| Literature DB >> 36032278 |
Jian He1,2, Xiaofei Shang1,2, Lixia Dai2, Xiaorong Yang2, Bing Li2, Yanming Wei1, Jiyu Zhang1,2, Hu Pan2.
Abstract
As the ornamental plants and traditional medicines, Rhododendron przewalskii, R. anthopogonoides, R. thymifolium, and R. capitatum are widely distributed in western China. In this paper, the essential oils from these four species were extracted by supercritical extraction and the components were analyzed using headspace solid phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS), the antibacterial, acaricidal and anti-inflammatory activities were investigated. Results showed that R. thymifolium (RTEO) contained the highest yield of 0.99% with 246 compounds, followed by R. capitatum (RCEO, 0.81%) with 290 chemicals, R. anthopogonoides (RAEO, 0.57%) with 302 compounds and R. przewalskii (RPEO, 0.30%) with 294 components. They also exhibited the safety at given doses and have the anti-inflammatory in vitro and in vivo tests via inhibiting the cytokines productions, the acaricidal and antibacterial activities also were found. 4-Hydroxy-3-methylacetophenone from RPEO, α-pinene and β-pinene from RAEO, β-farnesene and germacrone from RTEO, and benzylacetone from RCEO, as main and active components, inhibited the NO content in RAW 264.7 cells induced by LPS. These results indicated that four essential oils have certain medicinal value and laid the foundation for the development of these species as raw materials for the pharmaceutical and perfume industries.Entities:
Keywords: α-pinene; Rhododendron species; acaricidal activity; anti-inflammatory activity; essential oils
Year: 2022 PMID: 36032278 PMCID: PMC9399923 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.882060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Figure 1The yields of four essential oils (A) and venn picture of common compositions of four essential oils (B).
The top 30 compounds of the essential oils from four Rhododendron species.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | Phenylethyl alcohol | 12.0% | 1196.4 | α-Pinene | 8.4% | 750.22 | Cyclohexanone, 5-ethenyl-5-methyl-4- (1-methylethenyl)-2-(1-methylethylidene)- | 11.0% | 1273.3 | Benzylacetone | 11.3% | 1175.7 |
| 2 | Acetic acid | 6.0% | 988.43 | Humulene | 5.9% | 1097.6 | β-Farnesene | 5.0% | 1095.3 | Benzene, 1-ethenyl-4-ethyl- | 7.9% | 1198.6 |
| 3 | 4-Hydroxy-3-methylacetophenone | 5.6% | 1309.3 | β-pinene | 4.1% | 804.21 | γ-Cadinene | 4.8% | 1104.5 | γ-Muurolene | 7.1% | 1104 |
| 4 | Hexanoic acid | 4.4% | 1167.9 | o-Cymene | 3.5% | 902.32 | Selina-3,7(11)-diene | 3.9% | 1150.7 | α-Selinene | 4.5% | 1120 |
| 5 | Benzyl alcohol | 4.1% | 1181.1 | MYRTENOL | 3.1% | 1149.7 | Bisabolone | 3.8% | 1360.4 | Humulene | 4.5% | 1095.1 |
| 6 | Alloaromadendrene | 3.0% | 1059.8 | α-Bergamotene | 2.2% | 1051.1 | α-Bergamotene | 2.8% | 1050.3 | 4-Phenyl-2-butanol | 4.3% | 1231.7 |
| 7 | 4-Phenyl-2-butanol | 2.7% | 1231.4 | Selina-3,7(11)-diene | 2.0% | 1144.1 | Germacrone | 2.6% | 1301.6 | 4-Phenylbutan-2-yl acetate | 3.0% | 1199.9 |
| 8 | Thiophene, 2,3-dihydro- | 2.4% | 1361.5 | Copaene | 1.9% | 1014 | Selinene | 2.4% | 1121.5 | Acetic acid | 2.5% | 988.27 |
