Literature DB >> 36032129

Innate lymphoid cells in early tumor development.

Kathrin Warner1, Maryam Ghaedi1, Douglas C Chung1,2, Nicolas Jacquelot1, Pamela S Ohashi1,2.   

Abstract

Innate and adaptive immune cells monitor, recognize, and eliminate transformed cells. Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are innate counterparts of T cells that play a key role in many facets of the immune response and have a profound impact on disease states, including cancer. ILCs regulate immune responses by responding and integrating a wide range of signals within the local microenvironment. As primarily tissue-resident cells, ILCs are ideally suited to sense malignant transformation and initiate anti-tumor immunity. However, as ILCs have been associated with anti-tumor and pro-tumor activities in established tumors, they could potentially have dual functions during carcinogenesis by promoting or suppressing the malignant outgrowth of premalignant lesions. Here we discuss emerging evidence that shows that ILCs can impact early tumor development by regulating immune responses against transformed cells, as well as the environmental cues that potentially induce ILC activation in premalignant lesions.
Copyright © 2022 Warner, Ghaedi, Chung, Jacquelot and Ohashi.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carcinogenesis; cytokines; damage associate molecular pattern (DAMP); immunosurveillance; innate lymphoid cell (ILC); tumor development; tumor immunity

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36032129      PMCID: PMC9411809          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.948358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   8.786


1 Introduction

Tumorigenesis is a complex, multistep process in which normal cells evolve progressively to a neoplastic state. Thus, tumors are often preceded by different stages of premalignant tissue changes, including hyperplasia, metaplasia, and dysplasia, which are linked to an increased cancer risk. The immune system can detect tissue changes and eliminate transformed cells in a process referred to as tumor immunosurveillance. The original cancer immunosurveillance hypothesis was formulated in the 1950s and described that adaptive lymphocytes reduce tumor growth in response to recognizing tumor antigens (1, 2). Since then, this theory has been refined and cancer immunosurveillance is now widely accepted as being part of the cancer immunoediting process, wherein the tumor-suppressive and tumor-promoting activities of the immune system shape tumor development. This process is divided into three different phases: elimination (cancer immunosurveillance), equilibrium (cancer persistence/dormancy), and escape (cancer progression) (3–5). Our current understanding of cancer immunosurveillance is primarily based on studies in mice, which have shown that the immune system can prevent the outgrowth of many different types of primary and transplantable tumors (4). Evidence for the importance of the immune system in preventing tumor development in humans is found in studies showing increased incidences of malignancies in immunocompromised patients with AIDS and recipients of organ transplants using immunosuppressants, as well as spontaneously regressing benign and malignant melanocytic lesions accompanied by lymphocytic infiltrates (4). Despite the immune system’s anti-tumorigenic activities, deregulated inflammatory responses have also been linked to carcinogenesis and often precede tumor development (6). Thus, the immune system does not only protect the host against tumor development but also promotes progression of premalignant to malignant cells. A comprehensive view of tumor immunosurveillance would include not only adaptive immune cells but also innate immune cells since it is well known that they detect and destroy transformed cells (4, 5). Besides T cells, natural killer (NK) cells are known to play a key role in cancer immunosurveillance (7). NK cells are innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) that mirror CD8+ T cytotoxic cells and secrete cytotoxic molecules such as granzymes and perforin to eliminate virus-infected cells and tumor cells. Increasing evidence suggests that other ILC family members also play an important role in the immune response against tumors (8) and their role in tumor development is starting to being explored. ILCs have been classified into NK cells, ILC1s, ILC2s, ILC3s, and lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi) cells based on their cytokine and transcription factor expression profiles, and developmental pathways (9). ILC1s, ILC2s and ILC3s share features with CD4 T helper (h)1, Th2, and Th17/22 subsets, respectively. NK cells and ILC1s express the transcription factor T-box transcription factor 21 (T-BET) and secrete interferon (IFN)-γ. In addition, NK cells, but not ILC1s, require the transcription factor Eomesodermin (EOMES) for their development. However, a proportion of ILC1s can express EOMES (10). ILC1s are involved in the immune response against viruses and intracellular bacteria. They express multiple granzyme molecules, but at lower levels compared to NK cells. ILC2s are dependent on the transcription factors GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) and retinoic acid-related orphan receptor (ROR)α and produce classical type 2 cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13 in response to parasite infection and allergen exposure. ILC3s and LTi cell subsets share a characteristic expression of the retinoic acid receptor-related orphan nuclear receptor γt (RORγt) and the cytokines IL-17A and IL-22 but follow different developmental pathways. ILC3s are immune effectors that contribute to host defense against extracellular bacteria and fungi, whereas LTi cells initiate the development of fetal lymphoid tissues (9). NK cells circulate in the body, whereas the other ILC subsets are primarily tissue resident cells that preferentially reside in barrier tissues. In addition to providing immunity against infections, they also play critical roles in maintaining tissue homeostasis by responding rapidly to environmental cues, initiating effector responses in a tissue-specific manner and interacting with tissue-resident cells (11). This makes them ideally suited to sense malignant transformation and initiate anti-tumor immunity. However, ILCs have been associated with pro-tumor and anti-tumor activities in established tumors (8) and could therefore have a dual role during tumor development as well. In this review, we discuss the stress signals that could potentially activate ILCs during tumor development and recent advances supporting a role of ILCs in immune surveillance and carcinogenesis.

