| Literature DB >> 36032802 |
Jing Mi1, Xinghua Sun1, Shihui Zhang1, Naidi Liu1.
Abstract
In order to solve the problems of single monitoring factor, weak comprehensive analysis ability, and poor real time performance in traditional environmental monitoring systems, a research method of residential environment pollution monitoring system based on cloud computing and Internet of Things is proposed. The method mainly includes two parts: an environmental monitoring terminal and an environmental pollution monitoring and management platform. Through the Wi-Fi module, the data is sent to the environmental pollution monitoring and management platform in real time. The environmental monitoring management platform is mainly composed of environmental pollution monitoring server, web server, and mobile terminal. The results are as follows. The data measured by the system is close to the data measured by the instrument, and the overall error is small. The measurement error of harmful gases is about 6%. PM 2.5 is about 6.5%. Noise is about 1%. The average time for sensor data update is 0.762 s. The average alarm response time is 2 s. The average data transfer time is 2 s. Practice has proved that the environmental pollution monitoring and alarm system operates stably and can realize real-time collection and transmission of data such as noise, PM 2.5, harmful gas concentration, illumination, GPS, and video images, providing a reliable guarantee for timely environmental pollution control.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36032802 PMCID: PMC9402352 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1013300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Anal Chem ISSN: 1687-8760 Impact factor: 1.698
Figure 1System function design diagram.
Figure 2Hardware structure of environment parameter collection and transmission module.
Figure 3Hardware structure diagram of video image collection and transmission module.
Figure 4Software design flow chart of environment parameter collection function.
Figure 5Software design flow chart of the videos and images collection function.
Comparison between the harmful gas concentration, PM 2.5 concentration, and noise intensity measured by the system and the measured values by the instrument.
| Harmful gas concentration (ppm) | PM 2.5 concentration ( | Noise intensity (db) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value by system | Value by instrument | Error (%) | Value by system | Value by instrument | Error (%) | Value by system | Value by instrument | Error (%) |
| 51 | 48 | 6.35 | 33 | 31 | 6.46 | 46 | 47 | 2.13 |
| 48 | 46 | 4.35 | 33 | 30 | 10.0 | 52 | 52 | 0 |
| 30 | 29 | 3.45 | 31 | 30 | 3.33 | 50 | 50 | 0 |
| 50 | 46 | 8.70 | 33 | 31 | 6.46 | 48 | 49 | 2.04 |
| 49 | 45 | 8.89 | 35 | 33 | 6.06 | 47 | 48 | 2.08 |
Figure 6Test results of sensor data updating, alarm response, and average time of data transmission.