Jinseok Park1, Karen I Winey1,2. 1. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States. 2. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Abstract
The double gyroid structure was first reported in diblock copolymers about 30 years ago, and the complexity of this morphology relative to the other ordered morphologies in block copolymers continues to fascinate the soft matter community. The double gyroid microphase-separated morphology has co-continuous domains of both species, and the minority phase is subdivided into two interpenetrating network structures. In addition to diblock copolymers, this structure has been reported in similar systems including diblock copolymers blended with one or two homopolymers and ABA-type triblock copolymers. Given the narrow composition region over which the double gyroid structure is typically observed (∼3 vol %), anionic polymerization has dominated the synthesis of block copolymers to control their composition and molecular weight. This perspective will highlight recent studies that (1) employ an alternative polymerization method to make block copolymers and (2) report double gyroid structures with lattice parameters below 10 nm. Specifically, step-growth polymerization linked precise polyethylene blocks and short sulfonate-containing blocks to form strictly alternating multiblock copolymers, and these copolymers produce the double gyroid structure over a dramatically wider composition range (>14 vol %). These new (AB) n multiblock copolymers self-assemble into the double gyroid structure by having exceptional control over the polymer architecture and large interaction parameters between the blocks. This perspective proposes criteria for a broader and synthetically more accessible range of polymers that self-assemble into double gyroids and other ordered structures, so that these remarkable structures can be employed to solve a variety of technological challenges.
The double gyroid structure was first reported in diblock copolymers about 30 years ago, and the complexity of this morphology relative to the other ordered morphologies in block copolymers continues to fascinate the soft matter community. The double gyroid microphase-separated morphology has co-continuous domains of both species, and the minority phase is subdivided into two interpenetrating network structures. In addition to diblock copolymers, this structure has been reported in similar systems including diblock copolymers blended with one or two homopolymers and ABA-type triblock copolymers. Given the narrow composition region over which the double gyroid structure is typically observed (∼3 vol %), anionic polymerization has dominated the synthesis of block copolymers to control their composition and molecular weight. This perspective will highlight recent studies that (1) employ an alternative polymerization method to make block copolymers and (2) report double gyroid structures with lattice parameters below 10 nm. Specifically, step-growth polymerization linked precise polyethylene blocks and short sulfonate-containing blocks to form strictly alternating multiblock copolymers, and these copolymers produce the double gyroid structure over a dramatically wider composition range (>14 vol %). These new (AB) n multiblock copolymers self-assemble into the double gyroid structure by having exceptional control over the polymer architecture and large interaction parameters between the blocks. This perspective proposes criteria for a broader and synthetically more accessible range of polymers that self-assemble into double gyroids and other ordered structures, so that these remarkable structures can be employed to solve a variety of technological challenges.
The
double gyroid (DG) structure is a three-dimensionally periodic
bicontinuous structure with Ia3̅d symmetry that consists of two interpenetrating networks of the minority
component and a matrix of the majority component (Figure ). This ordered structure with Ia3̅d symmetry was first identified
in strontium lipids in 1967.[1] The first
report of the DG structure in block copolymers was made in 1994.[2] Since then, the DG has intrigued the polymer
science community due to its structural complexity compared to the
more common ordered structures of layers and hexagonally packed cylinders
found in linear block copolymers.[2] Moreover,
the percolating domains of the DG morphology contribute to enhancing
mechanical properties such as modulus, toughness, and creep resistance
of materials relative to the other morphologies.[3−5] The bicontinuous
domains of DG can also improve ionic conductivities when the interpenetrating
domains contain ionic functionalities.[6−9] The triply periodic structure of DG can
even control the optical properties and its application into metamaterials.[10−13]
Figure 1
Cubic
unit cell of a double gyroid morphology with Ia3̅d symmetry, showing the two interpenetrating
networks of the minority component (blue) with a volume fraction of
0.30.
Cubic
unit cell of a double gyroid morphology with Ia3̅d symmetry, showing the two interpenetrating
networks of the minority component (blue) with a volume fraction of
0.30.Followed by the first assignment of DG in the linear
polystyrene–polyisoprene
diblock copolymers (PS-b-PI),[2] comprehensive investigations of polystyrene–polyisoprene
block copolymers have advanced the understanding of the structural
characteristics of DG in polymeric systems.[14−18] Note that the DG structures in star block copolymers
and other block copolymer systems were originally reported to be double
diamond morphologies with Pn3m symmetry
and were later correctly identified as exhibiting the DG.[18] Subsequently, various block chemistries including
polystyrene-b-poly(2-vinylpyridine),[19,20] polyethylene-b-polyethylethylene,[21,22] and many others[23,24] also identified the DG in diblock
copolymers. Building upon the design rules to generate DG structures
from linear diblock copolymers, self-consistent field theory (SCFT)
was utilized to predict the equilibrium morphologies within the χN–f phase diagram, where χ, N, and f are the Flory–Huggins interaction
parameter, degree of polymerization, and the volume fraction of one
block component, respectively. The SCFT revealed that the DG structure
is thermodynamically stable within a relatively narrow volume fraction
range of ∼3.7 vol % at intermediate segregation strength of
χN = 20 and ∼1.5 vol % at strong segregation
of χN = 100.[25] Note
that the DG was originally found to be unstable at high χN values due to the increased sharpness at the interface
and packing frustration, while experiments and recent SCFT calculations
find that the DG exists at high χN.[25−28](a)
Phase diagram for AB diblock copolymers calculated from self-consistent
field theory. Reproduced from ref (31). Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society. (b)
Experimental phase diagram for PS-b-PI diblock copolymers.