2 ILCs and tumor development

Premalignant lesions arise from various causes, including infection, inflammation, and environmental exposures. Innate immune cells are considered the first responders to cellular stress and mediate adaptive immune responses. This is supported by a study that profiled 122 bronchoscopy biopsies from 77 patients using gene-expression profiling and multispectral imaging, which included 9 morphological stages of invasive lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) development. During hyperplasia, the earliest stage of transformation, there was an increase of innate immune cells, such as neutrophils, activated mast cells and NK cells, and resting dendritic cells (DCs), as well as naïve CD4 T cells. This was followed by an increase of CD8 T cells and activated memory CD4 T cells in metaplastic and dysplastic tissues. Thus, NK cells are part of an early immune response against tissue changes associated with malignant transformation. Although this study did not assess other ILC populations in these tissues, it is likely that they respond to the same stress signals that activate other innate immune cells (section 3.). Studies in mice have provided important evidence that ILCs play a role in mediating tumor immunosurveillance, either directly or indirectly through modulation of effector immune cell responses. Expression of IFN-γ and the effector molecule tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) by NK cells has been shown to prevent tumor initiation in mice (12, 13). In addition, low cytotoxic activity of NK cells is associated with an increased cancer risk in humans (14–16). Mice depleted of NK cells and ILC1s by anti-NK1.1 or anti-asialo-GM1 are more susceptible to the formation of chemically induced tumors (17). Furthermore, tumor incidence in Rag1−/−IL2Rγ−/− and Rag2−/−IL2Rγ−/− mice, which in addition to B and T cells also lack ILCs, was increased compared to Rag1−/− and Rag2−/− mice lacking only adaptive immune cells (18, 19). With the exception of NK cells, the contribution of individual ILC subsets to immune responses during early tumor development is less well defined. Using the MMTV-PyMT mammary tumor model, Dadi et al. demonstrated that a cytotoxic ILC1-like population accumulates in precancerous lesions (20). Importantly these cells were dependent on IL-15 and displayed toxicity against tumor cells (20) ( ). Interestingly, unlike the ILC1-like population, NK cells did not expand in these precancerous lesions, suggesting that tissue-resident ILC1-like cells may play a more important role in early sensing of cellular transformation. ILC2 stimulation by epithelial and/or Th2-derived cytokines induces IL-5, GM-CSF and IL-13 expression, leading to eosinophil recruitment, activation and survival (21, 22). In a model for chemically-induced fibrosarcomas, IL-5 overexpression protected mice from tumor establishment through an increased recruitment of eosinophils to the tumor and surrounding connective tissue (27). Thus, ILC2s could potentially mediate tumor immunosurveillance by regulating eosinophil accumulation in premalignant tissues ( ). A protective role of ILC2s during tumor development was also described in a chemically-induced colorectal cancer (CRC) mouse model as ILC2-deficient mice had an increased tumor burden compared to WT mice (28). This is further supported by a recent study showing that IL-33 mediated expansion of ILC2s was associated with reduced colonic inflammation in a colitis model (29). ILC2s may be involved in the immune response against developing CRC by activating eosinophils, as eosinophils have been shown to prevent the development of CRC in a colitis-associated cancer model independently of CD8+ T cells (30). However, in an adenomatous polyposis coli (Apc)-mutation-driven model of spontaneous intestinal tumorigenesis, IL-25 activated ILC2s promoted CRC development by promoting myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSCs) function to suppress T cell responses (24). In addition, another study found that in response to gastric tissue damage in mice, IL-13-secreting ILC2s are recruited to the gut mucosa and drive metaplasia development (25). Together, these studies provide evidence that ILC2s might promote malignant transformation, depending on the environmental cues and tissues involved ( ). Additional studies will be required to distinguish between pro- and anti-tumorigenic functions of ILC2s, similar to what is observed for their role in established tumors (8).
Figure 1

Potential roles of ILCs during tumor development. NK cells and ILC1s have shown cytotoxic activity against precancerous cells (12, 13, 20). IL-5-secreting ILC2s may recruit eosinophils (EOS) to precancerous tissues and activate cytotoxic effector functions in EOS, such as the release of eosinophilic granule proteins (EGPs) (21, 22). MHCII+ ILC3s were shown to promote CD4 and CD8 cell responses to prevent tumor development (23). Conversely, ILC2s may drive MDSCs activation and subsequent T cell suppression via IL-4 and IL-13 secretion (24), as well as metaplasia development via the release of IL-13 (25). IL-17A and IL-22 expression by ILC3s may promote clonal expansion of precancerous cells (26). This figure has been created with BioRender.com.

