different gas compositions.Figure b shows
the DTG curves under different gas compositions. To eliminate the
jaggedness of the curves, the Savitzky–Golay method was employed
to smooth curves. The window points and the polynomial order were
150 and 2, respectively. In addition, T0, Tmax, and Rm in different atmospheres were extracted to analyze the characteristic
temperature, as shown in Table . Obviously, T0 remains essentially
constant for each atmosphere. With the increase of H2 ratio
in the H2–CO mixtures, Rmax and Tmax also increase accordingly.
Particularly, the absolute value of Rm slightly increases with the increase of H2 concentration,
indicating that the reduction of the mixed gas increases. The presence
of CO limits the maximum decomposition temperature of FeS2 because at lower H2 concentrations, the maximum decomposition
rate peaks at Tmax. If the maximum decomposition
rate is to be further increased, the gas reduction and temperature
need to be increased, resulting in an increase in Tmax and Rmax with the increase
of H2 ratio. At the same time, due to the small molecular
size of H2, it is easier to diffuse into the FeS2 core for reaction, thus promoting its decomposition rate.
Table 2
Characteristic Temperatures (T0 and Tmax) and Rm in Different Atmospheres
atmosphere
T0 (°C)
Tmax (°C)
Rm (%/min)
100% CO
331.75
475.47
–0.96
90% CO 10% H2
330.04
480.83
–0.95
75% CO 25% H2
334.06
490.40
–1.00
50% CO 50% H2
333.54
501.01
1.03
25% CO 75% H2
332.50
505.76
–1.15
10% CO 90% H2
335.32
507.12
–1.19
Mineralogy of the Solid Products
Figure shows the XRD patterns for the solid products after
pyrolysis. All the samples are with similar mineralogy. FeS is found
in the solid product, indicating that the FeS2 in the sample
is almost completely reacted to form FeS. In addition, there are SiO2 and CaS present in the solid phase before and after the reaction,
indicating that these trace impurities in the raw materials do not
participate in the reaction. Although the difference in the composition
of the mixed gas leads to slightly different reaction rates and characteristic
temperatures, there was no effect on the solid product.XRD patterns
for the solid products formed at different gas compositions.Figure shows the
evolution of FeS2 in the samples by thermodynamic calculation.
During the pyrolysis of FeS2 in the CO–H2 atmosphere, FeS2 is directly converted to FeS, which
is consistent with the experimental data. According to previous studies
on the mechanism of FeS2 decomposition,[16,19,20,29] it is known
that FeS2 decomposition first produces intermediate products
such as Fe7S8 and then decomposes to produce
FeS. Moreover, the increase of H2 concentration reduces
the decomposition temperature of FeS2, indicating that
the increase of H2 concentration improves the reducibility
of the gas and promotes the decomposition of FeS2.
Figure 5
Theoretical
calculation of the evolution of FeS2 in
samples under different gas compositions from 0 to 1500 °C: (a)
75% CO + 25% H2 and (b) 75% CO + 25% H2.
Theoretical
calculation of the evolution of FeS2 in
samples under different gas compositions from 0 to 1500 °C: (a)
75% CO + 25% H2 and (b) 75% CO + 25% H2.Note that the initial decomposition temperature
of FeS2 in the calculations (200 °C) is different
from that in experiments
(350 °C, as shown in Figure ). This is because the calculations only considered
the thermodynamic conditions of the reaction and ignored the kinetic
factors. However, chemical reactions are affected by both thermodynamic
and kinetic conditions. Considering factors such as gas diffusion,
the reaction rate at 200 °C was extremely slow that no reaction
was observed in the experiment. The progress of the reaction can only
be detected when the temperature is further increased. Although there
are differences between thermodynamic calculations and experimental
results, the calculated results can help us understand the thermodynamic
conditions and the products of the reaction.Figure indicates
that at low temperature, CO is converted into CO2 due to
the carbon deposition reaction (2CO = C + CO2), and FeS2 reacts with CO2 to form Fe7S8 (found in the reaction products). The produced Fe7S8 continues to react with CO and is completely reduced to FeS
at the temperature of 675 °C. Therefore, an inflection point
of CO concentration appears around this temperature. Before that,
the CO content is mainly related to the amount of reduction to FeS
and the gas balance, and if the temperature continued to increase,
it was only related to the gas balance.
