Literature DB >> 36032859

Comparative Study of Outcome of Type 1 Tympanoplasty in Dry and Wet Ear in Tertiary Care Hospital.

Pramod Shankarrao Dhanajkar1, Prashant Narayanrao Keche1, Vijayalakshmi Kishan Ambulgekar2, Surendra Hirasingh Gawarle3, Abhijit Ram Gundale4.   

Abstract

Chronic suppurative otitis media is very common otological disease in general population. Persistent wet ear produces dilemma for ENT surgeons whether to go ahead with tympanoplasty or not. Present study compare outcome of type 1 tympanoplasty in both wet and dry ear. Present study is randomized, prospective, Interventional type of study carried in ENT department of tertiary care hospital over period of 18 months. Total 62 cases fulfilling study criteria were included in the study, which were equally divided in dry and wet group. All cases underwent type 1 tympanoplasty. Temporalis fascia was used as graft material in all cases. Most of the patients in both dry and wet group belonged to the age group between 21 to 30 (40.32%). 26 (41.94%) were males and 36 (58.06%) were females. Male: Female ratio was 1:1.38. After 12 weeks 27 (87.10%) cases of dry group and 20 (64.52%) cases of wet group had significant hearing improvement and in dry group 28 (90.32%) cases had intact graft while in wet group 23 (74.19%) cases had intact graft. According to the statistical analysis, in current study, there is no significant differences between the success rates of wet and dry ears, either in terms of graft uptake or the hearing improvement, thus it can be concluded that the presence of minimal ear discharge at the time of surgery does not affect the success rate of type 1 tympanoplasty. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dry ear; Type 1 tympanoplasty; Wet ear

Year:  2020        PMID: 36032859      PMCID: PMC9411430          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-01985-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  11 in total

1.  Grafting materials and methods in reconstructive ear surgery.

Authors:  R Perkins
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1975 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Comparative study of tympanoplasty in wet perforation v/s totally dry perforation in tubotympanic disease.

Authors:  H Vijayendra; Chetty K Rangam; R Sangeeta
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-04

3.  Failures in myringoplasty.

Authors:  E Vartiainen; J Kärjä; S Karjalainen; R Härmä
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1985

4.  Outcome of type-1 tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Fadl A Fadl
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 5.  Surgical advances in treating otitis media.

Authors:  M M Paparella; O Froymovich
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1994-05

6.  Postauricular undersurface tympanic membrane grafting: a follow-up report.

Authors:  M E Glasscock; C G Jackson; A J Nissen; M K Schwaber
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Comparative study of outcome of type I tympanoplasty in dry and wet ear.

Authors:  S K Nagle; M V Jagade; S R Gandhi; P V Pawar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-06-14

8.  A comparative study of different graft materials used in myringoplasty.

Authors:  B J Singh; A Sengupta; Sudip Kumar Das; D Ghosh; B Basak
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-06-14

Review 9.  Success and pitfalls in myringoplasty: follow-up study of 404 cases.

Authors:  E Vartiainen; J Nuutinen
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1993-05

10.  Success is a matter of experience: type 1 tympanoplasty : influencing factors on type 1 tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Hatice Emir; Kursat Ceylan; Zeynep Kizilkaya; Hakan Gocmen; Hakki Uzunkulaoglu; Erdal Samim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 3.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.