Potential roles of ILCs during tumor development. NK cells and ILC1s have shown cytotoxic activity against precancerous cells (12, 13, 20). IL-5-secreting ILC2s may recruit eosinophils (EOS) to precancerous tissues and activate cytotoxic effector functions in EOS, such as the release of eosinophilic granule proteins (EGPs) (21, 22). MHCII+ ILC3s were shown to promote CD4 and CD8 cell responses to prevent tumor development (23). Conversely, ILC2s may drive MDSCs activation and subsequent T cell suppression via IL-4 and IL-13 secretion (24), as well as metaplasia development via the release of IL-13 (25). IL-17A and IL-22 expression by ILC3s may promote clonal expansion of precancerous cells (26). This figure has been created with BioRender.com. A recent study by Goc et al. identified a major histocompatibility complex class II positive (MHCII+) ILC3 population in precancerous adenomas in mice and humans (23). In a spontaneous CRC mouse model, deletion of ILC3-specific MHCII resulted in an increased number of advanced tumors and a significant reduction in overall survival, suggesting that MHCII+ ILC3 limit tumor development. Further analysis revealed that mice lacking MHCII expression in ILC3s were characterized by a significant reduction of Th1 and T-bet+ CD8 T cells, thereby providing evidence that interactions between ILC3s and T cells promote type-1 immunity ( ). Although this study supports a role of ILC3s in tumor immunosurveillance, there are other studies that implicate ILC3s in tumorigenesis. Dysregulated IL-23 mediated ILC3 activation and IL-17 and IL-22 production has been shown to promote gut inflammation and tumorigenesis (31, 32). In addition, in a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mouse model established by a murine HCC cell line, IL-23 over-expression promoted HCC development in an IL-17-dependent manner (33). Interestingly, most IL-17-producing cells in early tumors were NCR−ILC3s, suggesting that they are the initial responders to IL-23. Using a model for UV–induced cutaneous carcinogenesis, Lewis et al. also demonstrated that chronic UV exposure leads to an increase in IL-22 and IL-17A-producing ILC3s in the skin, which drive mutant keratinocytes clonal expansion in the absence of T cells (26) ( ). Based on studies in established tumors, it is known that ILC3s can have conflicting functions (8, 34) and current evidence suggests that this might also be the case for their role during early tumor development.

3 Stress signals during cell transformation and their potential role in ILC activation

Stressed and dying cells in precancerous tissues express and/or release various endogenous danger molecules, such as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), cell-surface receptors, and cytokines, that activate the immune system (35). Early detection of stress signals is important for successful cancer immunosurveillance. However, some signals may activate inflammatory responses that contribute to malignant transformation instead of protecting against it. ILCs sense changes in the tissue microenvironment through a broad array of cell surface and intracellular receptors, including costimulatory receptors, cytokine and chemokine receptors (36–38). Binding of ligands to these receptors also drives ILC plasticity, thereby shaping their function and phenotype (39). Here, we will discuss how known stress signals released by precancerous cells could potentially activate ILCs and initiate ILC-mediated immune responses that impact tumor development. In particular, we will focus on signals associated with an inflammatory response in the absence of infection. ILCs express toll-like receptors that could potentially recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) during infection-associated tumor development (40, 41). However, it is likely that the immune responses to these infections and developing tumors in the same tissues overlap and the role of ILCs in response to intracellular pathogens has already been extensively reviewed elsewhere (40).

3.1 DAMPs

DAMPs are endogenous danger signals released by damaged or dying cells to induce an immune response during non-infectious inflammation. Although DAMPs have been proposed to activate local antigen-presenting cells (APCs), it is also possible that these signals promote inflammation by activating ILCs. However, the role of inflammatory signals during tumor development is often not clearly defined as they can also be associated with cancer growth. Here, we discuss DAMPs with receptors found on ILCs ( ) and their potential role during tumor initiation and activation of ILC responses.
Table 1

Expression of DAMPs and cytokine receptors by ILCs.

DAMP/CytokineReceptor(s)NK cellsILC1ILC2ILC3Reference(s)
MsHuMsHuMsHuMsHu
HMGB1 RAGEYes nd nd nd Yes nd nd nd (42, 43)
TLR2YesYes nd YesYesYes nd Yes(4448)
TLR4YesYes nd YesYesYes nd Yes(44, 4749)
ATP *P2Y1/2/4/6/11-14 YesYes nd nd nd Yes nd Yes(5053)
*P2X1-7YesYesYes nd nd nd nd Yes(51, 5456)
IL-33 ST2YesYes nd nd YesYes nd nd (5760)
IL-25 IL-25RNoNo nd NoYesYesNoNo(9, 61)
IL-12 IL-12RYesYesYesYesYesYesYes nd (36, 6266)
IL-15 IL-2RβYesYesYes nd YesYesYesYes(20, 6771)
IL-18 IL-18RYesYesYesYesYesYes nd Yes(62, 71, 72)
IL-23 IL-23RNoYesNoYes nd NoYesYes(9, 36, 73)

Mouse, Ms; Human, Hu; nd, not determined. *Expression of 1 or more of indicated receptors has been reported.