Figure 6
Theoretical calculated
variation of product content during FeS2 reacting with
H2 (a) and CO (b).
Theoretical calculated
variation of product content during FeS2 reacting with
H2 (a) and CO (b).According to Figure a, H2 and FeS2 start to react
at about 100
°C to form H2S, and the reaction lasts until 580 °C
(eq ). A slight difference
between the trend of H2S and FeS can be seen at about 500
°C, which indicates that H2S starts to decompose into
H2 and S2 at 500 °C (eq ). The content of H2S decreases
significantly after 580 °C. FeS2 is completely converted
into FeS. This indicates that only the decomposition of H2S occurs after this temperature. At 1190 °C, FeS melts into
the liquid state. In addition, a small amount of H2 and
S2 reacted after 1070 °C to produce HS (eq )[30−32]As shown in Figure b, it can be seen that the content of CO
decreases in all reactions
with FeS2 compared to the single reaction 2CO = CO2 + C at 400 °C, which indicates that CO reacts with FeS2 (eq ). Besides,
the subsequent decrease in CO2 content is mainly caused
by the gas balance after CO is reacted. After 670 °C, COS starts
to decompose (eq ).
After 600 °C, the carbon content decreases sharply and the CO2 content decreases slowly, indicating that carbon is involved
in the reaction. At this time, the CS2 content increases,
but the S2 content has not yet increased, indicating that
carbon reacts with FeS2 to produce CS2 (eq ). After 670 °C, the
contents of CS2 and CO2 show a similar downward
trend, while the contents of CO and S2 increase, indicating
that CS2 reacted with CO2 to form S2 and CO (eq )[33−36]
Generation of Gaseous Sulfides
Figure shows the mass spectrometry
(MS) results during the pyrolysis of pyrite; the inorganic compounds
with m/z = 32, 34, 60, 64, and 76
were detected during the experiments. According to previous analysis,[37] FeS2 catalyzes the reaction of H2 and CO to produce methanol (m/z = 34) only at low temperatures, while the temperature in this experiment
is higher than 400 °C, lacking the generating conditions of methanol,
and m/z = 34 therefore represents
H2S. As the gases in the experiment are H2 and
CO, oxygen cannot exist stably in such a strong reducing atmosphere,
so m/z = 32 represents sulfur monomers.
As discussed in Figure , the sulfur monomers generated from FeS2 will immediately
react with H2 or CO under current experimental conditions,
so the signal of sulfur in the mass spectrum is the m/z = 32 signal produced by the experimental gas
molecules after electron bombardment. m/z = 60 is COS, and m/z = 76 is carbon
disulfide. Since FeS2 is decomposed to produce sulfur vapor
during the experiment and thermodynamic calculation results show the
existence of S2 (Figure b), m/z = 64 in the
mixed gas represents S2.
Figure 7
Evolution of gaseous sulfides during the
reaction of FeS2 under different reducing gas compositions:
(a) 75% CO + 25% H2 and (b) 25% CO + 75% H2.
Evolution of gaseous sulfides during the
reaction of FeS2 under different reducing gas compositions:
(a) 75% CO + 25% H2 and (b) 25% CO + 75% H2.It can be observed that although the volume fraction
of H2 in the mixed gas is different, the temperature at
which all inorganic
sulfides begin to generate is around 400 °C, and the peak generation
temperature is about 480–550 °C. The peak temperature
of gaseous sulfide generation and the end temperature of the reaction
both decrease with the increase of the volume fraction of H2. It means that H2 reduces the decomposition temperature
of FeS2. Moreover, with the increase of the proportion
of H2, the amount of H2S (m/z = 34) in the evolved gaseous sulfide gradually
increases and exceeds that of COS (m/z = 60). It means that H2 contributes to the conversion
of the gaseous products of FeS2 decomposition from COS
to H2S. At the same time, CO contributes to the conversion
of the gaseous product of FeS2 decomposition from H2S to COS. In the current CO–H2 mixed atmosphere,
with the increase of temperature, gaseous sulfides begin to be produced
in the following order: COS → S → H2S →
S2 → CS2.The standard free energies
with temperature (ΔG–T diagram) for various possible reactions
with FeS2 are shown in Figure . Based on thermodynamic equilibrium calculation
results, as the temperature increases, the order of sulfide generation
should be H2S → COS → CS2 →
S (or S2). It can be found that the generation order of
sulfides obtained by the calculation is slightly different from the
experimental results. This is because the calculation involves an
ideal equilibrium state of a single atmosphere, ignoring the actual
kinetic conditions, while the experiment involves a mixed atmosphere.
