Literature DB >> 36032828

Comparision of Allogenic Cartilage and Autologous Cortical Bone in Ossicular Reconstruction: A Comparative Study.

K C Prasad1, Prathyusha Koneru1, M B Swapanthi1, P K Anjali1, Indu Varsha Gopi1.   

Abstract

Ossicular discontinuity is the most common cause of conductive hearing loss. The use of ossicular graft material in ossicular chain reconstruction significantly improves the result in hearing. This study was conducted to compare and analyze the outcome of ossicular reconstruction using allogenic septal spur cartilage and autologous cortical bone in terms of hearing results and graft uptake rates. Study design: randomized clinical trial. Study included 112 patients visiting our ENT department. Patients between 16 and 50 years of age with history of chronic ear discharge and air-bone-gap (ABG) of > 35 dB and ossicular involvement were included in the study. The patients underwent detailed ENT examination, audiological and radiological assessment of temporal bone and those patients with evidence of ossicular erosion were subjected to ossiculoplasty with allogenic septal spur cartilage (group I) and autologous cortical bone (group II) randomly. The patients were followed up to 6 months to analyze functional and anatomical results. 50 patients out of 56 patients (90%) from group I who underwent allogenic septal cartilage ossicular reconstruction showed significant improvement in hearing as assessed by pure tone audiogram after 3 months and 6 months. Remaining 10% of patients who did not show hearing improvement on PTA were reopened after 6 months. It was observed that the stapes head got necrosed in them. 40 patients (72%) out of 56 patients (50%) from group II who underwent autologous cortical bone reconstruction showed hearing improvement. Remaining 16 patients (28%) showed no hearing improvement. They were reopened and ankylosis, dislocation of ossicle and extrusion were noted. In our study, graft uptake rates, formation of retraction pockets, and hearing improvements were analyzed. Complications like ankylosis formation, dislocation of ossicle and extrusion rates were more in the group II compared to group I. Hearing results of group I are better compared to group II and the allogenic septal cartilage being readily available is a good option for ossicular reconstruction. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allogenic septal spur cartilage; Autologous cortical bone; Ossiculoplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 36032828      PMCID: PMC9411363          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-01924-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  7 in total

1.  Role of autografts in the reconstruction of ossicular chain in intact canal wall procedures.

Authors:  Neena Chaudhary; Nitin Anand; Anita Taperwal; A K Rai
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-07

2.  Hearing results of ossiculoplasty in Austin-Kartush group A patients.

Authors:  S Iurato; G Marioni; M Onofri
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Autologous incus versus titanium partial ossicular replacement prosthesis in reconstruction of Austin type A ossicular defects: a prospective randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Naragund Amith; Mudhol Rs
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  Long-term results in ossiculoplasty: an analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  Matthew Yung; Sarah L Vowler
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Double cartilage block ossiculoplasty in chronic ear surgery.

Authors:  S A Harvey; S Y Lin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty: a statistical staging system.

Authors:  J L Dornhoffer; E Gardner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Results of primary ossiculoplasty in ears with an intact stapes superstructure and malleus handle: inflammation in the middle ear at the time of surgery does not affect hearing outcomes.

Authors:  T P C Martin; M D Weller; D S Kim; M C F Smith
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.597

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.