Expression of DAMPs and cytokine receptors by ILCs. Mouse, Ms; Human, Hu; nd, not determined. *Expression of 1 or more of indicated receptors has been reported.

3.1.1 High mobility group box 1

HMGB1 is a nuclear protein widely expressed in mammalian cells and is involved in various cellular processes, including the maintenance of chromosome structure and function, DNA damage repair and transcription. Cells undergoing necrosis passively release HMGB1, while various exogenous and endogenous stimuli can induce the active release of HMGB1 by immune cells, endothelial and epithelial cells (74). Notably, HMGB1 is one of the DAMPs released during immunogenic cell death, which is induced by infectious pathogens and anticancer chemotherapeutics (75). Extracellular HMGB1 acts as a danger signal that mediates inflammation and repair responses via binding to the inflammatory receptor advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) and Toll-like receptors (TLRs). These receptors are expressed by various immune cells, including NK cells and ILC2s ( ). In established tumors, conflicting roles have been described for HMGB1, including the activation of tumor-promoting inflammatory responses and immunosuppressive pathways, as well as the induction of anti-tumor responses (76). Current evidence supports a pro-tumorigenic role of HMGB1 during tumor development. Studies assessing serum levels in patients with normal tissue, premalignant lesions, early and advanced stages of cancer, showed that HMGB1 levels increase according to the progression of gastric and hepatocellular carcinogenesis (77, 78). This suggests that HMGB1 is released during cellular transformation. However, HMGB1 might promote tumor development rather than activating immune responses against premalignant cells as chemically-induced skin and inflammation-induced liver cancer development was inhibited in mice deficient for the HMGB1 receptor RAGE (79, 80). This is further supported by a study of premalignant and malignant lesions of the uterine cervix, which showed that HMGB1 inhibited maturation of plasmacytoid DCs to render them tolerogenic (81). More studies are needed to understand the complex role of HMGB1 during tumor development. The impact of HMGB1 expression on ILCs in premalignant lesions has not been assessed yet. However, studies in established tumors support a role of HMGB1 in NK activation. In mice, HMGB1 released from chemotherapy-induced necrotic tumor cells induced NK cell activation and infiltration into the tumor (82). Mouse and human ILC2s were also shown to express RAGE and respond to HMGB1 activation (42, 83). Thus, ILC2s could potentially respond to HMGB1 via RAGE or its other receptors ( ) in premalignant and malignant lesions, however, if and what effect this has on tumor development is currently unknown.

3.1.2 Adenosine triphosphate

ATP is a multifunctional nucleotide best known for storing and transferring energy in cells. Extracellular ATP is actively secreted by stressed cells or passively released by dead cells, and acts on P2 purinergic receptors ( ). Released ATP is enzymatically converted into adenosine by the ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73, which binds to P1 purinergic receptors. Purigeneric receptors are widely expressed by various immune and non-immune cells. Established tumors are characterized by high concentrations of ATP and adenosine. Adenosine and ectonucleotidases are predominantly associated with tumor-promoting and immunosuppressive activities (84). Extracellular ATP-binding can support or inhibit anti-tumor responses, depending on ATP concentration, the type of receptor, and the target cell (85). The role of extracellular ATP and adenosine in tumor development has not been extensively studied and related studies have provided contradictory results. For example, studies assessing the role of the ATP receptor P2X7R in inflammation-associated CRC models have described an increase as well a reduction of tumor incidence in mice deficient for P2X7R (86, 87). Evidence for the involvement of ATP and adenosine in activating ILC responses was provided in the context of tissue repair and inflammation. Blocking of the ATP receptor P2X1R abrogated cytokine secretion in NK cells and ILC1s and impaired liver regeneration in a model for partial hepatectomy (54). In a chemically induced intestinal injury model, IL-22-secreting ILC3s accumulated in the colon and were important for the control of colitis. Treatment with an ectonucleotidase inhibitor prevented ILC3 activation and IL-22 production by ILC3s. Thus, accumulation of ATP was associated with ILC3 inhibition, while conversion to adenosine lead to activation of ILC3s (88).

