| Literature DB >> 36032101 |
Michael Baboudjian1,2,3, Bastien Gondran-Tellier1,3, Romain Boissier1,3, Patricia Ancel3, Juline Marjollet3, Luc Lyonnet4, Pauline François3, Florence Sabatier3,5, Eric Lechevallier1, Anne Dutour3,6, Pascale Paul3,4,7.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to evaluate whether donor-related inflammatory markers found in kidney transplant preservation fluid can associate with early development of kidney allograft dysfunction.Entities:
Keywords: VCAM = vascular cell adhesion molecule; delayed graft function; extended criteria donor; kidney transplantation; machine perfusion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36032101 PMCID: PMC9403542 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.966951
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Donor baseline characteristics.
| Overall Cohort | SCD | ECD |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 74) | (n = 27) | (n = 47) | ||
|
| 58.5 (47-69) | 47 (34-54) | 67 (58-74) | <.001*** |
|
| .015* | |||
| Male | 44 (59.5) | 21 (77.8) | 23 (48.9) | |
| Female | 30 (40.5) | 6 (22.2) | 24 (51.1) | |
|
| 25 (23-29) | 25 (22-29) | 26 (24-30) | .12t |
|
| 29 (39.2) | 2 (7.4) | 27 (57.4) | <.001*** |
|
| 3 (4) | 0 (0) | 3 (6.4) | .29, ns |
|
| 5 (6.8) | 4 (14.8) | 1 (2.1) | .06 t |
|
| 6 (8.1) | 1 (3.7) | 5 (10.6) | .40, ns |
|
| 22 (29.7) | 5 (18.5) | 17 (36.2) | .12 t |
|
| 64 (48-82) | 68 (49-82) | 62 (49-80) | .60, ns |
|
| 778 (570-957) | 812 (585-938) | 778 (566-1018) | .96, ns |
|
| <.001*** | |||
| Static | 35 | 27 | 8 | |
| HMP | 39 | 0 | 39 |
SCD, standard criteria donors; ECD, extended criteria donors, BMI, body mass index; HMP, hypothermic machine perfusion. Quantitative variables correspond to % when stated or median values and interquartile ranges (IQR: 25-75 interquartile ranges). Significant p values were noted using asterisk: *** p ≤.001. p values >.05 and <.2 are noted as t or ns, non significant (p>.2); Results are expressed as median and 25-75% interquartile ranges or proportion (%).
Figure 1Evolution of renal function according to the occurrence of early ECD transplant dysfunction 7 days post-transplant surgery eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) was analyzed in kidney transplant recipients at different time points (D: days) and notably at two months and 3 months following transplant surgery within the group of the 47 ECD donors (Extended Criteria Donors), further stratified according to the occurrence or delayed or slow graft dysfunction during the first week following transplantation (DGF/SDG group, lower line) or no early graft dysfunction at day 7 (upper dot line).
Figure 2Quantitative analysis of soluble inflammatory biomarker levels in transplant preservation fluids. Levels of soluble iammatory markers were analyzed by ELISA in preservation fluids from SCD transplants (Standard criteria donors n = 27, all conserved in static conditions) and from ECD transplant (extended criteria donorsn n=47) further classified as a group of transplants conserved in static conditions (ECD static: n = 8) and a group of transplants conserved by machine Perfusion (ECD MP, n = 39). Different panels of soluble markers evaluated are represented : (A) Soluble IL6, (B) Soluble IL6 receptor, (C) Soluble IFN-gamma, (D) Soluble TNF-alpha, (E) Soluble CXCL1, (F) Soluble Fractalkine, (G) Soluble ICAM, (H) soluble VCAM. Significant p values (p <.05) or trends for significance were (p < .2) resulting from non- parametric Mann-Whitney test comparison of evaluated soluble biomarkers median levels are indicated.
Correlation observed between sVCAM levels and other inflammatory biomarkers in the entire cohort.
| Variable |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Donor age | 0.4158 | .0002 |
| Cold ischemia duration | 0.2943 | .0109 |
|
|
|
|
| Creatinine day 7 | 0.3966 | .0005 |
| Creatinine 1 month post-transplant | 0.4041 | .0004 |
| CKD 1 month post-transplant | -0.4504 | <.0001 |
| CKD 3 months post-transplant | -0.4128 | .0008 |
|
|
|
|
| Fractalkine | 0.6096 | <.0001 |
| CXCL1 | -0.7037 | .0033 |
| ICAM | 0.2972 | .0101 |
| IL-6 receptor | 0.2465 | .0342 |
|
|
|
|
| matrigel: number of branching points | -0.7102 | .0021 |
| % of clusters with stalk cells | -0.6912 | .003 |
| % of clusters with tip cells | -0.6782 | .0037 |
| Number of matrigel Clusters | -0.4961 | .0448 |
|
| ||
| CD3-CD56+ NK cell infiltrate | 0.5275 | .0316 |
PRAT, PeriRenal Adipose Tissue; SVF, stromal vascular fraction. p values correspond to significant correlation (p <.05). *Correlation of VCAM levels evaluated in preservation fluid with angiogenic and inflammatory parameters obtained from a previous study on a subgroup of 17 donors (9 ECD and 8 standard donors).