| 9 | Heptanoic acid | 2.3% | 1213.4 | β-Sesquiphellandrene | 1.8% | 1139.9 | Calamenene | 1.8% | 1166.3 | 2-Butanone, 4-(4-methoxyphenyl)- | 2.1% | 1348.3 |
| 10 | 2-Butanone, 4-phenyl- | 2.1% | 1171.6 | γ-Muurolene | 1.6% | 1104.4 | γ-Elemene | 1.8% | 1082.7 | 5-Hepten-2-one, 6-methyl- | 1.6% | 937.4 |
| 11 | Nonanal | 1.6% | 965.73 | β-Bourbonene | 1.6% | 1026.2 | 3,5,11-Eudesmatriene | 1.6% | 1175.8 | 6-Methyl-3,5-heptadiene-2-one | 1.4% | 1057.2 |
| 12 | 2,4-Heptadienal | 1.3% | 997.36 | β-Bergamotene | 1.5% | 1102.3 | Acetic acid | 1.6% | 988.51 | Caryophyllene | 1.3% | 1061.6 |
| 13 | Octanoic acid | 1.3% | 1259 | D-Limonene | 1.4% | 862.66 | Caryophyllene | 1.6% | 1062.3 | δ-Cadinene | 1.2% | 1135.8 |
| 14 | 5-Hepten-2-one, 6-methyl- | 0.9% | 937.16 | β-Bisabolene | 1.4% | 1120.6 | 3-Methyl-6-(6-methylhept-5-en-2-yl)cyclohex-2-enone | 1.5% | 1353.3 | α-Pinene | 1.2% | 749.71 |
| 15 | α-Calacorene | 0.9% | 1197.3 | Ethanone, 1-(4- hydroxyphenyl)-2-phenyl- | 1.3% | 1086.6 | Nerolidol | 1.4% | 1255.2 | Phenethyl acetate | 1.0% | 1155.4 |
| 16 | 3,5-Octadien-2-one | 0.8% | 1023.9 | α-Gurjunene | 1.2% | 1060.5 | Myrcene | 1.3% | 845 | 3,5,11-Eudesmatriene | 0.8% | 1337.2 |
| 17 | Propanoic acid | 0.8% | 1031.8 | Benzene, 1-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methyl- | 1.1% | 1140.6 | Phenylethyl alcohol | 1.1% | 1196.9 | Germacrene B | 0.8% | 1123.1 |
| 18 | Benzaldehyde | 0.8% | 1022.9 | Pinocarveol | 1.1% | 1089 | 2-Butanone, 4-phenyl- | 1.1% | 1174.2 | α-Farnesene | 0.8% | 1132.7 |
| 19 | 1-Hexanol | 0.8% | 949.8 | 2-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethenyl)- | 1.0% | 1166.3 | Tricyclo[2.2.1.0(2,6)]heptane, 1,7-dimethyl-7-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-, (-)- | 1.0% | 1052.3 | Ylangene | 0.7% | 1009.1 |
| 20 | 3-Phenylpropanol | 0.7% | 1254 | Phenylethyl Alcohol | 1.0% | 1197.1 | Copaene | 1.0% | 1013.4 | β-Pinene | 0.7% | 803.26 |
| 21 | Butyrolactone | 0.7% | 1069.3 | δ-Cadinene | 1.0% | 1134.6 | β-Bourbonene | 1.0% | 1025.8 | 6-Methyl-1-octanol | 0.7% | 1038.1 |
| 22 | 1-Penten-3-ol | 0.7% | 843.61 | α-Selinene | 1.0% | 1119 | β-selinene | 0.9% | 1118.1 | β-Selinene | 0.7% | 1117.6 |
| 23 | β-Ionone 5,6-epoxide | 0.7% | 1229.5 | L-Bornyl acetate | 0.9% | 1054.3 | 1,4a-Dimethyl-7-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7-octahydronaphthalene | 0.8% | 1043 | 1H-Cycloprop[e]azulene, decahydro-1,1,7-trimethyl-4-methylene- | 0.7% | 1066.6 |
| 24 | 4-Phenylbutan-2-yl acetate | 0.7% | 1263.3 | α-Santalene | 0.9% | 1052.8 | 1-Methyl-4-(6-methylhept-5-en-2-yl)cyclohexa-1,3-diene | 0.8% | 1105.4 | 3,7-Cyclodecadien-1-one, 3,7-dimethyl-10-(1-methylethylidene)- | 0.7% | 1327.3 |
| 25 | 1H-Pyrrole-2,5-dione, 3-ethyl-4-methyl- | 0.5% | 1339.9 | Humulene epoxide II | 0.9% | 1250.8 | 4-Phenylbutan-2-yl acetate | 0.8% | 1198.6 | 1,4a-Dimethyl-7-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7-octahydronaphthalene | 0.6% | 1042.5 |
| 26 | Hexanal | 0.5% | 793.56 | Caryophyllene | 0.8% | 1063.1 | Acetic acid, 2-phenylethyl ester | 0.7% | 1155.8 | γ-Elemene | 0.6% | 1080.8 |