3.1.3 IL-33

IL-33 acts as a cytokine and a DAMP, as it’s released by epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts in response to tissue damage, as well as actively secreted by APCs. The primary receptor for IL-33 is ST2, which exists in soluble form as a decoy receptor, and as part of a membrane-bound heterodimer together with the co-receptor IL-1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP) that initiates downstream signaling (89). IL-33 activates ST2-expressing mast cells, eosinophils, macrophages, ILC2s, NK cells, and T cell subsets, such as Th1, Th2, CD8+ T cells, and Tregs (90) ( ), thereby modulating both innate and adaptive immune responses. IL-12-induced IFN-γ production by murine and human NK cells is enhanced by IL-33 (57, 58) and as a central regulator of type 2 immunity, IL-33 mediates ILC2 activation and proliferation (9). IL-33 has a dual role in established cancer and has been associated with both anti-tumor and pro-tumor immune responses (91). Anti-tumor functions are mostly attributed to the induction of type 1 immune responses and pro-tumor activities include the activation of Tregs and type 2 responses. The role of IL-33 in tumor development has been mostly studied in the context of CRC and current data suggests that IL-33 can contribute to the pathogenesis (92, 93) as well as the suppression of CRC development (94). IHC analysis of precancerous colorectal lesions also revealed that precancerous epithelial cells, as well as stromal and endothelial cells can be a source of IL-33 (95). It remains to be elucidated how IL-33 contributes to the described pro- or anti-tumorigenic functions of ILC2s in CRC and other cancers, and if the cytokine milieu in these tissues allows for IL-33-mediated enhancement of NK cell responses.

3.1.4 IL-25

Like IL-33, IL-25, also known as IL-17E, functions as a cytokine and a DAMP. IL-25 signals through the IL-25R, a heterodimer complex composed of IL-17RB and IL-17RA, and is produced by epithelial cells and immune cells including activated Th2 cells, mast cells, and eosinophils. Expression of IL-25 is regulated by harmful environmental cues and plays an important role in activating Th2 immune responses. Dysregulated IL-25 expression has been linked to airway inflammation and severe asthma exacerbation (96). IL-25 has also been shown to promote inflammatory responses in the context of colitis (97), suggesting that it might favor tumor development. However, pro- and anti-tumorigenic functions have been described for IL-25. A study by Thelen et al. found that blocking of IL-25 in a colitis-driven colon cancer model, leads to increased tumor burden and a decrease of eosinophils in colon tissues (98). Conversely, Jou et al. found that IL-25 treatment of Apc 1322T/+ mice, an APC-mutation-driven CRC mouse model, resulted in an increased tumor burden, which was accompanied by increased ILC2 infiltration (24). In this model, ILC2 indirectly suppressed anti-tumor T cell responses by activating MDSCs via IL-4 and IL-13. Genetic ablation of ILC2s or IL-25, or treatment with IL-25 blocking antibodies in these mice led to reduced tumor growth and increased survival.

3.2 Cytokine-mediated ILC activation

Cytokines are small soluble proteins that are crucial for immune cell homeostasis and the regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses. Proinflammatory cytokines are released in response to cellular stress and infection to alert the immune system to the presence of potential danger. Transformed cells are known to secrete and promote production of diverse cytokines in different types and stages of cancers (99). Furthermore, DCs and macrophages that are activated in response to cellular stress also start expressing proinflammatory cytokines and contribute to the local cytokine milieu. Studies of murine and human tissues found that there is a reduction of proinflammatory cytokines when premalignant lesions or early tumors progress to clinically apparent tumors (100–102) and an increase of immunosuppressive cytokines (103). In addition, aberrant release of proinflammatory cytokines contributes to tumor progression and immune cell dysfunction. Thus, the cytokines present in premalignant tissues will shape local immune responses, including ILC activity. Common cytokines associated with ILC activation are IL-12, IL-15 and IL-18 for ILC1s and NK cells; IL-2, IL-18, IL-25, IL-33, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) for ILC2s; and IL-1ß and IL-23 for ILC3s (104). Here, we discuss the role of ILC-activating cytokines in the context of tumor development.

3.2.1 IL-12

The heterodimeric pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-12 is known for its role in activating anti-tumor immunity (105). IL-12 is produced by APCs, such as DCs and macrophages, and induces Th1 differentiation and the production of IFN-γ in T and NK cells (106). In addition, IL-12 negatively regulates Treg cell function and proliferation (107, 108), as well as Th2 and Th17 differentiation (106). The lack of IL-12 subunits p35 or p40 results in increased or earlier tumor development in mice (109–112). These studies highlight the importance of IL-12 in regulating early immune responses against transformed cells. In addition, various IL-12 gene polymorphisms leading to decreased IL-12 production are associated with increased susceptibility to cancer (113). Besides NK cells, ILC1 also respond to IL-12 stimulation and IL-12 promotes conversion of ILC2s and ILC3s to IFN-γ-producing ILC1s (114).