Reproduced from ref (17). Copyright 1995 American Chemical Society. (c) Experimental phase
diagram of binary blends containing a diblock copolymer (PS-b-PI) and a homopolymer (hPI or hPS). The styrene weight
fraction of the pure PS-b-PI diblock copolymer is
37% (arrow). Below and above this point are blends with hPI and hPS,
respectively. The shaded region indicates the range of DG morphologies.
Reproduced from ref (2). Copyright 1994 American Chemical Society. (d) Phase diagram of
PS-polypeptoid diblock copolymers with stiff (top) and flexible (bottom)
interfacial linkages. Reproduced from ref (49). Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.The narrow composition range of DG in conventional
linear diblock
copolymers is due to the triply periodic minimal surface and chain
packing within the DG. Specifically, polymer chains should minimize
the interfacial area and uniformly fill the domains defined for each
block species.[29,30] Linear diblock copolymers that
satisfy both conditions are often limited to only a few volume fraction
range according to the self-consistent field theory (SCFT) calculation
(Figure a).[31] Experimentally, PS-b-PI diblock
copolymers self-assemble into the DG structures at fPI = 0.36–0.39 and 0.65–0.68 (Figure b).[17] The DG structures have been widely
observed in more complicated polymer systems than simple diblock copolymers,
such as AB/A diblock copolymer/homopolymer blends,[2,32,33] AB/A′B′ binary diblock copolymer
blends,[21,34] tapered block copolymers,[35] and ABA triblock copolymers.[4,36−38] In addition, ABC triblock copolymers exhibit a core–shell-type
DG (Ia3̅d symmetry)[39−42] and alternating gyroid (I4132 symmetry)[43−45] structures depending on the block species. DG structures exist at
a wider volume fraction range in diblock/homopolymer, due to the additional
chain ends and increased chain length dispersity that alleviates packing
frustration.[46−48] For example, polystyrene-b-polyisoprene
diblock copolymers (10.1 kg/mol PS and 17.3 kg/mol PI) with homopolystyrene
(760 g/mol hPS) or homopolyisoprene (650 g/mol hPI) blends demonstrated
that the volume fraction window for the DG structure increases up
to ∼12 vol % after a long time of annealing (Figure c).[2] Alternatively, introducing a more flexible linkage between blocks
of diblock copolymers expands the accessible DG window (Figure d).[49] A comprehensive phase map of PI-b-PS-b-PEO identified core–shell DG structures with PS encapsulating
PEO to form both gyroid structures when the PI matrix volume fraction
was 0.45–0.50.[40−42] Note that these block copolymers have been synthesized
using predominantly anionic polymerization methods to control the
composition range required to produce the DG with a molecular weight
dispersity index of 1.01–1.11.[20,24,50] While the polydispersity index can significantly
impact the self-assembly of block copolymers,[51−54] dissipative particle dynamics
simulations showed that increasing polydispersity index of ABA linear
block copolymers results in the destabilization of ordered DG structure
into a disordered bicontinuous morphology.[55] Experimental studies on ABA triblock copolymers identified the disordered
bicontinuous morphologies in a composition window of ∼10 vol
%.[56,57] In contrast, the layered morphologies of
ABC triblock copolymers can transform into core–shell DG structures
upon increasing the polydispersity of one block species.[58] In summary, the DG morphology has been found
in a wide variety of systems containing AB, ABA, and ABC block copolymers,
and the composition window within which the DG morphology resides
is narrowest for diblock copolymers and broadens for more complex
systems.
Figure 2
(a)
Phase diagram for AB diblock copolymers calculated from self-consistent
field theory. Reproduced from ref (31). Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society. (b)
Experimental phase diagram for PS-b-PI diblock copolymers.
Reproduced from ref (17). Copyright 1995 American Chemical Society. (c) Experimental phase
diagram of binary blends containing a diblock copolymer (PS-b-PI) and a homopolymer (hPI or hPS). The styrene weight
fraction of the pure PS-b-PI diblock copolymer is
37% (arrow). Below and above this point are blends with hPI and hPS,
respectively. The shaded region indicates the range of DG morphologies.
Reproduced from ref (2). Copyright 1994 American Chemical Society. (d) Phase diagram of
PS-polypeptoid diblock copolymers with stiff (top) and flexible (bottom)
interfacial linkages. Reproduced from ref (49). Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.
Double Gyroid Morphologies in Alternating Multiblock Copolymers
Linear (AB) alternating multiblock
copolymers have the potential for designing ordered nanostructures
as they can self-assemble into various nanostructures.[59] For example, SCFT calculations predict that
the equilibrium morphologies of (AB) multiblock
copolymers are identical to the conventional diblock copolymer morphologies
with layers, DG, cylinders, and spheres.[31] The number of repeating units (n) impacts various
characteristics of (AB)n alternating multiblock copolymers.