Figure 3Analysis of fractalkine and VCAM levels association with ECD donor-related risk factors. (A). VCAM levels were significantly correlated with the fractalkine levels evaluated in the perfusion fluid of ECD donors. (B). Comparative analysis of VCAM levels in perfusion fluid of transplant stratified according to three donor-related risk factors (donor age > 58.5 years, HTA and donor stroke) revealed that VCAM levels were significantly higher in aging ECD donors (> to the median 58 years value observed in the cohort and in conservation fluids of transplant from donors with hypertension (HTA). Significant p values (p <.05) or trends for significance were (p < .2) resulting from non-parametric Mann-Whitney test comparison of evaluated soluble biomarkers median levels are indicated. Non-significant values >.2 are not reported. (C). Comparative analysis of fractalkine levels in the perfusion fluid of transplants stratified according to three risk factors (age >58years, HTA and donor stroke) revealed enhanced levels in aging donors and a trend for enhanced fractalkine levels in preservation fluid in deceased donors with stroke.
Inflammatory biomarker levels observed in the machine perfusion fluid of ECD transplants and delayed/slow graft function.
| ECDNo DGF (n = 26) | ECDDGF/SGF at day7 (n = 13) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 20 (11-101) | 87 (30-126) | .493 |
|
| 532 (337-954) | 562 (217-1262) | ns |
|
| 14 (5-55) | 12 (3-18) | .1244t |
|
| 4 (4-17) | 4 (4-41) | ns |
|
| 1960 (443-9650) | 4451 (621-15965) | .1700t |
|
| 4187 (500-11369) | 16506 (10584-29904) | <.0001 |
|
| 12 (8-28) | 11 (6-52) | ns |
|
| 1 (1-2) | 1 (1-3) | ns |
|
| 374 (173-836) | 771 (416-2076) | .0630t |
ECD: extended criteria donors. DGF/SGF: delayed graft or slow graft function by day 7 post-transplant. Analysis was restricted to the group of ECD donors whose transplants were conserved under machine perfusion (n = 39). Indicated values correspond to median and 25-75 Interquartile ranges. Median values observed in SCD and ECD donors were considered significantly different using non-parametric Mann-Whitney Tests when p values were <.05. p values <.2 were noted t as a trend for significance. ns: p value >.2
Figure 4VCAM levels evaluated in transplant conservation fluid associate with early graft dysfunction. (A). Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the value of VCAM levels predicting early graft dysfunction of ECD transplants at 7 days post-transplant surgery. Area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals of prediction models are indicated. (B). Enhanced VCAM values are observed in conservation fluid of machine-perfused transplants with delayed or slow graft dysfunction by day 7. p values were considered significant at <.05.
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| VCAM > 550 | 2.8 | .043 | 3.57 | .040 | 1.06 | – | 12.03 |
| Donor gender male | 2.27 | .121 | 3.17 | .049 | 1.00 | – | 10.03 |
| Donor BMI >30 | 2.5 | .100 | 3.09 | .070 | 0.91 | – | 10.43 |
| Donor age >58 years | 1.44 | .462 | 1.09 | .880 | 0.32 | – | 3.73 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| VCAM > 550 | 6.56 | .025 | 8.52 | .02 | 1.41 | – | 51.58 | |
| Donor HTA | 2.4 | .175 | 2.56 | .194 | 0.62 | – | 10.61 | |
| Donor BMI >30 | 3.5 | .071 | 4.24 | .071 | 0.88 | – | 20.37 | |
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| VCAM > 550 | 7.04 | .001 | 4.04 | .034 | 1.11 | – | 14.73 |
| Donor HTA | 4.67 | .006 | 2.58 | .151 | 0.71 | – | 9.42 |
| Donor age > 58 years | 6.75 | .001 | 2.54 | .190 | 0.63 | – | 10.19 |
HTA: hypertension, p values ≤.05 were considered as significant. A bivariate logistic regression allowed us to estimate crude odds ratio (left panel). Significant variables, based on a threshold p value ≤.2 in univariate analysis were introduced in a multivariate logistic regression to assess the independent associations of clinico-biological characteristics with early graft dysfunction by day 7 post-transplant surgery (primary endpoint) in the entire cohort (upper table n = 74) or in the ECD cohort (n = 47). The lower table shows the univariate and multivariate analysis of parameters associated with the secondary endpoint (eGFR at 3 months < 45mL/min/1.73 m2. Adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals were estimated.