3.2.2 IL-15

IL-15 is a proinflammatory cytokine crucial for the proliferation and survival of T cells and NK cells (115). Lack of IL-15 in mice results in severe reduction of both cell types (116). IL-15 mainly exists as a heterodimeric complex with membrane bound or the soluble form (sIL-15) of IL-15Rα, and binds to the IL-2Rβγ heterodimer on nearby effector cells. Cellular sources of IL-15 include monocytes, macrophages, DCs, stromal cells, and epithelial cells (115). Various murine tumor cell lines have also been shown to express IL-15 (102). IL-15 enhances anti-tumor responses of murine and human CD8+ T cells and NK cells (117–120), and is considered a promising agent for cancer immunotherapy (121). In NK cells, IL-15 treatment leads to upregulated expression of NKG2D and the cytotoxic effector molecules TRAIL and perforin (122). In transplanted and spontaneous tumor models, IL-15-deficiency and the subsequent reduction in T and NK cell numbers leads to accelerated tumor development (102, 123–125), suggesting that IL-15 plays a critical role during early anti-tumor responses. Moreover, deletion of IL-15 in CRC patients was associated with a higher risk of relapse and reduced disease-free survival (126). Besides NK cells, mouse and human helper ILC1s have also been shown to respond to IL-15 (20, 67, 127–129). Other ILC populations may also get activated in response to IL-15 in early tumors as IL-15 has been shown to induce conversion of ILC3s into IFN-γ-producing ILC1s and cytotoxic NK cells (114, 130).

3.2.3 IL-18

IL-18, originally termed IFN-γ-inducing factor, is part of the IL-1 family. Binding of IL-18 to its receptor, which consists of IL-18Rα and IL-18Rβ, can be prevented by the soluble IL-18 binding protein (IL-18BP). IL-18 is expressed by various types of cells, including macrophages, DCs, and epithelial cells (131). Together with IL-12, IL-18 induces Th1 responses by acting on T cells and NK cells to induce IFN-γ production. Treatment with IL-18 also enhances Fas-L-expression and FAS-L-mediated cytotoxicity in NK cells and CD8+ T cells (132, 133). In patients with cervical premalignant lesions, low expression of IL-18 was associated with an increased risk of progression of pre-neoplastic lesions to cancer (134), supporting its role in activating immune responses against transformed cells.

3.2.4 IL-23

IL-23 is an IL-12 family member and a heterodimer that consists of a p19 and a p40 subunit, which is shared with IL-12. The IL-23 receptor is made up by IL-23R and IL-12Rβ1 subunits. The main sources for IL-23 are macrophages and DCs, which release IL-23 in response to exogenous or endogenous signals associated with host defense and wound healing (135). IL-23 plays a crucial role in the differentiation and maintenance of Th17 cells, and promotes Th17 production of IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-6, IL-22, and TNF-α. IL-23 is also one of the main mediators of ILC3 activation, resulting in their constitutive secretion of IL-22, which in turn acts on mucosal epithelium to induce the expression of antimicrobial peptides, tight-junctions and promote the colonization of beneficial commensal bacteria protecting against intestinal inflammation (136). The role of IL-23 in cancer is complex and has been associated with tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressive activities (135). Its role in tumor development is not well understood. In a model for MCA-induced fibrosarcomas, tumor incidence was reduced in mice deficient for the IL-23 subunit p19 and depletion of NK cells, but not CD8+ T cells, abrogated the protective effect of IL-23 depletion (137). Conflicting roles were described for IL-23 in the development of chemically-induced cutaneous tumors, as tumor growth was either inhibited (112) or enhanced (138) in p19-deficient mice, depending on the background strain. A study of murine and human premalignant lesions for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma reported elevated levels of IL-2, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-17 in premalignant lesions, which was dependent on IL-23 and accompanied by an increase in IFN-γ+ CD4+ T cells (100, 139). In IL-23R KO mice, production of these cytokines was reduced and the progression of premalignant oral lesions toward cancer accelerated (139), suggesting that IL-23 has a protective role during tumor development. Although IL-23–driven immune responses have been primarily linked to T cells, IL-23 could potentially activate ILC3 in premalignant lesions as well.