First, the microphase separation of multiblocks requires ∼50%
higher segregation strength (χNcrit ∼ 15.1 at n > 20) than the diblock copolymers
(χNcrit ∼ 10.5 at n = 1).[60] Also, the domain spacings
of ordered structures of (AB) alternating
multiblock copolymers decrease with increasing n,
particularly at n < 10.[61,62] Therefore, theory predicts that (AB) multiblock copolymers at sufficiently high segregation strength
will produce ordered structures, as well as the desired DG structures.
Nevertheless, experimental studies showing ordered structures in linear
(AB) multiblock copolymers are far fewer
as compared to studies of AB diblock copolymers, presumably due to
the (1) synthetic challenges to produce alternating and monodisperse
blocks and (2) insufficient block segregation strength upon increasing
the number of repeating blocks. Producing (AB) alternating multiblocks using anionic polymerization requires
2n polymerization steps and the polydispersity of
each block length impedes the ordering of microphase separated structures.
In linear (PS-b-PI) multiblock
copolymers, an increase of n resulted in the decrease
of the grain size of the layers, i.e., less ordering with increasing n.[63,64] For these reasons relative to
diblock copolymers, accessing ordered morphologies including the DG
in linear (AB) multiblock copolymers
has been quite limited.Recent studies of precise ion-containing
copolymers highlight the
phase behavior and formation of DG structures in alternating multiblock
architectures. Figure a presents the step-growth synthesis of polyester sulfonate multiblock
copolymers (PESxM) using a sulfosuccinate diester
with a counterion (M) and an alkyl diol of a fixed length with x carbons. These PESxM polymers are linear
(AB) multiblock copolymers with strictly
alternating polar ionic and nonpolar blocks. The polydispersity index
for the length of AB repeating subunit (N) is exactly
1.00 because the polar and nonpolar block lengths are fixed by the
monomers. Note that we define N as the number of
backbone atoms in the AB repeat unit, N = x + 6. In these (AB) multiblock
copolymers, the number of AB repeating units (n)
becomes trivial with increasing n as the chain-end
effects become negligible. In PES23Li, the hydrocarbon blocks crystallize
below the melting temperature (Tm) of
∼123 °C, and the short polar blocks self-assemble into
a layered (LAY) morphology as indicated by the differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC) traces (Figure b). Upon heating above the Tm, X-ray scattering with peaks at √6, √8, √14,
√16, √20, √22, √24, and √26 indicate
that PES23Li (n = 11) forms a well-defined DG morphology
at 150 °C (Figure C).[7] These peak locations unambiguously
indicate the DG structure of the Ia3̅d space group with a cubic lattice parameter of 7.6 nm.
This DG further transitions upon heating into the hexagonally packed
cylinder (HEX) morphology with an order-to-order transition (OOT)
temperature (TOOT) of ∼176 °C.
Upon being cooled at 1 °C/min, the phase transitions are reversible
at TOOT ∼ 168 °C and the DG
to LAY crystallization transition (Tc)
at ∼90 °C (Figure b).
Figure 3
(a) Precise ion-containing multiblock copolymers synthesized by
polycondensation of a sulfosuccinate diester and a diol, and then
ion exchange. Reproduced from refs (7), (62), (66), and (67). Copyright 2020, 2021,
2021, and 2019, respectively, American Chemical Society. (b) DSC traces
of PES23Li from the second heating and cooling at a ramp rate of 1
°C/min. (c) X-ray scattering of PES23Li at 150 °C identifies
the double gyroid morphology (Ia3̅d symmetry) with a lattice parameter of 7.6 nm. Panels (b) and (c)
are reproduced from ref (7). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
(a) Precise ion-containing multiblock copolymers synthesized by
polycondensation of a sulfosuccinate diester and a diol, and then
ion exchange. Reproduced from refs (7), (62), (66), and (67). Copyright 2020, 2021,
2021, and 2019, respectively, American Chemical Society. (b) DSC traces
of PES23Li from the second heating and cooling at a ramp rate of 1
°C/min. (c) X-ray scattering of PES23Li at 150 °C identifies
the double gyroid morphology (Ia3̅d symmetry) with a lattice parameter of 7.6 nm. Panels (b) and (c)
are reproduced from ref (7). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.The phase transitions found in PES23Li are altered
by the choice
of counterion. Figure illustrates the ionic aggregate and hydrocarbon chain structures
of PES23M as a function of temperature and cation species (M = Li+, Na+, Cs+, and NBu4). PES23NBu4 is an intermediate product that includes bulky quaternary
ammonium cations prior to the cation exchange with Li, Na, or Cs.
For all PES23M polymers, the hydrocarbon blocks form hexagonally packed
crystals below the Tm. For PES23NBu4 with a bulky quaternary ammonium cation and weak electrostatic
interaction, the melting transition is relatively low, Tm ∼ 32 °C, and the polymer transitions directly
from layered to disordered ionic aggregates upon heating. In contrast,
PESxM polymers with metal cations show melting transition
temperatures higher than 100 °C and produce DG structures above
the Tm. The GYR-HEX order-to-order transition
temperatures (TOOT) as measured by DSC
increase with the increase of cation size (Li < Na < Cs). PES23Li
and PES23Na show GYR–HEX transitions upon heating, while the
HEX morphology is inaccessible in PES23Cs below 210 °C. When
polar ionic diblocks strongly interact via Coulombic cohesion, OOT
phase boundaries shift to lower values of χN.[65] Since χ ∼ 1/T, this implies that the TOOT increases
with increased Coulombic interaction between ionically charged blocks.
