Literature DB >> 36032338

Modified Efficient and Simple Method for Biological Spill Cleanup.

Viji Vijayan1, Benson Ng Beng Sern1, Barbara Johnson2.   

Abstract

Introduction: Spill response procedures are an important aspect of laboratories where infectious materials are handled. The decades-old conventional method of spill cleanup uses paper towels to cover the spill. It requires 2 staff and involves a considerable amount of bending and squatting and being able to balance in those positions while wearing personal protective equipment (PPE). In this article, we describe a method that simplifies spill cleanup and compares it to the conventional method. The simplified method can be easily conducted by 1 person, takes about half the time, generates less waste, and reduces the amount of time spent in contaminated areas. Objective: The objective is to describe a modified, simple method of spill cleanup.
Methods: A mock spill was created and a spill response initiated per the institution's procedure. The simplified procedure uses a pail filled with decontaminant and a household mop dripping with the decontaminant. Mopping is done from the noncontaminated area toward the contaminated area so the spill does not spread. Mopping is done more than once, and all the materials used, including the mop(s), are disposed as biohazardous material.
Results: The simplified spill cleanup process described here can be performed by just one person and does not require bending and squatting while wearing PPE. The kit is very simple, consisting of a pail and a mop, which are common household tools familiar to most people.
Conclusion: The mop-and-pail methodology is simple, requires only one staff member, generates less biological waste, and requires less training and practice while effectively cleaning the spill. © ABSA International 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological spill cleanup; biosafety level 3; laboratory accidents; laboratory incidents; laboratory-acquired infections

Year:  2019        PMID: 36032338      PMCID: PMC9134464          DOI: 10.1177/1535676019850689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Biosaf        ISSN: 1535-6760


  8 in total

1.  Biosafety breaches. Accidents spur a closer look at risks at biodefense labs.

Authors:  Jocelyn Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Evidence-based biosafety: a review of the principles and effectiveness of microbiological containment measures.

Authors:  Tjeerd G Kimman; Eric Smit; Michèl R Klein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  A death in the lab.

Authors:  Richard Van Noorden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  It's time for a centralized registry of laboratory-acquired infections.

Authors:  Kamaljit Singh
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Laboratory-associated infections: summary and analysis of 3921 cases.

Authors:  R M Pike
Journal:  Health Lab Sci       Date:  1976-04

Review 6.  A literature review of laboratory-acquired brucellosis.

Authors:  Rita M Traxler; Mark W Lehman; Elizabeth A Bosserman; Marta A Guerra; Theresa L Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Biological Risks and Laboratory-Acquired Infections: A Reality That Cannot be Ignored in Health Biotechnology.

Authors:  Ana Cláudia Coelho; Juan García Díez
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-28

8.  Survey of laboratory-acquired infections around the world in biosafety level 3 and 4 laboratories.

Authors:  N Wurtz; A Papa; M Hukic; A Di Caro; I Leparc-Goffart; E Leroy; M P Landini; Z Sekeyova; J S Dumler; D Bădescu; N Busquets; A Calistri; C Parolin; G Palù; I Christova; M Maurin; B La Scola; D Raoult
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.267

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.