3.3 Cell surface receptors and molecules

Unlike T and B cells, ILCs do not express antigen receptors and therefore do not recognize specific tumor antigens. However, ILCs express other activating cell surface receptors that initiate anti-tumor responses (37). NK cell activity is regulated by a balance between various activating and inhibitory receptors that bind to cognate ligands on target cells (140, 141). Healthy cells express MHCI molecules on their surface that act as inhibitory ligands for inhibitory receptors on NK cells, such as killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) and the CD94/NKG2A heterodimer, thereby contributing to tolerance from NK cell recognition (142). Other central activating and co-activating NK cell receptors include the natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCRs) NKp30, NKp44, and NKp46, CD16, NKG2D, NKG2C, DNAX Accessory Molecule-1 (DNAM-1), and 2B4 (142, 143). NK cell activating ligands are often upregulated in response to cellular stress associated with infection and malignant transformation (144). The NKG2D receptor recognizes several MHCI-like ligands, including MHCI-polypeptide-related sequence MICA, MICB, and UL16 binding proteins (ULBP1-6) in humans, and retinoic acid early inducible-1 family (RAE-1α-ϵ), H60a-c, and murine UL16 binding protein-like transcript (MULT-1) in mice (145). Homodimerization of NKG2D by membrane-expressed ligands recruits phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (GRB2), resulting in a phosphorylation cascade. If then, the overall balance of signaling from both activating and inhibitory receptors favors NK cell activation, it can stimulate NK cell effector functions resulting in perforin/granzyme-mediated cytotoxicity and cytokine release. NKG2D is considered an important receptor in NK cell immune surveillance of cancer since spontaneous tumor development was shown to be more frequent in NKG2D-deficient mice compared to wild type mice (146). Cell surface expression of NKG2D ligands is low or not present on healthy tissues, but is upregulated on rapidly proliferating cells, virally infected cells, and cancer cells (147–150). Ectopic expression of NKG2D ligands in tumor cell lines results in tumor cell rejection in mice (151, 152). However, only a few studies have examined the expressionof these ligands in premalignant tissue. In mouse models for cutaneous carcinogenesis, exposure to carcinogens induces the expression of NKG2D ligands in skin cells (153–155). NK cell depletion in one of these studies resulted in higher numbers of papillomas (153), suggesting that NK cells play an important role in the elimination of DNA-damaged skin cells. Notably, recruitment of NK cells to the epidermis was dependent on TNF-α-induced chemokines CCL2 and CXCL10. In humans, premalignant skin lesions lacked expression of MICA (156) and low expression of MICA, MICB, and ULBP1 is found on thymic hyperplasia (157). Further studies are needed to understand the role of NKG2D ligands during tumor development in humans. The activating receptor DNAM-1 is expressed by many lymphocyte subsets, including NK cells and T cells. Binding of DNAM-1 (CD226) to its ligands PVR (CD155) and Nectin-2 (CD112) induces NK cell cytotoxicity (158). These ligands are highly expressed on tumor cells, but only low or no expression is found on healthy tissues. Lack of DNAM-1 expression results in reduced T and NK cell cytotoxicity against tumor cells and accelerated tumor outgrowth of chemically-induced fibrosarcomas (159) as well as spontaneous tumors (160, 161). PVR and Nectin-2 overexpression was observed in human premalignant lesions of CRC and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, respectively (162, 163). Together, these studies provide evidence for a role of DNAM-1 in tumor immune surveillance, which likely not only involves NK cell but also T cell activation. Notably, DNAM-1 is also expressed by human peripheral blood ILC2s (164) and murine liver ILC1s (55). DNAM-1-mediated ILC1 activation was critical for their activation and production of IFN-γ. Thus, DNAM-1-ligands expressed on premalignant and malignant tissues may also activate DNAM-1-expressing non-NK cell ILCs. NCR receptors were originally identified based on their ability to mediate cytotoxic functions of NK cells. The three known NCRs, NKp46, NKp44, and NKp30, comprise a family of type I transmembrane (TM) receptors and are encoded by the genes, NCR1, NCR2, and NCR3, respectively (165). Originally, these receptors were thought to be NK cell specific surface molecules, but many studies have provided evidence for expression on other cell types, including a subset of T cells, ILC1s and ILC3s (166–168). In the context of cancer, NCRs bind to a broad range of soluble, membrane-bound and nuclear ligands, including B7H6, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-DD, and Galectin-3. However, the full spectrum of NCR ligands and their role in cancer remains to be fully characterized. Studies have shown that NKp46 is required for expression of the apoptosis-inducing ligand TRAIL on NK cells and ILC1s in mice, and genetic deficiency of NKp46 impairs tumor clearance (169–174), thereby implicating a role for NKp46-mediated activation of NK cells and ILC1s in tumor immunosurveillance. In addition, expression of the NKp30 ligands B7H6 and BAT3 by tumor cells was shown to trigger NK-cell cytotoxicity and cytokine secretion (175–177). The expression of NKp46 and NKp30 in human precancerous lesions is variable. NKp46 ligands were shown to be expressed on human benign and malignant melanocytic lesions (178), but NKp46 and NKp30 ligands were only found on primary human prostate tumors and not benign prostate hyperplasia (179). B7H6 was expressed in high-grade but not low-grade cervical lesions (180). Thus, it remains to be determined during which stage of tumor development NCR ligands mediate NK cell responses against tissue changes associated with malignant transformation. In addition, expression of NKp30 and NKp44 was also reported on tumor-associated ILC2s and ILC3s, respectively (167, 181). In these studies, ILC3s were shown to interact with tumor cells and tumor-associated fibroblasts via NKp44, and were associated with a protective role against cancer, whereas NKp30+ ILC2s interacted with tumors cells via B7H6 and promoted an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Further studies are needed to decipher the role of NCRs on helper ILCs during early tumor immunosurveillance.