For PES23M, the GYR to HEX TOOT increases
from Li to Na to Cs, indicating stronger electrostatic cohesion with
increasing cation size.
Figure 4
Morphology summary of PES23M with varying counterion
species (M
= Li, Na, Cs, and NBu4) as a function of temperature. Hydrocarbon
chain structure (symbol) and ionic aggregate morphologies (shading)
were determined from in situ X-ray scattering upon
heating. The table summarizes the melting temperature (Tm) and order-to-order transition temperature (TOOT) as determined by differential scanning
calorimetry traces. The cation size is the effective radius of ions
coordinated with six oxygens. Reproduced from ref (7). Copyright 2020 American
Chemical Society.
Morphology summary of PES23M with varying counterion
species (M
= Li, Na, Cs, and NBu4) as a function of temperature. Hydrocarbon
chain structure (symbol) and ionic aggregate morphologies (shading)
were determined from in situ X-ray scattering upon
heating. The table summarizes the melting temperature (Tm) and order-to-order transition temperature (TOOT) as determined by differential scanning
calorimetry traces. The cation size is the effective radius of ions
coordinated with six oxygens. Reproduced from ref (7). Copyright 2020 American
Chemical Society.
Effect of Volume Fraction on the Phase Behavior of PESxM
The volume fraction of the polar block in these (AB) alternating multiblock copolymers is readily controlled
by the selection of the alkyl chain length of x carbons. Figure shows the temperature-dependent
phase diagram of PESxNa (x = 48–10)
as a function of polar volume fraction (fp = 0.16–0.45) and highlights the effect of hydrocarbon chain
lengths on the phase behavior.[66,67] In all polymers, layered
ionic aggregates coexist with a crystalline hydrocarbon block, and
the Tm increases with alkyl block length:
PES10Na at Tm = 91.7 °C and PES48Na
at Tm = 140 °C. The increase of Tm with x indicates that longer
hydrocarbon blocks crystallize into large crystals with fewer defects.
Upon heating above Tm, DG morphologies
are accessible at an unexpectedly wide range of volume fractions of
at least 14 vol % (0.27 < fp < 0.41)
for PES23Na, PES18Na, and PES12Na (Figure a). This result demonstrates greater accessibility
to the DG in (AB) multiblock copolymers.
These DG morphologies transition into HEX morphologies upon further
heating. In contrast, LAY morphologies of PES48Na and PES10Na directly
transition into the HEX morphology above the Tm. For DG-forming PESxNa polymers (x = 23, 18, 12), HEX–DG transitions are reversible
and rapid (a few minutes) upon cooling, whereas the DG morphologies
slowly crystallize into layered ionic aggregates upon further cooling
below Tm (Figure b). The slow crystallization kinetics are
associated with the restricted chain mobility imposed by the strong
ionic interactions. In PES12Na with a short 12-carbon block, DG morphologies
persist during the in situ X-ray scattering experiments
with an average cooling rate of ∼0.3 °C/min and then gradually
crystallize at room temperature into a layered ionic aggregate morphology
in about a week. Therefore, we observe kinetically trapped DG morphologies
with amorphous hydrocarbon blocks upon cooling below Tm.
Figure 5
Morphology diagram of PESxNa plotted
as 1/T versus fp while
(a) heating
and (b) cooling during in situ X-ray scattering experiments.
The values of x (48, 23, 18, 12, and 10) correspond
with increasing fp. LAY (blue), GYR (red),
and HEX (green) indicate layered, double gyroid, and hexagonal ionic
aggregate morphologies, respectively. Mixed phases near the transition
temperatures are indicated by light blue (LAY + HEX), purple (LAY
+ GYR), and olive (GYR + HEX) colors. Reproduced from ref (66). Copyright 2021 American
Chemical Society.
Morphology diagram of PESxNa plotted
as 1/T versus fp while
(a) heating
and (b) cooling during in situ X-ray scattering experiments.
The values of x (48, 23, 18, 12, and 10) correspond
with increasing fp. LAY (blue), GYR (red),
and HEX (green) indicate layered, double gyroid, and hexagonal ionic
aggregate morphologies, respectively. Mixed phases near the transition
temperatures are indicated by light blue (LAY + HEX), purple (LAY
+ GYR), and olive (GYR + HEX) colors. Reproduced from ref (66). Copyright 2021 American
Chemical Society.This kinetic competition between the self-assembly
of the polar
blocks and the crystallization of the hydrocarbon blocks is also evident
by comparing PES48Na and PES10Na upon cooling below Tm. For PES48Na, the 48-carbon alkyl block crystallizes
to form layered ionic aggregates during the in situ X-ray experiment, while the 10-carbon alkyl block of PES10Na persists
in the HEX morphology without crystallization. Since fp of PES48Na and PES10Na are 0.16 and 0.45, respectively,
PES48Na exhibits a stronger driving force to crystallization than
PES10Na. The hysteresis displayed in Figure for PESxNa multiblock copolymers
suggests that the accessible temperature window for DG morphologies
can be extended to lower temperatures, perhaps even room temperature,
by impeding the crystallization of the hydrocarbon backbones. For
example, substituting the linear diol with a noncrystallizable diol
may produce the DG at room temperature.In the PESxNa alternating multiblock copolymers
the DG structures are observed over an unexpectedly wide composition
range. One explanation might be the strong electrostatic cohesion
between the polar ionic blocks, which lead to asymmetric phase diagrams.
