| Literature DB >> 36032953 |
Kelly M Correia1,2, Scott B Alford3, Benjamin A Belgrad1, Kelly M Darnell4, M Zachary Darnell4, Bradley T Furman5, Margaret O Hall5, Christian T Hayes4,6, Charles W Martin3, Ashley M McDonald3, Delbert L Smee1,2.
Abstract
Drift macroalgae, often found in clumps or mats adjacent to or within seagrass beds, can increase the value of seagrass beds as habitat for nekton via added food resources and structural complexity. But, as algal biomass increases, it can also decrease light availability, inhibit faunal movements, smother benthic communities, and contribute to hypoxia, all of which can reduce nekton abundance. We quantified the abundance and distribution of drift macroalgae within seagrass meadows dominated by turtle grass Thalassia testudinum across the northern Gulf of Mexico and compared seagrass characteristics to macroalgal biomass and distribution. Drift macroalgae were most abundant in areas with higher seagrass shoot densities and intermediate canopy heights. We did not find significant relationships between algal biomass and point measures of salinity, temperature, or depth. The macroalgal genera Laurencia and Gracilaria were present across the study region, Agardhiella and Digenia were collected in the western Gulf of Mexico, and Acanthophora was collected in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Our survey revealed drift algae to be abundant and widespread throughout seagrass meadows in the northern Gulf of Mexico, which likely influences the habitat value of seagrass ecosystems. ©2022 Correia et al.Entities:
Keywords: Climate change; Habitat complexity; Halodule; Rhodophyta; Syringodium; Thalassia
Year: 2022 PMID: 36032953 PMCID: PMC9415429 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13855
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 3.061
Figure 1Location of the five study estuaries (stars) throughout the northern Gulf of Mexico.
Regions include Laguna Madre, TX (LM), Corpus Christi Bay, TX (CB), the northern extent of the Chandeleur Islands (LA), Cedar Key, FL (CK), and Charlotte Harbor, FL (CH). n represents the number of sites that were sampled within each estuary during the early and late summer 2018. Map data ©2021 Google.
Abiotic variables from each region.
Abiotic variables (Mean ± SE) measured during the early (May–June) and late (August–September) summer months 2018.
| Abiotic parameter | Time | Laguna Madre, TX | Corpus Christi Bay, TX | Chandeleur Islands, LA | Cedar Key, FL | Charlotte Harbor, FL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salinity (ppt) | Early | 36.8 ± 0.06 | 33.9 ± 0.16 | 16.2 ± 0.49 | 28.3 ± 0.59 | 22.6 ± 1.22 |
| Late | 37.1 ± 0.13 | 34.9 ± 0.14 | 27.6 ± 0.27 | 25.1 ± 0.70 | 19.9 ± 0.96 | |
| Temperature (°C) | Early | 28.1 ± 0.20 | 27.0 ± 0.15 | 29.8 ± 0.55 | 29.7 ± 0.16 | 30.1 ± 0.22 |
| Late | 29.7 ± 0.38 | 30.2 ± 0.20 | 30.8 ± 0.25 | 30.1 ± 0.52 | 31.8 ± 0.29 | |
| Dissolved Oxygen (mg L−1) | Early | 8.4 ± 0.43 | 6.2 ± 0.32 | 9.5 ± 0.58 | 7.6 ± 0.30 | 6.3 ± 0.24 |
| Late | 6.1 ± 0.47 | 11.8 ± 0.46 | 8.9 ± 0.38 | 6.8 ± 0.35 | 7.7 ± 1.50 |
Figure 2Average trawl and sled macroalgal weight in each region.
(A) Average trawl macroalgae weight (g m−2) + SE and (B) benthic sled macroalgae weight (g m−2) + SE sampling across each region during the early (black) and late (grey) summer months. The regions include Laguna Madre, TX (LM, n = 20), Corpus Christi Bay, TX (CB, n = 20), Chandeleur Islands, LA (LA, n = 20), Cedar Key (CK, n = 25), and Charlotte Harbor, FL (CH, n = 25). The asterisk (*) indicates that there is a significant difference between early (May–June 2018) and late (August–September 2018) sampling within that region.
Comparisons of trawl and sled algal weight across region and sampling time.
Multiple and general linear regression models for macroalgal biomass across region during early (May–June 2018) and late (August–September 2018) summer sampling. Each location was then separated and analyzed individually using generalized estimating equations with sample period as the fixed factor.
| SS |
| Prob > | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Region (LM, CB, LA, CK, CH) | 1937715.58 | 4 | 6.87 | <0.0001 |
| Sample period (early, late) | 142138.139 | 1 | 2.52 | 0.1137 |
| Region*sample period | 2547045.91 | 4 | 9.03 | <0.0001 |
|
| ||||
| Region (LM, CB, LA, CK, CH) | 197.888 | 4 | 3.38 | 0.0104 |
| Sample period (early, late) | 92.383 | 1 | 28.99 | <0.0001 |
| Region*sample period | 65.214 | 4 | 2.39 | 0.0521 |
Figure 3Vegetation comparisons.
(A) Scatterplots comparing the drift macroalgae percent cover to T. testudinum percent cover and (B) average seagrass canopy height from the quadrat dataset. (A) displays drift algae cover increasing with increased T. testudinum cover and (B) shows algae percent cover was highest at intermediate canopy heights (∼400 mm).
Backward regression to compare algae to abiotic and seagrass characteristics.
Multiple linear regression with backward elimination model selection results comparing algal density across abiotic and seagrass variables. The variables included in the model, following selection, include T. testudinum density and the average canopy height. Variables that were determined to be insignificant to the model during the selection process were average shoot count, salinity, water temperature, H. wrightii density, S. filiforme density, and dissolved oxygen.
| SS |
| Prob > | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 4.87 | 2 | 7.10 | 0.0010 |
|
| ||||
| 1.73 | 5.04 | 0.0258 | ||
| Average canopy height | 4.50 | 13.11 | 0.0004 |