Literature DB >> 36032392

Assessment of the Biorisk Status of Veterinary Laboratories in Southwest Nigeria: Application of the Food and Agriculture Organization Laboratory Mapping Tool-Safety Module.

Oluwawemimo Adebowale1, Adebankemo Oduguwa1, Saheed Dipeolu1, Michael Agbaje2, Olubumni Fasanmi3, Folorunso Oludayo Fasina4,5.   

Abstract

Introduction: Because of the nature of work conducted in veterinary laboratories and potential exposures to pathogenic microorganisms, good laboratory practices, risk assessments, biosafety, and biosecurity capacity is becoming vital. In this study, the Food and Agriculture Organization Laboratory Mapping Tool-Safety Module was applied to demonstrate its practical implementation in the assessment of biosafety and biosecurity statuses of veterinary laboratories in Nigeria.
Methods: The Laboratory Mapping Tool-Safety Module, a standardized questionnaire, systematically and semiquantitatively gathered data on 98 subcategories covering 4 areas of biosafety and biosecurity capabilities: administrative, operational, engineering, and personal protective equipment.
Results: Overall, the various areas and categories covered by the Laboratory Mapping Tool-Safety Module were weak across the board, with a mean performance of 19.5% (95% confidence interval, 14.0%-25.1%; range, 0.8%-29.6%). The weakest functionality was in emergency preparedness (0.8%; ie, emergency responses and exercises such as fire drills, spill cleanup, and biological spill kit availability). Also, many laboratories were deficient in metrology procedures, biosafety cabinets, chemical hazard containment, regular maintenance and external calibration procedures for laboratory equipment, and personnel health and safety. However, a few functionalities within individual laboratories scored above average (50%), for example, a university microbiology laboratory animal facility (100%). Interlaboratory comparison indicated that biosafety and biosecurity performance was similar across laboratories (P = .07) and did not vary by location (P = .37). Conclusions: Significant biosafety and biosecurity improvements are needed to guarantee the health and safety of workers and the global community, efficient responses to infectious disease containment, and compliance with the Global Health Security Agenda. © ABSA International 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FAO LMT-S; Nigeria; biosafety and biosecurity; global health; veterinary laboratory

Year:  2020        PMID: 36032392      PMCID: PMC9134632          DOI: 10.1177/1535676020930130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Biosaf        ISSN: 1535-6760


  9 in total

1.  Laboratory-acquired brucellosis: a Spanish national survey.

Authors:  E Bouza; C Sánchez-Carrillo; S Hernangómez; M José González
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Analysis of risk factors for laboratory-acquired brucella infections.

Authors:  O Ergönül; A Celikbaş; D Tezeren; E Güvener; B Dokuzoğuz
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Status of Laboratory Biosafety and Biosecurity in Veterinary Research Facilities in Nigeria.

Authors:  Ismail Ayoade Odetokun; Afusat Toyin Jagun-Jubril; Bernard A Onoja; Yiltawe Simwal Wungak; Ibrahim Adisa Raufu; Jessica Corron Chen
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2016-08-26

Review 4.  African perspectives: modern complexities of emerging, re-emerging, and endemic zoonoses.

Authors:  Abdulazeez Muzemil; Olubunmi Gabriel Fasanmi; Folorunso Oludayo Fasina
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.664

Review 5.  Biosafety and Biosecurity: A Relative Risk-Based Framework for Safer, More Secure, and Sustainable Laboratory Capacity Building.

Authors:  Petra Dickmann; Heather Sheeley; Nigel Lightfoot
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2015-10-21

6.  Biorisk assessment of medical diagnostic laboratories in Nigeria.

Authors:  Bankole Henry Oladeinde; Richard Omoregie; Ikponmwonsa Odia; Eguagie Osareniro Osakue; Odaro Stanley Imade
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2013-04-25

7.  Comparison and analysis of biological agent category lists based on biosafety and biodefense.

Authors:  Deqiao Tian; Tao Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Tool for Assessment of Animal Health Laboratory Safety and Biosecurity: The Safety Module of the Food and Agriculture Organization's Laboratory Mapping Tool.

Authors:  Beatrice Mouillé; Gwenaelle Dauphin; Lidewij Wiersma; Stuart D Blacksell; Filip Claes; Wantanee Kalpravidh; Youssouf Kabore; Sharon Hietala
Journal:  Trop Med Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-14

Review 9.  A Review of Laboratory-Acquired Infections in the Asia-Pacific: Understanding Risk and the Need for Improved Biosafety for Veterinary and Zoonotic Diseases.

Authors:  Jarunee Siengsanan-Lamont; Stuart D Blacksell
Journal:  Trop Med Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.