In block copolymers with charged moieties tethered to the backbone,
the composition of the charged block disproportionally impacts the
microphase-separated morphologies.[68−70] The physical properties
of PESxNa, such as the non-Gaussian chain statistics
of the short alternating blocks and conformational asymmetry of blocks,
may further skew the phase diagram. While PESxM systems
have charges covalently tethered to the backbone, extensive research
on diblock copolymers (e.g., PS-b-PEO) with added
salt have found that the salt content significantly impacts the equilibrium
morphologies.[71−76] Specifically, a substantial shift of the phase boundaries of salt-doped
block copolymers is often explained by factors including ion solvation
energy and ion–ion correlations. Clearly, the thermodynamics
of equilibrium morphologies in ion-containing block copolymer systems
are not yet fully understood. To the best of our knowledge, theoretical
studies are lacking to describe the wide range of DG structures and
the phase behavior of these ion-containing (AB) multiblock copolymers.Figure shows the
isothermal lattice parameters (a) of the three ordered
morphologies observed in PESxNa polymers along with
their scaling relationships to the number of backbone atoms (N = x + 6). The lattice parameters are
small (<10 nm) and exceptionally well-controlled by selecting the
length of the aliphatic diol monomers. The effect of n on the lattice parameter appears to be negligible for the PESxNa polymers, because the value of n spans
from ∼10 for PES23Na to ∼37 for PES12Na. The SCFT for
(AB) multiblock copolymers predicts the
domain spacings of layers when n = 10 is only slightly
larger (<2%) than that of n = 37. The scaling
relationship of a ∼ N0.92 for LAY is attributed to the crystallization of hydrocarbon,
and therefore the distance between the layered ionic aggregates is
proportional to the number of carbons in the hydrocarbon block. The
relationships for DG (a ∼ N0.67) and HEX (a ∼ N0.52) morphologies with amorphous hydrocarbon chains coincide
with the scaling relationship of strongly and weakly segregated neutral
diblock copolymers, respectively. By comparison, experimental results
for diblock copolymers observed exponents of ∼0.8–1.0.[77−80] The a–N relationships and
morphology map of PESxNa reveal that the nanoscale
ordered structures and their length scales in PESxNa multiblock copolymers can be finely tuned within the length scale
of 2–8 nm.
Figure 6
Lattice parameters of LAY at 40 °C (blue), DG at
130 °C
(red), and HEX at 170 °C (green) morphologies for PESxNa polymers (x = 10–48). The value
of N is defined as x + 6 for PESxNa. Data previously reported and used from refs (7), (62), (66), and (67). Copyright 2020, 2021,
2021, and 2019, respectively, American Chemical Society.
Lattice parameters of LAY at 40 °C (blue), DG at
130 °C
(red), and HEX at 170 °C (green) morphologies for PESxNa polymers (x = 10–48). The value
of N is defined as x + 6 for PESxNa. Data previously reported and used from refs (7), (62), (66), and (67). Copyright 2020, 2021,
2021, and 2019, respectively, American Chemical Society.Figure shows the
morphology diagram of PESxLi (x =
12, 18, 23) as a function of temperature upon heating.[62] Both PES23Li and PES18Li form DG above the Tm similar to PES23Na and PES18Na, while PES12Li
exhibits disordered morphologies above Tm. Consistent with the discussion about the cation effect on the TOOT for PES23M (Figure ), the TOOT of GYR–HEX
transition for PES18Li is 9.2 °C lower than that of PES18Na as
determined from DSC. Notably, PES12Li transitions into a disordered
morphology at Tm, whereas PES12Na transitions
into the ordered morphologies of DG and HEX above Tm. While cation effects shown in Figure were limited to fixed x = 23, the more comprehensive effect of fp presented in Figure a and Figure highlights
the cation effects on the phase boundaries in both fp and 1/T.
Figure 7
Morphology diagram of
PESxLi plotted as 1/T versus fp upon heating during in situ X-ray scattering experiments. The colors correspond
to morphology type as detailed in Figure with the addition of the disordered morphology
(DIS, gray). Reproduced from ref (62). Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.
Morphology diagram of
PESxLi plotted as 1/T versus fp upon heating during in situ X-ray scattering experiments. The colors correspond
to morphology type as detailed in Figure with the addition of the disordered morphology
(DIS, gray). Reproduced from ref (62). Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.
Determination of Ultrahigh χ and χN–f Phase Diagram in PESxLi
Further development of (AB) multiblock
copolymer thermodynamics requires knowledge of block interactions.
The Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (χ) is obtained
from the disordered morphology of PES12Li using the random phase approximation
for (AB) multiblock copolymers (Figure a).[62] The quality of the fit of the random phase approximation
theory to the experimental scattering data is high even though the
alternating block lengths in PES12Li are short. In Figure b, the temperature dependence
of χ = 77.4/T + 2.95 (T in
Kelvin) with a reference volume of 0.118 nm3 indicates
a high enthalpic contribution from ionic interactions and a high entropic
contribution from short block lengths. The value of χ at 25
°C is 3.21, identifying the PESxLi ion-containing
multiblock copolymers as ultrahigh-χ and low-N block copolymers. This is consistent with the formation of ordered
nanostructures with sub-3 nm domain spacings. For comparison, the
value of χ at 25 °C for polystyrene-b-poly(methyl
methacrylate) is 0.043.[81,82] Although the χ
value was inaccessible for PESxNa, the presence of
ordered morphologies at T > Tm for PES12Na and PES10Na suggests χ values even
higher
than PESxLi. The ultrahigh χ and ordered morphologies
with sub-3 nm domain spacings suggest a new direction for template-assisted
nanofabrication technologies using (AB) multiblock copolymers.