Different from the earliest appearance of H2S in the theoretical
calculation, COS is the earliest generated in the experiments.
Figure 8
ΔG–T diagram of
FeS2 reaction.
ΔG–T diagram of
FeS2 reaction.According to Aylmore and Lincoln,[29] it
is possible that COS is generated by the reaction shown in eq . The sulfur in this experiment
mainly comes from the decomposition of H2S and the disproportionation
cleavage of FeS2. According to the calculation results
in Figures and 8, none of these reactions can be satisfied under
conditions below 400 °C. Figure shows that COS is generated prior to H2S, which may be due to the immediate reaction of H2S that
is generated before COS with CO to form COS (eq ). The mass spectral signal of H2S is generated only after gas equilibrium is reached, and thus, the
COS content in the experiment increases before H2S[34,38]Compared with the calculation results,
the lower sulfur generation
temperature in the experiment is due to the electron bombardment of
COS molecules to generate the m/z = 32 signal. In general, the calculation results are consistent
with the experimental results, and the calculation results can reasonably
explain the experimental phenomena.Figure shows the
evolution curves of gaseous sulfide in various gas mixtures. m/z = 32, 34, 60, 64, and 76 represent
S, H2S, COS, S2, and CS2, respectively.
As shown in Figure a, the content of generated sulfur of FeS2 increases gradually
with the increase of H2 concentration, and the Tmax of generated sulfur is around 480 °C,
which indicates that H2 promotes the generation of sulfur
from FeS2. Figure b shows that with the increase of H2 concentration,
the overall content of H2S is gradually increased, while
the T0 decreases. It means that H2S is mainly produced by reaction of eq , and H2 decreases the generation
temperature of sulfur in FeS2. As shown in Figure c, it also shows that the COS
content increases overall with increasing CO concentration, but the
COS content at 100% CO is slightly lower than that at 75% CO and 90%
CO. According to Figure , H2 is able to react with FeS2 at around 100
°C, so the sulfur in FeS2 can be preferentially carried
out by H2, which in turn reacts with CO and CO2 to form COS. In 100% CO atmosphere, only CO can react with FeS2 and the reaction temperature is around 400 °C. Therefore,
the lower COS content in 100% CO atmosphere compared to 90 and 75%
CO atmosphere is the part of sulfur carried out by H2 in
the early stage. For Figure d, it can be found that the generation of S2 molecules
gradually increases with the increase of H2 concentration,
which further indicates that H2 promotes the generation
of sulfur in FeS2. In Figure e, the production of CS2 reaches
the peak at around 500 °C, but there is no significant regularity
in the production of CS2 under different H2 concentrations.
We speculate that this is due to the extremely low production of CS2 and the error of the device detection.
Figure 9
Evolution curves of gaseous
sulfides in different mixed gas compositions:
(a) m/z = 32, (b) m/z = 34, (c) m/z = 60, (d) m/z = 64, and (e) m/z = 76.
