| Literature DB >> 36033256 |
Nozipho P Gamedze1,2, Doctor Mziwenkosi Nhlanhla Mthiyane1,2, Olubukola Oluranti Babalola2, Moganavelli Singh3, Damian C Onwudiwe4,5.
Abstract
The green synthesis approach to nanoparticles has been widely received as an alternative to the conventional methods, specifically for applications in areas such as biology, agriculture and medicine, where toxicity is of great concern. In this study, copper oxide (CuO) and titanium oxide (TiO2) nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized using an aqueous extract of Mucuna pruriens utilis seed. The morphology and structural characterization of the NPs were achieved by using scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement, while the elemental composition was studied using electron diffraction X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). A monoclinic phase of CuO and anatase phases of TiO2 with high crystallinity were confirmed from the diffraction patterns of the XRD. Both TEM and SEM micrographs of the CuO confirmed short rod-shaped nanostructure, while spherical morphologies were obtained for the TiO2 NPs. The EDS study indicated that the composition of the samples conformed with the identified products in the XRD and attest to the purity of the NPs. The nanoparticles exhibited a dose-dependent profile in MTT cytotoxicity assay with some cell specificity. However, the anticancer potential of these NPs was still lower than that of the standard anticancer drug, 5-fluorouracil.Entities:
Keywords: Agricultural nanotechnology; Biosynthesis; Copper oxide; Cytotoxicity; Mucuna pruriens utilis; Titanium oxide
Year: 2022 PMID: 36033256 PMCID: PMC9404262 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10187
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1XR diffraction patterns of (a) CuO and (b) TiO2 NPs prepared from the extract of mucuna seed.
Figure 2(a) SEM, (b) TEM images of CuO nanoparticles prepared from the extract of mucuna seed. The corresponding particle size distribution histogram showing (c) length and (d) width.
Figure 3(a) SEM, (b) TEM images of TiO2 nanoparticles prepared from the extract of mucuna seed, and (c) the corresponding particle size distribution histogram.
Figure 4EDS spectra of synthesized (a) CuO and (b) TiO2 nanoparticles prepared from the extract of mucuna seed.
Figure 5Overlapped FTIR spectra of the plant extract, (a) CuO and (b) TiO2 nanoparticles.
Viability (%) of HeLa cell line at different concentrations of CuO and TiO2 nanoparticles.
| Sample | Concentrations | IC50 μg mL−1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 μg mL−1 | 25 μg mL−1 | 50 μg mL−1 | 100 μg mL−1 | ||
| 5-FU | 78.40 ± 0.034 | 58.89 ± 0.037 | 50.47 ± 0.015 | 37.99 ± 0.017 | 17.48 |
| CuO | 85.62 ± 0.090 | 38.05 ± 0.048 | 13.61 ± 0.024 | 7.84 ± 0.012 | 22.48 |
| TiO2 | 89.39 ± 0.046 | 70.99 ± 0.010 | 58.98 ± 0.025 | 14.03 ± 0.023 | 43.85 |
Viability (%) of HEK293 cell line at different concentrations of CuO and TiO2 nanoparticles.
| Sample | Concentrations | IC50 μg mL−1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 μg mL−1 | 25 μg mL−1 | 50 μg mL−1 | 100 μg mL−1 | ||
| 5-FU | 77.36 ± 0.048 | 51.92 ± 0.003 | 35.38 ± 0.010 | 11.33 ± 0.017 | 6.05 |
| CuO | 72.79 ± 0.055 | 61.86 ± 0.059 | 48.15 ± 0.017 | 33.40 ± 0.041 | 42.33 |
| TiO2 | 79.99 ± 0.006 | 58.94 ± 0.044 | 40.23 ± 0.014 | 25.47 ± 0.047 | 35.09 |