Figure 8
(a) Experimentally obtained scattering intensity
(dots) of PES12Li
in 10 °C increments from 120 to 170 °C. Theoretically defined
scattering intensities (line) from disordered (AB) multiblock copolymers are used to determine χ. (b) Temperature
dependence of χ and the linear relationship with 1/T above the mean-field temperature. Reproduced from ref (62). Copyright 2021 American
Chemical Society.
(a) Experimentally obtained scattering intensity
(dots) of PES12Li
in 10 °C increments from 120 to 170 °C. Theoretically defined
scattering intensities (line) from disordered (AB) multiblock copolymers are used to determine χ. (b) Temperature
dependence of χ and the linear relationship with 1/T above the mean-field temperature. Reproduced from ref (62). Copyright 2021 American
Chemical Society.Figure compares
the experimentally observed phase transitions of PESxLi polymers and the phase boundaries determined from self-consistent
field theory (SCFT) for (AB)17 multiblock copolymers. The
experimentally observed morphology transitions of PESxLi polymers are offset from the SCFT predictions: GYR–HEX
transitions for PES23Li and PES18Li and LAY–DIS transition
for PES12Li are shifted to a lower fp relative
to the theoretical boundaries. The discrepancies between the phase
behavior of PESxLi and the SCFT phase boundaries
can be attributed to the short block lengths and the electrostatic
interactions between the polar blocks. Theoretically, mean-field approximations
including the self-consistent field theory (SCFT) used to describe
the uncharged polymer systems are insufficient for predicting phase
behavior in electrostatically charged systems because of the field
fluctuations.[83−85] Theoretical models have introduced the fluctuation
effects to consider the electrostatic interactions in the phase-separated
polymer systems.[83−85] More recently, a polarizable field-theoretic model
explored the electrostatically stabilized microphase separation in
a blend of oppositely charged polymer systems, which showed a drastic
shift of phase boundaries.[85] A hybrid self-consistent
field theory and liquid state integral equation theory (SCFT-LS) demonstrates
that the ionically charged blocks of diblock copolymers significantly
skew the phase boundaries toward a lower volume fraction of charged
blocks.[65] The extent of boundary shift
increases as a function of charge fraction and Coulombic interaction
strengths. Similarly, dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) simulations
show this shift of phase boundaries with an increasing charge fraction.[86] Further development of these theoretical approaches
incorporating polarized field effects are needed to improve the understanding
of phase behavior in precise ion-containing (AB) multiblock copolymers.
Figure 9
Experimentally observed morphologies (symbols)
of PESxLi (x = 12, 18, 23) above Tm and numerically determined phase boundaries
(lines) of (AB)17 multiblock copolymers from SCFT calculations.
Symbol shapes
represent the morphologies of PESxLi: GYR (★),
HEX (●), LAY (▲), and DIS (◇). The three plots
at the right expand the χN scale for clarity
of the experimental results. Reproduced from ref (62). Copyright 2021 American
Chemical Society.
Experimentally observed morphologies (symbols)
of PESxLi (x = 12, 18, 23) above Tm and numerically determined phase boundaries
(lines) of (AB)17 multiblock copolymers from SCFT calculations.
Symbol shapes
represent the morphologies of PESxLi: GYR (★),
HEX (●), LAY (▲), and DIS (◇). The three plots
at the right expand the χN scale for clarity
of the experimental results. Reproduced from ref (62). Copyright 2021 American
Chemical Society.
Double Gyroid Morphologies in Thin Films of PES18Li
To provide a deeper
understanding of morphology characteristics
of precise ion-containing multiblock copolymers in confined geometries,
PESxLi thin films were prepared and examined with in situ grazing-incidence X-ray scattering (Figure ).[87] At 40 °C, distinct in-plane scattering peaks at q ∼ 1.5 Å–1 indicate that the crystalline hydrocarbon blocks pack with an interchain
distance of 0.4 nm and the chain axis vertically aligned relative
to the substrate (Figure a). The out-of-plane scattering peaks along the q-axis indicate well-defined ionic layers
parallel to the substrate, where the layer spacing is 3.1 nm (Figure d). Upon heating
above Tm, the layered morphology spontaneously
transitions into highly oriented DG with an epitaxial transition from
the (100) plane of LAY to the (211) plane of DG parallel to the substrate
(Figure e).[88] The domain spacing calculated from the primary
(211) peak of the DG structure is ∼2.5 nm. Further heating
to 180 °C allows an epitaxial transition of DG into HEX morphology,
where the cylinders are parallel to the substrate (Figure f).[19] The transitions between the DG and HEX are reversible, and the DG
to LAY transition is kinetically trapped due to slow crystallization
consistent with bulk behavior. The film thickness in Figure is 44 nm and corresponds
to ∼7 cubic lattices of the DG structure, ∼7aDG. The DG morphology also forms in 26 nm films (∼4aDG), although a thinner film of 17 nm (∼2.5aDG) leads
to coexisting DG and HEX morphologies due to greater confinement.