Evolution curves of gaseous
sulfides in different mixed gas compositions:
(a) m/z = 32, (b) m/z = 34, (c) m/z = 60, (d) m/z = 64, and (e) m/z = 76.In general, the increase of H2 concentration
favors
the generation of S, H2S, and S2 and reduces
the temperature of sulfide decomposed from FeS2. However,
the increase of CO concentration is beneficial for the generation
of COS and CS2, and the temperature range of sulfide generation
is 400–600 °C.Figure shows
the release of gaseous sulfides in FeS2 under different
ratios of CO and H2 by calculations. Obviously, with the
increase of reaction temperature, the sequence of gaseous sulfide
release is H2S → COS → CS2 →
S2 → S, which is consistent with the order in the
ΔG–T diagram, as shown
in Figure . The calculation
principle is based on the minimum Gibbs free energy of the chemical
reaction, and the final result is the equilibrium state. At around
350 °C, the H2S content peaks, along with a small
amount of COS. According to Figure , CO is not yet able to react directly with FeS2 at this temperature, indicating that COS is formed by the
reaction of H2S and CO (eq ), which further verifies the previous view. In the
gas mixture, H2S starts to be released at about 200 °C,
and its content reaches a peak at about 350 °C and then decreases
slowly. Simultaneously, the contents of COS and CS2 start
to increase significantly after 350 °C, indicating that the generation
temperature of COS and CS2 is higher than that of H2S. Moreover, the concentrations of COS and CS2 released
are obviously higher in 75% CO + 25% H2 mixture, while
those of H2S and S2 are obviously higher in
25% CO + 75% H2 mixture. It means that CO promotes the
release of COS and CS2, and H2 promotes the
release of H2S and S2. This is consistent with
the conclusions obtained from the experimental results.
Figure 10
Theoretical
calculation of the release of gaseous sulfides in FeS2 under
different ratios of CO and H2: (a) 75% CO
+ 25% H2 and (b) 25% CO + 75% H2.
Theoretical
calculation of the release of gaseous sulfides in FeS2 under
different ratios of CO and H2: (a) 75% CO
+ 25% H2 and (b) 25% CO + 75% H2.After the above discussions, the pyrolysis behavior
of FeS2 in the CO and H2 mixed atmosphere has
been clarified,
and the schematic diagram of the reaction mechanism is shown in Figure . FeS2 reacts with H2 to produce H2S. At the high-temperature
stage, the generated H2S decomposes to produce H2 and S2. In a CO atmosphere, FeS2 reacts with
CO to produce COS and a small amount of CS2. At the high-temperature
stage, COS and CS2 decompose to produce CO and S2.
Figure 11
Decomposition process of FeS2 in the H2 and
CO atmosphere.
Decomposition process of FeS2 in the H2 and
CO atmosphere.
Conclusions
In this work, the experiments
and thermodynamic calculations were
combined to investigate the pyrolysis process of FeS2 under
the mixed atmosphere of CO and H2. The effects of temperature
and H2 ratio on the pyrolysis products including solid
and gaseous products were analyzed. Under the current experimental
conditions, the following conclusions can be drawn.The final solid products from the decomposition of FeS2 in different proportions of CO and H2 mixed gases
are all FeS. The difference is that FeS2 is directly reduced
to FeS by reaction with H2, while it will be reduced to
Fe7S8 and then reduced to FeS when it reacts
with CO.H2S and COS are main
gaseous sulfides formed
by the decomposition of FeS2 in the CO–H2 atmosphere. The temperature at which gaseous sulfides start to release
is about 300 °C. All H2S are directly generated by
the reaction of FeS2 with H2. Some COS is directly
generated by the reaction of FeS2 with CO. The other is
formed by the reaction of CO with H2S or S2.higher H2 concentration can reduce
the pyrolysis
reaction temperature of FeS2, which is favorable for the
conversion of sulfides to H2S, while a higher CO concentration
promotes the conversion of sulfides to COS.When FeS2 reacts with H2 and CO
mixed gas, the order in which gaseous sulfides are produced with increasing
temperature is as follows: COS → S → H2S
→ S2 → CS2. The decomposition
temperature is generally from 400 to 800 °C, and a temperature
higher than 800 °C will be more favorable for the release of
COS and CS2.
Authors: Christian Frilund; Minna Kotilainen; José Barros Lorenzo; Pertti Lintunen; Kimmo Kaunisto Journal: Energy Fuels Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 3.605