| 27 | Myrtenol | 0.5% | 1149.3 | 2,6-Dimethyl-1,3,5,7-octatetraene | 0.8% | 872.53 | Benzenecarbothioic acid, 2,4,6-triethyl-, (2-phenylethyl) ester | 0.6% | 1106.4 | β-Elemenone | 0.6% | 1271.3 |
| 28 | Tricyclo2.2.1.02,6heptane, 1,7-dimethyl- 7-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-, (-)- | 0.4% | 1050.4 | Benzene, 1-methyl-3- (1-methylethenyl)- | 0.8% | 984.73 | Humulene | 0.6% | 1095.9 | Tricyclo[2.2.1.0(2,6)]heptane, 1,7-dimethyl-7-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-, (-)- | 0.5% | 1050.8 |
| 29 | δ-cadinene | 0.4% | 1131.7 | 3-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 4-methyl-1-(1-methylethyl)- | 0.7% | 1064.1 | 1,5,5,8-Tetramethyl-12-oxabicyclo[9.1.0]dodeca-3,7-diene | 0.5% | 1250.9 | Naphthalene, 1,2,4a,5,6,8a-hexahydro-4,7-dimethyl-1-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S-(1γ-4aγ-8aγ-]- | 0.4% | 1150.1 |
| 30 | γ-Bergamotene | 0.4% | 1056.5 | Ylangene | 0.7% | 1010 | Linalyl acetate | 0.5% | 1043.4 | Geranyl acetate | 0.4% | 1134.2 |
RAa Relative area of this compound.
RIb Retention indices.
The antibacterial activity of the essential oils from four Rhododendron species.
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RPEO | - | - | 4096 μg/mL | - | - | 4096 μg/mL |
| RAEO | - | - | 256 μg/mL | - | - | 64 μg/mL |
| RTEO | - | - | 1024 μg/mL | - | - | 256 μg/mL |
| RCEO | - | - | 1024 μg/mL | - | - | 256 μg/mL |
| Ampicillin sodium | 2 μg/mL | 2 μg/mL | 4 μg/mL | 2 μg/mL | 4 μg/mL | 2 μg/mL |
| Streptomycin sulfate | 64 μg/mL | 64 μg/mL | 32 μg/mL | 8 μg/mL | 4 μg/mL | 32 μg/mL |
The acaricidal activity of the essential oils from four Rhododendron species.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| RPEO | 1712.3 | 1212.1~4225.8 | Y = 1.8868X-1.1012 |
| RAEO | 1588.4 | 1173.5~2973.4 | Y = 2.1467X-1.8715 |
| RTEO | 2353.3 | 1454.7~3594.9 | Y = 1.5122X-0.0986 |
| RCEO | 4960.4 | – | Y =1.2053X+0.5459 |
Figure 2The paw edema level (A) and its inhibition level (B) of carrageenan-induced paw edema in mice test, and the ear edema level (C) and its inhibition level (D) of xylene induced ear edema test, the inhibitory effect of these compounds on NO production (E), IL-6 production (F) and SOD activity (G) in RAW264.7 cells induced by LPS, (H) the cell viability of four Rhododendrons species essential oils against RAW264.7 cells. (##represent the significant difference between control group and model group, p<0.01; * p<0.05 represent the significant difference between model group and drug-treated group; ** for p<0.01).
Figure 3The cell viability of seven components from four Rhododendrons species (A) and the inhibitory effect of these compounds on NO production in RAW264.7 cells induced by LPS (B). (phenylethyl alcohol (PA), and 4-hydroxy-3-methylacetophenone (HA) from RPEO(essential of Rhododendrron przewalskii Maxim.), α-pinene (α-PI) and β-pinene (β-PI) from RAEO(essential oil of Rhododendron anthopogonoides Maxim.), β-farnesene (FA) and germacrone (GE) from RTEO(essential oil of Rhododendron thymifolium Maxim.), and benzylacetone (BE) from RCEO (essential oil of Rhododendron capitatum Maxim.) (##represent the significant difference between control group and model group, p < 0.01; ** for p < 0.01).