This thin-film study demonstrates the exceptional fidelity of precise
ion-containing (AB) multiblock copolymers
for designing DG structures and other ordered morphologies in thin
films, which could develop into a versatile platform of ion transport
membranes, filtration membranes, and templates for pattern transfer.
Figure 10
In situ 2D grazing incidence (a–c)
wide-angle
and (d–f) small-angle X-ray scattering patterns of PES18Li
thin films (∼44 nm thick) at 40, 140, and 180 °C showing
parallel layers, aligned double gyroids, and parallel cylinders. Miller
indexes in (e) and (f) are shown for the double gyroid and 2D orthorhombic
lattices, respectively. The incident angles were larger than the critical
angle in these grazing incident measurements. Reproduced from ref (87). Copyright 2022 American
Chemical Society.
In situ 2D grazing incidence (a–c)
wide-angle
and (d–f) small-angle X-ray scattering patterns of PES18Li
thin films (∼44 nm thick) at 40, 140, and 180 °C showing
parallel layers, aligned double gyroids, and parallel cylinders. Miller
indexes in (e) and (f) are shown for the double gyroid and 2D orthorhombic
lattices, respectively. The incident angles were larger than the critical
angle in these grazing incident measurements. Reproduced from ref (87). Copyright 2022 American
Chemical Society.
Criteria for Designing Double Gyroid in (AB) Multiblock Copolymers
So far, this perspective has highlighted
the DG morphology in one
class of (AB) multiblock copolymers composed
of alternating polyester sulfonate with a metal counterion and hydrocarbon
blocks. After inspecting results from other classes of (AB) polymers, we will propose criteria for achieving
the DG morphology. First, the removal of ionic groups from PES23M
results in the absence of ordered morphologies above Tm, and we attribute this to a significant reduction in
χ.[7] Therefore, the blocks of (AB) multiblock copolymers should be highly incompatible
to achieve ordered morphologies at sub-10 nm length scales.Figure shows
a poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)-based multiblock copolymer synthesized
by the A2 + B2 melt polycondensation of a hydroxy-terminated
oligo(ethylene glycol) monomer and a 5-sulfoisophthalate salt.[89] In these ionomers, PEO lengths of m ∼ 9 and 13 with Li+, Na+, and Cs+ exhibit disordered ionic aggregate morphologies with an amorphous
PEO backbone. When the length of PEO is long enough at m ∼ 25 and 75, the PEO blocks crystallize and the ionic aggregates
form layers. Upon heating above the Tm, these PEO-based multiblock copolymers do not form ordered morphologies
such as DG and HEX. The absence of ordered morphologies in these PEO-based
ionomers can be attributed to the absence of precision in block lengths
and the lack of chain flexibility in the polar block. First, the PEO
block lengths are polydisperse as compared to the precise hydrocarbon
lengths of the PESxM polymers. It is well-established
that randomly distributed spacer lengths give rise to poorly defined
ionic aggregate morphologies compared to precise spacer lengths.[90−92] Second, the polar blocks with rigid phenyl ring in the backbone
are less flexible and impede the chain packing necessary to form DG
or HEX morphologies. In addition, the segregation strength of these
PEO-based ionomers will be weaker than polyethylene-based PESxM multiblock copolymers, pushing them toward the disordered
state. The lack of precision in block length, a rigid polar block,
and a smaller χ combine to impede the self-assembly of these
PEO-based sodium sulfonated polyesters into ordered nanostructures.
Figure 11
Poly(ethylene
oxide)-based sulfonated polyesters with counterion
(M) have poly(ethylene oxide) blocks of various average molecular
weights: 400, 600, 1100, and 3300 g/mol correspond to m ∼ 9, 13, 25, and 75 and fp =
0.31–0.05. Reproduced from ref (89). Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.
Poly(ethylene
oxide)-based sulfonated polyesters with counterion
(M) have poly(ethylene oxide) blocks of various average molecular
weights: 400, 600, 1100, and 3300 g/mol correspond to m ∼ 9, 13, 25, and 75 and fp =
0.31–0.05. Reproduced from ref (89). Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.Figure a shows
the precise acid-containing polymers synthesized via acyclic diene
metathesis (ADMET) polymerization of diene monomers containing a symmetric
pendant functionality. All-atom molecular dynamics simulations at T > Tm show that the precise polymer containing
COO–Li+ on every 21st carbon (p21AA-Li, fp = 0.15) exhibits disordered, stringy, and
percolated ionic aggregates (Figure b).[93] Similar stringy ionic
aggregates are formed above Tm when the
periodicity between the ionic groups is shorter (p9AA-Li and p15AA-Li),[93,94] indicating that the nonperiodic packing of ionic aggregates is preferred
relative to ordered morphologies in these ADMET polymers with pendant
acid or ionic groups. One exception to this generalization is the
precise ADMET polymer containing geminal phosphonic acids on exactly
every 21st carbon (p21gPA, fp = 0.25)
that exhibits low symmetry diffraction peaks assigned to spherical
aggregates on a face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice symmetry (Figure c).[95,96] In comparison with the PESxM polymers that contain
ester linkages and short polar blocks, the ADMET polymers have all-carbon
polymer backbones and the pendant groups on just one carbon. These
features of the acid- and ion-containing ADMET polymers provide fewer
chain conformations to accommodate microphase separation of the functional
groups and prevent self-assembly into ordered morphologies, including
the DG morphology. Given the chemical similarities between these ADMET
polymers and the ionic lipids that originally displayed the DG morphology,[1] the absence of the DG in these polymers is unexpected.