4 Perspectives

Despite the growing body of research on ILCs, there is still a lot we do not understand about how the responses of these primarily tissue-resident cells are shaped by disease- and tissue-specific signals. This incomplete knowledge is reflected by research studies describing conflicting roles for ILCs in inflammation, immunopathological conditions, and cancer. This review specifically highlights a gap in our understanding of the role of ILCs in immunosurveillance and carcinogenesis. Our current knowledge on ILCs in cancer is mostly based on studies in established tumors. However, early tumors and premalignant tissues are characterized by a different tissue environment than established tumors. This has a profound impact on ILC responses as these cells sense a large variety of tissue signals, which modulate their phenotype and function. Signals that could potentially activate ILC-responses at the pretumor stage are highlighted in this review and could serve as a starting point for future studies. In particular, studies in premalignant tissues of patients are needed to improve our understanding of the precancerous tissue microenvironment and the early immune responses against malignant transformation. It also remains to be determined if and to what extent signals found in the established tumor microenvironment, such as lactic acid and hypoxia (182, 183), shape ILC functions in precancerous lesions. A better understanding of ILC responses in early tumor development will also provide novel insights regarding the overall regulation of ILC responses in response to cellular stress.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, KW; Figure design, KW; writing – reviewing and editing, KW, MG, DC, NJ, and PO; Supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, PO. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is funded by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR FDN #143220) and the Canadian Cancer Society in memory of Mr. JIM JoTak (CCS grant #706152).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  182 in total

1.  Differentiation of type 1 ILCs from a common progenitor to all helper-like innate lymphoid cell lineages.

Authors:  Christoph S N Klose; Melanie Flach; Luisa Möhle; Leif Rogell; Thomas Hoyler; Karolina Ebert; Carola Fabiunke; Dietmar Pfeifer; Veronika Sexl; Diogo Fonseca-Pereira; Rita G Domingues; Henrique Veiga-Fernandes; Sebastian J Arnold; Meinrad Busslinger; Ildiko R Dunay; Yakup Tanriver; Andreas Diefenbach
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Natural cytotoxic activity of peripheral-blood lymphocytes and cancer incidence: an 11-year follow-up study of a general population.

Authors:  K Imai; S Matsuyama; S Miyake; K Suga; K Nakachi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-11-25       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  IL-23 suppresses innate immune response independently of IL-17A during carcinogenesis and metastasis.

Authors:  Michele W L Teng; Daniel M Andrews; Nicole McLaughlin; Bianca von Scheidt; Shin Foong Ngiow; Andreas Möller; Geoffrey R Hill; Yoichiro Iwakura; Martin Oft; Mark J Smyth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The P2X7 Receptor Promotes Colorectal Inflammation and Tumorigenesis by Modulating Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasome.

Authors:  Claudio Bernardazzi; Morgana Teixeira Lima Castelo-Branco; Beatriz Pêgo; Beatriz Elias Ribeiro; Siane Lopes Bittencourt Rosas; Patrícia Teixeira Santana; João Carlos Machado; Camille Leal; Fabiano Thompson; Robson Coutinho-Silva; Heitor Siffert Pereira de Souza
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Cancer Immunosurveillance by Tissue-Resident Innate Lymphoid Cells and Innate-like T Cells.

Authors:  Saïda Dadi; Sagar Chhangawala; Benjamin M Whitlock; Ruth A Franklin; Chong T Luo; Soyoung A Oh; Ahmed Toure; Yuri Pritykin; Morgan Huse; Christina S Leslie; Ming O Li
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Extracellular ATP and P2 purinergic signalling in the tumour microenvironment.

Authors:  Francesco Di Virgilio; Alba Clara Sarti; Simonetta Falzoni; Elena De Marchi; Elena Adinolfi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Activated Eosinophils Exert Antitumorigenic Activities in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hadar Reichman; Michal Itan; Perri Rozenberg; Tal Yarmolovski; Eli Brazowski; Chen Varol; Nathan Gluck; Shiran Shapira; Nadir Arber; Udi Qimron; Danielle Karo-Atar; James J Lee; Ariel Munitz
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 11.151

8.  Human leukocyte antigen-B-associated transcript 3 is released from tumor cells and engages the NKp30 receptor on natural killer cells.

Authors:  Elke Pogge von Strandmann; Venkateswara Rao Simhadri; Bastian von Tresckow; Stephanie Sasse; Katrin S Reiners; Hinrich P Hansen; Achim Rothe; Boris Böll; Vijaya Lakshmi Simhadri; Peter Borchmann; Peter J McKinnon; Michael Hallek; Andreas Engert
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 31.745

9.  Role of IL-23 signaling in the progression of premalignant oral lesions to cancer.

Authors:  Blaine Caughron; Yi Yang; M Rita I Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Tracing the Equilibrium Phase of Cancer Immunoediting in Epidermal Neoplasms via Longitudinal Intravital Imaging.

Authors:  Bradley J Kubick; Xiying Fan; Acacia Crouch; Riley McCarthy; Dennis R Roop
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 8.551

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.