Figure 12
(a)
ADMET polymerization to synthesize precise polymers. (b) Snapshot
of precise polymers containing COO–Li+ on every 21st carbon (p21AA-Li) from all-atom molecular dynamics
simulation at 600 K. All oxygen (red) and lithium (yellow) atoms of
COO–Li+ are shown. Carbon atoms of one
polymer chain are shown in blue and cyan denotes the carbon atoms
of COO–Li+ of the polymer chain. The
carbons of other polymer chains and all hydrogens are not displayed
for clarity. The box edge is 6.1 nm. Simulations previously reported
in ref (93). Copyright
2019 American Chemical Society. (c) X-ray scattering profile of precise
polymers containing geminal phosphonic acid groups on every 21st carbon
(p21gPA) at room temperature. Peak positions correspond to spherical
acid aggregates on a fcc lattice. Reproduced from ref (95). Copyright 2012 American
Chemical Society.
(a)
ADMET polymerization to synthesize precise polymers. (b) Snapshot
of precise polymers containing COO–Li+ on every 21st carbon (p21AA-Li) from all-atom molecular dynamics
simulation at 600 K. All oxygen (red) and lithium (yellow) atoms of
COO–Li+ are shown. Carbon atoms of one
polymer chain are shown in blue and cyan denotes the carbon atoms
of COO–Li+ of the polymer chain. The
carbons of other polymer chains and all hydrogens are not displayed
for clarity. The box edge is 6.1 nm. Simulations previously reported
in ref (93). Copyright
2019 American Chemical Society. (c) X-ray scattering profile of precise
polymers containing geminal phosphonic acid groups on every 21st carbon
(p21gPA) at room temperature. Peak positions correspond to spherical
acid aggregates on a fcc lattice. Reproduced from ref (95). Copyright 2012 American
Chemical Society.The physicochemical properties of the ionic groups,
chain flexibility,
and block incompatibility of the PESxM polymers provide
insight into designing DG-forming multiblock copolymers. Below we
propose four criteria for (AB) multiblock
copolymers to produce the DG and other ordered morphologies at sub-10
nm length scales.The A and B blocks are highly incompatible, for example,
pairing ionic and nonionic blocks.Both
the A and B blocks are comprised of flexible chains
to accommodate the surface curvature of the double gyroid structure
and other ordered morphologies.The lengths
of the A and B blocks are precise so that
the polydispersity index of the AB unit is exactly 1.00.The volume fraction of the minority block is 0.27–0.41
to form double gyroid structures. Lower and higher volume fractions
can form hexagonally packed cylinders or layers, respectively.
Conclusion
This Perspective summarizes the recent developments
of precise
ion-containing multiblock copolymers that self-assemble into double
gyroid structures at an unusually wide composition range of >14
vol
%. Step-growth polymerization methods could be developed to synthesize
an even wider variety of precise ion-containing multiblock copolymers,
and greatly expand the investigation of self-assembly in (AB) copolymers. Current self-consistent field
theories fail to capture the phase behavior of these precise ion-containing
polymers, and this is primarily attributed to the presence of charges
that induce electrostatic interactions and significant density fluctuations.
A combination of experimental, theoretical, and simulation studies
are required to fully establish a foundation for designing ordered
nanostructures including DG with precise ion-containing multiblock
copolymers.Numerous applications can be envisioned for new
(AB) multiblock copolymer synthesized
by step-growth
polymerization. First, precise multiblock copolymers could be used
for nanopatterning templates to achieve sub-3 nm domain spacings by
having ultrahigh χ and low N. Key next steps
include exploring multiblock copolymer kinetics, directed self-assembly
of ultrahigh χ polymers, and sequential infiltration synthesis
within sub-3 nm domains to improve etching contrast. In addition,
porous materials templated from the precise multiblock copolymers
could be explored as filtration membranes. Another set of potential
applications involves selective ion transport, including single-ion
conductors having covalently bonded ionic functionalities to the polymer
backbone as in the PESxM polymers. The ordered morphologies
in thin films of these ion-containing polymers create well-aligned
ion transport channels, which can be further optimized for high ionic
conductivity by selecting optimal block chemistries from step-growth
polymerization and by the selective solvation with additives to swell
the polar domains and dissociate the ion pairs.[97] Precise ion-containing multiblock copolymers have great
potential to expand understanding of block copolymer physics and address
a variety of technological challenges.
Authors: Lisa M Hall; Michelle E Seitz; Karen I Winey; Kathleen L Opper; Kenneth B Wagener; Mark J Stevens; Amalie L Frischknecht Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2011-12-19 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Michelle E Seitz; Christopher D Chan; Kathleen L Opper; Travis W Baughman; Kenneth B Wagener; Karen I Winey Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Joan M Widin; Adam K Schmitt; Andrew L Schmitt; Kyuhyun Im; Mahesh K Mahanthappa Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Frank S Bates; Marc A Hillmyer; Timothy P Lodge; Christopher M Bates; Kris T Delaney; Glenn H Fredrickson Journal: Science Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 47.728